Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Xi Jinping manipulates history on his way to a third term
Xi Jinping manipulates history on his way to a third term
Jul 3, 2025 8:02 PM

Is Xi a second great Red Emperor? His growing influence and use of raw power even to rewrite history seem to suggest so.

Read More…

China’s Xi Jinping has already served longer than any U.S. president other than Franklin Delano Roosevelt. And Xi is likely to pass FDR in just a couple years. The Chinese president and Chinese Communist Party general secretary has secured the support necessary for a third term—expected to be followed by a fourth and even fifth one, should Xi, currently 68, live long enough.

In mid-November, the CCP Central Committee, made up of nearly 400 regular and alternate members,approved a resolutionon the CCP’s “major achievements and historic experiences.” Only the third such measure in the party’s 100-year history, it elevates Xi to the pantheon that heretofore included only Mao Zedong, who led the CCP to victory and ruled until his death in 1976, and Deng Xiaoping, who gained control shortly after Mao’s death and muscled through the economic and social reforms that transformed the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

Xi’s political sanctification process has been ongoing for some time. A few years ago,the CCP enshrined“Xi Jinping Thought” in the constitution, along with that of Mao. Officials were ordered to study the newly sacred word. The latest resolution claims thatthe PRC has“made historic achievements and undergone historic transformations” under Xi, resolving problems that others could not solve. The measure’s purpose is to prepare for Xi’s third term.According to Victor Shihof the University of California (San Diego): “He wants to really highlight his own contribution to the development of the party, that also will seal his legitimate rule over China in the foreseeable future.”

Xi’s role is presented as moving China forward. Mao, known asthe (first) Red Emperor, famously declared thatthe PRC had “stood up”after “the century of humiliation” at the hands of Western colonial powers. Next, Deng took the anti-Marxian position that theChinese people should“get rich.” Decades later, Xi shifted China’s direction again, extending CCP authority over nominally private business in the name ofcreating a fairer economy. (Thegelding of Alibaba’s Jack Maserved as a powerful warning to lesser business moguls.) The Chinese leader is offering abroader ongoing programto “get strong.”

To advance his agenda, Xi is rewriting history, munist leaders are wont to do. The Economist explains: “Mr. Xi’s predecessors used history differently in their resolutions. In 1945 Mao justified a purge of his enemies, blaming them for past mistakes so he could position himself as the unquestioned leader. In 1981 Deng’s resolution said that Mao had made serious mistakes and that the Cultural Revolution of 1966-76 had been a ‘grave blunder,’ causing chaos. By criticizing Mao, albeit cautiously, Deng rebuilt public support for the party and freed his hand to pursue free-market reforms.”

Now Xi is trending a bit closer to Mao, though without the latter’s unpredictable mania for chaos, and away from Deng, mitted to retain the essentials of a market system. What will not change is the PRC’s relentless determination to ignore its terrible totalitarian disasters. Beijing has emerged as a great power because of what Xi refuses to admit: the dramatic dismantlement of Mao’s legacy.

In February the party issued a new historical airbrush. As The Economist describes it: “It touches only briefly on the Cultural Revolution. It does not mention the famine caused by the Great Leap Forward that killed tens of millions, nor any casualties in the crushing of the pro-democracy protests at Tiananmen Square in 1989. The section on Mr. Xi’s tenure takes up more than a quarter of the book. Mr. Xi’s predecessors, Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin, are given much less space.”

The CCP turned 100 earlier this year. There are four critical phases of Chinese history that the party consistently falsifies. The first is the conduct of the war. munists were interested in power, not people. Frank Dikötter writes this ofthe CCP’s military campaign: “To conquer key cities in the industrial northeast, manders laid siege to civilian populations. ‘Turn Changchun into a city of death,’ proclaimed Lin Biao, one of Mao’s most successful strategists, in 1948. By the time the metropolis fell five terrible months later, 160,000 batants had died of starvation.”

Although Mao proclaimed the new PRC government on October 1, 1949, power still had to be consolidated across the world’s most populous yet largely rural nation. During this time,Dikötter explains, millions were murdered and millions more imprisoned as part of campaigns against “landlords,” “counter-revolutionaries,” and others. Mao was intent on destroying preexisting relationships, writes Dikötter, “so that nothing would stand between the people and the party. … Nobody was to stand on the sidelines. Everybody was to have blood on their hands.”

The next critical period came in 1958, the“Great Leap Forward.”Mao, an intellectual who knew little about farming merce, was determined to simultaneously collectivize the former and industrialize the latter. The result was almost beyond description, theHolodomor in Ukraine, only tenfold.The result wasruinous famine, economic failure, and mass starvation. munism revealed itself at its worst: a callous, distant party elite, whose members ate and lived well and engaged in social engineering enforced by the power to detain, torture, and execute. Accounts of the time aresimultaneously horrifying, mind-numbing, and enraging. Estimates of resulting deaths range up to 46 million.

The final mad Mao campaign was the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. This campaign was triggered by his eclipse. Pushed aside after the cataclysmic Great Leap Forward, heforced his way back into powerby triggeringa furorofambitious revenge, ideological purification, party purge, social collapse, and civil war.The eternal imageof the Cultural Revolution is that of frenzied “Red Guards” waving Mao’s little Red Book, often brutalizing and killing “capitalist roaders” and others deemed to be mitted to the revolution. Millions, including Liu Shaoqi, the country’s president, whom Mao blamed for pushing the “Great Helmsman” aside, were imprisoned, tortured, and/or murdered. The human horror ended only on Mao’s death in 1976 and the subsequent purge of his chief acolytes, most notably theGang of Four.

Even though Mao’s political heirs agreed on ending his reign of terror, they bitterly fought for control, during which Deng, oft purged and rehabilitated under Mao, gained predominance. Since Mao could not easily be written out of Chinese history, the CCPpronounced his record to be 70% good, a judgment embodied in theparty’s 1981 historical resolution. That for someone responsible for tens of millions of deaths, 65 millionaccording totheBlack Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression. Some estimates go even higher. Yet Mao’s visage currently graces the PRC’s currency, his picture adorns the Gate of Heavenly Peace in Tiananmen Square, andhis mausoleum dominates Tiananmen. Although his continuedpublic presenceoffendsmany Chinese, Xi has moved Mao closer to his previous saintly status andpunished criticismof munist icon.

The final tragedy airbrushed from Chinese history is the 1989 massacre of protesters demanding political liberalization. Although the students in Tiananmen Square received the greatest attention, the protests were widespread andincluded workersas well. The ewas a close-run affair, as Deng ousted two successive party chairmen for being relative liberals. The purge that followed was fearsome, thoughthe China that emerged, while authoritarian, did not return to Maoism. The latter process had to wait another three decadesfor Xiand his rewrite of Chinese history.

Xi Jinping can manipulate the past, but he cannot control the future. Indeed, opposition to his rebirth as the second Red Emperorhas proved sufficientforXi to denouncehis critics. He will not rule forever, and on his departure from office, through retirement, death, or purge, his legacy might be speedily dismantled. With Xi falling far short of Mao or Deng in importance—he has created little more than a personal dictatorship, despite his ostentatious self-adulation—there might be a rush to airbrush “Xi Jinping Thought” out of politics and the constitution. That could revive support for moving toward a more liberal society.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
YouTube powers Brazil’s conservative Catholic wave
Father Paulo Ricardo is a very sympathetic man. Always smiling, he is tall, thin, and balding. His austere appearance reminds us of priests portrayed in the films of the 1960s. Father Paulo could easily pretend to be Dom Camilo, the wise Italian priest created by Giovannino Guareschi and immortalized in the cinema by the brilliant French actor Fernandel. Like Dom Camilo, Father Paulo is a provincial priest, far from the axis of Rio de Janeiro – Sao Paulo, who lives...
Video: Samuel Gregg on Russell Kirk’s contributions to conservatism
This is the fourth in a series celebrating the work of Russell Kirk in honor of his 100th birthday this October. Read more from the serieshere. On October 3, Acton’s Director of Research, Samuel Gregg, joined a panel at the American Enterprise Institute memorate the life and legacy of Russell Kirk, one of the leading American intellectuals of conservative thought.Hosted by AEI’s Ryan Streeter, the event also mentary from Daniel McCarthy of Modern Ageand Ted McAllister of the Pepperdine School...
William Penn on the three fundamental rights of citizens
Yesterday was the birthday ofWilliam Penn, the influential English Quaker and founder of Pennsylvania. This year also marks the 300th anniversary of his death. Although Penn was an Englishman, he became, as Gary M. Galles says, the first great champion of American liberty. As Galles notes, When Charles II died, a large debt to Penn’s father was settled in 1681 by granting him what would e Pennsylvania. Penn implemented his authority over the colony in his 1682Frame of Government, Pennsylvania’s...
Samuel Gregg: What is crony capitalism?
In an interview for Guatemala’s Universidad Francisco Marroquin, Samuel Gregg, the Director of Research here at the Acton Institute, answered questions about crony capitalism, mentioning how it works and his worries about this problem. Gregg explains crony capitalism by contrasting it with the free market and political market. He mentions how it works in the economy, what happens in the marketplace when it’s used, and why it’s a problem for both the people doing business and for entrepreneurs. ...
Brazil’s conservatives mount a counter-revolution
Writing to a friend about his pessimism regarding the future of Western Civilization, Jacob Burckhardt made an interesting observation. The Swiss historian believed that history was not a linear process and that he could see that sometimes that Providence contains some surprises for us. It is with bination of surprise and pessimism that we should analyze the Brazilian presidential election in which Jair Bolsonaro, a populist candidate with conservative tendencies, who made the defense of traditional Christian values the main...
Understanding Bolsonaro
When Jair Messias Bolsonaro walked into TV Cultura’s studio in July, no one had any idea of ​​the political tsunami that would engulf Brazil 90 days later. The “Roda Viva” is the oldest talk show on Brazilian television; a group of eight journalists sit on a wheel-shaped bench and in the center lies the interviewee. That Monday, Bolsonaro spoke about how he would toughen criminal laws, turn back the sexual revolution, and restore Christian morality. He admitted to not understanding...
How Michigan’s licensing laws hinder the disadvantaged
Proponents of greater government intervention often argue that some freedoms are well worth sacrificing for greater social stability or public health and safety. Such is particularly the case with occupational licensing and other micro-regulations, where the government routinely imposes barriers with the stated aims of “protecting consumers” or “stabilizing industries.” But while such regulations may overly technical and practical, the cost of the corresponding freedoms is far from abstract. It’s personal—felt in the form of new economic obstacles for the...
Jaime Balmes: constitutional politics at the service of conciliation
This article is written by Josep Mª Castellá Andreu and translated by Joshua Gregor. It was originally published by RedFloridaBlanca and is republished with permission. Nineteenth-century Spanish constitutionalism is usually interpreted as a pendulum swinging between liberal or progressive constitutions and moderate or conservative ones. This interpretation highlights constitutional instability and the minimal impact of constitutional documents on the nation’s political and social life. Former Constitution Square in Barcelona French writer Théophile Gautier (1811-1872) described Spain’s constitutional reality very well...
Sir Roger Scruton: How to preserve freedom in the West
One of the leading philosophers of our time says Western culture will have to be handed down outside the ivory towers and college lecture halls – and he has strong reason to believe that its promulgators will be successful. Sir Roger Scruton’s optimism is not unfounded; he found the dissident, underground munities munist-dominated Europe had a greater thirst for truth and Western culture than their contemporaries in the politically correct West. Scruton reminisced about his career as a pioneering thinker...
How the populist moment can become the liberty moment
Since the War of Independence, the American self-image has set individual liberty against oligarchic power. Abraham Lincoln encapsulated this when he described the American experiment as a government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Perhaps it was inevitable that populism, in the form of the People’s Party, was born on U.S. soil – and that, as it experiences a modern-day resurgence, it begins in the United States. The original Populists described themselves as “the plain people” fighting...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved