Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Brazil’s conservatives mount a counter-revolution
Brazil’s conservatives mount a counter-revolution
Feb 11, 2026 11:03 AM

Writing to a friend about his pessimism regarding the future of Western Civilization, Jacob Burckhardt made an interesting observation. The Swiss historian believed that history was not a linear process and that he could see that sometimes that Providence contains some surprises for us. It is with bination of surprise and pessimism that we should analyze the Brazilian presidential election in which Jair Bolsonaro, a populist candidate with conservative tendencies, who made the defense of traditional Christian values the main point of his electoral promises, received the biggest share of votes in the first round voting on Oct. 7.

Modern Brazil was born in 1985 when the military regime gave way to a civilian government. Raised to power by a civil-military movement that overthrew the munist government of João Goulart, the military decided to build a government based on ”truculence” and contempt towards the very civilian leadership that had supported them. This erratic behavior led to serial mistakes. To begin with, they politically destroyed the main and most popular conservative leader in Brazilian history, Carlos Lacerda, for the simple fact that they did not accept petition.

General Golbery do Couto e Silva, the mastermind of the regime, created a political theory called the pressure cooker. Accordingly to this theory since the left had been removed from power and munist guerrillas destroyed, some space had to be left for leftism to avoid social upheaval. The area chosen by the general as an outlet was precisely culture. As a result, after the military finally left power, all cultural outlets had been taken by the left. Left-wing ideas became hegemonic in the universities. In 1964 the overwhelming majority of newspapers were openly anti-Communists. By 1985 the only conservatives working in a newspaper of great circulation, The State of São Paulo, were Lenildo Tabosa Pessoa, and Gustavo Corção.

Surprised by the massive popular support for the army in 1964, the left decided to rethink the strategy of the power seizure. Through Brazilian Civilization magazine, which circulated freely in spite of the dictatorial regime, the left began to look at the Marxism ideas expressed by the Italian thinker Antonio Gramsci. Soon, the strategies of domination otherwise known as “long march through institutions” became the left’s new mantra. The Brazilian left understood that the power seizure would not take place through violent means. Instead they turned to systematic and infiltration of institutions – including religious institution.

This cultural revolution by the Brazilian left was extremely efficient. The conservatives and the military ended up facing a life-and-death war over which they had no strategic understanding of its nature. The conservatives were thus marginalized from the political debate, academia, publishing, and the media.

The culmination of this process of conquering power was the division of the political spoils between two leftist groups that took turns in the presidency of the republic.

The PT (Workers ‘Party) and the PSDB (Brazilian Social-Democratic Party) were born among the intellectuals of the University of Sao Paulo, more precisely at the CEBRAP (Brazilian Center for Analysis and Planning), a think-tank financed by the Ford Foundation. Among the members of this organization were the sociologist, theorist of the Dependency Theory, founder of the PSDB, and future president Fernando Henrique Cardoso (FHC), plus a dozen radical intellectuals who would join liberation theologians and syndicalist to create the PT.

In the 24 years following FHC’s victory in the 1994 elections, PT and PSDB became the only electoral options. Though the two groups diverge on some issues, they agree on the main goals of the Gramscian cultural revolution: the destruction of the traditional family and traditional social arrangements, feminism, while advancing abortion, and political correctness ideology. Even though the Brazilian population remained mostly attached to values considered conservative, the political system had been shaped to guarantee the leftist hegemony. It was the perfect example of what the German political theorist Robert Michels once described: “The organization is which gives place to the domain of the elected over the electors, the representatives over the people.”

The political changes that Brazil has been going through in the last few years owe much to the advance of the internet, social networks and the translation of conservative writers into Portuguese. Here lies a parallel between contemporary populist movements that have risen against the political establishment. Brexit and other anti-system movements gained strength partly of economic issues but also because they broke through the blockade imposed by the left to create networks of supporters who were unafraid of being demonized by the media. This counter-cultural revolution broke the left’s hold on the political debate. Even those who do not agree with everything Bolsonaro says can see in him someone who dares to speak the truth.

The first wave of protests in the post-1985 Brazil took place in June 2013. It began with a far-left movement demanding free public transportation in the city of Sao Paulo but quickly evolved into a mass movement against the political system as a whole. The Left, especially the PT, tried to weaponize the movement to expand its power but forgot that the PT was the system itself.

In a short time, people who had never had active political participation began to engage mainly through the internet. Many young conservatives came to realize that there was a whole political world that they did not know about; they thus started to build munication networks for the distribution of information. These conservatives learned how to imitate the tactics of the left, which they proved to have mastered during the political crisis that culminated in the deposition of the former president Dilma Rousseff in 2016 due to a mix of corruption and economic meltdown. The wave that swept Brazil in the presidential election electorally destroyed the PSDB. The party that had divided power with the PT and served as the means whereby the left dominated the conservative electorate was reduced to irrelevance.

Precisely in the moment that the left started to lose its cultural hegemony, the politically incorrect figure of Bolsonaro, a retired army captain, was able to catalyze the sense of rebellion of a significant part of the Brazilian population against the political system that has been shaped by the left over the past 40 years. He is first and foremost a real change in the Brazilian political life towards a more decent society.

In sum, the Brazilian election suggests that, among other things, the Brazilian t left’s cultural dominance of politics has been destroyed, and the right is being reborn. The next step will be to see if Brazilian conservatives and classical liberals can consolidate their gains culturally as well as politically.

Image: Jair Bolsonaro.O deputado Jair Bolsonaro durante promulgação da Emenda Constitucional 77, que permite médicos militares trabalharem no SUS (Antonio Cruz/Agência Brasil) Wikimedia

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
What do bond markets do?
Note: This is post #90 in a weekly video series on basic economics. Most borrowers, such as individuals and small businesses, borrow through banks. But larger institutions can also borrow from a different financial intermediary: the bond market. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Alex Tabarrok explains what bonds are, what they do, how they’re rated, and how the bond markets work. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to...
Sen. Elizabeth Warren brings government muscle to corporate ‘accountability’
It was in Godfather III where Al Pacino as Michael Corleone said it first and said it best: “Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!” Before we were able to put away our party hats after celebrating the Supreme Court’s Janus decision in June, Missouri rejected a right-to-work measure at the state’s primary ballot box last week. And now Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) wants to do a federally legislated end run around Janus with a...
The bright side of the trade war with China?
“This year marks the 40th anniversary of one of the most consequential anti-poverty programs in human history,” says Rev. Ben Johnson in this week’s Acton Commentary. “Now, there is evidence that its spillover effects may lift millions more out of dire need.” The new openness to enterprise, private property, and investment led to China’s meteoric economic rise. Now, Donald Trump’s tariffs are encouraging manufacturers to take their factories elsewhere. Ian Chen, CEO of a Chinese technological exporter, said that Trump’s...
Would Jesus take an Uber?
New York City has enacted the first-ever government cap on the number of vehicles licensed to ride-sharing services like Uber or Lyft. On Tuesday, Mayor Bill de Blasio signed the bill imposing a one-year moratorium on new licenses, establishing a minimum wage for drivers – and touching off an international debate among Christians and others about the morality of Uber. “As the council was considering the legislation, some in my church circles discussed avoiding ride-sharing as a way to love...
The first axiom of Christian economics
Note: This article is part of the ‘Principles Project,’ a list of principles, axioms, and beliefs that undergirda Christian view of economics, liberty, and virtue. Click here to read the introduction and other posts in this series. The Principle:#1 – Because everything in creation belongs to God, man is never more than a steward and must act accordingly. The Explanation: Economics can be defined as the science of purposeful individual action in an attempt to satisfy an unlimited number of...
10 things political scientists know that we don’t
“If economics is the dismal science,” says Hans Noel, an associate professor at Georgetown University, “then political science is the dismissed science.” Most Americans—from pundits to voters—don’t think that political science has much to say about political life. But there are some things, notes Noel, that “political scientists know that it seems many practitioners, pundits, journalists, and otherwise informed citizens do not.” Here are excerpts from Noel’s list of ten things political scientists know that you don’t: #1. It’s The...
Income inequality and the ‘Groupon Theory of Morality’
For many years I was unable to understand the reasoning behind the claims that e inequality is a moral issue that only applies at the group level. Then it came to me like an epiphany—or more accurately, as a Groupon email. According to Wikipedia, the Groupon works as an assurance contract: If a certain number of people sign up for an offer, then the deal es available to all; if the predetermined minimum is not met, no one gets the...
Radio Free Acton: Econ Quiz on pensions and public debt; Upstream on Frida Kahlo and Stalinism
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, host Caroline Roberts speaks with Dave Hebert, Professor of Economics at Aquinas College for another Econ Quiz segment on the topic of pensions and state debt. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks to Phil Terzian, a writer for The Weekly Standard, on the blind spots in the legacy of Frida Kahlo as well as our modern understanding of Stalinism. Check out these additional resources on this week’s podcast topics: Read...
The Prague Spring: An Eastern European perspective
The Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia began in earnest 50 years ago today, with the intention to destroy the blooming “Prague Spring.” But today, the truths that invasion revealed have been lost, both in the West and among many young people in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Krassen Stanchev of Bulgaria recounts the invasion’s history and importance in detail at Acton’sReligion & Liberty Transatlanticwebsite. In a new essay, he writes: On this date in 1968, armies of the Warsaw Pact invaded...
Introduction to the ‘Principles Project’
A young professor panies his mentor to a private meeting of economists from around the country. As they take their seats the host says, “To start us off, let’s have a few rounds of the best jokes.” An elderly woman stands up and says “37,” and everyone laughs. Another yells “49,” and the crowd cackles hysterically. This goes on for a while, when the young man turns to his senior and says, “I don’t get it, numbers aren’t funny.” His...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved