Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY
/
Who Restricts Religion More, Politicians or the People? Pew Crunched the Global Data.
Who Restricts Religion More, Politicians or the People? Pew Crunched the Global Data.
Oct 13, 2026 11:54 PM

  Government restrictions on religion are at a global high.

  Social hostility toward religion, however, has ticked downward.

  So concludes the Pew Research Center in its 14th annual analysis of the extent to which 198 nations and territoriesand their citizensimpinge on religious belief and practice.

  Some sort of harassment of religious groups was recorded in all but eight.

  The 2024 report, released earlier this month, draws primarily from more than a dozen UN, US, European, and civil society sources, and reflects conditions from 2021, the latest year with fully available data.

  The global median on Pews 10-point scale of government restrictions reached 3.0 for the first time ever, continuing a steady rise since the baseline score of 1.8 in 2007. Overall, 55 nations (28%) recorded levels marked very high or high, only two lower than last years total of 57.

  Nicaragua was highlighted for harassment of Catholic clergy.

  Regional differences are apparent: The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) scored 5.9, up from its baseline score of 4.7. Asia-Pacific scored 4.2, up from 3.2. Europe scored 3.1, up from 1.7. Sub-Saharan Africa scored 2.6, up from 1.7. And the Americas scored 2.1, up from 1.0.

  Pews 20 measures of government restrictions included efforts to ban particular faiths, prohibit conversion, limit preaching, or give preferential treatment to one or more religious groups.

  Some pertained to COVID-19, such as Canadas fines against open churches.

  A further 13 measures for acts of religious hostility by individuals or groups included religion-related armed conflict or terrorism, mob or sectarian violence, harassment over attire for religious reasons, and other forms of religion-related intimidation or abuse.

  Social hostilities toward religion continued to trend downward since a high of 2.0 in 2018, decreasing to 1.6, the lowest score since 1.2 in 2009. But 43 nations (22%) still recorded levels marked very high or high, though significantly fewer than the 65 offending nations in 2012.

  Nigeria was cited for clashes between Muslim herders and Christian farmers.

  The order of regional differences in social hostility matches that of government restrictions. MENA scored 3.6, returning to near its baseline score of 3.7 after peak years from 20122014. Asia-Pacific scored 1.9, up from 1.7. Europe scored 1.9, up from 1.2. Sub-Saharan Africa scored 1.3, up from 0.4. And the Americas scored 0.8, up from 0.3.

  Only four nations recorded very high status in both categories: Afghanistan, Egypt, Pakistan, and Syria.

  Joining them as repeat offenders for government restrictions were Algeria, Azerbaijan, China (highest with a score of 9.1), Indonesia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Maldives, Myanmar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Pakistan joined the list this year with Turkmenistan, while Brunei and Eritrea dropped out.

  Fewer nations were designated very high on social hostilities, but repeat offenders also included India, Israel, and Nigeriahighest with a score of 8.9. No new nations joined the list this year, while Iraq, Libya, Mali, and Somalia dropped out.

  Grading took place on a scale. The top 5 percent of nations in each index were categorized as very high, while the next 15 percent were high. The following 20 percent were categorized as moderate, while the remaining 60 percent were low. (Though Pew recognizes North Korea as a clear offending nation, it was not included in the report due to the inability of independent observers to have regular access.)

  Most nations in both indexes showed little to no change in their rating. Only 16 recorded a moderate increase of 1.01.9 or higher in their combined score, while only nine nations experienced a similar decrease. And only one country, Sudan, witnessed a decline of 2.0 or more for government restrictions, as a new constitution, now in limbo amid civil war, decriminalized apostasy.

  For social hostilities, only Turkey and Bolivia declined similarly, the latter due to no reportsas in previous yearsof Protestant missionaries expelled from indigenous areas. Conversely, Uganda and Montenegro witnessed 2.0 increases in their scores, the latter due to vandalization of mosques and harassment of Christian proselytization.

  Most common, according to Pew, is government harassment. More than 9 in 10 nations (183 total) tallied at least one incident. Social harassment occurred in more than 8 in 10 nations (160 total), and 157 nations experienced both.

  Pew also tallied the type of force or violence inflicted around the world. Property damage was most common with 105 offending nations, with Europe registering the highest with 71 percent occurrence. The MENA region led percentage occurrence in all other types, with physical assaults recorded in a global total of 91 nations, detentions in 77, displacement in 38, and killings in 45.

  Ethiopia was noted for the deaths of 78 priests during its civil war.

  Christians and Muslims remain the religious groups receiving harassment most widely. The number of nations harassing Christians increased from 155 to 160, up from a baseline total of 107. Nations harassing Muslims decreased from 145 to 141, but still up from the baseline number of 96. Harassment of Jews also declined from 94 to 91, but was only recorded in 51 nations in 2007.

  An other category of Bahais, Sikhs, and Zoroastrians followed, harassed in 64 nations, followed by folk religions in 40. Violations against Buddhists (in 28 nations), Hindus (in 24), and an unaffiliated category of atheists, agnostics, and humanists (in 27) were less widespread.

  A new feature in Pews report tracked nations that provided benefits to religious groups. With a total of 161 countries qualifying, 127 supported religious education, 107 offered funds to construct or maintain religious buildings, and 67 compensated clergy to some degree. Of the latter, more than half (36 nations) gave preferential treatment to certain religions. And of the total, 149 governments nonetheless harassed believers or interfered in their worship.

  Saudi Arabia, Pew noted, gives stipends to imams yet restricts their sermons.

  In addition to a tally of nations, Pew also organized data to measure the impact of restrictions and hostilities on a wide scope of humanity. Among the 25 largest nationsrepresenting 5.8 billion of the 7.8 billion world population in 2021Egypt, Pakistan, India, Indonesia, and Nigeria recorded the highest overall levels. Japan, the United States, South Africa, Italy, and Brazil ranked lowest.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY
Editor's Note: Spring 2020
At this time, only one issue dominates our thoughts: the novel coronavirus global pandemic. That crisis dominates this issue of R&L, as well. Our coverage seeks to be prehensive as possible: national and international, church and state, body and soul. In our cover story, Henrik Rasmussen puts “medical liberty” at the heart of a nine-point plan to rebuild from the coronavirus. “These proposals might seem fanciful with long odds of success,” he writes, “but so did the economic liberalization...
The age of ‘censureship’
Social media has a large menagerie of critics: politicians on the Left and Right, journalists, and ordinary people who despair over the anger and noise often so prevalent on these platforms. Their concerns are as diverse as those who express them, and some are made on firmer grounds than others. Politicians of the Left have criticized firms like Facebook, Twitter, and Google (owner of YouTube) for exercising “monopoly power” and demand that they be broken up. These are obviously...
Sweden’s coronavirus response defies— and promotes—big government
Thanks to its unique response to the coronavirus, Sweden is once again being discussed as an international oddity. Sweden seemingly relishes its status as a global anomaly: It is the world’s most secular-individualistic nation but has a strong apparatus of state control. For most of its history, it has been ruled by the Social Democratic Party. Today, Sweden is praised or disparaged, because it is one of few nations in the Western world that has not enforced a national...
Global pandemic tries the limits of European integration
The first political casualty of COVID-19 may be the European Union’s dream of an “ever-closer union.” However, the victim mitted to maintaining the illusion of vigorous life. Consider the speech delivered at the opening of the European Parliament’s session on January 29 by Guy Verhofstadt, an MEP from Belgium and the European Parliament’s Brexit coordinator. The body had scheduled a vote to approve the terms of the United Kingdom’s exit from the EU. In his 10-minute-long oration, Verhofstadt reflected...
How the Church can respond to the coronavirus pandemic
If you had asked someone on New Year’s Day 2020 what they envisioned the year ahead might look like, few would have imagined that the first few months would be spent canceling trips, events, and academic semesters. Families and college students hadn’t planned to spend their spring break in quarantine. Most businesses didn’t enter the year in fear of stomach-turning Dow Jones plummets and sobering market uncertainty. Regardless of projections, governments across the world are taking extensive measures to...
The media do not deserve a government bailout
Traditional journalism has been imploding throughout the internet age.The coronavirus catastrophe threatens to deliver the financial coup de grace.Businesses that are closed don’t buy ads. Shuttered newsstands and stores kill street sales. Reduced e means fewer discretionary purchases. Papers and magazines that have been desperately searching for a sustainable economic model might use the global pandemic as an opportunity to downsize and reorganize. Instead, some American journalists are looking to the government for help. Publishers want guaranteed ad buys....
Should the Catholic Church take government bailouts?
When a global crisis hits, what happens to an organization that spent decades undermining its financial stability and driving away its supporters? As much as it pains me to say it, the Roman Catholic Church in America is finding out.CBS News recentlyreportedthat 12,000 of 17,000 U.S. parishes requestedPaycheck Protection Act funding—government bailouts. Does the Catholic Church deserve a bailout? Should bishops accept the money? If they do, how can the Church’s leadership rebuild its reputation with the general public?...
In the liberal tradition: James Cash (J.C.) Penney Jr.
J.C. Penney may be best-known for his eponymous chain of department stores, but he attributed his rags-to-riches ascent to following the Bible’s most famous virtue. James Cash Penney Jr. was born on a farm near Hamilton, Missouri, on September 16, 1875. His father, a bivocational Baptist minister, taught his son the value of money by having him buy his own clothes beginning at age eight. His father, unable to pay his son’s college tuition, started his son’s career as...
Briefs: Spring 2020
Articles in this edition: FDA slowed approval of machine that could replace 8 million masks Church spends Easter making face masks Science: Humans naturally excel at creative cooperation FDA slowed approval of machine that could replace 8 million masks Rev. Ben Johnson When U.S. healthcare providers began running out of ventilators, the private sector came to the rescue. But when an Ohio-based nonprofit came up with a way to let doctors safely reuse existing masks multiple times, the FDA...
The economic and moral case against hoarding
We live in strange and unprecedented times. The exponential spread of COVID-19 has created chaos, fear, and panic. One of the scariest aspects of living through this pandemic, besides the health and safety of our families, is our uncertainty about the future. Each of us asked the same questions: How long will it be until we are safe? How long until we can browse through stores, have play dates, attend church, and hug an old friend? Uncertainty leads to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved