Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Three books to help you think like an economist
Three books to help you think like an economist
Aug 30, 2026 1:55 AM

Everyone knows that there is a difference between knowing about something and knowing how to do something. The first is a superficial way of knowing, not a bad way to begin, but it is no substitute for the mastery es by integrating knowledge into experience. It is the difference between a dilettante and a true student, which is the same as the difference between a bad and a good teacher. The dilettante teacher is the punchline of the old joke, “Those who can’t do teach, and those who can’t teach teach gym.” It is these sorts of teachers that Paul warns Timothy about saying:

But the aim of our instruction is love es from a pure heart, a good conscience, and a sincere faith.Some have strayed from these and turned away to empty discussion. They want to be teachers of the law, but they do not understand what they are saying or the things they insist on so confidently. (1 Timothy 1:5-7)

Last week I shared a concise natural law reading list. Natural law is a topic in the discipline of philosophy. The list was designed to teach you that concept by walking you through the philosophy underlying it and by showing you how thinkers of the past and present have used that concept to think about a range of issues in law, politics, and culture. This list is designed to help you learn the economic way of thinking and in so doing e your own economist.

Many books try to do too much. They are prehensive the reader winds up with knowledge which is a mile wide but only an inch deep. They e dilettantes about a staggering array of topics instead of ing students of a discipline. Henry Hazlitt’s Economics In One Lesson is the exact opposite type of book. It teaches only one lesson but it teaches it so well that it reshapes the way you understand everything. It is a lesson in attention, a lesson in, “looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy [and] tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.” Hazlitt then methodically and clearly applies the lesson to a myriad of topics unfolding the implications of the lesson and unraveling all it can teach us. It teaches us that that which is unseen has even more to teach us than that which is seen.

Grounded in the one lesson it is now time to be introduced to others. Paul Heyne’s short survey, A Students Guide to Economics, is a remarkable book. It is a survey of major topics in economics as an analysis of the questions which gave birth to their study. It introduces you to the major figures in economics who asked these questions, the influential works in which they asked and attempted to answer them, and gives you the historical context of why these questions came to them in the first place. It is an apprenticeship at the feet of the masters of the economic way of thinking.

With feet planted firmly in the past we can now step boldly into the present and leap into the future. Heyne, Boettke, and Prychitko’s book, The Economic Way of Thinking, is like most textbooks in one very good and one very bad way. Like most textbooks it is very good at teaching you the specific language and vocabulary of modern economics (i.e. elasticity, efficiency, externalities, etc.). Also like most textbooks it is, in a bad way, very expensive (Pro-tip: earlier editions are vastly more affordable). The Economic Way of Thinking is unlike most textbooks in two truly excellent ways. First, it is eminently readable. Second, the questions at the end of chapters are truly remarkable:

Which of the following actions generate negative externalitiesthat also create social problems?

a) Tossing peanut shells on the sidewalk

b) Tossing peanut shells on the floor at a major league baseball game

c) Dropping a candy wrapper on the sidewalk

d) Dropping confetti from an office building during a downtown parade

e) Setting off load firecrackers on Independence Day

f) Producing a fireworks display on Independence Day

These questions are not invitations to flip back to the prior chapter to find the answer but invitations to inquiry using the concepts taught in prior chapters. Springboards to ing an economist.

Happy reading!

Image Credit: Werkschule, lessons in economics. CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Religious Liberty or Government Tolerance?
Al Mohler absolutely dismantles Nicholas Kristof in this new piece. The cause of this skewering? Kristof’s “Beyond Pelvic Politics” column in The New York Times. Mohler notes, After asking his most pressing question, “After all, do we really want to make modations across the range of faith?,” he makes this amazing statement: “The basic principle of American life is that we try to respect religious beliefs, and modate them where we can.” That sentence caught the immediate attention of many....
Welcome to the PowerBlog, Joe Carter
When we launched the PowerBlog in 2005, we had little idea that it would grow into one of the Acton Institute’s most popular and munications channels. Nearly 4,000 posts, and ments later, the PowerBlog is still going strong. And for that, we heartily thank our many readers, contributors menters. Now we have for the first time a dedicated editor to help sustain and grow the blog for the advancement of the “free and virtuous society.” Veteran journalist Joe Carter is...
The End of Secularism and the HHS Mandate
The primary point of my first book, The End of Secularism, was to demonstrate that secularism doesn’t do what it claims to do, which is to solve the problem of religious difference. As I look at the administration’s attempt to mandate that religious employers pay for contraceptive products, I see that they have confirmed one of my charges in the book. I wrote that secularists claim that they are occupying a neutral position in the public square, but in reality...
How Conservatives Fight Poverty
At Public Discourse, Ryan T. Anderson reviews Lawrence Mead’s From Prophecy to Charity: How to Help the Poor: The loudest voices in our national debates about political economy tend to be libertarians and social welfare statists. To our detriment, most public policy discussions are filtered through these two lenses. At the same time, we tend to conflate the policy issues facing our nation as if they were one and the same. But consider the range of America’s political-economic challenges: How...
Report: Acton Institute raises local profile with move into new building
The Grand Rapids Press has a story today about the Acton Institute’s plans to move into new office space in the heart of the city. Stay tuned to the PowerBlog for exciting updates in the days and weeks ahead about the move. GRAND RAPIDS – The Acton Institute, a conservative think tank dedicated to blending Christian doctrine and free market economics, may be better known on the international stage than in its home town. That may change soon. The 22-year-old...
A Receding Voice: A Century of Methodist Political Pronouncements
Methodism was once the largest denomination in America. The faith grew rapidly from America’s beginning and has traditionally been characterized by aggressive evangelism and revival. It has carried a vibrant social witness, too. Methodist Church pronouncements once garnered front page headlines in The New York Times. Its high water mark undoubtedly came during prohibition, the greatest modern political cause of the denomination. Methodists even built and staffed a lobbying building next to Capitol Hill believing a dry country could remake...
Creeping Crony Corporatism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Corrupted Capitalism and the Housing Crisis,” I contend we need to add some categories to our thinking about political economy. In this case, the idea of “corporatism” helps understand a good deal of what we see in the American system today. Adding corporatism to our quiver helps us to make some more nuanced distinctions than simple “socialism” and “capitalism” allow. Take, for instance, Mitt Romney’s contention this week while campaigning in Michigan that the bailouts...
Subsidiarity vs. Soft Totalitarianism
While the recent contraceptive mandate controversy has exposed the Obama Administration’s disregard for religious freedoms, it has also reveled their natural disdain for subsidiarity. As George Weigel notes, this incident tells us “something very important, and very disturbing, about the cast of mind in the Executive Branch.” It is no exaggeration to describe that cast of mind as “soft totalitarianism”: an effort to eliminate the vital role in health care, education and social service played by the institutions of civil...
Befuddled Bureaucrats on the Bayou
I’ve tried to stay on top of the federal government’s response to natural disasters here at Acton. I’ve written a number mentaries, blog posts, and a story in Religion & Liberty covering the issue. “Spiritual Labor and the Big Spill” specifically addressed the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. For extensive background on this short clip of Bobby Jindal at CPAC 2012, see my post “Bobby Jindal on Centralized Disaster Response.” ...
The “Right to Be Insured” Trumps Religious Liberty?
New York pundit Al Sharpton and California Senator Barbara Boxer agree: The “right” to insurance paid for by an employer trumps freedom of conscience and religion. Senator Boxer warned yesterday that if the HHS contraception mandate was repealed it would set a dangerous precedence of religious rights trumping the right to be insured. On MSNBC’s Politics Nation with Al Sharpton last night, Boxer affirmed that under the proposed amendment proposed by Sen. Roy Blunt, an employer would not be forced...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved