Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
We desperately need the fearful and fascinating
We desperately need the fearful and fascinating
Nov 4, 2025 5:40 PM

G.K. Chesterton wrote that when men stop believing in God, then don’t believe in nothing; they believe in anything. Time to take a look at what that “anything” is in 2022.

Read More…

To say that the Western world is increasingly secular and materialistic is news to no one. But our modern tragedy isn’t “godlessness” but rather what has filled the void of the old religions for many. No one rejects transcendence in a vacuum—like Indiana Jones’ idol, something always has to take its place.

In 1917 German theologian and philosopher Rudolf Otto published Das Heilige—literally “The Holy,” though in English it’s usually titled The Idea of the Holy. In it he offers a description of religiosity centering on “the sacred,” on that mysterious Other that draws man almost irresistibly but at the same time fills him with awe and even dread. Otto defines the sacred as mysterium tremendum et fascinans—a fearful and fascinating mystery. Holiness is more than just moral uprightness and purity. It’s something that draws us.

Why tremendum et fascinans? With this Otto seeks to explain the tension generated by man’s instinctive desire for the transcendent. The sacred has an irresistible attraction: Man needs it, he can’t live without it, and no matter how hard he struggles to reject it, something always draws him to it. Yet along with this es a sense of powerlessness, even of dread—an awe that imbues man with humility and a sense of unworthiness. Even in Christianity, which teaches that God e to man as a man, there is still something infinitely other about the Almighty. There must be. Catechism lessons on the gifts of the Holy Spirit often take pains to say that “fear of the Lord” doesn’t mean being afraid of this God. That’s theologically correct, but the word “fear” still signifies something necessary in the relationship between God and man.

Every culture in human history has been religious. Man has an innate need and capacity for the tremendum et fascinans. Today, though the Western world has built an irreligious society, it cannot and has not changed the heart of man. The culture seeks to discount the response to the sacred before the question is even asked, and thus man’s longing for the fascinans and awe of the e pouring out in other ways. The substitutes may be pitiably unfulfilling, but you can’t snuff out the fundamental yearnings of the human heart. The cult of the ephemeral is the product of a heart unmoored from the Ultimate but unable to stop its quest for just that.

The poor substitutes for a transcendent fascinans are all around us—money, pleasure, and power are attractions as old as time itself. When God is rejected or considered irrelevant there is nothing the heart of man won’t use to try and fill that sense of emptiness. This doesn’t have to be in ways as sensational as mansions or sex or hedge funds; think of the deification of the environment or “science,” or the endless advertising for the latest gadget or the perfect diet, or the breathless crusading for the next president, or … the list goes on. A professor I know who teaches poetry at a sizable public university had his students write panegyrical poems to the COVID vaccine, their “savior” and giver of life. It’s disconcerting how idolatrous it sounds. But man will seek a savior wherever a savior may be found.

Perhaps more subtle than the false fascinans, but no less real, is the false tremendum. Tremendum in the true sense leads us to recognition of God’s greatness and purity and thus to humility and docility in our dealings with him. But when this is cast off as mere superstition, the false tremendum of apocalypticism takes its place. Prophets of doom have always held a certain lurid sway; we love to make an apocalypse out of everything. Look at the weather, for instance. Is it just me or is practically every weather event—every heat wave and thunderstorm and cold snap and hurricane—trumpeted as “unprecedented,” “historic,” “worst ever”? This of course harks back to environmental doom-ism. Then there is the media’s almost gleeful obsession with every aspect of the COVID pandemic and potential long-term consequences. Politics, too, is a bottomless source of apocalypses. If my side is god, then your side winning is no less than a displacement of god, signaling wholesale destruction. There are many reasons our country is so polarized and politicized, and this is certainly one of them. Man’s hunger for awe, when it has nothing truly awesome to turn to, seeks to satisfy itself with on lesser things. It’s junk food for the soul.

With the transcendent preemptively closed off, today’s man looks about and says, “This isn’t tremendum et fascinans, so we’ll have to make it that way.” Of course, it’s not so explicitly articulated, but that’s what it boils down to. Man has condemned himself to the worship of the fleeting, trying to invest every academic paper with the qualities of tremendum et fascinans. No society and no individual can simply be “free” in the abstract and expect to stay that way for long. With freedom we need the virtue to anchor ourselves in what also is true. Because the truth will set you free.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Africa needs more than foreign aid
So says Dr. George Ayittey, a professor of economics at American University and founder of the Free Africa Foundation, in an interview on today’s Morning Edition from NPR. Ayittey argues in part that after the African nations gained independence, they rejected the market system out of hand as a Western innovation, to the detriment of their societies. He calls for a return to indigenous structures of civil society, which embrace markets and free trade. He also says that we need...
Why not give yourself?
A question over at the ONE Campaign blog: Why don’t these celebrities cough up their own money and stop asking for mine? Answer: First off, they are. Most of the celebs involved in the campaign give hundreds of thousands, if not millions to charity. They just choose not make it public. But this campaign is not about asking you for YOUR money either, we want your voice. We are also talking about BILLIONS of dollars here. Not millions. If all...
Too much TV dumbs down kids
Three separate studies published by the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine suggests that too much TV-watching can harm children’s ability to learn. The article says that in one study, involving nearly 400 northern California third-graders, those with TVs in their bedrooms scored about eight points lower on math and language arts tests than children without bedroom TVs. A second study, looking at nearly 1,000 adults in New Zealand, found lower education levels among 26-year-olds who had watched lots of...
Making subsidies history?
The worldwide Live 8 shows e and gone, and are being hailed as perhaps the greatest collection of concerts ever. While moments like the introduction of Birhan Woldu or (to a lesser extent) the reunion of the estranged members of Pink Floyd certainly made pelling television, only time will tell whether or not they will have a significant impact on Africa’s future. One item of news that could have a significant impact seems to have been lost in the American...
Heroes of the half-measure: Christian advocates for government charity
The Group of Eight (G8) conference this week in Gleneagles, Scotland has been the object of a lot of attention from various charity campaigns. Jordan Ballor writes, “What is similar in all these movements is an emphasis on the role of government in providing assistance to the poor. But it is precisely this aspect of the initiatives that is most problematic from a Christian perspective.” Read the full text here. ...
Sirico on kelo
Rev. Robert Sirico wrote a column in the Detroit News’ Faith and Policy series over the weekend on the Kelo v. New London decision handed down by the US Supreme Court. In “Court reveals conflicting ownership ideas,” Sirico writes, In the Supreme Court’s “new” ownership society, the very safety and security of God-given, inalienable rights are threatened. Pope Leo XIII was pointing to this when he described private ownership as “a natural right of man” and a right that must...
Bush says abortion not a limtus test for high court
President Bush, on his way to the G-8 Summit, said that views like abortion or gay marriage will not serve as litmus tests for selecting a Supreme Court nominee. “I’ll pick people who, one, can do the job, and people who are honest, people who are bright and people who will strictly interpret the Constitution and not use the bench to legislate from,” Bush said. “I will take my time,” Bush said. “I will be thorough in my investigation.” The...
Private aid and investment abroad
A study released late last month by the Hudson Institute found “$62.1 billion in U.S. private donations to developing countries in 2003, the last year numbers are available.” The report, cited in an op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal, goes on to argue that the formula used by the Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD) to judge the generosity of various countries “fails to take into account the primary way in which Americans help others abroad: through the private...
A quote of note from Archbishop Silvano Tomasi
The following is from Archbishop Tomasi’s address at the 93rd International Labor Conference in Geneva. (Click here for the full text of his remarks.) “It is the dignity of every human person that requires access to work in condition of personal security, health, fair remuneration, a safe environment. Work is a right and the expression of human dignity…work is the motor for development and poverty elimination, for unlocking the hidden resources of nature, for personal and professional fulfillment and family...
O’Connor steps down
Breaking news for the day: Sandra Day O’Connor has announced that she is retiring from the United States Supreme Court. Yesterday, Anthony Bradley asked what the President should look for in a Supreme Court Nominee. Join the discussion here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved