Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Volodymyr Zelensky is the Servant of the People
Volodymyr Zelensky is the Servant of the People
Feb 11, 2026 6:44 AM

In this 2015 starring the ic Zelensky, we witness what is now an absolutely surreal depiction of a man from nowhere thrust into history with the weight of his people’s fate on his shoulders. Imagine such a thing happening in real life. I know I can’t.

Read More…

Three Ukrainian oligarchs, a shadow Triumvirate as it were, stand on a balcony overlooking a gorgeous town square. An election for president is imminent and they’re tired of wasting millions on backing their own candidates and then millions more on ruining those candidates’ rivals. So they decide that, this time, they’ll refrain from buying a president for Ukraine. They’ll step aside and allow the people to make their own choice for leader. “Unsupervised democracy?” one asks. They see it as a kind of game and experience something of an adrenaline rush.

And so Ukrainians, when given the opportunity to make their will known, select, of all people, Volodymyr Zelensky—or should I say ic alter ego, Vasyl Petrovych Holoborodko, a “simple teacher from Kiev” as one news reader calls him, in this 2015 Ukrainian , Servant of the People, now streaming on Netflix.

When we meet him, Vasyl, divorced and living at home with his parents and niece, has two main concerns: getting a shirt ironed so his principal doesn’t fire him during their weekly meeting (which would suit his cabbie of a father just fine, seeing as unemployment pays more than teaching) and getting into the bathroom, currently occupied by said niece. And the bathroom just happens to be where Vasyl is seated when the es that he has just been elected president of Ukraine.

How? How does a schoolteacher get elected president? On the limousine ride to the capitol he realizes it was all the fault of that video. See, one of his students, recently upbraided by Vasyl for being a smart aleck and a numbskull, captured on his cellphone a profanity-laden rant Vasyl unleashed on a friend when his students are pulled out of class and told to prepare voting booths and posters for the ing election—again. Why his history class and not, say, the math class? Because history is undervalued, not treated as a science. “And then we wonder why our politicians make the same mistakes when they enter the halls of power. Because they’re great mathematicians! All they know is to divide and subtract!”

That little observation is just the beginning. “And who is there to vote for? It’s always the lesser of two ass—– and it’s been this way for 25 years!” And so on. The video is uploaded to YouTube (of course) and goes viral, ing the talk of the school and even, as it turns out, the country. Days later and back in the classroom, his students insist that their parents loved the video and would vote for Vasyl for president instead of the usual suspects.

And the next thing you know, he’s being driven to the capitol. The priorities of State e evident quickly: Hermès, Donna Karen, Ralph Lauren, or Versace cologne? Berluti, Testoni, or Louis Vuitton shoes? Calvin Klein, Jean-Paul Gaultier, Dolce & Gabbana, or Karl Lagerfeld suit? A Patek Phillipe or Vacheron Constantin watch (one of which is favored by Putin, he is told). Photos are snapped, selfies are uploaded to Facebook, a mold of his hand is take for the National Museum, one of his foot for the Soccer Museum, and all this before lunch.

On the way to his first press conference, in which this was all in aid of, Vasyl asks to take care of two urgent personal matters. One requires a stop at the bank so he can make a payment on a loan. Once there he learns, not from his usual teller but from the chairman of the bank himself, that he is the winner of a special, annual lottery draw, and as such has had all his debts written off. The chairman assures him it has nothing to do with Vasyl’s just having been elected president of the nation.

As Mel Brooks would say, it is good to be king.

From the bank Vasyl hurries to his usual Friday meeting with the principal only to be informed by his prime minister, Yuriy Ivanovich Chuiko, that as president there’s never a need to hurry. “You’re not late. You’re delayed.” (Now we know where Biden gets it.) Despite being the most powerful man in the country (at least on paper), Vasyl is still terrified of entering the principal’s office (aren’t we all). He suffers a flashback of the day when he was confronted about the video that would elevate him to the highest office in the land, but in that moment almost certainly was about to get him fired for “doing irreparable damage to the school.” Vasyl defends his rant on the principle that it was, four-or-however-many-letters-in-Ukrainian words aside, “the truth.” In this case, the truth, instead of setting everyone free, has brought the wrath of the Ministry of Education down on the principal’s coiffe and the school must now undergo “re-certification,” which is no doubt the administrative equivalent of a colonoscopy only without a sedative.

But as Vasyl enters the principal’s office now, as the newly elected president of Ukraine, well, the principal greets him not with threats of dismissal but with both a massive cake decorated more like a Christmas wreath than a pastry and her insistence that it was an honor to have had him on the faculty—and if she ever scolded him it was only because she saw such great potential in him. I guess president trumps minister of education when es to invasive medical procedures.

Even his usually underimpressed father now sings his son’s praises as he fields phone calls from people he has no recollection of ever meeting but who nevertheless are looking for handouts from the new president in the interest of a friendship that never existed in the first place. Opportunists do not let little things like dignity stand in the way of a sinecure. Although the father has no qualms about handing out deputy minister positions to real friends. “Enough already,” his wife intones. “You’ve already appointed half of Ukraine.”

The perks of the position are quickly beginning to add up. “Get used to it, Vasyl Petrovich,” his handler says. “You’ve been granted an entirely new life. It’s like a second birthday,” which reminds Vasyl that it is, in fact, his niece’s birthday and he needs to buy her a gift. The fact that they are already late for that 1 p.m. press conference does not matter. The president has a pressing need. (That Vasyl may already be putting personal, even if familial, needs ahead of the country’s doesn’t seem to dawn on him. Yet.)

As for that press conference, his first formal introduction to the country at large as their new president, well, his prepared-by-minions responses plex economic and political e across as phony and forced as you’d imagine. But instead of sticking to the script, Vasyl instead apologizes for not being prepared. He promises to do his homework if the press corps will allow him to “retake the questions.” He admits quite frankly that he doesn’t even know “some of the meanings of the terms being used.”

But rather than being beguiled by this sudden burst of honesty, even innocence, one journalist is incensed and insists on knowing where he got the “two million” to register his candidacy for president in the first place. This is the first we’re hearing of a fee to get on the ballot. As it happens, he was never really an accidental candidate. Once that video of his rant burned up the interwebs, the students in his history class egged Vasyl on to register with the Election Board. At first he rejected the idea because a mon person can’t e president,” if for no other reason than it takes 2 million unpronounceable Ukrainian dollar-like thingees to register. “Sure, but you know about crowdfunding, right?” a student pipes up. Which they’ve already taken care of.

The two million is literally in a bag. And Vasyl is a candidate for president of Ukraine.

Those oligarchs who opened the episode? They’ve been watching the press conference on TV while enjoying an exquisite, caviar-saturated meal. “Our country likes cheap populism,” one of them declares. A debate then ensues as to who was really responsible for putting this guy in power. Each assumed it was the other, despite their having decided to let the people have their own way, which only meant letting Ukrainians pick between the two frontrunners, each of whom was already bought and paid for. But this guy came out of nowhere. “A man ascended to the presidency who isn’t under the control of any of us?” Oy vey! “Perhaps he’s a puppet of the West. Or the Kremlin.” Somebody needs to do some investigating.

Even Chuiko, the prime minister, doesn’t believe he came up with the two million from something called “crowdfunding,” which he assumes is just slang for some underhanded scheme. No, “the people” didn’t e up with the money. “The people” don’t do anything.

In short, no one believes what is in fact the truth: mon man without guile or political experience is now the most powerful person in the country, thanks to a popular assent collated by the internet, the same medium that brings you cats falling off pony walls and Russian disinformation. Can you blame them?

History Stranger Than Fiction

Armando Iannucci, the Italian-Scot writer-director of the political satire The Thick of It and its American counterpart Veep, has made quite the career for himself portraying the political class as a bunch of narcissistic, Peter Principled vulgarians whose concern for mon good is as authentic as a laugh track. Servant of the People isn’t quite in the Iannucci class; it doesn’t produce the guilt-inducing belly laughs (the racism! the misogyny!) and is neither as relentlessly crass or even cynical, although it makes an effort. The problem, if you can call it that, is Zelensky’s character. Vasyl is a recognizable human being—in over his head, sure; naïve and unprepared for the position he’s been given, of course; thrown off-balance, yes. But damn if he doesn’t at least care. His rant against government corruption and placency that allows a broken system to stay broken wasn’t for the cameras; it came from the heart and just happened to be caught on camera. And the final scene betrays a playfulness, a sentimentality, that was never to be found in any of Iannucci’s creations.

This was just the pilot episode, and there are three seasons total. (IMDB “Trivia” says: “This is the only known fictional show to end because it came true.” Wiki appears to agree. I mean, try and imagine Robin Williams or Jerry Seinfeld suddenly mander in chief at the end of their respective TV runs, and nailing it. It’s almost as incredible as that Bedtime for Bonzo guy ing president and overseeing the end of the Cold War.)

I doubt I’ll stick withServant of the People to the very end of Season 3, but I am curious. Will Vasyl prove to be a president who makes a difference (whatever that means), or will the civil service, that permanent class of fiddlers and obfuscators whose only goal is to serve their own narrow ends, undermine him at every turn, as in the premise (if not always the execution) of Yes Minister? Or will the oligarchs strike back? Will the Kremlin? Will Zelensky, er, Vasyl save his nation from depredation against impossible odds?

I sure as hell hope so.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Innovation in Nepal: Lessons on economic freedom from a farmer-entrepreneur
Agriculture is a way of life for the people of Sugauli Birta, a small village in Nepal. But while farmers invest much of their time and energy in their crops, they often spendlong hours traveling across the region to have their grain and rice ground by regional mills. Such journeys are a drain on productivity and opportunity, diverting attention and resources away from their land, families, munity. Fortunately, a local entrepreneur, Lorik Prasad Yadav, had an innovative idea that would...
First Things Interviews Samuel Gregg about his new book
In a newly released interview, senior editor at First Things, Mark Baulerein, sits down with Samuel Gregg to discuss his new book, Faith, Reason, and the Struggle for Western Civilization. Gregg discusses the relationship between reason and faith among other topics that he addresses in his book. Gregg states: One of the things I try to argue in this book is that if you want to understand a civilization that has taken things like liberty, rule of law, creativity, justice,...
Acton Line podcast: The reality of a $15 minimum wage; Should big tech be regulated?
On July 18, the Raise the Wage Act passed the U.S House of Representatives, a bill that would double federal minimum wage by 2025. Members of Congress who support the bill believe it will increase pay for 27 million workers and lift over one million people out of poverty, but those opposed to the bill say it would cause millions more to lose their jobs. Dave Hebert, professor of economics at Aquinas College, joins the podcast to dispel some of...
Viktor Frankl on the error of the pleasure principle
Aristotle asked what made the good life? Was it pleasure, material wealth, honor, or virtue? He argued that while pleasure, wealth, and honor were a part of a good life and human happiness, they could not constitute it. Pleasure is fleeting, wealth is always always acquired for the sake of something else–a big house, a nice car, influence –and es from other people and can be taken away from you. Real human happiness and a good life could only obtained...
Simon Leys on Christopher Hitchens, Mother Teresa & “The Empire of Ugliness”
One of my favorite contemporary writers is Theodore Dalrymple, whose essays I first discovered in The New Criterion about 20 years ago. He wrote that one of his favorite writers, who also had a pen name, was the essayist and critic Simon Leys who died in 2014. I would never e across his work without Dalrymple’s mendation. Recently I finally got around to reading some of Leys’ essays with a mix of delight and disappointment that I had not discovered...
No, millions of Americans are not living on less than $2 per day
Over the past five years some welfare advocates have been promoting an eye-opening claim: more than 3 million U.S. households—including 1.65 million households with children—are living on less than $2 per person, per day. That sounds horrific, and it is: horrifically misleading. New research published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) finds that more than 90 percent of the 3.6 million non-homeless that had previously been classified as living in extreme poverty were misclassified. Shockingly, more than half...
Why do we hate whistleblowers?
Americans claim to hate fraud and corruption. Yet we also tend to despise and discourage those who “snitch” and expose such crimes. How do we reconcile these contradictory positions? Today is “National Whistleblower Appreciation Day,” an observance to celebrate people e forward to raise the alarm about a problem within government or a public organization. In honor of the day I mend watching this video by Kelly Richmond Pope, an accounting professor turned documentary filmmaker, who considers why we hate...
Boris Johnson: Where there is a vision, the people flourish?
Newly elected UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson eliminated half of Theresa May’s Cabinet members during his first day on the job. That es as Johnson presents a unique vision of economic liberty at home and independence from the European Union, writes Rev. Richard Turnbull in a new essay posted at the Acton Institute’sReligion & Liberty Transatlanticwebsite. Rev. Turnbull notes Johnson’s mitment to economic liberty, a view that has not been so strongly embraced since the time of Margaret Thatcher. After...
Is Pete Buttigieg right that opposing a $15 minimum wage ‘taunts’ God?
Are those who oppose raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour transgressing the Scripture and mocking the Lord God Almighty? One might get that impression from watching Tuesday night’s Democratic presidential debate, when one of the participants explicitly made that argument. The allegation came when South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg offered his exegesis ofProverbs 14:31. “[T]he minimum wage is just too low,” Buttigieg said. “And so-called conservative Christian senators right now in the Senate are blocking a bill to...
Protecting farmers or crony capitalism?
Reuters reported today that a large portion of US farm aid went to the wealthiest farmers and advocacy group. More than half of the Trump administration’s $8.4 billion in trade aid payments to U.S. farmers through April was received by the top 10% of recipients, the country’s biggest and most successful farmers, a study by an advocacy group showed on Tuesday. Highlighting an uneven distribution of the bailout, which was designed to help offset effects of the U.S.-China trade war,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved