Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Peter Heslam on wealth creation among the global poor
Peter Heslam on wealth creation among the global poor
Aug 16, 2026 7:42 AM

Throughout our debates about global poverty and economic inequality, critics of capitalism routinely raise the point that half of the world’s population live on less than $2 per day, while wealth among the other half continues to “concentrate.”

The underlying assumption is clear: For so many to be making so little, someone (somewhere) must surely be takingmuch.

Yet given that such a statistic actually represents a high-water mark in human historyfor all people — rich and poor alike — we’d do well to reject the zero-sum mythologies of the day and adjust our perspective around the more positive reality of ever-expanding economic growth and global trade. Opportunities for growth and increased economic opportunity are more available than we tend to think.

“That statistic ought to raise the question in our minds,” explains Peter Heslam in the following excerpt from the PovertyCure series. “What happened to the otherhalf? How did they get to be there? The real question about poverty is the question of wealth.”

Markets are simply channels for creativity and contribution, and the more the global poor e integrated and connected to those channels — whether through improvements in economic freedom or expanding supply chains and global trade — the more we see increased participation and economic prosperity across the globe.

As we reflect on such statistics, then, we needn’t lump this or that “half” of this or that economic grouping in static categories. Indeed, as Heslam points out, many of the world’s poorest are already right in the middle of a journey toward economic abundance.

There is such a thing as an honest day’s work. If we’re talking about the poor, business for them is the most natural thing.

They’re off to sell their goods in the local market and they’re working hard and they’re taking risks and they’re thinking about the future, and they’re doing all the things that an entrepreneur has to to do. It’s the ability to provide for their loved ones, and that is going to include, in one way or another, wealth-generating exercises. They’re not going to get it any other way. These are harsh environments.

We need to make a distinction in our minds between what’s wrong about capitalism and what’s right about capitalism. What lifts the poor is the creation of wealth and the empowerment and the dignity and the self-reliance es from that.

If we truly hope to decrease global poverty, it won’t happen by pretending we’re inevitably trapped in a zero-sum struggle between winners and losers, and it won’t happen by viewing or treating others only according to their current constraints or daily budgets.

Rather than creating imaginary wedges between the rich and poor, fighting over select pieces of the proverbial “economic pie,” we can shift our focus on making sure there’s access to the pond. Rather than pretending that opportunity inevitably belongs to the few, and shifting around our resources accordingly, we can focus on creating, innovating, and collaborating with our neighbors, working to expand economic freedom and invite others into circles of exchange.

We can focus on expanding opportunities for wealth creation through increased partnership, sharing in the economic abundance and creativity that’s available for all through enterprise, entrepreneurship and basic trade and exchange.

Learn more about PovertyCure here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
PBR: A Mainline Bailout
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Under the Obama administration, the faith-based initiative will increasingly e a means to bailout flagging mainline and liberal denominations and ministries, who will have no problem modating their religious practices to secular standards. And in this we will see even clearer manifestation of the theocratic hopes of the religious left. ...
Acton Commentary: Choosing a Prosperous Future
“Focusing on education is not a distraction from the pressing business of economic recovery,” Kevin Schmiesing writes. “It is vital to ensuring it.” This focus should advance school choice and a reduction of administrative red tape. Read mentary at the Acton website, and share ments below. ...
An Economic Recovery for the Religious Left
Mark Tooley calls out “emerging church maestro” Brian Mclaren in a piece today in The American Spectator titled “A Real ‘Economic’ Recovery.” I was introduced to Brian McLaren in seminary when new students were required to read his books in introductory classes. Unfortunately, I was one of only a handful not impressed. He also lectured in person to a class I took, but honestly I don’t remember much about the lecture, except conservatives were generally denounced and “big oil” was...
PBR: On Faith
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Perhaps taking a cue from this week’s PBR question (or perhaps not), the On Faith roster of bloggers have been asked to weigh in on the following question this week: “Should the Obama Administration let faith-based programs that receive government grants discriminate against those they hire or serve?” Notable responses include those from Chuck Colson, Al Mohler, and Susan Brooks Thistlewaite, the latter of whom has these...
Kaarlgard Declares ‘Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism’
In a Forbes blog post titled “Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism,” Rich Kaarlgard counters the critics of supply-side capitalism by pointing to an absence of morality. Kaarlgard declares: Many people do blame capitalism for bringing us to this low moment in the economy. Do they have a point? They do if capitalism, as they define it, is devoid of any underlying morality. True enough, it is hard to see any underlying morality when one surveys the present carnage caused by...
Roepke was right
In my Winter 2007 article on economic globalization for AGAIN Magazine, I quoted economist Wilhelm Roepke. (AGAIN is published by Conciliar Media Ministries, a department of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Church of North America). Roepke: Economically ignorant moralism is as objectionable as morally callous economism. Ethics and economics are two equally difficult subjects, and while the former needs discerning and expert reason, the latter cannot do without humane values. In light of all that has happened with the U.S. economic...
Acton Commentary: Race Alarmists Hijack Black History Month
Ignore those racial disparity studies that point to the “resegregation” of America’s educational system. They advance the lie that minorities cannot survive without whites. “What is best for e black and Latino students is what is best for all students: stable and supportive families, parental options, and high achieving schools with stellar teachers,” Bradley writes. Read mentary at the Acton website, and then discuss it here. ...
The Buckleyization of America
William F. Buckley, 1956: [I’d] sooner be governed by the first two thousand people in the Boston telephone directory than by the two thousand members of the faculty of Harvard University. Rassmussen poll results, 2009: Forty-four percent (44%) voters also think a group of people selected at random from the phone book would do a better job addressing the nation’s problems than the current Congress, but 37% disagree. Twenty percent (20%) are undecided. ...
An Alternative Stimulus
Washington is all atwitter about the “Stimulus,” which is currently being pushed through Congress (without being read by most members). Acton’s own Michelle Muccio e up with a plan of her own, and did a bit of independent research to see if her proposal would find any support: ...
PBR: Public Good and the Faith-Based Initiative
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” I have little confidence in the future of the faith-based initiative because conservatives who gain office are unwilling to take any fire at all in order to advance the cause beyond concept. At the same time, liberals will be unable to make productive use of the idea because of giant fissures regarding public religion in their movement. In theory, President Obama would make an ideal person to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved