Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Tragedy of ‘Mockingjay’
The Tragedy of ‘Mockingjay’
Jul 12, 2025 11:44 PM

“Mockingjay — Part 2,” the last film based on Suzanne Collins’ bestselling Hunger Games trilogy, opened this past weekend to high sales that, nevertheless, fell short of the other films in the series and industry expectations. In addition, with a thematically confused ending, the story itself doesn’t live up to the quality of previous installments.

Regarding sales, Brent Lang reported for Variety,

The final film in the “Hunger Games” series debuted to numbers that few pictures in history have ever enjoyed, but not everyone seems impressed.

Indeed, “The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 2” is a victim of the franchise’s success. The film’s $101 million bow ranks as the lowest of the four installments and is off 17% from the previous film in the series. Globally, the picture also struggled to attract as big crowds. The $247 million it made worldwide fell short of the roughly $300 million that many analysts expected the picture would generate.

Lang offers an interesting bit of speculation for what the “problem” may have been with this second “Mockingjay”:

Compounding issues, “Mockingjay — Part 2” ends on a relatively downbeat note. Although a series built around children fighting to the death always had dark undercurrents, the film ended with political maneuvering and betrayals that prevented it from concluding on a triumphal note. Moreover, some of the novelty of the concept had worn off by the fourth and final installment.

I’m not sure that it would have improved ticket sales, but I actually think the problem was the source material. Specifically, I don’t think the ending was downbeat enough, because Collins tried to have it both ways between tragedy and victory. Let me explain. (Spoiler alert!)

The rebels beat Snow, and Katniss preemptively saves the people of Panem from another dictatorship under Coin, who proposes to reinstate the Hunger Games one last time to teach the Capitol citizens a lesson. Instead of executing Snow, as she requested, Katniss takes aim at Coin, ending her tyranny before it could begin and making democratic elections possible.

That would have been a great twist, if the story hadn’t already shifted to tragedy. I’m no fan of tyranny, after all. While I liked all the films better than the books, and this was no exception, even slowing the pace by splitting Mockingjay into two movies didn’t allow for the right pacing, because the problem wasn’t just the book’s rushed pacing but the content of the book.

Kurt Vonnegut once said in an interview with the Paris Review,

I try to keep deep love out of my stories because, once that particular es up, it is almost impossible to talk about anything else. Readers don’t want to hear about anything else. They go gaga about love. If a lover in a story wins his true love, that’s the end of the tale, even if World War III is about to begin, and the sky is black with flying saucers.

The problem with “Mockingjay” is that the love story ends in tragedy and Collins tries to smooth it over with a big victory against the Hunger Games equivalent of a sky “black with flying saucers.” Call me sentimental, but even if I have the end of tyranny and the best of all political worlds, “but have not love, I am nothing” (cf. 1 Corinthians 13:2).

But wait! Surely I must have misspoken, right? The love story turns out fine. Katniss and Peeta live happily ever after, don’t they?

That too, however, is part of the problem. Simply put: Katniss was bad at loving Peeta. The whole time, as readers of the novels especially know, she cannot make up her mind between Peeta and Gale. Collins fills three books with Katniss’s mixed signals and infuriating inner-discord about them.

No, Katniss ending up with Peeta in the end doesn’t fix Mockingjay’s problem, because “Katniss and Peeta” isn’t the true love story of the books. It may not have been romantic—in fact, it was purer for being unromantic—but there was a real love story to the Hunger Games: Katniss’s true love was Prim.

Don’t believe me? Just ask Katniss. “How could I leave Prim,” she asks in the first book, “who is the only person in the world I’m certain I love?” She even confesses to Caesar Flickerman on live TV, “I love her more than anything.” It was her love for Prim that led her to volunteer as tribute in her place. The whole trilogy develops from that one act of selfless love.

But as readers and viewers know, that love story doesn’t turn out happily ever after. After the bombing of Capitol children that surrounded President Snow’s mansion, Prim, now a medic for the rebels, shows up to tend to the wounded. The first attack, however, turns out to have been meant to lure more people into the carnage and another explosive detonates right as Katniss recognizes her sister.

This event also ends what turns out to have been pletely pointless mission to assassinate Snow. That would have been fine, if the story had shifted to tragedy at this point. But Collins only mits. The closest the es is Katniss having a breakdown and throwing things at Prim’s cat, who finds its way back to her house in the Victors’ Village at the end of Mockingjay:

“Get out!” He dodges the pillow I throw at him. “Go away! There’s nothing left for you here!” I start to shake, furious with him. “She’s ing back! She’s never ing back here again!” I grab another pillow and get to my feet to improve my aim. Out of nowhere, the tears begin to pour down my cheeks. “She’s dead.” I clutch my middle to dull the pain. Sink down on my heels, rocking the pillow, crying. “She’s dead, you stupid cat. She’s dead.”

If the words “THE END” had followed this, maybe the story would have worked. It would have been better, at least. But instead, the “Katniss and Peeta” love story takes over to try to save the day, ending with Peeta and Katniss living happily ever after (except for recurrent nightmares).

Of course, people do get over grief. There’s nothing wrong with writing stories about that. But that kind of grief—the grief of star-crossed love—can’t be gotten over with so little time to process from the perspective of readers and viewers. Romeo and Juliet wouldn’t have been any less of a tragedy if Romeo had lived and ended up, in one final scene set years later, with Rosaline. The whole story would e undone if something like that had happened.

So, how was the movie? As I said, better than the book. In fact, it’s still a fun action flick, with great performances from Jennifer Lawrence et al. But it isn’t anything more than that. For a series that so consistently delivered depth beyond the surface in previous installments, that’s a tragedy.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
FAQ: What is Sukkot, the ‘Feast of Tabernacles’?
The Jewish feast of Sukkot lasts seven (or eight) days – in 2020, from sundown on Friday, October 2, to sundown on Friday, October 9. Here are the facts you need to know. When is Sukkot? Sukkot – also known as the Feast of Tabernacles, Feast of Booths, Feast of Ingathering, or simply “The Feast” – always begins on the fifteenth day of the seventh month of the Jewish calendar (Tishrei). Thus, it begins five days after Yom Kippur, the...
Everything that’s wrong with Dick Costolo’s tweet in 1,531 characters
Woke capitalism went into overdrive on Wednesday, when a former Twitter CEO seemingly endorsed the full-scale liquidation of entrepreneurs who refuse to bring politics into the workplace. Dick Costolo served as COO of Twitter before ing its CEO from 2010 to 2015. On September 30, he replied to a tweet about woke capitalism from venture capitalist Paul Graham. Graham shared a statement from the cryptocurrency exchange platform Coinbase, which vowed to “create a sense of cohesion and unity” by emphasizing...
Gavin Newsom’s gas-powered vehicle ban: the wrong approach to fight climate change
One would expect that the decades-long exodus of low- and e residents fleeing California would be cause for reflection and self-critical introspection on behalf of its effective one-party government. Skyrocketing costs of living and a cratering middle class – caused by years of anti-business regulation, powerful public sector labor union monopolies, and one of the highest tax burdens in the nation – should be ample reason for the Golden State’s progressive leadership to reassess its approach to governance. But don’t...
What Nicholas Kristof got right
Recently, Nicholas Kristof’s published an op-ed about the Social Progress Index, a multi-year study of the quality of life in 163 countries. Kristof writes, “New data suggest that the United States is one of just a few countries worldwide that is slipping backward.” While at first reading this sounds like bad news, I think the data (and underlying science) is a bit plicated than they might appear. The SPI seeks to offer “a new way to define the success of...
Fratelli Tutti is a familiar mixture of dubious claims, strawmen, genuine insights
One of the first things that will strike readers of Pope Francis’s new social encyclical Fratelli Tutti is its sheer length. At about 43,000 words in English (including footnotes), that’s more than the Book of Genesis (32,046) and three times the size of the Gospel of John (15,635). Despite its length, there’s little in this text that we have not heard Francis say before in one form or another. But whether the subject is capital punishment or his theme of...
When cronyism meets ‘creative destruction’
Amid rapid globalization, Americans have faced new pressures when es to economic change, leading to abundant prosperity, as well as significant pain and disruption munities. In search of a villain, populists and progressives routinely blame the expansion of free trade and rise of global conglomerates, arguing that entrenched and moneyed interests are now allowed to run rampant from country to country with petition or accountability. In search of a solution, those same critics tend to relish in nostalgia, either reminiscing...
Beyond civility: Ginsburg, Scalia, and friendship
The first presidential debate provided an accurate and disheartening summary of our current political climate – three men shouting over each other for 90 minutes. Opposite sides of the political spectrum cannot seem to agree on basic truths or mon ground. The majority of Trump and Biden voters say that they have few or no close friends who voted for the opposite party. A thriving society requires that we are able to debate important questions and find solutions together. What...
COVID-19 and crony capitalism
Who wins in the COVID-19 economy? In some cases, outright fraud allows businesses to prosper. In other cases, political connections enable businesses to collect revenue from the federal government. Crony capitalism is defined by the Mercatus Center as “an economic system in which the profitability of firms in a market economy depends on political connections.” Large-scale bailouts and interventions have increased cronyism during the pandemic. The more government funds that are available for individuals and businesses to capture, the larger...
Amy Coney Barrett: handmaid of the Lord, not the state
In their attempt to forestall the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, a growing number mentators point to her membership in a Christian group that once used the term “handmaid.” This “controversy” shows, among other things, how the works of Margaret Atwood have displaced the traditional Western canon. However, it also adds a thin veneer of respectability over rehashed anti-Catholic prejudice, camouflages anti-Christian bigotry, and conceals a noxious and unconstitutional religious test for office. It takes little...
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: freedom and equality
“Equality” is a term that people uss a lot of nowadays – too much, some would argue. This week in Forbes, the Acton Institute’s managing director, international Alejandro Chafuen writes about equality and its relationship to freedom. Not all agree on which factors of equality are most important – equality of opportunity, e equality, equality before the law, and so on – but however we define it, freedom and equality cannot be separated. Dr. Chafuen’s analysis incorporates much from a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved