Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Pandemic or not, America has the best healthcare in the world
Pandemic or not, America has the best healthcare in the world
Jun 28, 2026 8:15 PM

When President Donald Trump fell ill with COVID-19, there was absolutely no contemplation of moving America’s head of state to another country to receive healthcare services. This might be surprising, considering the oft-quoted World Health Organization ranking of our healthcare system at 37th globally. Wouldn’t we want our president to be treated in the country with the very best healthcare?

The problem, of course, is that parisons in healthcare often mislead. This was true before the pandemic, but it has also been true in the midst of it.

First, these parisons often fail to consider how the U.S. population is different – more diverse and much bigger – than many of the world’s countries, particularly European countries, whose size is often similar to that of U.S. states. Indeed, there are more Californians than there are Canadians and slightly more North Carolinians than there are Swedes.

Secondly, and more critically, the focus on the prevalence of various diseases or longevity (which is influenced by a host of cultural and lifestyle factors) in parisons is misplaced. A better metric is survival rates, or specifically how patients fare when they are sick. After all, doctors cannot enforce healthier lifestyles, but they can help heal us from sickness.

And in America, they do a fine job of this.

Before COVID-19’s travel restrictions, it was mon for elite foreigners to travel to the U.S. for medical care. One McKinsey and Company study estimated that 60,000 to 85,000 foreign patients made this trip each year, and the Fraser Institute, a Canadian think tank, counted more than 50,000 Canadians crossing the border in search of care in 2014. This came about despite WHO’s ranking of Canada ahead of us, at 30th.

America’s medical system was, in some ways, better prepared for a pandemic than other nations. While we have a relatively low physician-to-population ratio, and fewer total hospital beds per capita than parable countries, the U.S. is home to more ICU beds per capita than any other nation, according to an analysis of 2012 data. Perhaps this is because we are used to treating a relatively unhealthy and overweight population, a population at higher risk for a COVID-19. Ironically, our healthcare system enables many people to live longer and better lives in spite of orbidities, chronic conditions, and poor lifestyle choices. From the outside, our lack of health might reflect poorly on our healthcare system, but it is exactly because of the high quality of care available in the U.S. that so many Americans can afford to live in the unhealthy way that they do.

Similarly, the U.S. uses a great deal more neonatal ICU care than other industrialized countries. But you would not know it from our infant mortality rate, which is relatively high for two reasons: First, Americans carry high-risk pregnancies (e.g., to mothers who are teenage, obese, or of advanced maternal age) at a higher rate than other countries. And secondly, the U.S. counts more babies as live births who, due to prematurity or low birth weight, have little chance of survival. Ironically, our infant mortality rate suffers, because we make a greater effort to save every life. If you are about to deliver a baby, you would be fortunate to deliver in the U.S., where the baby will receive this high level of care.

Despite our risk factors for COVID-19, despite the greater degree to which the coronavirus has spread in the U.S., and despite criticisms and conflict over our government’s response, the U.S. health system has done a phenomenal job at what it is supposed to do: keep patients alive. The U.S. has one of the world’s best COVID-19 survival rates, meaning if you are diagnosed with it, you would have a greater chance of survival here than in many other countries, including many of those that the WHO and others rank as having healthcare systems superior to our own.

According to the latest CDC numbers, the U.S. survival rate for COVID-19 is 0.98. That means that if you are diagnosed with COVID, you have a 98% chance of not dying from the virus. Conversely, you face a mortality rate of nearly 2% (2.2).

By contrast, the United Kingdom, another wealthy country, has a lower survival rate of 96%. The Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center tracks the mortality rate (the inverse of the survival rate) for each country, and finds that the U.S. also performs better than Mexico (where the COVID-19 mortality rate is currently 10%), Italy (4%), the UK (4%), Belgium (3%), Sweden (3%), Canada (4%), China (5%), Spain (3%), and many other countries.

Now, COVID-19 survival rates, even more so than survival rates for other illnesses, are plagued by confounding variables. A country could, as many suggest the U.S. has done, reach a rosier rate by simply testing more people, identifying more cases (many of which are mild or even asymptomatic), and counting those among the denominator.

Indeed, the U.S. has experienced a higher caseload and greater spread of the virus than most other countries. The number of cases and the spread of the virus are reflections of many factors, including government policy, culture, and individual choices and behaviors. The medical system – our hospitals, doctors, and nurses – have little control over this, just as they have little control over how many Americans drive recklessly or are obese.

While the spread of the virus (and testing response) has an effect on the mortality numbers, it is not the full story.

Another important part of the story is access to healthcare services. Fortunately, so far American doctors have not seen the worst of their COVID-19 e true: They have not been in the unenviable position of triaging COVID-19 patients and rationing access to beds, ventilators, or hospital care. Even in the midst of New York City’s peak, we were not sending elderly patients home to die, as some Italian hospitals were forced to do.

This explicit form of rationing is particularly shocking to many Americans, but it is not mon in countries with socialized medicine. Even mon is an implicit form of rationing where patients must simply wait longer for appointments, treatments or surgeries, due to the failure of the health system to match supply with demand.

Because Americans have some of the world’s shortest wait times, we have better access to preventive care and care for serious diseases. This is why America has the world’s best cancer survival rates, best longevity after age 80, and better heart attack survival rates than the average parable countries.

With COVID-19 survival rates, time – critical time which allowed for medical knowledge to advance – is also a factor: America’s COVID-19 survival rate, like survival rates around the world, has improved greatly since the beginning of the pandemic, when health providers knew little about the disease.

For decades, American medical innovators ultimately have served patients throughout the world, as advancements in treatments, techniques, pharmaceuticals, and devices are exported overseas. More patients are alive today in all parts of the world thanks to the way America incentivizes and rewards medical innovation.

However, there is one area where international healthcare rankings do get criticism of the U.S. right: Americans do not have equal access to high quality care. And the private payment pipeline that most Americans use, often involving panies and employers, is plex and inefficient. The quality of care Americans receive can vary greatly based on their type of insurance and available resources. Of course, the vast majority of Americans will never stay in a suite like the one President Trump visited at Walter Reed.

This said, people outside (and even inside) the United States often misunderstand two things: First is the degree to which our government finances healthcare. Approximately one-third of Americans are in a government insurance plan. Health reformers should take note it is not privately insured patients, but Medicare and Medicaid patients (and uninsured patients) who face the greatest challenges accessing healthcare, because these programs reimburse health providers at below-market rates.

Second, virtually all American hospitals are legally obligated to treat patients in need of emergency care regardless of their ability to pay. This may not be “universal healthcare” by the typical definition, but it is a type of universal care.

Progressive political advocates, who are quick to seize on any ranking of the U.S. that depicts our system as inferior to that of countries with socialized medicine, often paint a picture of Americans dying in our streets for lack of healthcare. This is not accurate, nor are the rankings that suggest that American healthcare stinks.

Of course, we can do better, and reforms should focus on how we pay for healthcare. But as we work to reform America’s convoluted healthcare payment system, we should take care not to damage what is best about American healthcare – namely, the best quality of healthcare available in the world. Instead, we should seek to expand access to healthcare for the sake of all Americans and, ultimately, all people around the world.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Capitalism without Bankruptcy
On the first half of today’s installment of The Diane Rehm Show, Jerry Taylor, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute got off a good line in the midst of a discussion concerning federal regulation of emission standards. Concerning the performance of the American car manufacturers parison to that of foreign automakers, and the moral hazard involved in the various bailouts, Taylor said, “Capitalism without the threat of bankruptcy is like Christianity without the threat of hell. It doesn’t work...
The ‘P’ Word
This guy fails the ‘anthropological Rorshach’ test: Jonathon Porritt, who chairs the government’s Sustainable Development Commission, says curbing population growth through contraception and abortion must be at the heart of policies to fight global warming. He says political leaders and green campaigners should stop dodging the issue of environmental harm caused by an expanding population. The 2 child limit that Porritt encourages is not just an attempt to limit population growth, but is instead a policy that would put the...
PBR: Aristotle on What is Wrong with Socialism
In response to the question, “What is wrong with socialism?” Writing well over 2000 years ago, Aristotle answered Plato, whose Republic advocated socialism, thusly: What mon to the greatest number gets the least amount of care. People pay most attention to what is their own: they care less for what mon; or, at any rate, they care for it only to the extent to which each is individually concerned. Even when there is no other cause for inattention, people are...
PBR: History Casts Doubt
In response to the question, “What is wrong with socialism?” I can hardly do better than Pope John Paul II, who wrote in Centesimus Annus, “the fundamental error of socialism is anthropological in nature,” because socialism maintains, “that the good of the individual can be realized without reference to his free choice.” The socialist experiment is attractive because its model is the family, a situation in which each gives according to his ability and receives according to his need—and it...
PBR: What is Wrong with Socialism?
This week we introduce a new regular feature we’re calling “PowerBlog Ramblings” (PBR). The concept is simple: we’ll post a question along with some background for why that question has been selected, and various PowerBlog contributors and guests will respond to that question. We’ve named this feature “PowerBlog Ramblings” in part as an allusion to the publication with which the institute’s namesake Lord Acton was closely associated for a time, The Rambler, which was in part aimed “to provide a...
New Book: Cleveland on Economic Policy
As the media bombard us with misleading language describing the role of government in the economy (e.g., that a stimulus plan will “inject money” or “create jobs”), those who know better need to keep up a steady drumbeat mon sense concerning the potential and track record of the state’s involvement in economic affairs. Long-time Acton associate Paul Cleveland’s newly published Unmasking the Sacred Lies is a valuable contribution to the effort. Professor of Economics at Birmingham-Southern College, bines here a...
Acton Commentary: Hollywood’s Radical Che Chic
Was the real Che Guevara a lover of “humanity, justice and truth”? In mentary today, Bruce Edward Walker reviews Steven Soderbergh’s new four-hour “Che” film epic and discovers “a cinematic paean to one of the twentieth-century’s most infamous butchers.” Read the mentary at the Acton Institute website. ...
Vatican Condemnation of anti-Semitism Unchanged Despite Misstep on Holocaust Denier
The pope has certainly earned his salary this week. In his attempt to heal a schism, he inadvertently set off a fire storm. As most everyone knows by now, the pontiff lifted the munication of four bishops illicitly ordained by the late Archbishop Marcel Lefevbre in 1988, whose dissent from the Second Vatican Council drew a small but fervent following. One of these bishops, Richard Williamson, is a holocaust denier. To understand the saga, it is necessary to peel back...
Jesus and the Parables
By happy serendipity two books of related interest caught my attention today. The first is David Cowan’s Economic Parables: The Monetary Teachings of Jesus Christ (Paternoster, 2007). Michael Kruse mends the book in a brief review. The other book is a newly-announced Christianity Today award winner in the “Biblical Studies” category. The judges describe Klyne R. Snodgrass’ Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus as “a superb culmination of career-long reflection on one of the most...
Acton Commentary: The Moral Bankruptcy Behind the Bailouts
Amid the Washington clamor for more and bigger bailouts, a few brave voices among elected officials and government veterans are being raised about the moral disaster looming behind massive government spending programs. If we ignore these warnings, writes Ray Nothstine in today’s Acton Commentary, we may be “continuing down a path that may usher in an ever greater financial crisis.” Read the mentary here and share ments below. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved