Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The 2020 election was a mess: 4 ways to keep it from ruining your life
The 2020 election was a mess: 4 ways to keep it from ruining your life
Sep 13, 2025 12:16 AM

The 2020 election pitted a violent leftist movement against a crass, self-centered incumbent who uses the levers of power to benefit himself. The campaign hardly proved inspiring. It also ended up with results that confounded the professional political class and distressed tens of millions of Americans. Days after voters cast their ballots, the presidential race remained undecided, and a nasty legal and PR battle continues to play out.

For Catholics and other Christians, the temptation to e agitated, concerned, and outright fearful should be outweighed by our belief that God has already won. In reality, we must fight every day to keep from being overwhelmed with what we read, watch, and hear. It is with this reality in mind that we should take the following four actions to keep ourselves and those who rely on us in a positive state of mind and spirit:

Be charitable;Take responsibility for our own conduct;Remember that elections matter but are not permanent; andPractice subsidiarity in our own lives

Charity is about more than being polite to people with whom we disagree. In the context of the election, it means to be loving. It means having a cup of coffee or a phone conversation with someone who ferociously disagrees with your politics and philosophy but with whom you desire to have a relationship, because mon es before our political differences. It may require keeping the relationship on an even keel munication open while pressing someone about their position on a moral issue. And it definitely requires us to assume (unless proven otherwise) that people whose moral positions conflict with our own – who, for example, support abortion or who believe that America is an irredeemably racist nation – are acting out of ignorance instead of malice.

The fact is that charity is the core of how Americans of all faiths, and no faith, will get through ing months and years. We have a president who thrives on conflict, a radical leftist movement that thrives on violence, and social media that profit off of bringing out the worst of humanity’s interpersonal characteristics. Yet as a liberal atheist friend and I wrote just before election day:

The fact is that humanity, free speech, and elections are messy. But they don’t have to be a mess. Being part of the world means fortable with being fortable – breaking down silos so that mon es to the fore. By avoiding the mess, by creating caricatures instead of detailed pictures of real people, we deny others the opportunity to learn from our gifts and ourselves the opportunity to learn from the gifts of others.

Our second post-election action is take responsibility for our own conduct. Blaming Trump for dividing us is to give him power he does not have. If God cannot make us stop sinning because we have free will, Trump definitely cannot cause us to start sinning. Likewise, social media platforms are not responsible for how we act – we are. We choose to let social media keep us up late, act uncharitably, and post rashly. Trump and social media are no more to blame for what we do than alcohol is for intoxication, food I for gluttony, or cars are for speed-induced accidents.

Third, remember that elections matter, but they are not permanent. This is a variation on former Heritage Foundation President Ed Feulner’s maxim: “In Washington, there are no permanent victories or permanent defeats, just permanent battles.” His wisdom reminds us that, yes, America is ing less Christian and less open to the free market. Both parties are exploding the debt, abortion is widespread, and we keep voting in people who are more concerned with political victories than public service. But America has won two world wars, reunited after the Civil War, reduced abortion, and created a racial environment that reflects an equality of opportunity that is more in line with Catholic and American values than at any point in our history. Rest assured, we can survive the 2020 election.

Our fourth and final responsibility is to practice subsidiarity in our own lives. This Catholic principle takes on more than a governmental dimension in this context. It forces each of us to focus on keeping ourselves healthy, providing for our families, deepening our friendship, and performing our jobs well. It requires us to sign off of social media and the news to get enough sleep instead of worrying about the latest twist in the election. The latest political dopamine hit will e, and the parties will continue to act like spoiled children. In the meantime, our kids need diapers changed and meals made. Our bosses and clients need to receive our best service. Our spouses and families need to be reminded that e first. And our faith must be fed from the One source Who alone can sustain us.

Through these four principles – charity, responsibility, recognizing the temporal nature of politics, and subsidiarity – Catholics and other people of faith can e the despair and fear that is gripping so much of America. We can also influence those closest to us to uphold their responsibilities to themselves and to their loved ones, creating a widening spiral of positive change that does exponentially more good than our fear does.

America’s decline does not have to be permanent. This leads to one final responsibility: to maintain hope. Our choices for president in 2016 and 2020 were not exactly inspirational or visionary leaders, but the good news is that neither violent populism nor violent leftism won a mandate. Some centrist Democrats are acknowledging that their party slid too far toward the Left and considered ousting Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House. The GOP will likely retain the ability to stop far-Left policies in the Senate. This practical hope means that Catholics can push for liberty through our faith, and show how America is best when it follows Christian principles. The GOP will certainly be open to many of these arguments, and the actions of House Democrats may mean pockets of that party will be, as well.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
‘A Threat to Tyranny Everywhere’
Arnold Kling had the opportunity to screen The Call of the Entrepreneur and published his reactions to it on Tech Central Station. In this rave review Mr. Kling, in the first paragraph, calls The Call both the “most subversive film” he has ever seen, and “a threat to tyranny everywhere.” He points out that while the film uses the so-called “G-word,” it avoids the scare-tactics that “An Inconvenient Truth,” also a religious film in his view, makes use of and...
OK, Let’s Review
How do you “end poverty” in the developing world? Well, certainly not by promoting a “poverty agenda” that has proven to be a failure again and again. The two items below both appeared yesterday. The first is from a review of “The Elephant and the Dragon,” a book by Robyn Meredith, a Hong Kong-based correspondent for Forbes magazine. The second is from mentary by the chairman of Microsoft India in the Wall Street Journal (reg. req’d). As Ms. Meredith prehensive,...
An Even Greater Society?
John Edwards formally kicked off his poverty tour in New Orleans’s Lower Ninth Ward this week and of course blamed the president for the government’s mishandling of the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Edwards also played up symbolism by visiting some of the samel cities Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy visited during their famed poverty tours. Edwards may not significantly differ from other Democratic front runners for the White House, although some say he is the only candidate with a...
Speaking of ‘Priestly’ Science
Speaking of the “priestly” voice of science, Given all the atheist militancy raising a ruckus lately, I suppose it isn’t too surprising that I am stumbling upon more regular and more baldly dismissive declarations these days about the ineradicable patibility of science and religion among Science’s self-appointed Elite Champions online. I’ve been a perfectly convinced and rather cheerfully nonjudgmental atheist for well over twenty years at this point, but I must say that I think it is arrant nonsense to...
John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, Part 2
Readings in Social Ethics: John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, part 2 of 3. There are six sermons in this text, based on the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus. This post deals with the second pair. References are to page numbers. Sermon 3: A summary and introduction to the series of sermons: “The parable of Lazarus was of extraordinary benefit to us, both rich and poor, teaching the latter to bear their poverty with equanimity, and not allowing...
John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, Part 3
Readings in Social Ethics: John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, part 3 of 3. There are six sermons in this text, based on the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus. This post deals with the third and final pair. The first four sermons dealt directly with Chrysostom’s exegesis of the parable of Lazarus and the rich man. These latter two sermons were given on different occasions. References are to page numbers. Sermon 6: The es after an earthquake has...
New books update
Bringing to your attention two recent publications by Journal of Markets & Morality contributors: The first is Less Than Two Dollars a Day: A Christian View of World Poverty aand the Free Market, by Kent Van Til, published by Eerdmans. The second is Economics in Christian Perspective: Theory, Policy, and Life Choices, by Victor Claar and Robin Klay, published by InterVarsity. Based on a quick perusal, I guess that the latter entry is a little more sanguine about the achievements...
Without A Prayer
I would say I met Jeremy Jerschina by chance on the campus of Calvin College, except that nothing ever happens by chance on the very Reformed sidewalks, hallways, and parking lots of Calvin College. So I’ll say I met him by Providence. Jeremy was visiting from New Jersey as a prospective Calvin student, to study Philosophy or Theology or something in the humanities. He struck me as being extremely well-read, genuine, and sensitive to the call of God on his...
Everything Old is New Again
Here’s an interesting report from the Media Research Center’s Business & Media Institute on the cyclical nature of media coverage on the issue of climate change. We all know about the global cooling craze of the 1970’s, but who knew that the issue goes back more than a century? It was five years before the turn of the century and major media were warning of disastrous climate change. Page six of The New York Times was headlined with the serious...
The Problem of Equality
Samuel Gregg examines the nature of equality in democratic society. “Though Tocqueville held that democracy’s emergence was underpinned by the effects of the Judeo-Christian belief in the equality of all people in God’s sight, he perceived a type munal angst in democratic majorities that drove them to attempt to equalize all things, even if this meant behaving despotically,” he writes. Read mentary here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved