Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: The American Rescue Plan, the child tax credit, and child poverty
Explainer: The American Rescue Plan, the child tax credit, and child poverty
Dec 17, 2025 8:49 PM

On Thursday, President Joe Biden signed the American Rescue Plan, one day after the House of Representatives passed the $1.9 trillion stimulus by a vote of 220-211. Its supporters, especially those on the Religious Left, assert that the bill’s changes to the child tax credit represent the best way to reduce child poverty. What changes does the American Rescue Plan make to child tax credit? How much money could families expect to get, and when? Is the glowing analysis of its impact true? Or are other policies more effective at limiting – or virtually eradicating – child poverty?

Here are the facts you need to know.

What is the current child tax credit?

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 allows parents with at least $2,500 in e to claim a child tax credit of up to $2,000 for each American child aged 16 or younger. If the CTC would exceed the amount of e tax the parents owe, they could receive up to $1,400 as a refundable child tax credit. This amount is limited to 15% of e and is indexed to inflation.

How does the American Rescue Plan change the child tax credit (CTC)?

The American Rescue Plan expands the child tax credit in its amount, payout, and age and e eligibility. The bill includes a one-year, fully refundable child tax credit amounting to $3,000 for children age 6-17, or $3,600 for children under 6. The ARP increases the CTC by raising the age of eligibility one year, to 17, eliminating the $2,500 minimum e requirement, and allowing parents to receive the full amount even if the refund would be greater than the amount of taxes they owe.

Rather than relieving parents of their tax burden, the American Rescue Plan sets up the child tax credit as a wealth transfer payment.

The Biden administration plans to pay this credit upfront, possibly in monthly increments beginning this summer, rather than in one lump sum when parents file their taxes next year.

How would expanding the child tax credit impact U.S. child poverty?

The ARP’s alteration of the child tax credit would reduce the percentage of American child living poverty from 13.6% to 6.1%, according to an estimate from theCenter on Poverty & Social Policy at Columbia University. If these estimates are right, that’s a potential reduction of nearly 45%.

What have religious groups said about this?

Members of the Religious Left have used this estimated poverty reduction as a justification to support the American Rescue Plan. “Expanding the CTC would do more to reduce hunger and poverty among our nation’s children than any single policy has in decades,” said the anti-hunger nonprofit Bread for the World. “Families receiving up to $3,600 per child would be a lifeline,” said the Network Lobby for Catholic Social Justice of the abortion-funding bill.

Some figures portrayed passing the bill as fulfilling mandments. “As we work our way through these troubled times, we must continue to heed God’s call to care for the ‘least among us,” said Rev. Eugene Cho, president and CEO of Bread for the World.Rev. Jim Wallis, the founder of Sojourners, said the bill would fix “the reversal of biblical values and priorities” that allegedly prevailed heretofore. Sojourners lobbied Congress to pass the ARP in its capacity as a member of the Circle of Protection, whose stated goal is “to form a Circle of Protection around [government]programs that meet the essential needs of hungry and poor people” – indicating that its members entertain only a narrow range of permissible, government-centered solutions to social problems.

Does anything reduce child poverty more than an expanded child tax credit?

If accurate, a 45% reduction in child poverty would represent a significant reduction; however, another mechanism would cut child poverty faster and deeper than this much-celebrated legislation. Having one member of the household who works full time eliminates nearly 100% of all child poverty. The Fraser Institute found in its report “The Causes of Poverty” that only 1.7% of Canadians who live in a home where someone works full time live below the poverty level. Those who live in a home that follows the “Success Sequence” – with people who graduate high school, work full time, and wait until marriage before having children – have less than a 1% poverty rate (0.9%, specifically).

What is the biggest impediment to people finding a full-time job today?

The most easily solved hindrances to full-time work today are government policies stifling job creation, especially oppressive COVID-19 lockdown orders. Despite the fact that science has since shown the coronavirus is deadliest to a narrow subset of the population, lawmakers have opted to cling to their lockdown powers, keeping businesses and schools shuttered.

The effects have been devastating. Up to 60% of businesses that shut their doors during the pandemic will close permanently. These orders have disproportionately harmed munities. Fully one-quarter of all black-owned businesses that closed due to COVID-19 have yet to reopen. They have also destroyed social capital. One of every five churches face permanent closure, according to Barna Group President David Kinnaman.

Lawmakers intended the Paycheck Protection Program to alleviate the pressure caused by artificial, government-mandated business closures. However, PPP funds often went to powerful and well-connected businesses that needed the money least. A mere 1% of businesses received more than a quarter of all PPP loans; 600 businesses each received the maximum loan amount of $10 million.

Worse yet, the American Rescue Plan originally included a measure to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., led seven more of her Democratic colleagues in giving that portion of the bill a curt thumbs down. A $15 minimum wage would disproportionately lock young, minority, and less educated Americans out of the job market, creating an army of welfare recipients dependent on the government for their daily bread.

Why is work important?

Work allows an individual “to provide a dignified livelihood for himself and his family,” according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. It also stabilizes society by making all members feel invested in its success. “There is no peace without employment,”saidPope Francis on the sixtieth anniversary of the Treaty of Rome.

Are there other benefits to work?

Work expresses the creativity that God embedded within every member of the human race. “In work, the person exercises and fulfills in part the potential inscribed in his nature,” the catechism adds. Work enables each person “toprolong the work of creation by subduing the earth” and “make legitimate use of his talents to contribute to the abundance that will benefit all.”

What’s the bottom line?

All Americans want to reduce child poverty. However, that goal does not justify every means. It does not outweigh the immorality of voting for a bill that subjects hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to funding for abortion-on-demand. Nor would it mitigate the cost of the vast majority of the bill, which has nothing to do with COVID-19 and will only burden future generations with pounding debt. For our purposes, the American Rescue Plan could further stymie the greatest child poverty-reducing mechanism known to man: full-time work.

While American families deserve support and relief from the artificial employment crisis triggered by political leaders’ lockdown orders, true fulfillment will e from a government check.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Miracles before our eyes
The case is open. Today marks the first day the canonization of John Paul II is officially underway. (Read BBC’s account.) To those for whom the procedures of the Catholic Church in matters such as these seem alien, I point to the lucid explanation of the Reverend Giuseppe D’Alonzo (the man in charge of verifying the claims of John Paul’s miracles): Asked what he thought about making John Paul II a saint, the Rev D’Alonzo replied that it was not...
Take your ball and go home
“Winning isn’t everything.” Whatever happened to this slice of wisdom? In Columbus, Ohio, a team of baseball players has been ejected from their league for being “too good”! (Read the story here). The parents of the teams being slaughtered by the better plained that losing was seriously detrimental to their kids’ self-esteem. Therefore, the league decided to reward the hard work of the winning team with expulsion. Winning isn’t everything, but apparently, losing is. What this league and the supporting...
No ‘Magic Number’ on foreign aid
USAID Administrator Andrew Natsios set the record straight at a U.N. conference when he told the gathering that the United States has “no intention” mitting to a goal for foreign aid pegged to a percentage of gross domestic product. Some countries are pressing for the U.S. mit to an official development assistance (ODA) goal of 0.7 percent of GDP, a figure that would oblige the United States to spend more than $90 billion annually. The Washington Times reported that Natsios...
Sue the competition
AMD is suing Intel, claiming “freedom of choice and the benefits of innovation…are being stolen away in the microprocessor market,” says Hector Ruiz, AMD chairman, president and chief executive. This case raises concerns over at Fast Company Now, as Kevin Ohannessian writes, I worry that this could start a new trend. Is petitor trouncing you? Sue him. Do you feel your product is underperforming due to unfair opposition? Take your rival to court. It does seem at times that America...
Journal of Markets & Morality, volume 8, issue 1
Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 8 • Number 1 The publication of this issue (vol. 8, no. 1) marks the full implementation of the journal’s two issue moving wall. This means that as an archived issue, volume 7, number 1 is now freely available in its entirety. Subscribers are able to access electronically the full content of the two most current issues. Stephen Grabill’s editorial deals with these trends in scholarly publishing, with an eye on the specific situation...
The problem with aid
In a number of previous posts, I have expressed concern over new efforts to increase the amount of government-to-government aid to Africa (see here, here, and here for background). Today brings another bit of news that should give pause to anyone advocating for massive increases in government aid to Africa. From Saturday’s London (UK) Telegraph : The scale of the task facing Tony Blair in his drive to help Africa was laid bare yesterday when it emerged that Nigeria’s past...
Reagan voted greatest American
Ronald Reagan was voted the Greatest American in history by a slim margin by a Discovery Channel program, barely beating out Abraham Lincoln. Martin Luther King, Jr., George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin rounded out the top 5. Of course, I’m not sure how much credence should be lent to a list whose top 100 included such luminaries as Tom Cruise, Ellen DeGeneres, Brett Favre, Dr. Phil, and Michael Moore. In any case, when Ronald Reagan passed away last year, Acton...
How religious right, left can work together
The Detroit News included a statement from me, along with two of their Faith and Policy columnists, reacting to a Washington Post story by Alan Cooperman about cooperation between religious leaders from the political left and right. Here’s my bit: The Washington Post’s article about the prospects for rapprochement between religious conservatives and liberals gets to the heart of the “cold war” that has existed between these groups for so long. The historic intractability of both sides has led to...
Ruling on the Decalogue
I have to admit that I’ve never been able to get that fired up about the controversies surrounding the various public displays of the Decalogue. It no doubt has to do with my view that it is far more important for the law to be written on our hearts rather than on stone (see for example Jeremiah 31:27-40). It’s all (on both sides) struck me as a little to much like public posturing, and for the Christian conservatives who support...
Sacred/secular strife in the public square
The battle over public displays of the 10 Commandments indicates to me just how much ground Christians have given up in recent years. Radical secularists have attacked any and all public expressions of Christian faith, most often by means of the “T” word (theocracy) and appeals to the “wall of separation.” What Samuel Gregg calls “doctrinaire secularism” is winning. It has gotten to the point that identifiably or uniquely Christian expressions have been all but expunged from, or at best...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved