Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: The American Rescue Plan, the child tax credit, and child poverty
Explainer: The American Rescue Plan, the child tax credit, and child poverty
Jan 14, 2026 1:14 AM

On Thursday, President Joe Biden signed the American Rescue Plan, one day after the House of Representatives passed the $1.9 trillion stimulus by a vote of 220-211. Its supporters, especially those on the Religious Left, assert that the bill’s changes to the child tax credit represent the best way to reduce child poverty. What changes does the American Rescue Plan make to child tax credit? How much money could families expect to get, and when? Is the glowing analysis of its impact true? Or are other policies more effective at limiting – or virtually eradicating – child poverty?

Here are the facts you need to know.

What is the current child tax credit?

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 allows parents with at least $2,500 in e to claim a child tax credit of up to $2,000 for each American child aged 16 or younger. If the CTC would exceed the amount of e tax the parents owe, they could receive up to $1,400 as a refundable child tax credit. This amount is limited to 15% of e and is indexed to inflation.

How does the American Rescue Plan change the child tax credit (CTC)?

The American Rescue Plan expands the child tax credit in its amount, payout, and age and e eligibility. The bill includes a one-year, fully refundable child tax credit amounting to $3,000 for children age 6-17, or $3,600 for children under 6. The ARP increases the CTC by raising the age of eligibility one year, to 17, eliminating the $2,500 minimum e requirement, and allowing parents to receive the full amount even if the refund would be greater than the amount of taxes they owe.

Rather than relieving parents of their tax burden, the American Rescue Plan sets up the child tax credit as a wealth transfer payment.

The Biden administration plans to pay this credit upfront, possibly in monthly increments beginning this summer, rather than in one lump sum when parents file their taxes next year.

How would expanding the child tax credit impact U.S. child poverty?

The ARP’s alteration of the child tax credit would reduce the percentage of American child living poverty from 13.6% to 6.1%, according to an estimate from theCenter on Poverty & Social Policy at Columbia University. If these estimates are right, that’s a potential reduction of nearly 45%.

What have religious groups said about this?

Members of the Religious Left have used this estimated poverty reduction as a justification to support the American Rescue Plan. “Expanding the CTC would do more to reduce hunger and poverty among our nation’s children than any single policy has in decades,” said the anti-hunger nonprofit Bread for the World. “Families receiving up to $3,600 per child would be a lifeline,” said the Network Lobby for Catholic Social Justice of the abortion-funding bill.

Some figures portrayed passing the bill as fulfilling mandments. “As we work our way through these troubled times, we must continue to heed God’s call to care for the ‘least among us,” said Rev. Eugene Cho, president and CEO of Bread for the World.Rev. Jim Wallis, the founder of Sojourners, said the bill would fix “the reversal of biblical values and priorities” that allegedly prevailed heretofore. Sojourners lobbied Congress to pass the ARP in its capacity as a member of the Circle of Protection, whose stated goal is “to form a Circle of Protection around [government]programs that meet the essential needs of hungry and poor people” – indicating that its members entertain only a narrow range of permissible, government-centered solutions to social problems.

Does anything reduce child poverty more than an expanded child tax credit?

If accurate, a 45% reduction in child poverty would represent a significant reduction; however, another mechanism would cut child poverty faster and deeper than this much-celebrated legislation. Having one member of the household who works full time eliminates nearly 100% of all child poverty. The Fraser Institute found in its report “The Causes of Poverty” that only 1.7% of Canadians who live in a home where someone works full time live below the poverty level. Those who live in a home that follows the “Success Sequence” – with people who graduate high school, work full time, and wait until marriage before having children – have less than a 1% poverty rate (0.9%, specifically).

What is the biggest impediment to people finding a full-time job today?

The most easily solved hindrances to full-time work today are government policies stifling job creation, especially oppressive COVID-19 lockdown orders. Despite the fact that science has since shown the coronavirus is deadliest to a narrow subset of the population, lawmakers have opted to cling to their lockdown powers, keeping businesses and schools shuttered.

The effects have been devastating. Up to 60% of businesses that shut their doors during the pandemic will close permanently. These orders have disproportionately harmed munities. Fully one-quarter of all black-owned businesses that closed due to COVID-19 have yet to reopen. They have also destroyed social capital. One of every five churches face permanent closure, according to Barna Group President David Kinnaman.

Lawmakers intended the Paycheck Protection Program to alleviate the pressure caused by artificial, government-mandated business closures. However, PPP funds often went to powerful and well-connected businesses that needed the money least. A mere 1% of businesses received more than a quarter of all PPP loans; 600 businesses each received the maximum loan amount of $10 million.

Worse yet, the American Rescue Plan originally included a measure to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., led seven more of her Democratic colleagues in giving that portion of the bill a curt thumbs down. A $15 minimum wage would disproportionately lock young, minority, and less educated Americans out of the job market, creating an army of welfare recipients dependent on the government for their daily bread.

Why is work important?

Work allows an individual “to provide a dignified livelihood for himself and his family,” according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. It also stabilizes society by making all members feel invested in its success. “There is no peace without employment,”saidPope Francis on the sixtieth anniversary of the Treaty of Rome.

Are there other benefits to work?

Work expresses the creativity that God embedded within every member of the human race. “In work, the person exercises and fulfills in part the potential inscribed in his nature,” the catechism adds. Work enables each person “toprolong the work of creation by subduing the earth” and “make legitimate use of his talents to contribute to the abundance that will benefit all.”

What’s the bottom line?

All Americans want to reduce child poverty. However, that goal does not justify every means. It does not outweigh the immorality of voting for a bill that subjects hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to funding for abortion-on-demand. Nor would it mitigate the cost of the vast majority of the bill, which has nothing to do with COVID-19 and will only burden future generations with pounding debt. For our purposes, the American Rescue Plan could further stymie the greatest child poverty-reducing mechanism known to man: full-time work.

While American families deserve support and relief from the artificial employment crisis triggered by political leaders’ lockdown orders, true fulfillment will e from a government check.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Faith-based funding politicizes religion
Rev. Robert A. Sirico looks at the Bush Faith-Based Initiative following the departure of Jim Towey, who headed the office. “I would far rather see a president rally people to give more to charity than rally voters to support government programs that go to religious organizations, and to create incentives and lessen penalties when they do give,” Rev. Sirico writes. Read Rev. mentary here. ...
Subsidiarity in action
In January, I wrote about the Central Plains wildfires as a very personal crisis in my Oklahoma hometown. I underscored the importance of subsidiarity, which is the idea that a central authority should perform only those tasks which cannot be handled effectively at a more immediate or local level. I’ve now had opportunity to practice subsidiarity in Oklahoma. And I can tell you, it’s harder to do than to talk or write about in the abstract. The preceding months of...
Improving Catholic education
For Catholics, few doubt the importance of quality Catholic secondary education. However, many know that the current state of Catholic secondary education in America leaves much to be desired. The question that naturally rises is “what can concerned people do to enact serious improvement?” The Acton Institute offers at least one solution. The Catholic High School Honor Roll is a unique evaluation system that assesses the overall quality of Catholic high schools based on academic excellence, Catholic identity, and civic...
Religious liberty in Japan
For the past several decades in the United States many parents have gravitated toward one extreme or the other in terms of allowing religion in public schools. It is generally understood these days that our public school system is not a religious organization, and should not promote one religion as a state religion, over others. Of course, this does not mean that morality or other ideas that call on the revelation of religion cannot be taught, but we try to...
Acton scholars on the immigration debate
Two Acton scholars, Andrew Yuengert and Fr. Paul Hartmann, were interviewed on “The World Over” (EWTN Studios) last Friday, April 28, about the Catholic response to immigration rights. Yuengert, author of the Acton monograph “Inhabiting the Land,” emphasizes the dignity of the human person as a foundation for looking at the issues surrounding immigration. Yuengert says that the “right to migrate” is not an absolute right, but to prevent people from assisting immigrants in need is immoral. e because they...
Ecobits
Two quick bits for your Tuesday: – Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? CRC says so! – Is “steady state ecological economics” the answer to environmental and economic woes? [also, a quick thanks to Jordan for inviting me to join the PowerBlog team.] Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? But the three organizations CRC singles out have an agenda that goes beyond education and is the equivalent of lobbying, Kendall contends. FREE, for example, describes itself...
The long arm of corruption
As the immigration debate mentators dig deeper in the search for the “sources of the problem.” Many have rightly pointed out that a healthier Mexican economy would alleviate the need that spurs many Mexicans to seek financial recourse across the border. Whatever one’s views on the current debate, we ought to be able to agree that a more prosperous Mexico would be beneficial for everyone. But then others have correctly noted that talk about the Mexican economy is really a...
Spelling relief II
Jordan pretty well covered the territory in his earlier post on gas prices. But with the silliness from both Republicans and Democrats ongoing, it can’t hurt to suggest two additional sensible treatments of the subject: Thomas Nugent on National Review Online, and Jerry Taylor of the Cato Institute on Fox News. ...
Coercing charity
This section from Reinhold Niebuhr’s Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics strikes me as quite true: The coercive factors, in distinction to the more purely moral and rational factors, in political relations can never be sharply differentiated and defined. It is not possible to estimate exactly how much a party to a social conflict is influenced by a rational argument or by the threat of force. It is impossible, for instance, to know what proportion...
Clear thinking on immigration
Andrew Yuengert, the author of Inhabiting the Land – The Case for the Right to Migrate, the Acton study on immigration, looks at the current debate and debunks mon misconceptions. “The biggest burdens from immigration are not economic – they are the turmoil caused by the large numbers of illegal immigrants,” Yuengert writes. Read mentary here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved