Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How ‘neo-socialism’ brings class warfare to life today
How ‘neo-socialism’ brings class warfare to life today
Sep 10, 2025 7:11 AM

Democratic socialism is on the rise America, as evidenced by the popularity of politicians like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as well as the mainstreaming of various collectivist policies. Many have shrugged at the movement, explaining it away as a far cry from the blood-soaked tyrannies of yore. But while the practical differences are certainly significant, many of the basic moral impulses remain the same, bent toward a particular ideal of social control and deconstructionism across individual and institutional life.

In a recent paper for the Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, Ayaan Hirsi Ali takes aim at the economic and moral problems of such efforts, arguing that democratic capitalism remains the best solution, “not only for its economic efficiency, but also for its moral superiority and the possibilities it provides for humans to flourish.”

“Democratic capitalism, in the framework of the rule of law and respect for individual rights, has benefited billions of human beings,” writes Ali. “It allows for gradual, incremental progress to remedy legitimate grievances as they arise. Until a better alternative can credibly be proposed, these are the institutions that we should celebrate – and defend.”

Raised in the Somali Democratic Republic, Ali is no stranger to these forces. She has experienced the failures of collectivism firsthand — economically, socially, and at every level of society.

She reflects on her mother, whose daily life largely consisted of “standing in line for hours on end to receive the daily ration of food allotted by the government.” Such lines were useful for the planning elite, she explains, reminding citizens of their dependency on the collectivist machine. “I recall that my mother and grandmother felt a sense of bafflement, indignity, and real powerlessness as a result of this daily grind,” Ali explains. It’s a telling portrait of how individual subjugation can stifle munity, undermining the real sources of provision through top-down organization.

Yet such injustice went beyond material devastation and individualized pain. Pressed by the state’s various restrictions, some Somalians would eventually express their creativity in other ways. “They began to smuggle, scheme, game the system, and lie,” Ali explains. Predictably, state officials were happy to modate such behavior, leading to a system wherein the wealthy and well-connected consolidated their control through the power of the state. By overemphasizing equality in select areas, they inevitably neglected it elsewhere:

The system of scientific socialism as implemented by the government did not result in equality and justice. On the contrary, it was the people with the strongest political connections to the government and to influential clans who were most empowered under the system. A system that claimed to empower the marginalized and dispossessed showed an astonishing lack passion for precisely the least-connected people.

You had to “know someone,” invariably someone who was not accountable to the public. What I witnessed in those days was the very opposite of equality and justice. There was tremendous inequality and tremendous injustice. Siad munist regime brutally repressed dissidents, as did other authoritarian socialist regimes of the twentieth century.

Ali proceeds to highlight other case studies across the world, from Venezuela, to Cuba, to China, to various Eastern European states. “In every implementation and expression of authoritarian socialism, individual freedom has been promised for a utopian and unattainable collective idea,” she concludes. “The sheer number of failed socialist experiments raises important questions about politics, economics, justice, and human nature.”

So, how do the more recent pare?

On economics, today’s so-called socialists are noticeably softer, to be sure. Yes, they will promote lavish social welfare programs and seek to control certain sectors, but in doing so, they will also hem and haw about the legitimacy of capitalism, occasionally praising the good of private ownership. Very few will advocate for outright state ownership of the means of production, carefully cloaking their vocabulary with the typical qualifiers about how the authoritarian socialists simply did it wrong. The economic ideas are still heavily clouded by fatal conceits, but if there is a revolutionary aspect to all this, it seems to stem from something deeper.

For Ali, our modern “grievance politics” is the key — fixed on zero-sum battles against various oppressors fueled by the arbitrary ideals of the age.

Whereas “the socialism of the twentieth century was primarily economic in orientation,” Ali explains, today’s “neosocialism” takes its cues from the current streams of identity politics, seeking to politicize multiple aspects daily life. In our new “crisis of history,” we are no longer confined to a struggle between proletariat and bourgeoisie but are part of a larger war among an amorphous array of peting classes” – social, economic, religious, racial, and otherwise.

This isn’t to say there aren’t distinct struggles among distinct classes in American life. Likewise, it isn’t to say that such struggles aren’t often perpetuated by select clusters of the entrenched and well-connected. It’s simply to note that socialism finds its remedy in exacerbating these tensions. Rather than managing our differences and disagreements in a context of ordered liberty, it seeks to squeeze us into a unified collective, promoting false notions of “equality” that, in application, diminish our cultural diversity and prod us ever closer to lifeless conformity.

“Just as in the socialism of old, the individual and his own moral contributions are [still] devalued,” she explains. “What matters, once again, is the group (the collective tribe) to which an individual belongs. Again, these collective groups are either oppressive or oppressed, and an individual’s moral worth is determined by looking at the group or groups to which he belongs. Capitalism, with its emphasis on individualism, meritocracy, and color-blindness, is patible with this worldview.”

Today’s democratic socialists relish the glories of popular control, seeking to distinguish themselves from their authoritarian forebearers. But democracy does little to correct for such targeted violations of individual freedom. Indeed, when tied to our current climate of mob politics, democracy serves to highlight socialism’s core flaws in uniquely destructive ways — expanding and diversifying our class warfare well beyond the typical categories of rich vs. poor, even if it is felt primarily at the levels of munity and social media warfare.

“The rise of tribalism, identity politics, critical race theory; the ideological bent of gender studies, the focus of intersectionality on collective blocs rather than the human individual – all of these correlate with the rise of a new socialism,” Ali explains. “Consequently, we are at risk of losing the ideal of a universal humanity, which can be based only on a respect for individuals, regardless of their backgrounds and attributes.”

It doesn’t represent our only tribal temptation, of course, particularly now that populists and nationalists have found their own footholds in American identity politics, each boasting their own ironic bits of Marxist revolutionary flair. But given the their heightened position across institutional life – the academy, the media, business, and elsewhere – the neosocialists hold cultural sway that seems likely to endure, regardless of whether it has any successes in the realm of “practical politics.”

The more we hastily divide our neighbors into groups of “oppressed” vs. “oppressor,” elevating collective conformity as the only way forward, the less justice we are likely to see across all spheres of society. Even if the “market” or “democracy” aren’t being dismantled directly in favor of Venezuelan-style economic autocracy, the social and relational ripple effects of these cultural movements will inevitably mirror the values at the heart of those tired economic aims.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
New York Times and Flat-Earth Economics: Does Government Create Jobs?
Washington Post columnist Robert Samuelson says everyone seems to understand that the private sector creates jobs. Everyone, that is, except the New York Times. Samuelson calls the Times’ decree of government job creation “simplistic” and that it has a “flat-earth quality”. He explains that if the government adds jobs – expands government – es at taxpayer expense. But if the people whose money is taken via taxation or borrowing had kept the money, they would have spent most or all...
“Integral Human Development” Deadline Approaches
For next spring’s issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality, we’ve planned a special issue devoted to the theme “Integral Human Development,” guest edited by Peter Heslam and Manfred Spieker. The deadline for submissions is December 1, a month away as of today. Details about submission procedures can be found on the JMM website. Check out the full CFP at the site as well, and consider the following from Caritas in Veritate: In the present social and cultural context,...
Orthodox Thoughts on the 2012 Election
V. Rev. Paul Jannakos offers an Orthodox perspective on the ing election: As Orthodox Christians we bear witness to Christ in all dimensions of life. This includes participation in civic life, where as citizens of this country we elect into office those who aspire towards the work of public service on both the local and federal levels. We do not deny that the democratic electoral process is a wonderful gift given to us as citizens of the United States. We...
Always Reforming, Without Tarrying
Today is Reformation Day, and I wanted to pass along a quote that I have found to embody a valuable perspective about the imperative to always be seeking reform of one’s own life and manners, without needing to tarry for broader social or political change. The quote appears in the newly-published translation of a work by the Dutch Reformed theologian Herman Bavinck, The Christian Family, which originally appeared in 1908. The point of departure is his exploration of the institution...
The Timeliness of Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Freedom
Vatican II’s Declaration on Religious Freedom is just as timely today as it was fifty years ago, argues Joanna Bogle: Religious freedom is the issue of the hour: in America, in Europe, in what we (used to?) think of as “the West”. But what is particularly interesting is that es just as we are marking the 50thanniversary of the opening of the Second Vatican Council – the Council in which the Church explored the whole question of religious freedom and...
Government Jobs and Social Uplift
In the Nov/Dec issue of Touchstone, I have a piece on the issue of whether government jobs can act as a lever for opportunity and social mobility. My answer is a highly qualified “yes” with a number of cultural caveats. Love to get reactions from the munity. The good people at Touchstone published this one online. You can read it here. Here’s a teaser: The question is whether the modern liberal approach to improving the quality of citizens’ lives by...
Helping Without Hesitating or Hurting
Everyone agrees that during times of natural disaster, people need help. With “Superstorm Sandy” pummeling the eastern third of the U.S., it is easy to see that many people will need aid in the form of food, clothing, shelter and other basic necessities, and we are obliged to help. But we should be smart about it. Brian Fikkert, author of “When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty Without Hurting the Poor…or Yourself”, gives three reasonable guidelines for helping in these...
The Ethics of ‘Price Gouging’
After declaring a state of emergency in the wake of Hurricane Sandy, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie issued a forceful reminder to merchants: Price gouging during a state of emergency is illegal and will result in significant penalties. Price gouging—raising prices during an emergency condition over their normal level—is illegal in many states. But is it unethical? Jordan Ballor addressed that question in 2005 after Hurricane Katrina: Raising prices for modities during an emergency situation smacks of opportunism at best....
Rev. Sirico: How to Think Clearly About Social Justice
On Oct. 4, Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, spoke about social justice at the 2012 Hillsdale College Free Market Forum in Houston. The theme of the Forum, which encourages the study of free enterprise by bringing scholars together for dynamic exchanges of ideas on topics related to free market economics, was “Markets, Government, and the Common Good.” Rev. Sirico spoke about the evolved meaning of the phrase “social justice,” explaining the current usage of...
Ladies, let’s take our dignity to the voting booth
In 1920, millions of American women exercised their right to vote for the first time. It was the culmination of decades of work by women from varying backgrounds and just as varied goals. However, they all shared a vision that women should be part of the political process in the United States. One woman was Susan B. Anthony. Described passionate and having a keen mind, she was a fierce abolitionist and led the legal crusade to allow women to keep...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved