Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: Obama’s New Overtime Rule
Explainer: Obama’s New Overtime Rule
Jan 27, 2026 7:50 PM

What just happened?

On May 18, the Obama administration announced the publication of a new Department of Labor rule updating and expanding overtime regulations.

Why did the overtime rule change?

Since the 1930s some white collar jobs (i.e., those performed in an administrative setting) have been exempt from the overtime requirement. The white collar exemption salary level was adjusted in 2004 to $455 per week or $23,660a year. The new rule will entitle most salaried white collar workers earning less than $913 a week ($47,476 a year) to overtime pay.

The rule also updates the total pensation level above which most white collar workers will be ineligible for overtime. The final rule raises this level to the 90th percentile of full-time salaried workers nationally, or from the current $100,000 to $134,004 a year

The salary threshold will also automatically be updated every three years, beginningJanuary 1, 2020. Each update will raise the standard threshold to the 40th percentile of full-time salaried workers in the lowest-wage Census region, estimated to be $51,168 in 2020.

How is overtime pay determined?

Unless covered by another exemption, employees covered by the FLSA must receive overtime pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek at a rate not less than one and one-half times their regular rate of pay.

What gives President Obama the authority to regulate overtime pay?

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. This federal statute introduced the forty-hour work week, established a national minimum wage, and guaranteed “time-and-a-half” for overtime in certain jobs. When he signed the original bill into law, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said that, next to the Social Security Act, it was the most important act passed during the New Deal era.

In March 2014, President Obama directed the Secretary of Labor to update the overtime regulations to “reflect once again the intent of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and to simplify and modernize the rules so they’re easier for workers and businesses to understand and apply.”

How many people will be affected?

The federal government estimates that over 4 million workers will be affected within the first year of implementation.

When does the new rule go into effect?

December 1, 2016.

What are some of the negative effects of this policy?

For an explanation of five ways this rule will hurt workers, see here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Vatican Roves Far Afield with Central World Bank Idea
Kishore Jayabalan, director of Istituto Acton in Rome, is quoted extensively in a story about the Vatican’s note on economic centralization written by Edward Pentin, a reporter for the National Catholic Register. If you wonder why the Acton Institute is around — why we feel the need to connect your good intentions with sound economics — well, Kishore explains: Kishore Jayabalan… ed the Vatican’s attempt to deal with the economic crisis, but he said their conclusions were based on “political...
Rev. Sirico: The Vatican’s Monetary Wisdom
In the Wall Street Journal, Acton Institute President and Co-Founder Rev. Robert A. Sirico looks at the recent “note” on economics released this week by the Vatican. The document, titled “Toward Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of a Global Public Authority,” was published with an eye toward the ing G-20 meeting in Cannes, France, on Nov. 3-4. This 18-page document has, Rev. Sirico observes, “been celebrated by advocates of bigger government the world over.” But...
Vatican’s Call for Central World Bank: What the Left Misses
Samuel Gregg is quoted in today’s New York Times story about the Vatican note calling for a central world bank — he gives the final word on the document. The “politically liberal Catholics” quoted before him reveal that they have missed a crucial distinction in the document produced by the Pontifical Council for Peace and Justice. Gregg, of course has picked up on that distinction; he wrote yesterday: Putting aside doctrinal questions, this text also makes claims of a more...
Government Greed Needs an ‘Occupation’ Too
In mentary this week, I used Louisiana as one of the backdrops to shine the light on government greed. I first became fascinated with the political scene in the Pelican State when I moved down to the Mississippi Gulf Coast. I stayed up late one night in 1996 watching C-Span2 while Woody Jenkins, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, appeared to have his election stolen. I was hooked from that point on. Former Louisiana governor Earl Long once remarked, “When...
Cardinal Pell: Climate Hysteria is Hubristic
Today, George Cardinal Pell delivered a lecture at the invitation of the Global Warming Policy Foundation titled “Eppur’ si muove, or ‘yet it moves:’ One Christian Perspective on Climate Change.” He insisted that a scientific consensus is a lazy basis for the making of policy, and that before states impose drastic environmental regulations, an analysis of their demonstrable costs and benefits must be undertaken. Galileo is supposed to have muttered the lecture’s title after recanting his heliocentrism in the face...
Frank Schaeffer’s Fundamentalist Fakery
Frank Schaeffer: Bachmann, Palin, Perry Use Religion Like Snake Oil Salesmen (2011) Remaining Orthodox in a Secular World : A Sermon by Frank Schaeffer (2002) Mark Tooley, president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD), has a story on about Frank Schaeffer’s call for the Occupy Wall Street protesters to go after evangelical Christians. Schaeffer is the son of evangelical theologian Francis Schaeffer (1912-1984). Tooley: A blogger for The Huffington Post, young Schaeffer is now faulting religious conservatives for...
‘Central World Bank’ Would Hurt Cardinal Turkson’s Native Ghana
Last summer, Acton’s PovertyCure team traveled to Ghana to meet with its economists and entrepreneurs — the men and women who are helping the country develop. It just so happens that they also met briefly with Peter Cardinal Turkson, president of the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Peace and Justice and co-author of the note released yesterday that has stirred up a global controversy. Cardinal Turkson, a native of Ghana, calls for the establishment of a central world bank in his...
In Philadelphia, A Model School Kindles Hope
For too long government-run systems have dominated American primary and secondary education. As innovations of the past two decades such as charter schools and vouchers prove, parents, children, and society benefit when government promotes rather than stifles educational reform based on choice petition. Add to the mounting evidence another success story: St. Martin de Porres school in Philadelphia. This inner city school is finding new life through the cooperation of three not-always-cooperative entities: munity, and government. Read the rest of...
Vatican Releases Note on Global Financial Reform
This morning the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace issued a bold statement advising how to bring order to the global financial crisis. I was in attendance at the much anticipated press conference that was organized to debrief reporters on the statement’s content. The statement came in the form of a “Nota” (“Note” in Vatican terms): Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of Global Public Authority. The President and Secretary of the Council, together with...
Samuel Gregg: Cardinal Pell’s Intellectual Fortitude Is Refreshing
Acton’s director of research, Samuel Gregg, blogs about Cardinal Pell’s speech on global warming over at The Corner. He summarizes the remarks and then provides their ecclesiastical context, defending both the cardinal and the Pope from the radical left and from charges of submission to intellectual fashion. [Pells] key points are simply that (1) the scientific debate is not over, (2) the climate movement has always seemed more driven by ideology than evidence, and (3) this isn’t a basis for...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved