Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
AOC’s blacklist has no place in the workplace
AOC’s blacklist has no place in the workplace
Jan 29, 2026 11:47 PM

Economists and ethicists agree: A worker should be evaluated by the job he does, not his political views. But the more politicized life es, the greater the chance petent employee will lose his or her job because of his private political views. Politicians like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez propose blacklisting their political foes, potentially including tens of millions of people, over politics. In an Orwellian twist of fate, the best employees may be fired precisely because they perform their job to the best of their ability.

An example appears to be playing out in the firing of Portsmouth, Virginia, Police Chief Angela Greene. As I wrote recently at FEE.org:

The town’s progressive leadershipfiredAngela Greene after she pressed charges against rioters who decapitated andpulled downa Confederate statue,striking a middle-aged black manin the head. The injury left the man atose, caused him toflatline twiceas hisbrainswelled dangerously, and required months of therapy to teach him towalk and talk again. City officials fired Greene on [last]Monday morning, a little more than two months after placing her on paid leave. She said she plans to sue.

There is more to the story. One of the people Greene crossed happens to be State Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth, a 28-year incumbent and the present president pro tempore of the Virginia state Senate.

Body camera footage of the June 10 protest shows Sen. Lucas telling Chief Greene that a connection in city government had authorized the mob to vandalize the Confederate statue (although it is not clear that a politician can unilaterally repeal laws against vandalism and destruction of property). Then-Portsmouth City Manager Lydia Pettis “Patton just gave permission though me. You need to give her a call,” Lucas told Greene.

“I’m telling you, you can’t arrest them,” Lucas instructed police. “You can’t stop them. This is city property.”

Greene tried to call Patton, who did not respond. “I had no other alternative but to await confirmation or denial from city leaders in order to prevent a false arrest or incite the crowd, who were told they could damage the property by an elected official,” Greene said. The police force froze in uncertainty because of political leaders’ nonfeasance.

After the protest turned tragic, Patton denied giving Lucas permission to vandalize the statue. If true, Sen. Lucas appears to have lied to a police officer, a Class 1 misdemeanor under Virginia state law. Instead of prosecuting her, Patton pinned the blame for the accident squarely on Greene for failing to prevent demonstrators from tearing down the statue. At the same time, city officials made it clear they would not press charges against the vandals for the unauthorized property destruction, which left a black man with permanent, life-altering injuries.

Greene then exercised her legal duty to charge more than a dozen people, including Lucas, with violating the law. It was her job, Greene explained. “I vowed to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and promised to faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent upon me, to the best of my ability,” she said. “As the head of the primary law enforcement agency in the City of Portsmouth, it is my obligation to investigate all crimes that have occurred, and when probable cause exists, present that evidence for the prosecution, which is what was done in this matter.”

For her trouble, city officials placed Greene on months-long, paid leave before firing her last Monday. Her colleagues promptly rushed to her defense. “The decision to terminate Chief Greene’s employment, made and announced by [new] Portsmouth City Manager Lavoris Pace, was unbelievable and unjust,” the Fraternal Order of Police said in a statement reported late last week. “No one was held responsible mitting a crime which resulted in destructive property damage and a citizen being severely injured.”

The same day the city terminated Greene, Portsmouth Commonwealth’s Attorney Stephanie Morales dropped the charges against Lucas, et. al. Former Gov. Terry McAuliffe turned the tables and accused Greene of engaging in a “despicable political persecution.”

Greene’s ouster did not satisfy some local leaders, who now demand that the city investigate any remaining police officers who helped prepare these charges – as instructed by their boss, Chief Greene. Their only apparent crime is demanding equal justice apply to a popular, powerful politico; defending the sanctity of property rights; and performing their duties without partiality.

Their plight is our plight. Potentially millions more Americans will lose their vocations, if political leaders get their way. As the FEE article notes, a number of national political figures including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have suggested that Trump administration alumni – or possibly anyone who voted for the sitting president – should never hold another job.

The FEE article details five reasons employment discrimination harms society. Two of these points illustrate how viewpoint discrimination hurts the would-be employer, including a summary of the groundbreaking work of economist Gary S. Becker. The article concludes:

For economic as well as philosophical and moral reasons, we should oppose viewpoint discrimination in secular education and employment. … Among [our unalienable] rights is the right to be judged on our performance, not our political orthodoxy.

You can read the whole article here.

The ability to work allows people to use their God-given gifts to serve others, meet the needs of society, and support themselves and their families. The free market honors this undertaking, crowns it with abundance, and multiplies the opportunities for mutual service. Politics constricts, rations, and denies these opportunities in the service of ideological – or, more often, starkly personal – ends. If political leaders can deny justice to law enforcement, none of us will remain unscathed.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
International Governance in Caritas in Veritate and The Road to Serfdom
In his new encyclical, Caritas in Veritate, Pope Benedict XVI calls for an international political authority, “so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth.” He tasks it with issues like human rights, ensuring access to necessities including food and water, and managing the global economy. What might an effective international governing body look like? The Nobel laureate economist Friedrich Hayek asked the same question in 1944 in his book, The Road to Serfdom. Seeing his...
Caritas in Veritate Not a Leftist Manifesto
A number of journalists and some pundits on the religious left are aiming to own Caritas in Veritate, the new papal encyclical on economics. To them, the encyclical is a polemic against globalization and even the free market itself. Jacqueline Salmon over at the Washington Post’s “On Faith” page, quotes Vincent Miller, a professor who characterizes the encyclical as a “trenchant critique of capitalism,” before she claims that Caritas in Veritate “places the usually conservative pontiff on the left as...
A Theory of Gift, Duty, and Rights Based on Caritas in Veritate
One of Pope Benedict XVI’s great emphases in his new social encyclical, Caritas in Veritate, is the idea of gift. A gift is something that we have received without earning. As the Pope wisely notes, “The human being is made for gift,” even though man is often “wrongly convinced that he is the sole author of himself, his life and society.” The truth is that we are not the authors of our own lives. We did not earn or create...
Caritas in Veritate: How to Help the Poor
Throughout Caritas in Veritate there is a strong message to help the poor. This is an age old belief held by many. It can be found throughout the Bible and is preached by Christians and members of differing faiths. What was interesting and refreshing to hear in this new encyclical was how Pope Benedict XVI renewed this call for helping the poor. What has e mon theme presently is to provide aid to poor countries that gets funneled directly to...
Caritas in Veritate: Doing Justice – Benedict’s Way
As the squabbling continues over the at-times contradictory policy-suggestions contained in Benedict XVI’s social encyclical, there’s a risk that the deeper – and more important – theological themes of the text will be overlooked. It’s also possible some of the wider implications for the Catholic Church’s own self-understanding and the way it consequently approaches questions of justice will be neglected. For historical perspective, we should recall that before, during, and after the Second Vatican Council there was – and remains...
Resource Page on Caritas in Veritate
Recently the Acton Institute dedicated a resource page on its website to Pope Benedict XVI’s new social encyclical, Caritas in Veritate. The resource page contains blog posts and articles about Caritas in Veritate from policy experts and staff members from the Acton Institute. Furthermore the resource page will be updated with new content and provide an in-depth analysis on Caritas in Veritate. ...
Zenit: Abela on Caritas in Veritate
Andrew Abela, 2009 Novak Award recipient from the Acton Institute, offered a business perspective on Pope Benedict XVI’s new social encyclical, Caritas in Veritate, to the Catholic news service Zenit. In the interview, Abela talked about ways the encyclical could point the way out of the global financial crisis: ZENIT: Does the Holy Father give any concrete means for digging ourselves out of the economic crisis? Abela: Yes. It seems to me that the Holy Father is saying that trust...
Quick Conservative Protestant Take on Caritas in Veritate
I remember once reading an author who began by saying that he wasn’t a big fan of Paul. I was offended by that because I thought, “Who are you to pronounce yourself a non-fan of Paul? Furthermore, who cares whether you’re a fan of Paul?” I say this because I have been reading Caritas in Veritate by Pope Benedict. As I read, I find I agree and disagree with different portions of it. I can imagine a Catholic saying, “Who...
Roundtable on Caritas in Veritate
A round up mentary on the new encyclical was published yesterday on the Web site of Catholic World Report. CWR asked “a group of leading Catholic intellectuals to reflect on the encyclical, its place in the larger body of Catholic social teaching, and Pope Benedict’s vision of a well-ordered and just society.” Those who contributed included J. Brian Benestad, Francis J. Beckwith, Father Joseph Fessio, S.J., Richard Garnett, Thomas S. Hibbs, Paul Kengor, George Neumayr, Tracey Rowland, Father James V....
Caritas in Veritate: Not the Left’s Encyclical
It was, I suppose, inevitable. The moment Benedict XVI’s social encyclical appeared, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, USA Today, and the usual suspects predictably portrayed Caritas in Veritate as a “left-wing” text. It reflects their habit of presenting the Catholic Church as “conservative” on moral questions and “liberal” on economics. That’s their script, and until the day that the Internet juggernaut deals its final death-blow to the mainstream media, they will stick to it. Unfortunately, there has also...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved