Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
10 facts about the 100th anniversary of women’s suffrage in the UK
10 facts about the 100th anniversary of women’s suffrage in the UK
Aug 26, 2025 1:38 PM

Women in the UK received the right to vote for the first time 100 years ago today: February 6, 1918. Numerous cities are celebrating the centenary today and throughout the season. Here are the facts you need to know:

The “Representation of the People Act” proposed the right for British women to vote – but only if they were over the age of 30, a property or homeowner, and a member of or married to a member of the Local Government Register, or were a university graduate voting in a university constituency. The bill also reformed male voting by removing most property qualifications for men over 21, and allowed men to vote as young as age 19 if they served in the armed forces. It received royal assent on February 6, 1918.Women could already vote in nations including Finland, Norway, Denmark, and Australia.British women would receive the same voting rights as men in 1928.Like the U.S. civil rights movement, many of the suffragettes cited spiritual reasons for their activism. Helena Swanwick wrote, “[L]et there be no mistake about it – this movement was not primarily political; it was social, moral, psychological, and profoundly religious.” British suffragettes often used Joan of Arc as a symbol.Since the Church of England did not embrace the right of women’s suffrage, more militant leaders planted bombs inside Westminster Abbey, St. Paul’s Cathedral, Rosslyn Chapel, and other Anglican churches. One of these damaged the Coronation Chair and the Stone of Destiny in 1914. Other targets included the Bank of England, the National Gallery, and numerous train stations. However, Women’s Social and Political Union leader Emmeline Pankhurst reportedly gave orders that “not a cat or a canary to be killed: no life.”The Archbishop of Canterbury, Randall Davidson, had privately supported women’s suffrage – but refused to take a stance publicly, for fear of rewarding the suffragettes’ vandalism. He feared the militants would ask if “‘they have even converted a stolid Archbishop?’ whereas in the first place he was fairly converted before.” The Home Secretary, Winston Churchill, likewise assessed that, by the militant suffragettes’ actions, “their cause has marched backwards.”The United States would not allow women to vote until the adoption of the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution on August 26, 1920. However, women could already vote in 15 states.The first female monarch since the passage of the act, Queen Elizabeth II, became queen on February 6, 1952, upon the death of her father, King George VI. Every February 6 memorated as “Accession Day,” as well as remembering the date that women first won the right to vote.The number of female MPs in Parliament hit an all-time high after the June 2017 snap election: 208 of 650 members of the House of Commons are women (119 Labour, 67 Conservative, 12 SNP, and four Liberal Democrats).There have been two female prime ministers of the UK: Margaret Thatcher and Theresa May, both Conservatives.

domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
What Difference Does This Election Make for Religious Hiring Rights?
Stanley Carlson-Thies, president of the Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance, writes in the Nov. 4 IRFA Newsletter: The races haven’t all even been decided yet, and, given the big changes, it will take considerable time for new directions to be settled, so it is far too soon to try to guess how the November 2nd voting will affect national policy. Just a few quick thoughts: Two notable changes in Congress to the benefit of institutional religious freedom: Dan Coats, who served...
A Tale of Two Europes
A new article from Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg published today in Acton News & Commentary. Sign up for the free, weekly email newsletter here. +++++++++ A Tale of Two Europes By Samuel Gregg The word “crisis” is usually employed to indicate that a person or even an entire culture has reached a turning-point which demands decisions: choices that either propel those in crisis towards renewed growth or condemn them to remorseless decline. These dynamics of crisis are especially pertinent...
Audio: Sirico on Subsidiarity, Free Enterprise & the 2010 Elections
Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico took to the airwaves this morning in Chicago on WVON’s Launching Chicago with Lenny McAllister to discuss today’s elections across the country from a Christian perspective. You can listen to the interview using the audio player below, and don’t forget to follow Rev. Sirico on Twitter right here. And don’t forget to vote! [audio: ...
Video: More Highlights from the Acton Institute’s 20th Anniversary Celebration
On October 21st at Acton’s 20th Anniversary Dinner, Richard M. DeVos – Co-Founder of Amway Corporation with his friend Jay Van Andel – was presented with the 2010 Faith and Freedom Award. Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute, cited DeVos for his “decades-long exemplary leadership in business, his dedication to the promotion of liberty, his courage in maintaining and defending the free and virtuous society, and his conviction that the roots of liberty and the...
‘A’ for Austerity: The New Scarlet Letter
I introduced this week’s Acton Commentary yesterday with some thoughts about “The Audacity of Austerity.” In today’s “‘A’ for Austerity: The New Scarlet Letter,” I take to task the attitude embodied by Paul Krugman’s vilification of proponents of austerity measures. Most recently Krugman called such advocates “debt moralizers,” implicitly drawing the connection between austerity measures and “puritanical” virtues like thrift. In this Krugman follows in the spirit of Nathaniel Hawthorne, who indeed has much to answer for in forming the...
Chicago Event: How Ideology Destroys Biblical Ecumenism
For those PowerBlog readers in the Chicago area, I’ll be in town next Tuesday for a luncheon where I’ll be discussing the topic, “How Ideology Destroys Biblical Ecumenism.” The event is sponsored by the Chicago-based ministry ACT 3 and will be held at St. Paul United Church of Christ, 118 S. First Street, Bloomingdale, IL. The event will begin at 11:45am (Tuesday, November 9) and you can register for the luncheon at the ACT 3 website. The point of departure...
Vote Today
“Elections belong to the people. It is their decision. If they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will just have to sit on their blisters.” — Abraham Lincoln (HT: PBS) ...
Three Questions for Putting Politics in its Place
Last week Ray Nothstine and I hosted an Acton on Tap focused on the topic, “Putting Politics in its Place.” For those not able to join us at Derby Station here in Grand Rapids, I’m passing along this essay based on ments. You can find ments here. — — — — — — “Three Questions for Putting Politics in its Place” In my attempt to articulate a way to put politics in its proper place I want to pursue three...
More on Putting Politics in its Place
Last week Jordan Ballor and I offered short addresses to the crowd that gathered for Acton on Tap in Grand Rapids. This is an essay that closely mirrors ments from the event. It’s a sermon of sorts, and a personal testimonial too. — — — — — — Remarks on the “Limit of Politics” for Acton on Tap: I love elections. Elections produce drama, conflict, and intrigue. It produces statements like this by the former Louisiana governor and federal convict...
Speaking of a Principled Basis for Limited Government
My recent posts on politics and austerity and this week’s Acton Commentary refer to a principled basis for limited government. I speak of “the limits of government rooted in a rich and variegated civil society.” Here’s a good statement of that basis from Lord Acton: There are many things government can’t do – many good purposes it must renounce. It must leave them to the enterprise of others. It cannot feed the people. It cannot enrich the people. It cannot...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved