Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
UK Northern Ireland abortion act oversteps legal boundaries: Expert
UK Northern Ireland abortion act oversteps legal boundaries: Expert
Dec 16, 2025 7:08 AM

The UK Parliament has taken a step to overturn legislation on two of the most sensitive issues in politics, in violation of an agreement that grants authority over those issues to a lower level of government. The move to legalize abortion and to allow marriage between members of the same sex in Northern Ireland will “drive a coach and horses through the devolution settlement,” according to one Northern Irish Member of Parliament.

On Tuesday, the House of Commons voted to legalize abortion in Northern Ireland, if a devolved government is not restored in Stormont by October 21. The abortion amendment passed 332-99, while the same-sex marriage vote was383-73. The MPs who voted against the amendment – including Jacob Rees-Mogg– may be found here.Prime Minister Theresa May abstained on both measures. The motion came the same day that an estimated 10,000 people marched in Dublin, in the Republic of Ireland, to support pro-life laws.

While abortion has been legalized in England by the 1967 Abortion Act, Northern Ireland has steadfastly rejected attempts to liberalize the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act. That law, which allows abortions only when the life or permanent health of the mother is at risk, has limited Northern Ireland to amere 12 abortions in 2017-2018.

“This is a deeply sad day as MPs vote to remove legal protection from the most vulnerable members of society,” said Peter Lynas, director of Evangelical Alliance Northern Ireland. “Equality must treat both mother and child fairly and choice must recognise both lives in a pregnancy.”

While the rest of the UK redefined marriage in 2014, the motion has failed in NI although parliament has heldfive voteson the matter.

The key legal issue is that both matters are supposed to be decided by the devolved governments in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Westminster overstepped its legally agreed parameters to impose its will on others, who have repeatedly rebuffed efforts to change their views.

Devolution reflects the principle of subsidiarity, or federalism in the U.S. context. “The purpose of devolution is to allow the different parts of the UK to make laws that are appropriate for that part of the country,” said DUP MP Sir Jeffrey Donaldson.

Roger Kiska analyzes the peril of this action in a new essay forReligion & Liberty Transatlantic. Kiska – who is a solicitor for England and Wales, a member of the Michigan State Bar, and legal counsel for the Christian Legal Centre in London – is uniquely positioned to describe the underlying legal issues, as well as the social strife these amendments are likely to engender.

Kiska writes:

The problem with this political opportunism is that es at an incredibly high price. Peace with Northern Ireland came slowly and violently. The Parliament of the United Kingdom would do well to recall the blood, violence and conflict that precipitated the Good Friday Agreement and the establishment of a devolved system of government in Northern Ireland. It would do well to pay attention to the growing strife there as well, amidst the backdrop of contentious Brexit negotiations which include the controversial backstop question. We need look no further then April of this year for evidence of growing discontent in the region, when journalist Lyra McKee became a casualty of dissident republican riots in Londonderry which have been labelled by security forces as an act of terrorism.

Devolved government, based on the theory of subsidiarity, has been a guarantor of peace and stability. It has assured all parties have a voice in their own government and helped bring peace among people of divergent national and religious backgrounds. This system ought not be discarded for political opportunism.

Read his full essay here.

This photo has been cropped. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Short Reply to Dr. Witt Regarding the Economy
I think the country IS discovering its inner Dave Ramsey. The savings rate keeps going up. People are self-consciously trying to protect themselves from uncertainty. At first, it was to protect against a private sector meltdown. Now, it is an attempt to protect against public sector profligacy. In both cases, this new found habit of saving keeps the economic motor running slow and low. Government attempts to e that instinct are bound to fail. The only thing that will loosen...
Review: The Modern Papacy
Ryan T. Anderson, editor of the Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse site, reviews Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg’s new book, The Modern Papacy, in the Nov. 28 issue of the Weekly Standard. Anderson says the book is “a significant contribution to the study of John Paul and Benedict’s thought.” Excerpt of “The Holy Seers” follows (for plete article, a Weekly Standard subscription is required): Gregg presents John Paul and Benedict as more or less united in the main trajectory of their...
John Stackhouse’s Strange View of the Manhattan Declaration
The well-known evangelical theologian and historian John Stackhouse has added his name to the ranks of Christians who don’t find much to like about the Manhattan Declaration. There is a twist in this case, though. He plaining about the alliance between evangelicals and Catholics, for example. (Thank you, Lord.) However, one of Dr. Stackhouse’s major objections is equally perplexing. While he declares himself to be pro-life and pro-traditional marriage, he believes the call to enshrine those positions in the law...
The Difference Between the U.S. and China
It’s the end of the semester. A degree of giddiness creeps in. My students and I have been working through the political systems of a variety of nations. Yesterday, we talked about China. China is a wonderful subject because any professor pletely sold out to Marxist fantasy gains the license to speak judgmentally about Mao’s ridiculous policies of The Great Leap Forward (in which the nation stopped producing food and tried to manufacture steel in backyards) and The Cultural Revolution...
How to effectively fight poverty
In advance of the Acton Institute’s conference, “Free Enterprise, Poverty, and the Financial Crisis,” which will be held Thursday, Dec. 3, in Rome, the Zenit news agency interviews Dr. Samuel Gregg, Director of Research. Recipe for Ending Poverty: Think, Then Act Scholar Laments Lack of Reflection in Tackling Issue ROME, NOV. 30, 2009 (Zenit.org).- The recipe for alleviating poverty is not a secret, and yet much of the work being done to help the world’s poor is misdirected, according to...
Deacons, Secularism, and the Welfare State
A few weeks ago Hunter Baker posted some thoughts on secularism and poverty, in which he wrote of mon notion that since private charity, particularly church-based care, had failed to end poverty, it seems only prudent to let the government have its chance. Hunter points out some of the critically important elements in creating a culture of prosperity and abundance, what Micah Watson calls “cultural capital.” But it’s worth examining in more detail the point of departure, that is, considering...
School Choice and the Common Good
With Afghanistan, health care, and economic distress devouring the attention of media, politicians, and the electorate, school choice may seem like yesterday’s public policy headline. Yet the problems in America’s education system remain. In fact, plummeting tax revenue highlights the necessity of increasing public school efficiency, while unemployment and falling household es heighten the recruitment challenges facing tuition-funded private schools. And quietly, the movement for school choice—improving education by returning power to parents—continues to make progress. This week, news from...
Religion, Culture, and Humanity
I recently gave an interview to the Georgia Family Council (where I worked as a younger fellow) about my book for their website. Here is an excerpt I think might interest readers: What made you decide to write your book The End of Secularism? I wrote this book for a few reasons. I detected that the moment might be right for someone to lay out a very rigorous critique of secularism. While it was once plausible to people that secularism...
Rand Redivivus?
Heather Wilhelm of the Illinois Policy Institute examines the usefulness of Ayn Rand for political engagement by friends of the market economy in a WSJ op-ed, “Is Ayn Rand Bad for the Market?” She concludes, Rand held some insight on the nature of markets and has sold scads of books, but when es to shaping today’s mainstream assumptions, she is a terrible marketer: elitist, cold and laser-focused on the supermen and superwomen of the world. Wilhelm’s picture of Rand underscores...
Bernanke Versus the Austrians
My essay in today’s American Spectator Online looks at why Ben Bernanke should not be confirmed to a second term as Chairman of the Federal Reserve: Two planks in Bernanke’s recovery strategy: Expand the money supply like a banana republic dictator and throw sackfuls of cash at panies with a proven track record of mismanaging their assets. The justification? According to the late John Maynard Keynes, this is supposed to restore the “animal spirits” of the cowed consumer, the benighted...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved