Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Super Bowl Hummus Showdown
The Super Bowl Hummus Showdown
Jul 31, 2026 2:21 AM

Taking advantage of every Super Bowl XLIX opportunity to empty a sack full of football tropes, Green America unleashed an email this week, seeking your writer’s help in pressuring Sabra Hummus to discontinue use of genetically modified organisms. The tasty product, distributed by Sabra Dipping Co., LLC and 50-percent owned by PepsiCo Inc., goes well with chips and soft drinks on game day but has raised the ire of anti-GMO activists Green America and the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. The Green America email reads:

Sabra Hummus is the official dip of the NFL and one of the major backers of Super Bowl XLIX. The Super Bowl is a huge marketing opportunity for Sabra to continue to misinform consumers by promoting its product as a healthy alternative to traditional halftime snacks. The reality is quite different – Sabra hummus is laden with GMOs. It doesn’t matter if your favorite team isn’t playing, or if you are not a big fan of football. This is an important time to speak up and tell Sabra to score a touchdown by removing GMOs.

Green America helpfully provides a script for activists too busy to develop their own arguments against GMOs in their case against the offending chickpea concoction:

Hi, my name is [NAME]. As a concerned customer, I am calling today to ask Sabra to stop mixing GMOs into its hummus and other products. Sabra is seen as a healthy snack but doesn’t live up to that image when it contains genetically engineered soybean oil that is produced with toxic pesticides that put humans, pollinators, and the planet at risk. By using GMOs, Sabra is supporting an unsustainable food system that largely benefits biotechnology corporations. I hope that Sabra will be a leader in environmental and social responsibility by sourcing non-GM ingredients. I will not be serving Sabra hummus at my Super Bowl party until the GMOs are out.

For their part, the religious shareholders of ICCR succeeded in convincing PepsiCo the error of its GMO ways two years ago:

After filing a shareholder proposal asking PepsiCo to label its genetically engineered food products, ICCR members reached an agreement with pany wherein it agreed to release a public statement detailing its position on labeling genetically modified ingredients, and mitment to proactively seeking input from ICCR shareholders on this issue.

While celebrated as an ICCR victory, PepsiCo’s concession seems more of a effort to quiet a noisy yet decidedly minority contingent of its shareholders. Writing as PepsiCo’s vice president, Global Public Policy and Federal Government Affairs, Paul Boykas dropped a bit of truth and science on the ICCR investors who seeming care less about pany’s profitability and fellow investors than their own questionable agenda:

As you know, like other US food and panies, PepsiCo utilizes genetically modified ingredients in the US where they have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. We have appreciated the dialogue ICCR has conducted directly with representatives of PepsiCo’s food safety department to share insights and challenges to the current system. Though PepsiCo relies on government agencies to assure the safety of such ingredients, pany also maintains an active global Food Safety Department and robust procedures and works closely with suppliers to ensure the safety of products and the integrity of ingredients, including through testing. In addition, our food scientists track emerging trends and new scientific reports on issues which are critical to maintaining high standards in food safety….

It should be noted that PepsiCo does offer certain products which do not utilize GM ingredients to provide consumers with choices, which is the hallmark of PepsiCo’s overall portfolio….

Yet, Green America also has a script for activists to challenge the seeming Hummus from Hell:

As someone who cares about the health and environmental impacts of the foods I buy, I am deeply concerned that pany manufactures hummus with soybean oil from genetically engineered soybeans and citric acid potentially from genetically engineered corn.

pany boasts that it mitted to protecting the people, places, and environment on which your product relies. I am speaking up because by allowing GMOs in your supply chain you are failing to uphold mitment.

It is very misleading to market your products as a “healthy” alternative to mon dips and spreads when one of your main ingredients is likely GMO. GMOs have never been proven safe for human consumption, but the health problems we’ve seen in lab rats and animals leave great cause for concern for ourselves, not to mention the negative environmental impacts of GMOs. For example, GMOs are contributing to a rapid rise in the use of increasingly toxic herbicides.

I urge PepsiCo to be a leader and make the mitments for change:

I want Sabra hummus to go non-GMO and for PepsiCo to certify Sabra products through a non-GMO-verified third party.I want PepsiCo to work throughout its supply chain to reduce the use of toxic synthetic pesticides.

I want PepsiCo to stop fighting state-level GMO labeling efforts. We have a right to know what’s in our food! It is time PepsiCo starts supporting a mandatory Federal-level labeling initiative.[Emphases added]

This year, I may forego watching the Patriots and Seahawks battle it out in Phoenix to fantasize a gridiron battle between scientifically inclined shareholders and ICCR/Green America activists. Once the dust has cleared and the former declared victorious, I’ll vacate the couch to wash the hummus from my whiskers.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
P.J. Hill on the social power of markets
Economic exchange is often seen as a cold and calculating endeavor—entirely self-focused and impersonal, with sole attention on price and profit and, thus, little regard for actual human needs or well-being. Such a view fails to recognize that trade is more simply the manifestation of humanpartnership, and, seen rightly, such partnership is filled with positive social and moral implications. In a recent lecture for the Oikonomia Network, economist P.J. Hill highlights the profound social connections that markets can help to...
Would Jesus take an Uber?
New York City has enacted the first-ever government cap on the number of vehicles licensed to ride-sharing services like Uber or Lyft. On Tuesday, Mayor Bill de Blasio signed the bill imposing a one-year moratorium on new licenses, establishing a minimum wage for drivers – and touching off an international debate among Christians and others about the morality of Uber. “As the council was considering the legislation, some in my church circles discussed avoiding ride-sharing as a way to love...
The bright side of the trade war with China?
“This year marks the 40th anniversary of one of the most consequential anti-poverty programs in human history,” says Rev. Ben Johnson in this week’s Acton Commentary. “Now, there is evidence that its spillover effects may lift millions more out of dire need.” The new openness to enterprise, private property, and investment led to China’s meteoric economic rise. Now, Donald Trump’s tariffs are encouraging manufacturers to take their factories elsewhere. Ian Chen, CEO of a Chinese technological exporter, said that Trump’s...
The Prague Spring: An Eastern European perspective
The Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia began in earnest 50 years ago today, with the intention to destroy the blooming “Prague Spring.” But today, the truths that invasion revealed have been lost, both in the West and among many young people in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Krassen Stanchev of Bulgaria recounts the invasion’s history and importance in detail at Acton’sReligion & Liberty Transatlanticwebsite. In a new essay, he writes: On this date in 1968, armies of the Warsaw Pact invaded...
Introduction to the ‘Principles Project’
A young professor panies his mentor to a private meeting of economists from around the country. As they take their seats the host says, “To start us off, let’s have a few rounds of the best jokes.” An elderly woman stands up and says “37,” and everyone laughs. Another yells “49,” and the crowd cackles hysterically. This goes on for a while, when the young man turns to his senior and says, “I don’t get it, numbers aren’t funny.” His...
Income inequality and the ‘Groupon Theory of Morality’
For many years I was unable to understand the reasoning behind the claims that e inequality is a moral issue that only applies at the group level. Then it came to me like an epiphany—or more accurately, as a Groupon email. According to Wikipedia, the Groupon works as an assurance contract: If a certain number of people sign up for an offer, then the deal es available to all; if the predetermined minimum is not met, no one gets the...
What do bond markets do?
Note: This is post #90 in a weekly video series on basic economics. Most borrowers, such as individuals and small businesses, borrow through banks. But larger institutions can also borrow from a different financial intermediary: the bond market. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Alex Tabarrok explains what bonds are, what they do, how they’re rated, and how the bond markets work. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to...
Sen. Elizabeth Warren brings government muscle to corporate ‘accountability’
It was in Godfather III where Al Pacino as Michael Corleone said it first and said it best: “Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!” Before we were able to put away our party hats after celebrating the Supreme Court’s Janus decision in June, Missouri rejected a right-to-work measure at the state’s primary ballot box last week. And now Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) wants to do a federally legislated end run around Janus with a...
Radio Free Acton: Econ Quiz on pensions and public debt; Upstream on Frida Kahlo and Stalinism
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, host Caroline Roberts speaks with Dave Hebert, Professor of Economics at Aquinas College for another Econ Quiz segment on the topic of pensions and state debt. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks to Phil Terzian, a writer for The Weekly Standard, on the blind spots in the legacy of Frida Kahlo as well as our modern understanding of Stalinism. Check out these additional resources on this week’s podcast topics: Read...
The first axiom of Christian economics
Note: This article is part of the ‘Principles Project,’ a list of principles, axioms, and beliefs that undergirda Christian view of economics, liberty, and virtue. Click here to read the introduction and other posts in this series. The Principle:#1 – Because everything in creation belongs to God, man is never more than a steward and must act accordingly. The Explanation: Economics can be defined as the science of purposeful individual action in an attempt to satisfy an unlimited number of...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved