Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Super Bowl Hummus Showdown
The Super Bowl Hummus Showdown
Apr 27, 2026 3:03 PM

Taking advantage of every Super Bowl XLIX opportunity to empty a sack full of football tropes, Green America unleashed an email this week, seeking your writer’s help in pressuring Sabra Hummus to discontinue use of genetically modified organisms. The tasty product, distributed by Sabra Dipping Co., LLC and 50-percent owned by PepsiCo Inc., goes well with chips and soft drinks on game day but has raised the ire of anti-GMO activists Green America and the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. The Green America email reads:

Sabra Hummus is the official dip of the NFL and one of the major backers of Super Bowl XLIX. The Super Bowl is a huge marketing opportunity for Sabra to continue to misinform consumers by promoting its product as a healthy alternative to traditional halftime snacks. The reality is quite different – Sabra hummus is laden with GMOs. It doesn’t matter if your favorite team isn’t playing, or if you are not a big fan of football. This is an important time to speak up and tell Sabra to score a touchdown by removing GMOs.

Green America helpfully provides a script for activists too busy to develop their own arguments against GMOs in their case against the offending chickpea concoction:

Hi, my name is [NAME]. As a concerned customer, I am calling today to ask Sabra to stop mixing GMOs into its hummus and other products. Sabra is seen as a healthy snack but doesn’t live up to that image when it contains genetically engineered soybean oil that is produced with toxic pesticides that put humans, pollinators, and the planet at risk. By using GMOs, Sabra is supporting an unsustainable food system that largely benefits biotechnology corporations. I hope that Sabra will be a leader in environmental and social responsibility by sourcing non-GM ingredients. I will not be serving Sabra hummus at my Super Bowl party until the GMOs are out.

For their part, the religious shareholders of ICCR succeeded in convincing PepsiCo the error of its GMO ways two years ago:

After filing a shareholder proposal asking PepsiCo to label its genetically engineered food products, ICCR members reached an agreement with pany wherein it agreed to release a public statement detailing its position on labeling genetically modified ingredients, and mitment to proactively seeking input from ICCR shareholders on this issue.

While celebrated as an ICCR victory, PepsiCo’s concession seems more of a effort to quiet a noisy yet decidedly minority contingent of its shareholders. Writing as PepsiCo’s vice president, Global Public Policy and Federal Government Affairs, Paul Boykas dropped a bit of truth and science on the ICCR investors who seeming care less about pany’s profitability and fellow investors than their own questionable agenda:

As you know, like other US food and panies, PepsiCo utilizes genetically modified ingredients in the US where they have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. We have appreciated the dialogue ICCR has conducted directly with representatives of PepsiCo’s food safety department to share insights and challenges to the current system. Though PepsiCo relies on government agencies to assure the safety of such ingredients, pany also maintains an active global Food Safety Department and robust procedures and works closely with suppliers to ensure the safety of products and the integrity of ingredients, including through testing. In addition, our food scientists track emerging trends and new scientific reports on issues which are critical to maintaining high standards in food safety….

It should be noted that PepsiCo does offer certain products which do not utilize GM ingredients to provide consumers with choices, which is the hallmark of PepsiCo’s overall portfolio….

Yet, Green America also has a script for activists to challenge the seeming Hummus from Hell:

As someone who cares about the health and environmental impacts of the foods I buy, I am deeply concerned that pany manufactures hummus with soybean oil from genetically engineered soybeans and citric acid potentially from genetically engineered corn.

pany boasts that it mitted to protecting the people, places, and environment on which your product relies. I am speaking up because by allowing GMOs in your supply chain you are failing to uphold mitment.

It is very misleading to market your products as a “healthy” alternative to mon dips and spreads when one of your main ingredients is likely GMO. GMOs have never been proven safe for human consumption, but the health problems we’ve seen in lab rats and animals leave great cause for concern for ourselves, not to mention the negative environmental impacts of GMOs. For example, GMOs are contributing to a rapid rise in the use of increasingly toxic herbicides.

I urge PepsiCo to be a leader and make the mitments for change:

I want Sabra hummus to go non-GMO and for PepsiCo to certify Sabra products through a non-GMO-verified third party.I want PepsiCo to work throughout its supply chain to reduce the use of toxic synthetic pesticides.

I want PepsiCo to stop fighting state-level GMO labeling efforts. We have a right to know what’s in our food! It is time PepsiCo starts supporting a mandatory Federal-level labeling initiative.[Emphases added]

This year, I may forego watching the Patriots and Seahawks battle it out in Phoenix to fantasize a gridiron battle between scientifically inclined shareholders and ICCR/Green America activists. Once the dust has cleared and the former declared victorious, I’ll vacate the couch to wash the hummus from my whiskers.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton on religious liberty and Huckabee’s economics
Two new mentaries this week: In “Religious Liberty and Anti-Discrimination Laws,” Joseph Kosten looks at recent controversies in Colorado and Missouri involving Roman Catholic institutions. Without the liberty to decide who represents its views and who disperses its message to the public, a religious institution or organization lays bare its most vulnerable aspect and es destruction from within. Separation of church and state does not mean that religious institutions may not function within a state, nor does it mean that...
Ethical employment
What do you look for when you are searching for a job? A growth industry? A healthy bottom-line? A positive corporate culture? bination of the above? Fortune magazine recently rated the “Top 100 Places to Work.” Not surprisingly, at the top of the list is Google, which not only is dubbed the “millionaire factory” because of its generous stock option packages and a matching top tier share price, but because of the innovation associated with its workplace. Employees are encouraged...
Colorado Catholic Charities controversy III
An update on the battle between Archbishop Chaput and the Colorado legislature over an ostensibly anti-discrimination bill that in fact infringes on religious liberty. (Acton’s Joseph Kosten ably defined the argument in this mentary; I initially raised it here.) Zenit reports on the back and forth between Chaput and the Anti-Defamation League’s Bruce DeBoskey, with Catholic Charities president Christopher Rose wading into the fray. Here’s Rose on the idea that laws forbidding government to discriminate on religious grounds apply to...
Global warming consensus alert: New, shocking data!
It’s been a while since we’ve had a GWCW update, so here are links to a couple of articles I just ran across at Watts Up With That: RSS Satellite data for Jan08: 2nd coldest January for the planet in 15 yearsArctic sea ice back to its previous level, bears safe; film at 11 That second post is especially interesting considering the breathless media reports about endangered polar bears in danger of drowning as the ice melts from under their...
‘Casino capitalism’ or personal failure?
Two weeks ago, French bank Société Générale announced that off-balance sheet speculation by a single “rogue trader” had cost pany 4.9 billion Euros ($7.2 billion). The scandal had enormous repercussions in international markets leading mentators to decry the rotten nature of global “casino” capitalism and to call for the reversal of financial liberalization. However, the actual circumstances of the case do not justify more government intervention in financial markets but illustrate individual moral failings and poor internal governance on behalf...
Oh, what might have been!
From a review in the New Yorker magazine (HT) of David Levering Lewis, God’s Crucible: Islam and the Making of Europe, 570 to 1215, in which the author clearly regrets that the Arabs did not go on to conquer the rest of Europe. The halting of their advance was instrumental, he writes, in creating “an economically retarded, balkanized, and fratricidal Europe that . . . made virtues out of hereditary aristocracy, persecutory religious intolerance, cultural particularism, and perpetual war.” It...
Question: Which blog is best?
Help Acton do well in the 2008 Blogger’s Choice Awards by submitting a vote or two for Acton. We’re nominated in the following categories (you may vote for Acton in each if you’d like or if you feel we deserve it): • Best Blog Design • Best Religion Blog • Best Charity Blog Voting for a blog does require registration, but it doesn’t take long to do. I’ll occasionally post reminders about this here so that those of you who...
Campaigning for state involvement in education
I came across a troubling essay in this month’s issue of Grand Rapids Family Magazine. In her “Taking Notes” column, Associate Publisher/Editor Carole Valade takes up the question of “family values” in the context of the primary campaign season. She writes, The most important “traditional values” and “family values” amount to one thing: a great education for our children. Education is called “the great equalizer”: It is imperative for our children to be able pete on a “global scale” for...
February Acton Notes
A new Acton Notes is now available online. Acton Notes is a monthly newsletter published by the Acton Institute. This month’s issue features an article by Rev. Robert Sirico, president of the Acton Institute, about Socialism. Rev. Sirico points out a couple of ways in which to confront those who mistakenly hold to the fashionable ideology. If a person identifies with the idea mon ownership of the means of production, point out that this is impossible because you hold no...
Knowing the Gardener II – abiding and bearing fruit
Knowing the Gardener was a look at the “big picture” distinguishing God’s intent for Christian creation care from the rest of environmentalism. But I must tell you friends, there’s a huge pitfall out there to avoid. It’s a pit God’s been tirelessly digging me out of for some time now. Paul points to it in Romans 8: There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit…...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved