Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Super Bowl Hummus Showdown
The Super Bowl Hummus Showdown
Nov 1, 2026 1:07 AM

Taking advantage of every Super Bowl XLIX opportunity to empty a sack full of football tropes, Green America unleashed an email this week, seeking your writer’s help in pressuring Sabra Hummus to discontinue use of genetically modified organisms. The tasty product, distributed by Sabra Dipping Co., LLC and 50-percent owned by PepsiCo Inc., goes well with chips and soft drinks on game day but has raised the ire of anti-GMO activists Green America and the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. The Green America email reads:

Sabra Hummus is the official dip of the NFL and one of the major backers of Super Bowl XLIX. The Super Bowl is a huge marketing opportunity for Sabra to continue to misinform consumers by promoting its product as a healthy alternative to traditional halftime snacks. The reality is quite different – Sabra hummus is laden with GMOs. It doesn’t matter if your favorite team isn’t playing, or if you are not a big fan of football. This is an important time to speak up and tell Sabra to score a touchdown by removing GMOs.

Green America helpfully provides a script for activists too busy to develop their own arguments against GMOs in their case against the offending chickpea concoction:

Hi, my name is [NAME]. As a concerned customer, I am calling today to ask Sabra to stop mixing GMOs into its hummus and other products. Sabra is seen as a healthy snack but doesn’t live up to that image when it contains genetically engineered soybean oil that is produced with toxic pesticides that put humans, pollinators, and the planet at risk. By using GMOs, Sabra is supporting an unsustainable food system that largely benefits biotechnology corporations. I hope that Sabra will be a leader in environmental and social responsibility by sourcing non-GM ingredients. I will not be serving Sabra hummus at my Super Bowl party until the GMOs are out.

For their part, the religious shareholders of ICCR succeeded in convincing PepsiCo the error of its GMO ways two years ago:

After filing a shareholder proposal asking PepsiCo to label its genetically engineered food products, ICCR members reached an agreement with pany wherein it agreed to release a public statement detailing its position on labeling genetically modified ingredients, and mitment to proactively seeking input from ICCR shareholders on this issue.

While celebrated as an ICCR victory, PepsiCo’s concession seems more of a effort to quiet a noisy yet decidedly minority contingent of its shareholders. Writing as PepsiCo’s vice president, Global Public Policy and Federal Government Affairs, Paul Boykas dropped a bit of truth and science on the ICCR investors who seeming care less about pany’s profitability and fellow investors than their own questionable agenda:

As you know, like other US food and panies, PepsiCo utilizes genetically modified ingredients in the US where they have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. We have appreciated the dialogue ICCR has conducted directly with representatives of PepsiCo’s food safety department to share insights and challenges to the current system. Though PepsiCo relies on government agencies to assure the safety of such ingredients, pany also maintains an active global Food Safety Department and robust procedures and works closely with suppliers to ensure the safety of products and the integrity of ingredients, including through testing. In addition, our food scientists track emerging trends and new scientific reports on issues which are critical to maintaining high standards in food safety….

It should be noted that PepsiCo does offer certain products which do not utilize GM ingredients to provide consumers with choices, which is the hallmark of PepsiCo’s overall portfolio….

Yet, Green America also has a script for activists to challenge the seeming Hummus from Hell:

As someone who cares about the health and environmental impacts of the foods I buy, I am deeply concerned that pany manufactures hummus with soybean oil from genetically engineered soybeans and citric acid potentially from genetically engineered corn.

pany boasts that it mitted to protecting the people, places, and environment on which your product relies. I am speaking up because by allowing GMOs in your supply chain you are failing to uphold mitment.

It is very misleading to market your products as a “healthy” alternative to mon dips and spreads when one of your main ingredients is likely GMO. GMOs have never been proven safe for human consumption, but the health problems we’ve seen in lab rats and animals leave great cause for concern for ourselves, not to mention the negative environmental impacts of GMOs. For example, GMOs are contributing to a rapid rise in the use of increasingly toxic herbicides.

I urge PepsiCo to be a leader and make the mitments for change:

I want Sabra hummus to go non-GMO and for PepsiCo to certify Sabra products through a non-GMO-verified third party.I want PepsiCo to work throughout its supply chain to reduce the use of toxic synthetic pesticides.

I want PepsiCo to stop fighting state-level GMO labeling efforts. We have a right to know what’s in our food! It is time PepsiCo starts supporting a mandatory Federal-level labeling initiative.[Emphases added]

This year, I may forego watching the Patriots and Seahawks battle it out in Phoenix to fantasize a gridiron battle between scientifically inclined shareholders and ICCR/Green America activists. Once the dust has cleared and the former declared victorious, I’ll vacate the couch to wash the hummus from my whiskers.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How We Tax the Poor
Imagine you’re a single mom with one child who receives $19,300 a year in government benefits. A local business offers to hire you full-time at an hourly rate of $15 an hour. At 2,000 hours a year (40 hours for 50 weeks) you would earn $30,000. Should you take the job or stay on the government dole? The additional $10,700 a year certainly sounds enticing. But because you would lose your benefits and have to pay taxes, your disposable e...
How a College Is Partnering with Churches to Boost Employment for the Disabled
Contrary to popularperceptions, people with disabilities are equipped with unique skills and creative capacity, giving them a powerful role to play in the world economy, whether as restauranteurs, goldsmiths, warehouse workers, marine biologists, car washers, or Costco employees. Unfortunately, those gifts are not always recognized by the marketplace. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, the unemployment rate for those with disabilities is more than doublethe average for thosewithout. Thankfully, that blind spot is slowly being revealed, whether by forward-thinking...
Frankenfish? No, It’s Just a Salmon
My many mentors over the course of my lifetime thus far have advised me, to a person, to be more optimistic and less cynical. The glass, they told me, always should be perceived as half-full regardless the circumstances. Remembering this advice, I’ll forego reprimanding the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for its dithering the past 19 years whether genetically engineered salmon should be sold and, if so, labeled. Instead, I celebrate their long-awaited affirmative decision to allow the sale of...
Video: Marina Nemat on Finding Faith in an Iranian Prison
On November 19, the Acton Institute was pleased to e Marina Nemat to the Mark Murray Auditorium as part of the 2015 Acton Lecture Series. Marina was born in 1965 in Tehran, Iran, in what was at the time a relatively secular and free nation. (Granted, she lived under the dictatorship of Mohammad RezaPahlavi – the Shah of Iran – but as we were reminded a couple of weeks ago by Jay Nordlinger, when es to dictators you have to...
Audio: Rev. Robert A. Sirico on the Free Market and Environmental Stewardship
Conference Panel for “In Dialogue With Laudato Si'”, December 3, 2015 Today at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome, the Acton Institute has organized a half-day conference called “In Dialogue With Laudato Si’: Can Free Markets Help Us Care For Our Common Home?” in response to Pope Francis’ appeal in Laudato Si’for“a new dialogue about how we are shaping the future of our planet.” In advance of the conference, Acton Institute President Rev. Robert A. Sirico was...
Should Religious Liberty Be Considered the ‘First Freedom’?
Ask most Americans why religious liberty is considered the “first freedom” and they’ll likely say it’s because es first in the Bill of Rights. While technically true (it es first) that wasn’t the intention of the original framers of the Constitution The original Bill of Rights included two other amendments that were listed ahead of what we now consider the “First Amendment” but that failed to be ratified. If the placement of “first” on the list was a mere historical...
The Perversion of the Establishment Clause
“Nothing in the Constitution has been so judicially perverted from its original intent as the establishment clause,” says Zack Pruitt in the first entry of this week’s Acton Commentary. “The same clause went from protecting the people from a tyrannical state-run church to punishing those who dare to voluntarily pray on government property.” A football coach in Washington was recently suspended from his duties because he made a habit of praying at midfield following games. Players or students were never...
Why the ‘Proto-Communism’ of Early Christians Doesn’t Work for Modern Society
“There are solid grounds for believing that the first Christian believers practiced a form munism and usufruct [i.e., the right to enjoy the use and advantages of another’s property short of the destruction or waste of its substance],” wrote Peter Marshall in Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. As evidence Marshall cites the second chapter of the book of Acts: And all who believed were together and had all things mon. And they were selling their possessions and belongings...
Should Faith-Based Refugee Resettlement Groups Be Debt Collectors?
Over the past few months there has been a lot of discussion about refugees and resettlement. But not much is said about the logistical problems the refugees have to e. For example, how exactly do they get to the United States? The answer is that they have to travel—and thatcosts money. For those who can’t afford to cover the cost themselves, the U.S. government issues interest-free loans through the U.S. Refugee Resettlement Program. The loan repayments are due every month,...
Black Friday and the Moral Goodness of the Market Economy
“The real question is not does morality inform the market,” says Rev. Gregory Jensen in the second entry of this week’s Acton Commentary, “but whose morality informs the market.” Consumer disapproval of Black Friday has caused a drop in demand. Consequently, retailers have curtailed their investment in these kinds of sale events. If economics is agnostic as to what motivates the change in demand, as a Christian I can’t be. Retailers are responding to the moral cues of shoppers and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved