U.S. troops who proselytize are guilty of sedition and treason and should be punished to stave off a “tidal wave of fundamentalists.” That’s whatMikey Weinstein, founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation,told Fox News. Weinsteinand his group met privately with Pentagon officials on April 23 to try to convince them to punish military officers who engage in such devious evangelistic tactics as having aChristian bumper sticker on their car or a Bible on their desk. Weinstein says such activities cancan amount to “pushing this fundamentalist version of Christianity on helpless subordinates.”

“If a member of the military is proselytizing in a manner that violates the law, well then of course they can be prosecuted,” he said. “We would love to see hundreds of prosecutions to stop this outrage of fundamentalist religious persecution.”

“[Proselytizing] is a version of being spiritually raped and you are being spiritually raped by fundamentalist Christian religious predators,” Weinstein told Fox News.

The Pentagon confirmed to Fox News that Christian proselytizationis against regulations. “Religious proselytization is not permitted within the Department of Defense, LCDR Nate Christensen said in a written statement.

Michael L. “Mikey” Weinstein, who served as White House Counsel in the Reagan administration and general counsel to H.Ross Perot, is an anti-religion extremist who is not taken seriously by anyone outside the secular political left (see here to see how unhinged he can be). But if Pentagon officials e convinced that his peculiar anti-evangelism perspective is indeed within the bounds of military regulations, it could have a chilling effect on how Christians in the military share their faith.

Everyone in the military agrees that a leader should not be coercive or use their power and influence to force their religion on anyone. In my entire career in the Marines I never once heard mander suggest anything coercive, such as that we were expected to attend theirBible study. But I did have many leaders that invited me to church or talked about their faith with both believers (like me) and those who did not share our faith. Should they have been court-martialed? Will they be in the future?

Unfortunately, while we used to be able to answer such questions with an obvious “no,” the answer is no longer so clear. The current administration has established a shameful reputation for disregarding the religious freedoms of American citizens. While Christians will want to give them the benefit of the doubt, the Pentagon should make it clear that they will respectthe religious liberties of the men and women whose job it is to protect such freedoms.

Update: Over at Mirror of Justice, my friend Rick Garnett has an excellent post on proselytism, evangelization, and the First Amendment in which he raises a very significant point about balance:

. . .it seemsto mereally importantthat any regulations and policies designed to (quite appropriately) protect our men and women in the service from abuses of superiors’ authority (whether those abuses involve unwanted and aggressive religious messages, or take any other form)notreflect a premise or presumption that thecontentof traditional religious teachings and practices is substantively objectionable andthereforenot-to-be-discussed-or-advocated in the armed services and alsonotreflect a premise or presumption that evangelism itself — the invitation to e over” — (as opposed to abusive instances of it) is objectionable, even among members of the service.