Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Which is a real dystopia, the U.S. or Venezuela?
Which is a real dystopia, the U.S. or Venezuela?
Aug 31, 2026 12:45 AM

As Americans contemplate a “Green New Deal” and British schoolchildren skip school by the thousand to demand (more) government action on climate change, a little-noticed op-ed gives us a glimpse into a genuine dystopia. The author warns that this nightmare scenario will not unfold “The Day After Tomorrow” but has already taken place, for years, in the squalid homes and empty stores of socialist Venezuela.

In the West, the stereotype of a Christian crackpot warning “The End is Near” on a sandwich board sign has been replaced with dark, Green visions of an environmentalist conflagration. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez captured the nation’s attention when she said last month, “The world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change, and your biggest issue is – your biggest issue is, ‘How are we gonna pay for it?’ And like, this is the war, this is our World War II.”

Less reported is what she said three sentences later: “How are we saying take it easy when the America that we’re living in today is so dystopian, with people sleeping in their cars so they can work a second job without health care, and we’re told to settle down?”

The congresswoman’s description of the United States as an economically depressed dystopia bears little resemblance to the contemporary American landscape, where unemployment is at historic lows and wages are rising. However, let’s accept her rather bare definition of a dystopia as a place in which it is impossible to provide for basic needs while working two jobs.

Enter Daniel Di Martino, a young writer who enjoys considerably less exposure than “AOC” but, based on his newest article, deserves a wider readership. Di Martino left Venezuela for the United States and is currently a college student in Indiana – and he warns that left-wing proposals for massive government intervention in the economy turned his homeland into a “nightmare.”

In an article published at USA Today on Friday morning, he wrote:

I didn’t need to look at statistics to see this, but, rather, at my own family. When [Hugo] Chavez took office in 1999, my parents were earning several thousand dollars per month between the two of them. By 2016, due to inflation, they earned less than $2 per day. If my parents hadn’t fled the country for Spain in 2017, they’d now be earning less than $1 per day,the internationaldefinitionof extreme poverty. Even now, the inflation rate in Venezuela is expected to reach10 million percentthis year.

Venezuela has e a country where a woeful number of childrensufferfrom malnutrition, and where working two full-time jobswill pay for only six poundsof chicken a month.

In the course of the article, he describes how nationalization of vital industries led to weekly power outages and his home going without water for weeks at a time. While he says that no one proposal of itself – from nationalized healthcare to a wealth tax – will necessarily destroy the U.S. economy by itself, “if all or most of these measures are implemented, they could have the same catastrophic consequences for the American people that they had for Venezuela.” (Please take the time to read the article in full here.)

Taxation drives out business; socialism destroys innovation; and paying for the programs by printing money (Modern Monetary Theory) devalues currency and devours families’ life savings. Di Martino warns specifically that “Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed paying for the [Green New Deal] proposal by asking the Federal Reserve toprint money. This is exactly what produced Venezuela’s nightmare.”

The nightmare – or dystopia, if you prefer that term – is the mirror image of the fanciful dream that government alone can solve all human problems. One expert, or a few technocrats, have all the answers to plan for the happiness and well-being of millions, or billions, or people – but their plans require unquestioning obedience. The late Presbyterian minister Marvin R. Vincent of Union Theological Seminary wrote that if Christ had accepted the Satanic temptation to turn stones into bread, he would have said, in effect:

As I cannot live without bread, so My kingdom cannot thrive so long as men’s worldly needs are unsupplied. My administration must be a turning of stones into bread. It must make men happy by at once miraculously removing all want and suffering from the world, and inaugurating an era of worldly prosperity.

Marxism promises all this, but at the price of freedom. The offer of guaranteed, meager daily rations in exchange for absolute allegiance emanates from demonic sources. “We know that this has not been Christ’s policy,” Rev. Vincent continued. “Social prosperity is based on righteousness.”

That has been the genius of the West’s historical economic system. Capitalism incentivizes people to engage in spontaneous cooperation. The free market rewards high-quality, conscientious, and diligent service to meet the needs and desires of others. The synergy of service creates greater abundance and social harmony.

Di Martino warns us that rejecting these pillars of a sound society leads to dystopia.

He ought to know. He’s seen a real one.

domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
What is a Christian Libertarian?
Our friends over at AEI have a wonderful website—Values & Capitalism—devoted to many of the same topics we cover here at Acton: faith, economics, poverty, the environment, society. Values & Capitalism, which is capably managed and curated by my buddy Eric Teetsel, is an excellent resource that I mend to all liberty-loving, virtue promoting Christians (i.e., all good Acton PowerBlog readers). Being a huge fan of their work I was therefore grieved to read that one of their bloggers, Jacqueline...
Will Our Future Be Bleak or Blessed?
Rev. Sirico on why we shouldn’t have a bleak outlook on the future: Many people I know are rather despairing about our future. This is contributing to a real and growing pessimism throughout society. I can understand all of these feelings but there is a potential mistake here. I’ve begun to think that those who are too attached to the day’s headline news develop a bias toward thinking that the world is on a permanent downhill slide. The mistake is...
Great Lent and the Ascetic Foundations of Society
Today marks the beginning of Great Lent in the Orthodox Church. Not simply a fast, it is a time for that true asceticism which, according to Fr. Georges Florovsky, “is inspired not by contempt, but by the urge of transformation.” There is something of this true asceticism, even if imperfect and plete, at the basis of all human society. One must, even to only a small extent, renounce self-will to be a member of a family, a clan, or a...
Complaining to Mary: Should Christian Libertarians Defend Blackmail?
[Note: Since my previous post on Christian libertarianism stirred up an interesting debate, I thought it might be worth adding one more post on the subject before we move on. I think the following thought experiment will help shed light on our previous discussion.] The medieval monk and scholar Caesarius of Heisterbach tells of hearing a lay brother praying to Jesus: “Lord,” the man declared, “if Thou free me not from this temptation I plain of Thee to Thy mother.”...
The Lost Dignity of Work
From websites promoting help with Monday morning atheism, to an ever present ‘TGIF,’ a place of honor toward work seems to do nothing but diminish within our culture. The mere suggestion that work is not a curse of the fall is unfortunately quite foreign in many circles. Joseph Sunde at Remnant Culture has written a blog based on his reading of Booker T. Washington’s biography entitled Up From Slavery in which he highlights the high ethic and dignity Washington placed...
What Does Lent Tell Us About Markets and Morals?
What does Lent, which starts today, have to do with markets and morals (and Cuba)? Sociologist Margarita Mooney explains: Free markets are good because they are free. Free markets allow people to live by morals that lead people to almsgiving, passion, and to sometimes being willing to not consume something. munist economy leaves no room for freedom in production and consumption, and that lack of economic freedom is enforced by restricting political and religious freedom. There is nothing morally good...
Cardinal George: No Catholic hospitals in two years unless HHS mandate rescinded
(HT: Catholic Culture) Note: One in six patients receives care in a Catholic hospital in the United States. February 26, 2012 What are you going to give up this Lent? By Francis Cardinal George, O.M.I. The Lenten rules about fasting from food and abstaining from meat have been considerably reduced in the last forty years, but reminders of them remain in the fast days on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday and in the abstinence from meat on all the Fridays...
Cost-Effective Compassion
What are the best ways to help the poor in developing countries? Answering that question is not as straightforward as you might assume, says development economist Bruce Wydick in Christianity Today. As Wydick notes, most relief and development organizations carry out self-assessments and measure impact based on self-studies, methods that are neither unbiased nor empirically rigorous. So to get a better answer to the question Wydick polled ten other top development economists. He asked them to rate, from 0 to...
Madison: Religious Conscience Trumps Civil Pronouncements
I have been highlighting James Madison’s words on religious conscience on the PowerBlog over the past several weeks. The HHS Mandate is not simply an issue that can be promised, or willed away. Rick Warren’s statement, “I’d go to jail rather than cave in to a government mandate that violates what mands us to do” is tied to Madison’s thoughts below. Madison has an understanding here that a citizen must be faithful to his religious conscience above and beyond any...
Jane Austen, Moral Philosopher
In the latest addition to my Jane Austen Theorem*, Thomas Rodham makes the case for reading Jane Austen as a moral philosopher who proposes “a virtue ethics for bourgeois life, the kind of life that most of us live today.” Virtue ethics understands the good life in terms of personal moral character, of ing the kind of person who does the right thing at the right time for the right reasons. It is therefore about the fundamental ethical question, How...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved