Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Where Is All That ‘Dark Money’ Coming From?
Where Is All That ‘Dark Money’ Coming From?
May 15, 2025 12:31 AM

Your writer possesses well-meaning friends forever vigilant in my best interests. Most recently, one such kind soul sent an email alerting me to the dangers of so-called “dark money” in the political process. Believing himself on the side of the angels – and fully onside with activist nuns, priests and other religious – my friend sought my assistance in the fight against “evil” corporations participating in the political process.

So I got the following in my inbox. And all I had to do for America’s campaign finance salvation was sign a petition circulated by The Daily Kos and People for the American Way:

Bruce, join Daily Kos and People for the American Way in urging the SEC to require that publicly traded corporations disclose their political spending….

The Supreme Court’sCitizens Unitedruling was a travesty, which has opened the floodgate to corporate money in our political spending. Repealing it via a constitutional amendment will take years, but there’s something we can do in the meantime that will go a long way.

The Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) is the federal agency with the job of protecting investors from corporate abuse. It is well within its authority to require that publicly traded corporations disclose their political spending—but it won’t happen without a fight.

End the shroud of secrecy. Join Daily Kos and People For the American Way in urging the SEC to require that publicly traded corporations disclose their political spending.

Keep fighting,

Paul Hogarth, Daily Kos

Note that People for the American Way is a George Soros’ funded nonprofit. In fact, Soros’ Open Society Initiative donated nearly $3.5 million to PFAW – a liberal organization founded by the late television producer Norman Lear (“All in the Family” and “Maude” – between 2005 and 2009. Actor, political activist and credit card shill Alec Baldwin and “Family Guy” creator and Academy Award embarrassment Seth MacFarlane currently sit on PFAW’s board of directors.

As stated here, here and here, corporations that choose to participate in the political process and donate privately – and legally – to groups that advance their interests more resembles a cherished American tradition than it does the ominous-sounding “shroud of secrecy.” As I noted this past summer in a recap of a debate between Brian G. Cartwright, senior adviser, Patomak Global Partners, as advocate for Citizens United, and Bruce F. Freed, president and founder, Center for Political Accountability (another Soros’ funded outfit):

Cartwright began his seven minutes by declaring that ‘a government large enough, pervasive enough and intrusive enough’ makes it necessary for businesses to engage in politics. To live meaningfully and effectively in a republic such as the United States, he said, requires an engagement with government panies have any hope of protecting or advancing their interests.

Just so. This brings up an interesting point concerning who spent more political “dark money” in 2013. Wrote Tony Lee last week on Breitbart’s “Big Government” website, 70 percent of dark monies spent this year actually flowed out of liberal/progressive bankrolls:

Though Democrats have railed against the influence of money in politics after the Supreme Court’sCitizens Unitedruling, liberals have accounted for 70% of the so-called ‘dark money’ that has been spent this year.

Accordingto Open Secrets, ‘liberal dark money in 2013 makes up 70 percent of all the dark money spent so far. At this point in 2011, liberal money accounted for less than 6 percent of the dark money spent, and in 2009, the total was a little higher, at 6.5 percent.’…

‘Spending by liberal 501(c)(4) groups is already more than $1.7 million so far this cycle,’ Open Secrets writes. ‘That’s an increase of nearly 6700 percent over the $25,458 spent by liberal dark money groups at this point in the 2012 cycle.’

Ed Markey, the Massachusetts Democrat who won John Kerry’s Senate seat, has been the biggest beneficiary so far of ‘dark money.’ The League of Conservation Voters reportedly spent ‘more than $800,000 in direct support’ for Markey’s campaign, which was ‘almost twice as much as all dark money bined had spent at this point in the 2012 cycle.’

The ‘dark money’ from which Markey has benefited is made more ironic because paredtheCitizens Uniteddecision to the infamousDred Scottdecision while he was receiving the ‘dark money’ the decision allowed.

Somehow I don’t believe I’d be siding with the angels by hitching my wagon to the ideological likes of Soros, Baldwin, MacFarlane and Markey – nor, for that matter, the religious activists who sympathize with overturning or circumventing Citizens United. These individuals and groups wish only a one-sided debate in the political process.

Inquisitive readers may want to know if I signed the electronic petition. In the interest of full transparency and disclosure, dear audience, I answered my friend simply, “I think not!”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Italian nativity scene adds holiday sparkle to downtown Grand Rapids
Special window display at the Acton Building For the holiday season this year, the Acton Institute has a very special window display facing Veteran’s Park and Fulton Street in downtown Grand Rapids. The window display, “Wise men still seek Him” features a rare nativity set, Cathedral glass-inspired paint, and more. Acton’s president and co-founder, Rev. Robert Sirico, inspired the work, wanting to create a proper display for his personal precepio (extended nativity scene). It’s said that in 1223, St. Francis...
Abraham Kuyper and the ‘Bearer of Principle’
“What might Abraham Kuyper teach us as Americans prepare to go to the polls next year?” asks David T. Koyzis in this week’s Acton Commentary. “I believe that he can help us to vote more intelligently by clarifying the true nature of representation in a democratic munity.” Kuyper treated representation in Ons Program [Our Program] published in 1879 in the platform of the newly established Anti-Revolutionary Party in the Netherlands. The delegate conception he titled the “imperative mandate,” in which...
6 Quotes: The Second Vatican Council’s Declaration on Religious Freedom (Dignitatis Humanae)
Fifty years ago today, on December 7, 1965, Pope Paul VI promulgated the Declaration on Religious Freedom (Dignitatis humanae). This document produced by the Second Vatican Council clarified the Catholic Church’s views on religious liberty, changed the way the Church interacted with states, and helped foster ecumenical relations with other faith traditions. Since the release of Dignitatis humanae, the importance of defending religious freedom has e even more necessary. As Archbiship Charles J. Chaput has said, “In some ways, the...
The Federal ‘Anti-Poverty’ Program that Taxes the Poor
Imagine you’re at the checkout line at the supermarket and the clerk asks how much e your family earns each year. Offended, you ask why that is any of her business. “We need to know to determine how much sales tax you need to pay,” the checker politely explains. “If you’re classified as the ‘working poor’ you need to pay more sales tax.” “I think you have that backwards,” you helpfully add. “You mean the working poor need to pay...
Aslan’s Song of Stewardship
When wethinkabout “stewardship,” our minds tend to revert to the material and the predictable. We think about money or the allocation of resources. We think about growing crops or creating goods or financial investment andgenerosity. For the Christian, however, stewardship goes much further, weaving closely together the tangible andtranscendent in all areas of life.“Stewardship is far more than the handling of our money,” write Lester DeKoster and Gerard Berghoef. “Stewardship is the handling of life, and time, and destiny.” In...
Does Microlending Solve Poverty?
If you give a man a fish you feed him for a day, but if teach a man to fish, you feed him for a lifetime. But what if a man knows how to fish but can’t afford a fishing pole? Or what if he knows how to sew but can’t afford a sewing machine? Can farm, but lacks a plow? The recognition that some people have skills to make themselves self-sufficient but lack capital to buy the tools they...
Rev. Sirico: Fox TV’s unserious ‘Lucifer’ nothing to get upset about
Fox TV is prepping for a Jan. 25 release of a new show titled “Lucifer,” where “bored and unhappy as the Lord of Hell, the original fallen angel, Lucifer Morningstar has abandoned his throne and retired to L.A., where he owns Lux, an upscale nightclub.” Fox adds helpfully, “He’s no angel.” A report by Barbara Hollingsworth on notes that “a number of faith-based and conservative watchdog groups are panning Lucifer.” Among others, she interviewed Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president and...
Facebook and the Institutional Forms of Social Good
Over at Think Christian, I take a look at the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and derive a lesson from Jesus’ interaction with the rich young man in Mark 10. A basic lesson we can take from the decision to organize the initiative as an LLC rather than a traditional non-profit corporation is that pursuing social good is possible in a wide variety of institutional forms. A for-profit incorporation doesn’t preclude a main, or even primary, purpose aimed at social good. Just...
3 Modern Economic Lessons from an Ancient Tax on Windows
King William III of England needed money, so in 1696 he decided to implement a new property tax. To make sure the tax was progressive (i.e., affected the rich more than the poor), the parliament devised a seemingly clever idea: they’d use the number of windows as an index for the value of a house. The assumption was that larger homes, presumably owned by the wealthy, would have more windows than the houses of the poor. All a tax assessor...
More Fear Mongering on GMO Foods
In an email last week, GMOInside.org – a coalition opposed to genetically engineered and genetically modified organisms, which counts shareholder activist group As You Sow a member – blasted an email chock-a-block with material for two previous posts (here and here). And es a third PowerBlog post about the activists’ effort to roll back Senate support for the Safe and Affordable Food Labeling (SAFE) Act, dubbed the DARK Act (Deny Americans the Right to Know Act – get it?). Readers...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved