Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Monopoly can teach us about the purpose of markets and money
What Monopoly can teach us about the purpose of markets and money
Jul 1, 2025 10:59 PM

The game of Monopoly has brought generations of people together, even as it’s somehow managed to tear friends and family apart. Indeed, amid all the fun and frivolity, it’s still a cut-throat game driven by luck, exploitation, and money-lust.

Just like the actual marketplace, right?

Alas, despite being “just a game,” Monopoly has surely done its share of feeding the various pop-culture caricatures of plete with a twirly-mustached mascot. But despite those subtle distortions, perhaps it can still teach us something — showing us what the market is by showing us what it is not.

When es to the basic mechanics of the game, Monopoly inhabits a peculiar world wherein exchange is only “free” in the most limited sense, and where there is almost always a winner and a loser. Economist Russ Roberts describes it as the “ultimate zero-sum game,” in which “whoever has the most toys wins and winning means taking everything belonging to everyone else.”

Under such rules, Roberts argues, Monopoly’s version of “capitalism” is just as the naysayers proclaim: an “unrelentingly gloomy system of exploitation where the rich eventually wear everyone else down”:

You profit only by taking from others. The assets of its world are fixed in number. Yes, you can build houses or hotels, but somehow, the greater the supply of places to live, the HIGHER the price, an absurd contradiction to real-world economic life. In Monopoly, hotels never get a makeover and railroads, unlike Amtrak, are always profitable.

In Monopoly, getting rich and succeeding in business es from exploiting unlucky suckers who randomly enter your life. There’s no role for hard work or creativity — figuring out what customers might want to buy that isn’t being offered by petitor. There’s petition.

But while the basic economics of gameplay may indeed stray from reality, what about the behavior of the players therein? What about the peting and fighting for more wealth and power, irrespective of cost or consequence to one’s neighbor?

Unfortunately, as unethical, irrational, and unproductive as such behavior may be, the underlying attitudes are far closer to reality than many of us would like to believe. Even still, they presents a false view of the way God intended us to view and approach our work and creative collaborations. On this, we have plenty to learn, as well.

In a Karam Lecture for the Oikonomia Network, Eric Tully of Trinity International University parses out those lessons from a Christian perspective, using Monopoly as an example of how not to think about faithful work and stewardship in the global economy.

In Monopoly, “we just temporarily set aside normal standards of right and wrong,” Tully observes. “We embrace greed and just focus on money and crushing all the other players. It brings out the worst in some of us.”

To demonstrate how this might translate into reality, Tully points to the financial and housing crisis of 2008, the toxic ingredients of which were stirred together with the logic and imagination worthy of petitive Monopoly master.

“Politicians forced banks to make loans to people who could not repay,” he reminds us. “Predatory banks made irresponsible, risky loans in order to bolster their bottom line. People were greedy, bought much more than they could afford, and took on huge debt. It was the pursuit of goods instead of goodness, and it was a disaster.”

For Tully, such extremes are helpful in reminding us that, as Christians, the purpose of our economic activity isn’t self-provision, self-protection, or the accumulation of personal wealth. Rather, “when we fear the Lord, we value righteousness over wealth,” he says. “Second, we promote justice. And third, we are generous to those in need.”

The economic rules and realities of the day are far different than those in Monopoly and so are our moral and spiritual priorities therein. We not only have the privilege of engaging in free and open exchange in a free and open society, not bound by chance or sneering, money-hungry property owners. We have the privilege of pursuing our freedom with the truth and love of the Gospel.

Image: John Morgan, Monopoly (CC BY 2.0)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Calvin Coolidge’s warning against an entrenched bureaucracy
As we read about the increase of scandal, mismanagement, and corruption within our federal agencies, it is essential once again to revisit the words of Calvin Coolidge. Recent actions at the IRS, Veterans Administration, and the ATF gunwalking scandal all point to systemic problems e from an entrenched bureaucracy. As more and more of the responsibilities of civil society is passed over to centralized powers in Washington, federal agencies have exploded with power and control, leading to greater opportunities for...
Using Drones for Good
Drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), have been a prominent and controversial topic in the news of late. Today, the Washington-based Stimson Center released its mendations and Report on US Drone Policy. The think tank, which assembled a bipartisan panel of former military and intelligence officials for the 81-page report, concluded that “UAVSs should be neither glorified nor demonized. It is important to take a realistic view of UAVs, recognizing both their continuities with more traditional military technologies and the...
A Cultural Case for Capitalism: Part 8 of 12 — Capitalism and Cronyism Confused
[Part 1 is here.] In his case against capitalism, Wendell Berry argues that the average person not only is anxious because he depends upon so many other people for his wellbeing (truckers, panies, etc.) but that he ought to be anxious. There’s a grain of truth here. We shouldn’t e helpless sheep without a clue what to do were the power to go down for a couple of days in January. But inter-dependency, far from a sign of cultural sickness,...
World War I and the Break with History
Much of the art before World War I can be seen as moral in nature, says Bruce Edward Walker in this week’s Acton Commentary, while post-Armistice monly celebrates materialism if not outright hedonism: After the Great War, however, the genie was out of the bottle, leading to works meant only to shock, dismay or anger would-be censors and art consumers in general. These works lacked what Irish philosopher and statesman Edmund Burke were essential for a “moral imagination” of which...
Charitable Giving Increases, But Smaller Proportion Goes to Religious Groups
Despite the struggling-to-recover economy, charitable giving by Americans continues to rise. But a smaller proportion of this money is going to religious organizations. According to a newly released report by Giving USA, total estimated charitable giving in the U.S. rose 4.4 percent between 2012 and 2013, to $335.17 billion in contributions. The single largest contributor to the increase in total charitable giving was an increase of $9.69 billion in giving by individuals. In 2013, per capita giving by U.S. adults...
A Cultural Case for Capitalism: 9 of 12 — Berry vs. Salatin
[Part 1 is here.] Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning, details how the growth of government-corporate cronyism during the past 120 or so years has been largely a phenomenon of the socialist left. Wendell Berry misses this crucial historical insight in his running critique of capitalism, and his missing it draws him into flatly inaccurate claims, as when he asserts that “the United States government’s agricultural policy, or...
The Disease of Self-Chosen Sacrifice
In our efforts to serve others and do good in the world, we humans have a remarkable tendency to fall short, no matter how carefully constructed or well intended our plans and designs may be. When failure occurs, economists are likely to point to some kind of knowledge problem, notingthat, for instance, Western Congregation X didn’t (and perhaps couldn’t)know or foresee that sending hundreds of free shoes to Developing Nation Y would put several local merchants out of business. To...
A Cultural Case for Capitalism: Part 10 of 12 — The Free Market that Wasn’t
[Part 1 is here.] Some might answer any defense of the free economy by pointing to the housing and financial crisis that came to a head in 2008, holding it up as proof positive the free economy is a wrecking ball swinging munities and leaving all manner of economic and cultural destruction in its wake. The financial crisis did enormous damage, but the major drivers of the crisis were a series of public policies that manipulated the market in pursuit...
Radio Free Acton: Culture Care with Makoto Fujimura
Makoto Fujimura with his personal copy of The Four Holy Gospels at Acton University 2014 What does it mean for Christians to use our gifts to fulfill God’s purposes in cultural flourishing? Makoto Fujimura, internationally renowned artist, intellectual, and founder of the International Arts Movement, is well placed to address this question. In this edition of Radio Free Acton, Fujimura joins host Paul Edwards to discuss his art, his story of faith, and how a “culture care” mindset can change...
The Moral Value of Economic Growth
In 1820, America’s per capita e averaged $1,980, in today’s dollars. But by 2000, it had increased to $43,000. That economic growth has benefited the rich, of course. But it has also transformed the lives of the poor — and prevented many more from ing or staying poor. In this superb short video, the American Enterprise Institute briefly explains the moral value of economic growth. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved