Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Monopoly can teach us about the purpose of markets and money
What Monopoly can teach us about the purpose of markets and money
May 11, 2025 10:36 PM

The game of Monopoly has brought generations of people together, even as it’s somehow managed to tear friends and family apart. Indeed, amid all the fun and frivolity, it’s still a cut-throat game driven by luck, exploitation, and money-lust.

Just like the actual marketplace, right?

Alas, despite being “just a game,” Monopoly has surely done its share of feeding the various pop-culture caricatures of plete with a twirly-mustached mascot. But despite those subtle distortions, perhaps it can still teach us something — showing us what the market is by showing us what it is not.

When es to the basic mechanics of the game, Monopoly inhabits a peculiar world wherein exchange is only “free” in the most limited sense, and where there is almost always a winner and a loser. Economist Russ Roberts describes it as the “ultimate zero-sum game,” in which “whoever has the most toys wins and winning means taking everything belonging to everyone else.”

Under such rules, Roberts argues, Monopoly’s version of “capitalism” is just as the naysayers proclaim: an “unrelentingly gloomy system of exploitation where the rich eventually wear everyone else down”:

You profit only by taking from others. The assets of its world are fixed in number. Yes, you can build houses or hotels, but somehow, the greater the supply of places to live, the HIGHER the price, an absurd contradiction to real-world economic life. In Monopoly, hotels never get a makeover and railroads, unlike Amtrak, are always profitable.

In Monopoly, getting rich and succeeding in business es from exploiting unlucky suckers who randomly enter your life. There’s no role for hard work or creativity — figuring out what customers might want to buy that isn’t being offered by petitor. There’s petition.

But while the basic economics of gameplay may indeed stray from reality, what about the behavior of the players therein? What about the peting and fighting for more wealth and power, irrespective of cost or consequence to one’s neighbor?

Unfortunately, as unethical, irrational, and unproductive as such behavior may be, the underlying attitudes are far closer to reality than many of us would like to believe. Even still, they presents a false view of the way God intended us to view and approach our work and creative collaborations. On this, we have plenty to learn, as well.

In a Karam Lecture for the Oikonomia Network, Eric Tully of Trinity International University parses out those lessons from a Christian perspective, using Monopoly as an example of how not to think about faithful work and stewardship in the global economy.

In Monopoly, “we just temporarily set aside normal standards of right and wrong,” Tully observes. “We embrace greed and just focus on money and crushing all the other players. It brings out the worst in some of us.”

To demonstrate how this might translate into reality, Tully points to the financial and housing crisis of 2008, the toxic ingredients of which were stirred together with the logic and imagination worthy of petitive Monopoly master.

“Politicians forced banks to make loans to people who could not repay,” he reminds us. “Predatory banks made irresponsible, risky loans in order to bolster their bottom line. People were greedy, bought much more than they could afford, and took on huge debt. It was the pursuit of goods instead of goodness, and it was a disaster.”

For Tully, such extremes are helpful in reminding us that, as Christians, the purpose of our economic activity isn’t self-provision, self-protection, or the accumulation of personal wealth. Rather, “when we fear the Lord, we value righteousness over wealth,” he says. “Second, we promote justice. And third, we are generous to those in need.”

The economic rules and realities of the day are far different than those in Monopoly and so are our moral and spiritual priorities therein. We not only have the privilege of engaging in free and open exchange in a free and open society, not bound by chance or sneering, money-hungry property owners. We have the privilege of pursuing our freedom with the truth and love of the Gospel.

Image: John Morgan, Monopoly (CC BY 2.0)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Will Chicago Mandate the “Everyday Low Price” too?
Chicago’s City Council passed a measure last week that mandates “big box” stores such as Wal-Mart, Best Buy and Lowe’s to pay workers — regardless of experience — a minimum wage of $13 an hour including benefits by 2010. See the opinion piece in today’s Wall Street Journal. The justification is to help poor people have a better standard of living. Is this another example of good intentions mixed with bad economics? This time I doubt the intentions are to...
‘We get Viagra. They get malaria.’
At least, the title of this post is typical of the mantra against the practices of drug panies, according to Peter W. Huber’s “Of Pills and Profits: In Defense of Big Pharma,” in Commentary magazine (HT: Arts & Letters Daily). Huber, a senior fellow of the Manhattan Institute, summarizes in brief the pany argument, and then goes on to examine what truth there is in such claims. He says of the difference between creating and administering drugs, “Getting drug policy...
Sin and Extreme Sports
You may know that a traditional way of interpreting the Ten Commandments involves articulating both the explicit negative prohibitions as well as the implicit positive duties. So, for example, the mandment prohibiting murder is understood in the Heidelberg Catechism to answer the question, “Is it enough then that we do not kill our neighbor in any such way?” by saying, “No. By condemning envy, hatred, and anger God tells us to love our neighbors as ourselves, to be patient, peace-loving,...
Isn’t the Cold War Over?
I’ve got an idea for a new . Titled, Hugo and Vladi, it details the zany adventures of two world leaders, one of whom (played by David Hyde Pierce) struggles to upkeep his image of a friendly, modern European diplomat while his goofball brother-in-law (played by George Lopez) keeps screwing it up for him by spouting off vitriolic Soviet rhetoric and threatening all of Western civilization with his agressive (but loveable) arms sales and seizures of private panies. It is...
Coulter on Christianity and the Welfare State
In this Beliefnet interview conducted by Charlotte Allen, conservative firebrand Ann Coulter references the work of Acton senior fellow Marvin Olasky: Is it possible to be a good Christian and sincerely believe, as Jim Wallis does, that a bigger welfare state and higher taxes to fund it is the best way in plex modern society for us to fulfill our Gospel obligation to help the poor? It’s possible, but not likely. Confiscatory taxation enforced by threat of imprisonment is “stealing,”...
On Blogging
G. K. Chesterton on Journalists: “…there exists in the modern world, perhaps for the first time in history, a class of people whose interest is not in that things should happen well or happen badly, should happen successfully or happen unsuccessfully, should happen to the advantage of this party or the advantage of that party, but whose interest simply is that things should happen. “It is the one great weakness of journalism as a picture of our modern existence, that...
Gambling Hypocrisy
“All forms of gambling are predatory and immoral in their very essence,” says Rev. Albert Mohler. I don’t agree, at least insofar as his identification of what makes gambling essentially immoral is not necessarily unique to games of chance: the enticement for people to “risk their money for the vain hope of financial gain.” Stock e to mind. Indeed, as I’ve pointed out before, there is no single coherent Christian position regarding gambling per se. For example, the Catechism of...
Yeah, Ohio!
Ohio Court Limits Eminent Domain ...
Krauthammer on Proportionality
“‘Disproportionate’ in What Moral Universe?” asks Charles Krauthammer in today’s Washington Post. He continues: When the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor, it did not respond with a parallel “proportionate” attack on a Japanese naval base. It launched a four-year campaign that killed millions of Japanese, reduced Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki to cinders, and turned the Japanese home islands into rubble and ruin. Disproportionate? No. When one is wantonly attacked by an aggressor, one has every right — legal...
‘The Aryan clause, the Confessing Church, and the ecumenical movement’
The latest issue of the Scottish Journal of Theology is out, and includes my article, “The Aryan clause, the Confessing Church, and the ecumenical movement: Barth and Bonhoeffer on natural theology, 1933–1935.” Here’s the abstract: In this article I argue that the essential relationship between Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Karl Barth stands in need of reassessment. This argument is based on a survey of literature dealing with Bonhoeffer and Barth in three basic areas between the critically important years of 1933...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved