Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘To Fail or To Flourish: Does My Life and Work Really Matter?’
‘To Fail or To Flourish: Does My Life and Work Really Matter?’
Nov 2, 2025 10:42 AM

On Tuesday, the Acton Institute co-sponsored, along with Regent University’s College of Arts & Sciences and School of Divinity, To Fail or To Flourish: Does My Life and Work Really Matter? The purpose of the event was to initiate a conversation on campus on the topic of human flourishing involving students, faculty, staff and administration.

The day started with a session by Dr. Corné Bekker entitled, “Does the Bible Say Anything About Flourishing?” Dr. Bekker leads the Ph.D. in Organizational Leadership Ecclesial Leadership major, teaches in the doctoral programs of the School of Business and Leadership, and is actively involved in research on the use of Biblical hermeneutics and spirituality to explore leadership.

Dr. Bekker examined the question, “What does it mean to be fully alive?” He cited St. Iranaeus’ quote (“the glory of God is man fully alive”) and explained how it is often misquoted and/or misused, oftentimes in the context of flourishing. David Kelsey, in “On Human Flourishing,” says, “Christian theology has a large stake in making it clear that its affirmations about God and God’s ways of relating to human beings underwrite human beings’ flourishing.” Flourishing is not simply being happy or feeling fully alive. Human flourishing must start with Christ Himself. Kevin Cronin in his book Kenosis: Emptying Self and the Path of Christian Service describes three relationships important to flourishing: God and self, others and self, self and self. Dr. Bekker described these three relationships in the remainder of his lecture.

As it says in Genesis 1:26-28, “. . . so God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. And God blessed them.” John Paul II in the 2004 Compendium of Social Doctrine of the Church states, “The human person, in Himself and in his vocation, transcends the limits of the created universe, of society and of history: his ultimate end is God Himself.” Dr. Bekker cited these sources to show the importance of the relationship between God and self.

Bekker also referenced Matthew 16:24, which states, “Then Jesus told His disciples, If anyone e after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me” (ESV). In the context of discussing the relationship between self and self, Dr. Bekker claimed, “Human flourishing must have as it starting point God Himself, otherwise it will end with mere self-fulfillment.” From Charles Taylor’s book, A Secular Age, Bekker noted, “The call to renounce doesn’t negate the value of flourishing; it is rather a call to center everything on God . . . a collaboration with the restoration of a fuller flourishing by God.”

Finally, regarding the context of others and self, flourishing is neither mere collectivism nor raging individualism. Flourishing starts with God, includes individual responsibility, and also focuses on mon good. Ephesians 2:18-22 says, “So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God . . . being joined together.” In Caritas in Veritate Benedict XVI states, “God desires to incorporate us into this reality munion as well: ‘that they may be one even as we are one.'”

Dr. Bekker described peace (shalom) and good as two biblical descriptors of human flourishing. Cornelius Plantinga describes shalom as “universal flourishing, wholeness, and delight. A rich state of affairs that inspires joyful wonder and its creator and Savior opens doors and es the creatures in whom he delights.” David Ford regarding good says, “In which case, the highest, most real, authentic or adequate human flourishing could include our aiming in our range of final goals at something other than human flourishing . . . Loving, worshipping God is the ultimate end.”

The Westminster Confessions asks, “What is the chief end of man? The response: Man’s chief and highest end is to glorify God, and fully to enjoy Him forever.”

Dr. Bekker concluded his lecture by reading from Jude verses 24 and 25: “Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy, to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen” (Jude 1:24, 25 ESV).

Dr. John Mulford, director of the Center for Entrepreneurship and professor in the School of Business and Leadership, spoke on the topic of how work and life matter for the world around us. Dr. Mulford has extensive experience with developing entrepreneurs around the world.

He described “kingdom businesses” as an engine for transforming people and nations. These businesses honor God, operate by godly principles, show love, and achieve their full potential. He was careful to qualify that Christianity doesn’t equal transformation, believing in God doesn’t equal knowing him, and knowing God doesn’t equal obeying him. A Christian nation can have ungodly thinking, values, and behaviors.

God chooses to activate man to cooperate with him toward the transformation of his world. Entrepreneurship can be catalytic toward societal transformation. The majority of Dr. Mulford’s lecture was spent describing his worldview of business from the perspectives of the stomach (flesh), head (principles), and heart (God’s Holy Spirit). He described what various parts of business such as strategy, philosophy, product, marketing, power, trust, and wealth look like from these perspectives.

Dr. Mulford described some ponents to what a kingdom business looks like a daily basis. These include excellence, service, calling, guidance, faith, prayer, and ministry. He concluded his lecture by describing the “sweet spot” of one’s calling as the nexus of petence, and opportunity.

Dr. Jordan Ballor, research fellow for the Acton Institute and executive editor for the Journal of Markets & Morality, gave a luncheon lecture, “Does Economics Even Matter For Flourishing? Or, What Does It Mean To Be A Christian Bus Driver?” Dr. Ballor asked the audience to consider how you would respond if you were a bus driver and someone was running toward your bus after you left the bus stop. Would you stop for them or would you keep going? This es from Paul Heyne’s essays on the subject of the morality of economics.

Dr. Ballor described the “four P’s of God’s economy” as procreation (family), productivity (work), proclamation (church), and protection (government). He went on to describe the connection between work and economic productivity. He posed the question, “What kind of system best reflects the dignity of the human person created in the imago dei, unleashing creativity and innovation?” He went on to describe the implications for manual and skilled labor, goods and services, vocation and love for others, and cultural development of civilization.

Dr. Ballor argued that “economics can make you a better disciple.” Every believer has a stewardship responsibility. He outlined three economic fallacies that threaten good discipleship: the theory of limited good/zero-sum fallacy, that petition is immoral, and that profit is immoral. Three economic realities that are a “boon” for good discipleship are the recognition of opportunity costs, that incentives matter, and that good intentions are not enough.

He concluded the lecture by noting that economics is important, but not all-important. Wealth just like any good gift from God, can be a significant temptation. Paul Heyne’s article in Religion & Liberty provided the closing thought: “The market is a faithful servant in America today, providing more and more of the good things that we want. That is no reason to cripple it. It is reason, however, to think more carefully about what we want.”

The event concluded with a panel discussion summarizing the day’s lectures and describing the implications for flourishing in the various disciplines. The panelists explored questions on technology, flourishing in the arts, and barriers that keep people from flourishing.

Audio from the event at Regent University will be posted here in ing weeks. Our thanks to Amanda Morad at Regent who wrote an article about our event. You can read it here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Money for Nothing, or So it Seems
These kinds of stories make me sick, and they are all mon. In today’s Washington Post, a lengthy article examines the Livestock Compensation Program, which ran from 2002-2003, and cost over $1.2 billion. In “No Drought Required For Federal Drought Aid,” Gilbert M. Gaul, Dan Morgan and Sarah Cohen report that over half of that money, “$635 million went to ranchers and dairy farmers in areas where there was moderate drought or none at all, according to an analysis of...
Debating the Ethics of Chimeras
My piece on the debate over chimera research and the relevance of your worldview to the debate appears today at BreakPoint, “A Monster Created in Man’s Image.” Drawing on the work of C.S. Lewis, and among the questions and conclusions included, I write, “Chimera research may indeed have some potential benefits, but we cannot ignore the question of potential costs. What toll does such research take on the dignity of human beings? Must we destroy the human person in order...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 6
If the mon Protestant objection to natural law revolves around sin, as we saw in Part 5, we should now address the second mon objection that natural law is a rival to God and Scripture. Contemporary evangelical critics, such as Carl Henry, object that natural law elevates autonomous human reason above divine revelation. Henry thinks the Thomist doctrine of natural law teaches a universally shared body of moral beliefs that exist independently of divine revelation. This contrasts, he thinks, with...
Transcendence and Obsolescence: The Responsible Stewardship of Oil
In this mentary, “Transcendence and Obsolescence: The Responsible Stewardship of Oil,” I ask the question: “Why did God create oil?” I raise the question within the context of debates about global warming and the burning of fossil fuels, including Al Gore’s movie An Inconvenient Truth and the work of the Evangelical Climate Initiative. I argue that nonrenewable resources, especially fossil fuels, “have the created purpose of providing relatively cheap and pervasive sources of energy. These limited and finite resources help...
Politicizing Scripture
There’s some discussion at Mirror of Justice (here and here) of Martin Marty’s recent piece in The Christian Century, “Snookered,” which raises the issue of the validity of politicians invoking Scripture, using the example of Tom DeLay. The new progressive Christian approach seems to be to assert, rightly of course, that “God is not a Republican. Or a Democrat,” and is rather more nuanced and convincing than, say, “Jesus is a Liberal.” And since so much politics, aside from a...
Classical Liberalism, Foreign Policy, and Just War
One of the more lively and illuminating discussions at last week’s Advanced Studies in Freedom seminar revolved around the question whether and how classical liberalism is applicable to foreign policy, specifically with regard to questions of war. In the New York Times earlier this week, Robert Wright, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation, wrote a lengthy op-ed that bears on the relevant questions, “An American Foreign Policy That Both Realists and Idealists Should Fall in Love With.” Wright...
Milosz
“…can one build something lasting if the goal is not truth, but power? The few, most penetrating minds of that time understood that what constitutes the sickness of contemporary culture is the repudiation of truth for the sake of action…” Czeslaw Milosz, 1942 ...
How Just Must a Just War Be?
As a follow-up to yesterday’s post about just war, I’m passing along this TCS Daily piece by Prof. Bainbridge, “Just War for the Sake of Argument” (it’s also discussed at The Remedy and Bainbridge’s own blog). Bainbridge’s piece measures the current Lebanon/Israel conflict by the standards of just war, and finds it wanting. He makes the following important point: “Although Catholic scholars and theologians have thus made valuable contributions to the just war tradition down through the centuries, the principles...
Answers to just war questions
After ruminating earlier this week about foreign policy and just war, I asked a series of interrelated questions yesterday about just war. Prof. Bainbridge was kind enough to respond, and offered the critically important distinction between jus ad bellum and jus in bello, that is, justness up to war and justness in war. This gets at the difference between justification for the cause or occasion for war, causus belli, and the way in which that war is conducted. Bainbridge concludes,...
Businesspeople are Evil!
A very, very interesting piece in WSJ this week detailing a study by the Business and Media Institute that looks at how businesspeople are portrayed on television: The study, titled “Bad Company,” looked at the top 12 TV dramas during May and November in 2005, ranging from crime shows like “CSI” to the goofy “Desperate Housewives.” Out of 39 episodes that featured business-related plots, the study found, 77% advanced a negative view of the world merce and its practitioners. On...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved