Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The ‘War on Poverty’ and the Unique, Unrepeatable Poor Person
The ‘War on Poverty’ and the Unique, Unrepeatable Poor Person
Feb 11, 2026 8:04 AM

Former U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson declares a “war on poverty” – Jan. 8, 1964

Last week the U.S. Census Bureau released its report, e and Poverty in the United States: 2013. The agency announced that “in 2013, the poverty rate declined from the previous year for the first time since 2006, while there was no statistically significant change in either the number of people living in poverty or real median household e.”

Sure to spark reactions from both sides of the political aisle, the report, along with this year’s 50th anniversary of the U.S. government’s launch of a “war on poverty,” present an opportunity to reflect on the effectiveness of the United States’ domestic poverty alleviation strategy to date.

But amid the necessary analysis and debate about government’s role in helping the least among us, it is essential to keep at the forefront of our thinking the primary figure poverty alleviation efforts are intended to help: the human person. Through taking the time to recognize each individual’s unique gifts and creative capacity, we can more fully appreciate his/her contribution to society and form relationships that enable this flourishing to take root.

Ismael Hernandez, founder and executive director of the Freedom and Virtue Institute, echoes the importance of recognizing people’s true nature. He says, “The person needs to be called by name, the ‘poor’ need for us to dump that label and look at them as unique and unrepeatable human beings, not simply another token belonging to an expansive and yet shallow sea of sameness.”

This involves having “not only a heart for the poor, but also a mind for the poor,” and taking the time to immerse oneself in the landscape in which one works, before taking action. PovertyCure partner, Perpetual Help Home, Inc. is embracing this thinking and doing great work to form relationships with women in troubled situations and assist in their climb out of poverty. By speaking to these women, with histories of incarceration and homelessness, and learning about their needs, the Perpetual Help Home staff determined that a housing, enterprise development, and training program would be an effective way to provide foundational assistance and empower them to improve their environment.

In PovertyCure’s interview with Perpetual Help Home’s executive director, Cheryl Miller, she shares that her desire to empower blossomed from personal experience living in poverty. She explains:

…26 years ago I was a welfare mom, and I have two children that were born into the welfare system.

And fortunately for me, the people who got engaged in my life were people who understood the principles that are embraced in the message of PovertyCure. They understood that I didn’t need to be fixed and I didn’t need handouts. That I needed to be challenged and I needed to be pushed, and I needed to take control of my own life. And I did. And I went back to school, because I knew that my children wouldn’t have a future if I couldn’t do something to move past the economic situation. And it wasn’t even the economics; it was the whole sense of hopelessness.

So I went back to school and I got my degree and I became a teacher, but then I felt like it’s time to do something different. And when I got to working the first week at Perpetual Help Home, and I walked in and I saw the women and I heard their stories, and recognized them, I realized I was just looking at the past me.

Miller explains that through her work, she doesn’t want to perpetuate the notion that, “I have what you need and I can fix you.” Instead, she states:

I want to be a part of building something and being part of a message that says, ‘We recognize that you have something significant to offer. We recognize that you were created in the image of God, and we want to provide you the opportunity to live that in the fullest extent possible.’

In this 50th anniversary year of the “war on poverty,” we should hope for a renewed vision of the human person, as unique, unrepeatable, and capable of amazing feats. Though policy makers will debate about aid-plan expansion or reduction, we on an individual level have an equally important responsibility in developing our conscience and affirming the dignity of others.

As Hernandez states, “…we can still hope that Christians might realize that they are called to be faithful servants, witnesses to the beauty and dignity of the poor.”

See PovertyCure’s video interview with Cheryl Miller below:

This article is cross-posted from the PovertyCure Blog.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Labor unions and free association
The Service Employees International Union and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have broken away from the plaining that the federation has focused too much on political activism in the face of declining union membership and influence. Dr. Charles Baird was a featured guest on yesterday’s edition of Kresta in the Afternoon on Ave Maria Radio, discussing Catholic perspectives on unionism and whether the modern American labor union movement patible with church teachings. Dr. Baird is Chair of the Department of...
Labor (dis)union
The New York Times reports this morning that “leaders of four of the country’s largest labor unions announced on Sunday that they would boycott this week’s A.F.L.-C.I.O. convention, and officials from two of those unions, the service employees and the Teamsters, said the action was a prelude to their full withdrawal from the federation on Monday.” The withdrawal is the culmination of a period of dissatisfaction with the direction of big labor in the US. The leaders of the dissident...
Textual interpretation
A week ago Stanley Fish, a law professor at Florida International University, wrote an op-ed in The New York Times about the principles of constitutional interpretation, especially as represented by Justice Antonin Scalia. Fish takes issue especially with the notion that the text can have meaning “as it exists apart from anyone’s intention.” Fish essentially denies that texts are things that can have meanings in themselves, and it amounts to a philosophical denial of realism. Part of Fish’s problem is...
Great debate
Foreign Policy hosts this exchange on environmental issues and economics. Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, gets the first word and Bjørn Lomborg, adjunct professor at the Copenhagen Business School, gets the last word. ...
The school of fish
The recent blogpost by my colleague Jordan Ballor discusses an op-ed written by law professor Stanley Fish. I am more familiar with Stanley Fish from his days as a literary theorist, and perhaps a quick review of a younger Fish will contribute to the conversation. Fish is known for, among other things, an idea of literary interpretation he called munities’ that suggests meaning is not found in the author, nor in the reader, but in munity in which the text...
The hermeneutical spiral
Mr. Phelps takes issue with my characterization of Stanley Fish’s position as amounting “to a philosophical denial of realism.” Let me first digress a bit and place ment within the larger context of my post. My identification of a position that “words and texts have no meaning in themselves” is really just an aside within the larger and more important question about what measure of authority authorial intent has in the interpretation of documents, specifically public documents like the Constitution....
CAFTA/Culture of Life: enemies?
John Paul II gave us all a tremendous gift by endorsing the terms Culture of Life and Culture of Death. But as with all great gifts, we must guard these terms carefully so as not to wear them out with misuse, robbing them of their relevance. Unfortunately, this is precisely what is happening in the current debate over CAFTA. A group called Catholics for Faithful Citizenship (PDF) claims the following: “Clearly, supporting CAFTA is inconsistent with upholding a culture of...
We must kill religion to save it
There are so many things wrong with this news item from Canada, I hardly know where to begin. But I’ll make perhaps the most obvious point of contradiction. This guy is “worried that the separation between church and state is under threat,” so he wants to initiate state control over religion, especially “given the inertia of the Catholic Church.” I’m not at all familiar with Canadian law. Is there something in Canada similar to the American Establishment Clause? ...
Animal cruelty?
I’m not quite sure what to make of this local story: “Four people are charged for their alleged involvement in killing two bald eagles.” The details of the alleged crimes are as follows: “Prosecutors say two teenagers shot the eagles in the Muskegon State Game Area with a .22 caliber rifle in April 2004 and then chopped them up with a hatchet.” Since the bald eagle, one of the nation’s revered symbols, is an endangered animal, it is protected by...
CAFTA vs. ‘Distributive Justice’
The Interfaith Working Group on Trade and Investment, a Washington-based amalgam of left-liberal religious activists, has asked the U.S. Congress to reject ratification of the Central American Free Trade Agreement. Here’s a representative statement: “Religious leaders boldly stood with impoverished people and called today for sustainable development in Central America and respect for the integrity of Creation.” Some of our best friends are impoverished? In this group’s statements, there’s scarcely an intelligible economic thought to be found or, for that...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved