Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Don’t Buy The Lie: ‘Freedom To Worship’ Not The Same As Religious Liberty
Don’t Buy The Lie: ‘Freedom To Worship’ Not The Same As Religious Liberty
Oct 15, 2026 8:32 PM

It seems such a subtle distinction: “freedom to worship” as opposed to “religious freedom.” The phrase, “freedom to worship,” started appearing in 2010, and in 2013, President Obama made the following remarks in his address for the annual Proclamation for Religious Freedom Day:

Foremost among the rights Americans hold sacred is the freedom to worship as we choose.” He then refers to the history of this right. “Because of this protection by our Constitution, each of us has the right to practice our faith openly and as we choose.”

It seems as if the president is equating the two, doesn’t it? But Sarah Torre says there are not the same, and equating the two is dangerous. In fact, it’s a lie.

Americans have increasingly faced attempts to water down this robust understanding of religious freedom to a mere “freedom to worship.”

Through expansive government mandates and cultural pressures, this incorrect view of religious liberty argues that faith should remain a private affair—relegated to personal activities or weekend worship services. Step outside the four walls of a home or house of worship and robust protection of religious freedom ends.

Where is this “freedom to worship” a most egregious lessening of our rights? Torre illustrates with the Obama administration’s unrelenting pursuit of the Little Sisters of the Poor, and the attempts to force this group of Catholic sisters to include coverage of birth control and abortion for the members of the order and their employees. (The recent Supreme Court decision, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, granted some family-owned businesses exemption from the HHS mandate regarding birth control and abortion, but does not cover non-profit religious groups, such as the Little Sisters of the Poor. The Little Sisters of the Poor provide care for the aged poor around the world.)

Torre warns that the loose “freedom to worship” could impact health-care professionals and their right to refuse to participate in procedures that violate their religious beliefs and consciences. She also says that our “ever-expanding government” is forcing many Americans to violate their beliefs regarding marriage.

A couple who runs a farm in upstate New York was fined $13,000 for declining to rent their family farm for a same-sex wedding ceremony. Others involved in the wedding industry, like photographers, florists and cake makers, have been hauled into court for declining to use their artistic talents to participate in same-sex weddings. Facing coercion by state governments to place children with same-sex couples, some Christian adoption agencies have even been forced to end foster care and adoption services rather than abandon their belief that children do best with a married mother and father.

“Freedom to worship” means you can do whatever you wish, so long as it’s in your house of worship. Leave those confines, and your right to practice your faith is subject to government override.

Read, “Don’t Buy the Lie That Freedom to Worship Is the Same as Religious Freedom” at The Daily Signal.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Explainer: What you should know about right-to-work laws
Shifts in the position of state legislatures during the recent election has made it likely that several states will be passing right-to-work bills in 2017. As Melissa Quinn of The Daily Signal notes, in Kentucky, Missouri, and New Hampshire, last month’s election resulted in a flip in party leadership in either governors’ mansions or state legislatures, which put previously defeated right-to-work legislation back on the table. Here is what you should know this issue which, as Quinn says, “pits the...
Economics made the world a better place
“A lot of doom and gloom types say we’re living in dark times. But they’re wrong,” says economistDonald J. Boudreaux. “While there are real problems, the world has never been healthier, wealthier, and happier than it is today. Over a billion people have been lifted from dire poverty in just the past few decades.” ...
Does globalization destroy culture?
Globalization is routinely decried for its disruptive effects, particularly as it relates to local culture munity enterprises and institutions. Even as it’sproven to drive significant economic growth, questions remain about its steamrolling influence on the culture. “Even if we grant that petitive markets create prosperity, is it worth the fast food chains and the big box chains we see everywhere we go?” asks Michael Millerin an excerpt from PovertyCure. “What about a sense of vulgarity and bringing things to the...
Video: Karl Zinsmeister on how philanthropy fuels American success
As we enter into a new year here at Acton, we still have some items from 2016 to share with you. On October 3rd, we were pleased to e Karl Zinsmeister, Vice President ofPublications at the Philanthropy Roundtable, to speak on the importance of philanthropy in the United States. Philanthropy in America is a bursting, bubbling impulse that has vital effects on almost every sector of our society. Private action to solve public problems is one of the practices that...
5 Facts about Jean-Baptiste Say
Today is the 250th anniversary of Jean-Baptiste Say, one of the most important economic thinkers of the nineteenth century. Here are five facts you should know about this French economist: 1. Say’s conviction that the study of economics should start not with abstract mathematical and statistical analyses but with the real experience of the human person was likely based on his own vocational experiences. He had worked at a broad range of occupations including journalist, soldier, politician, cotton manufacturer, writer,...
Providence, presidents, and the fundamental fallacy of pop economics
When running for president, candidates often makes outlandish promises about how we’ll benefit once they have power. For instance, vice-presidential candidate John Edwards said in 2004 that, “when John Kerry is president people like [quadriplegic actor] Christopher Reeve will get up out of that wheelchair and walk again.” And in 2008, then-candidate Barak Obama said we’ll look back on his winning the Democratic nomination as the moment “when the rise of the oceans began to slow and the planet began...
The Force in Rogue One: Religious Development or Diversity?
Chirrut Îmwe The newest Star Wars film, ‘Rogue One: A Star Wars Story,’ has enjoyed a box office success of more than $700 million since its release and generally positive reviews from fans and critics alike. The film series has a mythic quality for many, offering stories of heroism, betrayal, virtue, pride, and even spirituality. At First Things this week, Marc Barnes offers a decent analysis of the different developments of how the Force in particular — the main religious...
Unemployment as economic-spiritual indicator — December 2016 report
Series Note: Jobs are one of the most important aspects of a morally functioning economy. They help us serve the needs of our neighbors and lead to human flourishing both for the individual and munities. Conversely, not having a job can adversely affect spiritual and psychological well-being of individuals and families. Because unemployment is a spiritual problem, Christians in America need to understand and be aware of the monthly data on employment. Each month highlight the latest numbers we need...
How a great Nobel economist understands the relationship between faith and reason
Gregg and Smith at Acton University On New Years Day, the Nobel Prize-winning economist Vernon Smith turned 90. To mark the occasion, Samuel Gregg wrote an essay for the Stream about Smith and the significance of his work. Gregg explains Smith’s most famous contribution to economics: Smith is best known for pioneering “experimental economics.” This involves behavioral experiments in which people are placed in a particular micro-economy in which they can engage in trade, but without knowing the conditions driving...
If the lottery was honest
When es to government programs for redistributing e, nothing is quite as malevolently effective as state lotteries. Every year state lotteries redistribute the e of mostly poor Americans (who spend between 4-9 percent of their e on lottery tickets) to a handful of other citizens—and tothe state’s coffers. This video by Crackedshows what a lottery ad would be like if the government-run business was forced to be honest:“The only reason it stays legal isbecause the government is the profiteer of...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved