Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Pro-Easter vs. Anti-Easter Response to Levi Pettit
The Pro-Easter vs. Anti-Easter Response to Levi Pettit
Jan 11, 2026 11:38 AM

Former Oklahoma University student Levi Pettit and his friends did a terrible thing. The frustration and anger at the very racist chant about the lynching of African Americans by the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity is understandable and justified. However, in light of Levi Pettit’s act of public repentance, our response reveals how we understand a key aspect of Easter. Those who painfully forgive Pettit demonstrate a central pillar of the Passion of Christ whereas those who refuse to forgive Pettit inadvertently render the death and resurrection of Christ meaningless.

Torraine Walker’s op-ed at Huffington Post is a great example of an anti-Easter response to Pettit. Walker says that he is not buying Pettit’s apology. “Why are people of color expected to automatically forgive a racist who hasn’t proven themselves changed? These apologies always feel so fake and inauthentic.” Walker says that Pettit’s response is an example of a “Racial Apology Ritual” because it was manufactured and fake. Walker concludes,

It’s a mentality rooted in white privilege and assisted, unwittingly or not, by the black baptist church ritual of “testifying,” confessing your sins before the congregation and being absolved. But as any churchgoer can tell you, redemption is a lifelong process usually marked by episodes of “backsliding,” reverting back to the familiar bad habits that tarnish someone’s life in the first place. Change doesn’t happen overnight and it definitely doesn’t end with an apology. Real personal change has e from within, and a real apology has e from a truly remorseful person to the people they’ve hurt, away from any cameras. . . We’ll see what the future holds; until then, I’ll withhold my forgiveness.

On Easter, Christians around the world solemnly remember the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The resurrection of Christ is the good news that the sins of God’s people are forgiven, forever, because Christ paid the due penalty for them not living according to God’s definition of being human. As such, every human person is invited to repent of their sin, ask God for forgiveness, and follow Christ. Why? Because God passionate and gracious, “slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin” (Ex 34:6-7). God does punish sin, however, and the punishment for our sin was fully satisfied in the death and resurrection of Christ.

Walker’s response is an indication that he may not know this good news for himself. Confession, repentance, and forgiveness are not bestowed only after a person changes. These are bestowed so that people are free and empowered to change by the grace of God. The same grace that provides mercy and forgiveness is the same grace that enables human persons to live differently, virtuously. It is God who does the proving. Because of Christ, and the work of the Spirit, forgiveness, then, is never withheld for those who repent (1 John 1:19). If Pettit repented to God he is forgiven. Walker seems to think, however, that he is greater than God.

Alternatively, Earl Ofari Hutchinson presents a more pro-Easter response to Pettit’s public apology. Hutchinson believes that Pettit should be praised. Here’s why:

The fact that you have one student offender who did not play to that gate, and claim victimization, and instead accepted, fully, responsibility for his racist, offensive action, is cause for much hope; hope that someone actually got it, and is willing to lend a public face, their face, to those who express their disgust at racial bigotry.

It’s even better that es from a young person that legions of young people can more readily identify with than all the sermons on racial tolerance from those of the older generation, and especially civil rights leaders. Their sermons are like water off a duck’s back to many of them. We don’t need more surveys on race relations to know that they haven’t had much meaning to too many young people, such as Pettit.

Easter gives us courage to take responsibility for our sin, own it as ours, not play the victim card, and offer it, vulnerably, to God. Easter gives us the freedom and permission to ask for mercy. Easter invites us to repent and ask God for forgiveness. It is God who is wounded and offended by our sin and it is an act of mercy and grace that God provides the means of confession, repentance, and forgiveness instead of giving us what we deserve.

Levit Pettit’s pastor does a good job of situating Pettit’s public sin within the context of Peter’s denial of Christ. If Peter can deny Christ and be forgiven then so can Levi Pettit. Because of Easter, we can forgive a repentant 20-year-old man who has asked for mercy and pledged himself to live differently in the future empowered by grace.

Thankfully, we do not have prove ourselves worthy of forgiveness nor do we have to demonstrate the proof of change in order for God’s forgiveness to be bestowed. This is the essence of grace. We receive from God what we do not deserve: mercy and empowerment. A disposition of forgiveness, then, is so central to following Christ that Jesus said, “For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins” (Matt 6:14-15). Therefore, those who know that they need forgiveness are those who offer forgiveness freely. Finally, if God has forgiven Pettit because of Easter, then I have no reason to withhold forgiveness either.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Why the Market Needs the Family
The Family & the Market, an Acton University lecture by Jennifer Roback Morse, uses Christian theology and logic to illustrate unique connections between seemingly unrelated aspects of society, at least to the secular world. Morse is the founder and president of the Ruth Institute, where she discovered that the economy depends on the intact family raising children. This Institute has a dream: that every child is ed into a loving home with a married mother and father. Their goal is...
Yes, Law Is Inherently Violent. That’s Not the Problem.
“Law professors and lawyers instinctively shy away from considering the problem of law’s violence,” says Yale law professor Stephen L. Carter. “Every law is violent. We try not to think about this, but we should.” Carter, one of the most astute legal minds in America, rightfully points out the inherent violence embedded in the law. But he draws some unfortunate conclusions from this fact: On the first day of law school, I tell my Contracts students never to argue for...
The Costs of Jailing Teens
In early June 2016, Matthew Bergman, 15, allegedly admitted to police that he killed his aunt and stabbed his mother in Davidson County, Tennessee near Nashville. When mit crimes in the suburbs or in urban areas, experts are ambivalent about what to with them because of the long-term consequences of youth incarceration. Low munities get hit the hardest. Since the 1980s juvenile incarceration rates have increased steadily creating a phenomenon often referred to as the “school-to-prison pipeline.” There are many...
C.S. Lewis and the root of power philosophy
C.S. Lewis is probably best known for his work in children’s literature and Christian apologetics. “Mere Christianity,” “The Problem of Pain” and “The Abolition of Man” are among his most popular works, but he has many more valuable essays regarding truth and Christianity which are not as widely read. A favorite lecture of mine, titled “The Poison of Subjectivism”, is found in his collected essays, “Christian Reflections.” After leaving Malvern College in June 1913, Lewis (or Jack as he preferred...
We’re all Dead: How J.M. Keynes – And His Critics – Went Wrong
“Critics of John Maynard Keynes were so determined his economics were wrong that they allowedKeynes to dictate the terms of the debate,” says Victor Claar, professor of economics atHenderson State University, in his Acton University lecture. He continues to describe Keynes flawed anthropology with respect to classical economists and the Great Depression. Key observations of human nature include the principles of work, property, exchange, and division of labor. We can survive and prosper, take ownership of our work, support and...
Is Shifting The Justice Reform Burden Better?
The brokenness of America’s criminal justice system is not just an urban issue. Working class defendants in small towns across America are vulnerable to system that does not protect them from government negligence. For example, New York’s state legislature approved new indigent defense measures last week that finished an almost decade long battle over statewide indigent defense problems. The case began with a 2007 lawsuit by the NY Civil Liberties Union on behalf of several indigent defendants (Hurrell-Harring et al....
Understanding Austrian economics
Carl Menger (1840-1921) | Wikimedia Commons The central theme of the Austrian tradition, which might better be called the liberal tradition, is that society runs itself. This is strongly linked to the idea of freedom in the liberal sense, meaning the opportunity for the individual to advance and to create wealth. Jeffrey Tucker, Director of Content at FEE (Foundation for Economic Education) argues that the Austrian school started by Carl Menger revived an old method of thinking in the liberal...
New Acton Commentary: Economics not Great at Orthodox Council
Recently, The Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church was held in Crete, culminating in a document titled “The Mission of the Orthodox Church in Today’s World”. In the most recent Acton Commentary, research fellow and managing editor of the Journal of Markets & Morality Dylan ments on the flaws in economic principles and guidelines espoused in the document. In framing the criticism, Pahman argues that “the statement’s economic pronouncements range from ambiguous and questionable to both wrong and...
The immorality of tariffs
The benefits of free trade are vast, and enjoyed throughout the world. The alternative — trade restricted by protective tariffs and quotas — concentrates benefitsto a protected few who profitdue to petitionfrom petitors. The morality of free trade is clear. Individuals canchoose what they buy from where, linking the worldthrough a network of exchange. Integration through trade and exchange is a major factor lifting people out of poverty. The more and freer the trade, the better for human flourishing. Despite...
The unintended consequences of clothing donations
A recent article in the Wall Street Journal focuses on the market for the global clothing donation and recycling industry, centering on the trade from the United States to India. One of the most immediately striking elements of the piece are the photographs that pany it, featuring piles and piles of used clothing on large trucks and people picking through the mountains of fabric taller than they are. The quantity of donated clothing is astounding. These pictures show a fraction...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved