Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Post-Super Bowl Thoughts on Theology and America
Post-Super Bowl Thoughts on Theology and America
Mar 16, 2026 1:56 PM

How ’bout them Seahawks?

As a Chicago Bears fan the answer to that question means very little to me, but I did enjoy the annual ritual of binge-eating and loudly talking over friends and loved ones who gathered together around the TV for Super Bowl 48.

One thing that stood out was the tradition of having various NFL players and civil servants recite the Declaration of Independence before the game. Some of the powerful (and unmistakably religious) lines from our nation’s charter of freedom stirred up a few thoughts on the important role theology has played in this nation for more than hundred years.

For many Americans, the term “theology” is a confusing, misunderstood, or even meaningless one.It’s okay to admit that, even if you consider yourself a spiritual person.

Theology is simply the study, or understanding, of God.

Every person has a theology, even atheists, for they make the definitive claim that there is no God. The presupposition of my definition for theology is that one has already thought about God. It is nearly impossible to separate the question of God from our own experience of asking the “Why am I here?” and “What is my purpose?” questions that rightly plague us all. You can brush these questions off for much or all of your life, but the intellectually honest person is confronted with them and eventually says, “Results be damned: In one form or another, I’m going to explore what knowledge is out there on the subject of God’s and man’s existence.”

On a side note: If you have never reached this point of candid self-reflection in your life, I do not intend to debate the existence of God here and now. But we cannot avoid Him in a discussion of American history and public life.

Here is where I believe the theology of an American matters to their neighbor. Don’t confuse theology with “religion.” You belong to a religion, but you believe in a particular theology.

The question before us, as fellow citizens of a representative republic, is the genesis of our rights.

Where do e from? Does everyone have them? Can they be taken away? Should they ever be taken away? What can and/or should be done if they are taken away?

Thomas Jefferson, the author of theDeclaration of Independence, believed in a Higher Power who created the world, wound it up like a watch, and then walked away to let things play out as they will. Jefferson believed that, like the inner-workings of a watch, there were certain truths, what one might call “Natural Laws,” which governed the universe.

He was what is known as a deist. He was also a lawyer and a rationally thinking man.

The core of his reasoned defense for America’s right to be free from British tyranny was this: “All men are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.” This, in my opinion, is the single most distinctive thing about America.For, as G.K. Chesterton put it, America is the only nation to be founded upon a creed. The Jewish people of the Old Testament were the first to claim that mankind was made in God’s image. Jefferson, a deist no less, and our remarkable Founding Fathers took the logical next step and said “If God created us, then our e from Him, not a king.”

These “truths” were considered to be “self-evident”…as in, “You have to go out of your way to ignore or deny them.”

How does one explain where e from without a Higher Power?If it is not God, then our rights are arbitrary and illusionary. If our rights do e from someone or something higher than ourselves, namely a Creator, then we are entirely dependent on the whims of the State.

You don’t have to worship on Sunday morning at Sarah Palin’s church or profess belief in a literal Six-Day Creation to acknowledge the importance of this point. You don’t have to be the (misguided) type of person who calls America the “Second Israel” to appreciate the uniqueness of this country’s fundamental claims about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

The genius of our Founders was this: led bytheir undeniably Judeo-Christian theological influences and values, they conceived a way to ground our national system in theology without forcing people to be religious. You can believe whatever it is you want about God, Jesus, Buddha or the Hale-Bopp Comet.Go ahead and pray (or not pray) to God in any way you see fit – but we believe in a Higher Power and the only possible chance for sustained freedom and liberty we can see is a nation where everyone, especially those who are lent power to lead, is held toa higher standard.

No one wants a theocracy, but to write theJudeo-Christian heritageout of our nation’s history is preposterous and should not be taken seriously. For better or worse, this is who we are.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Why “opportunity zones” are an opportunity to expand cronyism
Embed from Getty Images Bad policy is not transformed into good policy simply because it’s advocated by good people with good intentions. This should be obvious—especially to conservatives—yet it’s a lesson we continually have to relearn. Consider, for example, the case of “opportunity zones.” As National Review reported, last month a bipartisan group of congressmen introduced a new bill called the Investing in Opportunity Act (IOA), which would will allow investors to temporarily delay paying capital-gains taxes on their investments...
What you should know about deadweight loss
Note: This is post #24 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. When prices are controlled, the mutually profitable gains from free trade cannot be fully realized, creating what is known as deadweight loss. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Alex Tabarrok shows how to calculate deadweight loss using our example of a price ceiling on gasoline. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to 2 times the speed....
5 facts about the Brexit vote and Scottish independence
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon meets with members of European Parliament. On Monday night, Parliament passed a bill allowing Prime Minister Theresa May to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Union under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. On the same day, Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon called for Scotland to hold a second referendum on declaring independence from the UK. Here are five facts you should know about these momentous developments within the transatlantic alliance: 1. The bill...
Radio Free Acton: Anne Rathbone Bradley on the power of economic freedom
Today on Radio Free Acton, we talk with Anne Rathbone Bradley, Ph.D. She serves as Vice President of Economic Initiatives at The Institute for Faith, Work and Economics, and joins us to talk about the vital role that economic freedom plays in lifting people out of poverty. We also address some of mon clichés that are used to attack the market economy, and even take a short peek into the political economy of Al Qaeda. You can listen to the...
Understanding the President’s Cabinet: HHS Secretary
Note: This is the eighth in a weekly series of explanatory posts on the officials and agencies included in the President’s Cabinet. See the series introductionhere. Cabinet position:Secretary of Health and Human Services Department:Department of Health and Human Services Current Secretary: Thomas E. Price, M.D. Succession:The HHS secretary is twelfth in the presidential line of succession. Department Mission:“It is the mission of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) to enhance and protect the health and well-being of...
Economist as prophet vs. savior
What do economists actually know? What can they possibly know? Assuming his usual role as the insider skeptic, economist Russ Roberts ponders those questions at length, concluding that far too much economic analysis is conducted and promoted with far too little humility. bination of economics with statistics in plex world promises a lot more than it delivers,” Robertswrites. “We economists should be more humble and honest about the reliability and precision of statistical analysis.” This is especially true in an...
5 Facts about the Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
On Mondaythe Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its report on the projected effects of the House Republican plan to replace the Affordable Care Act. Here are five facts you should know about the federal agency that “scores” legislation: 1. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is an independent, nonpartisan federal agency within the legislative branch that provides analyses of budgetary and economic issues to support the Congressional budget process. (The CBO can sometimes be confused with the Office of Management and...
Beyond a material understanding of poverty
As we continue to encounter the adverse effects of particular forms of foreign aid, it es increasingly clear that plex social and economic problems requires a level of care, concern, and discipleship not well suited to detached top-down “solutions.” But just as we ought to be more careful about the types of solutions we create, we ought to be equally concerned about the nature of the needs themselves, which are no plex or difficult to discern. Most typically, those blind...
‘Instruction by which we may profit’: A guide to reading Tocqueville’s ‘Democracy in America’ (Part 1)
When Alexis de Tocqueville authored Democracy in America, a two-volume treatment of America, he wrote it “to find there instruction by which we ourselves may profit.” By “we,” Tocqueville was referring to his fellow Frenchmen, but although he may have written those words in 1835, we as Americans of the 21st century also have plenty to profit from Tocqueville’s wisdom, if we’ll but receive it. In the next several posts, we’re going to walk through Democracy in America methodically and...
5 ways the church can help the poor
munity includes people who are both materially poor and ‘poor in spirit’,” says Zachary Ritvalsky in this week’s Acton Commentary. “However, what exactly does it mean to say that people are ‘poor in spirit’?” To be “poor in spirit” is not the same as being economically poor, yet both kinds of poverty matter, and the church must address both. In mentary on Matthew, John Nolland interpreted the phrase like this: “The poor in spirit would be those who sense the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved