Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Shenandoah and ‘every good gift’ for which we give thanks
Shenandoah and ‘every good gift’ for which we give thanks
Mar 28, 2026 3:54 PM

“Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, eth down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.”

I’ll be reading this passage (James 1:17-18) to my congregation on Thanksgiving morning. It’s one of the assigned Propers for Thanksgiving Day according to the 1928 Book of Common Prayer, and it’s a stirring reminder of the goodness of God.

The themes are pretty obvious. Unlike lusts and sinful enticements that bring forth sin and death (James 1:13-16), the Father is always good. All that is good and es from Him, ultimately. He is the good and the source of all that is good. He does not tempt His children toward evil—such is a blasphemous thought, crediting the work of the Devil to our Lord, Redeemer, and Friend.

And our Lord does not change, unlike heavenly bodies that vary over time, as the seasons and years pass by, marking our own short, mutable lives. Yet He loves mortals such as ing to redeem us and making us the good wheat of the fields white with harvest, living sacrifices of praise and thanksgiving to Him. Obviously, this is a rich and important truth to bear in mind during the Thanksgiving season, but I fear we often neglect it.

I am reminded of this negligence whenever I watch one of my favorite films, Shenandoah. In this 1965 film, Charlie Anderson (played by James Stewart) is an independent farmer in Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley during the Civil War. He is also a widowed patriarch with six sons, a daughter, and an expectant daughter-in-law.

Charlie Anderson has a spiritual problem. His virtue of self-sufficiency and values of household independence have warped into a vice. He credits his and his family’s efforts for providing their daily bread rather than God’s providence (grace/generosity/etc.), confessing so in an irreverent prayer given before dinner. He does attend church with his children, but only out of begrudging obedience to his late wife’s request. And he resents God for taking away his beloved wife, Martha. He credits what is bad in his life to the Heavenly Father, and all that is good to himself and his clan.

His whole world turns upside-down thanks to the ravages of the war. While Charlie maintains a policy of neutrality toward both sides, the es to him. Fortune proves to be no respecter of persons or their preferences. In a near Job-like experience, Charlie loses property and members of his beloved family to rapine and violence. By the end of the film, three new bodies are in the cemetery, and his youngest son, Boy, is missing—likely a casualty. Charlie returns to his smaller, damaged household, unable to offer up his usually sarcastic grace before breakfast. He goes out to a now-enlarged plot of graves. He “talks” to his departed wife Martha, contemplating the merciless ravages of war. He says, “I wish I could just know what you’re thinking about it all, Martha, and maybe things wouldn’t look so bad to me if I only knew what you thought.” At this moment, church bells ring, beckoning Charlie to the Sunday meeting. There, he sings the last couple of lines of Martin Luther’s hymn, “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God”:

Let goods and kindred go, this mortal life also;

The body they may kill, God’s truth abideth still, His kingdom is forever.

During the service, Charlie’s youngest son limps in, to the great joy of his father. Charlie, stripped of so much, is grateful for the good things he does have in this life that are blessing of God, particularly the restoration of a son that he had thought was lost. At the end of the film, Charlie and Boy tearfully sing Thomas Ken’s ubiquitous doxology:

Praise God, from whom all blessings flow;

Praise Him, all creatures here below;

Praise Him above, ye heav’nly host;

Praise Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.

Charlie Anderson is a changed man, broken by the bitter pains of misfortune and the steadfast grace of God. Presumably, this is gist of what pious Martha would have told Charlie if she were still alive.

During ing holiday season, many people who have suffered loss as Fortune’s wheel has gone up and down may be tempted to resentment. Most dangerous of all, they may be tempted to resent God Himself, blaming Him as the cause of the evils and pain they have suffered in this life. If they had His omnipotence, omnipresence, omniscience, and sovereignty, surely they would have done a better job—at least for themselves.

But, of course, as Charlie Anderson came to realize, God is not the source of evil. He is only and ever good, and unchangingly so. May we all be thankful for this truth.

Image: Shenandoah, Universal

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
ResearchLinks – 08.17.12
Article: “Catholicism, Human Rights and the Public Sphere” Christopher McCrudden, International Journal of Public Theology This article suggests that the scope and meaning of human rights, and its relationship to religion, is anything but settled, and that this gives an opportunity to those who support a role for religion in public life to intervene. Such intervention should address four main issues. First, it should ensure that judges engage in attempting to understand religious issues from a cognitively internal viewpoint. Secondly,...
Metaphysical Business
Work is at the core of our humanity, says Anthony Esolen, and our ownership of what we produce precedes laws demanding that we give it back to munity” in the abstract. “You didn’t build that!” is probably the mostpreposterousstatement I have ever heard from an American politician. A high bar to clear, no doubt, but let me justify the choice. It puts the effect before the cause. Suppose someone were to say, “If it weren’t for cities, there wouldn’t be...
Education and Incentives
I have written on several recent occasions about the role of incentives in education, both for teachers and for students (see here, here, and here). Yesterday, David Burkus, editor of LDRLB, wrote about a recent study by Harvard University economic researchers on the role of incentives in teacher performance. Interestingly, they found that incentives (such as bonus pay) are far more effective if given up front with the caution that they will need to be returned if the teacher’s performance...
The Vocation of the Politician
This morning the online publication Ethika Politika, the journal of the Center for Morality in Public Life, published my response to a previous article by Thomas Storck on natural law and political engagement. In his article, Storck contents that though the natural law exists as a rationally accessible, universal standard of justice, due to the disordered passions of our fallen condition political engagement on the basis of natural law is all but fruitless. Instead, he mends a renewed emphasis on...
Acton Commentary: Spiritual Competition and the Zero-Sum Game
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Spiritual Competition and the Zero-Sum Game,” I examine a plaint against the market economy: that it engenders what Walter Rauschenbusch called “the law of tooth and nail,” petitive ethos that ends only when the opponent is defeated. In the piece, I trace some of the vociferousness of such claims to the idea of economic reality as a fixed or static pie: The moral cogency of the argument petition is enhanced in a framework where the...
The Complexities of Paul Ryan
Some proponents of limited government understandably yearn to see Mitt Romney’s recently announced running mate, Paul Ryan, as something like the pure intellectual descendent of Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman. Some on the left, meanwhile, will be tempted to portray him as a heartless monster who only wants to enrich the 1 percent. Paul Ryan the politician is plex than either portrait. Far from throwing granny under the bus, his efforts at budget reform are an essential step in saving...
Gregg: A Book That Changed Reality
Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg is featured in The American Spectator today with an article titled, “The Book That Changed Reality.” The piece lauds Catholic philosopher, journalist and theologian Michael Novak’s groundbreaking 1982 book, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism. Called his magnum opus, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism synthesized a moral defense of capitalism with existing cultural and political arguments. Gregg notes this ments on the book’s timely publication and lasting influence: From a 2012 vantage point, it’s easy to...
Germany’s Lutheran Economics
While the economy of America is influenced by old British economists like Smith and Keynes, Germans are still being influenced by an even older, homegrown economist: Martin Luther. Even today Germany, though religiously diverse and politically secular, defines itself and its mission through the writings and actions of the 16th century reformer, who left a succinct definition of Lutheran society in his treatise “The Freedom of a Christian,” which he summarized in two sentences: “A Christian is a perfectly free...
The FRC Shooting and the Vocation of a Hero
The key-card was required to get into the building and to operate the elevator, a security precaution added years earlier when protestors chained themselves together in the lobby. But when I forgot my key—and I was always forgetting my key—he plained. He never uttered a sarcastic remark or had a passive-aggressive sigh to remind me of my absent-mindedness. He’d just leave the guard-desk and quietly help me out. I suspect Leo Johnson exhibited the same stoic friendliness today, when a...
Another Reason We Can’t Afford the Affordable Care Act
In addition to internal logical inconsistencies which raise serious concerns of long term economic sustainability regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), recently analyzed by John MacDhubhain, Robert Pear reports in the New York Times over the weekend how confusion over certain ambiguities in the law (ironically over the meaning of the word “affordable”) would end up hurting some of the people it is precisely designed to help: working class families. Pear writes, The new health care law is known as...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved