Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
John Hancock embodied freedom and generosity
John Hancock embodied freedom and generosity
Jul 5, 2025 11:07 AM

Forever known for his signature, the American Founding Father John Hancock (1737-93) was also staunch opponent of unnecessary or excessive taxation. “They have no right [The Crown] to put their hands in my pocket,” Hancock said. He strongly believed even after the American Revolution, that Congress, like Parliament, could use taxes as a form of tyranny.

As Governor of Massachusetts, Hancock sided with the people over and against over zealous tax appropriators and collectors. Hancock argued farmers and tradesmen would never be able to pay their taxes if their land and property were confiscated. He barred government officials from imprisoning farmers too poor to pay taxes. In addition to his views on taxes, Hancock supported cuts in government spending.

Hancock inherited a substantial amount of wealth from merchant trading, a business started by his uncle known as the “House of Hancock.” Hancock’s father, a minister, died when he was just a child. He was raised by his wealthy uncle and aunt. Their wealth gave him a first class education.

Hancock went on to increase the assets and e of his uncle’s business, when he took control of the enterprise. He was quite possibly the richest man in the American Colonies. Hancock enjoyed owning the finest home, attire, furniture, coaches, and wines. As a fault, he could even show ical attachment to material possessions from time to time. He once organized a military party to challenge the British during the revolutionary war, his part in the conflict was only to last a few weeks and was close to his home, still he galloped to battle with six carriages behind him carrying his finest warrior apparel and the finest French wines. Patriot Generals poked fun at his unnecessary show of pomp and pageantry. Still he fretted, when he realized he was missing a pair of imported leather boots.

While his wealth was immense, so was his generosity. Hundreds of colonists depended on his business for their economic livelihood. In addition, he helped his own ambitious employees start their own entrepreneurial endeavors. He gave lavishly to local churches, charities, the arts, assisted widows, and paid for the schooling of orphans. Hancock also spent his own wealth on public works and aesthetic improvements for the city of Boston.

His enormous popularity was in fact, to a large degree, due to his substantial giving. Hancock was also known for treating others with the characteristics of Christian principles. He treated those of modest means with the same respect as those who had access to wealth and power. Several authors have affectionately referred to him “As a man of the people.” A German officer who fought for the British was astounded at the way he befriended and talked to the very poorest citizens of Boston.

Hancock started out as a moderate in the dispute with the English. He preferred to petition the Crown and Parliament through his pen and numerous contacts. In fact, the majority of his wealth was created from trading and contracts with the English. His views gradually shifted towards independence however because of bination of issues. One was no doubt taxes and tariffs, but to a lesser degree Hancock may have been spurred by the desire to protect his home and possessions from anti-British mobs in Boston who found appeasement in looting the homes of loyalists and sympathizers of the English. He protected his property and home on one occasion by appeasing a mob with free alcohol. Boston had quickly turned into a hotbed of patriot radicalism.

Still, Hancock risked his wealth, health, and life for the American Revolution. His suffering from the gout was made worse due to the immense workload of his office. His young daughter died during this time, and later his only other child, a son, died on an accident on the ice. As President of the Second Continental Congress, the first signer of the Declaration of Independence, and President of the Congress of the Confederation, he worked feverishly daily and late into the nights to support the war effort, only pausing for a few hours of sleep and to honor the Sabbath. His position required him to be present for virtually all congressional meetings, hearings, and business.

He was selected for these prestigious positions because of his popularity among the vast majority of colonial leaders, who were often tied to regional loyalties. A large part of his duty was influencing states to support the revolution with ample financial and material assistance. It was a difficult task due to the weakness of the central government. Hancock ended up contributing much of his own fortune to the cause of liberty.

After the war Hancock was elected Governor of Massachusetts. He was easily reelected, and when he retired, again the people demanded his return to office. He was known for an mon fairness and protecting the rights of mon citizen from an oppressive government. He was lenient on the leaders of the Shays’ Rebellion. His decision to support the U.S. Constitution, pending the addition of a Bill of Rights, easily swayed a divided Massachusetts convention. He died in office as Governor in 1793. John Adams, often a political rival and opponent of Hancock, declared after his death:

I could melt into tears when I hear his name…If benevolence, charity, generosity were ever personified in North America, they were in John Hancock. What shall I say of his education? His literary acquisitions?…His military, civil, and political services? His sufferings and sacrifices? I can say with truth that I profoundly admired him and more profoundly loved him.

[To learn more about John Hancock read John Hancock: Merchant King and American Patriot by Harlow Giles Unger]

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Worldwide Flight From Family Is Killing Us
In the 1970s, Paul Ehrlich tried to warn us: human beings were in trouble. We were reproducing so rapidly, Ehrlich opined, that millions of us would soon be starving. Ehrlich got one thing right: we are in trouble. But he pletely wrong about overpopulation. Today, just the opposite is true. There aren’t enough of us human beings. And a lot of people are seriously disinterested in making more. Nicholas Eberstadt calls this the “flight from family.” All around the world...
Why is NYC Discriminating Against Churches?
New York City owns almost 1,200 public school buildings that sit empty on nights and weekends. To earn some extra e, the city rents out the empty schools to tens of thousands munity groups for any meetings that might be of interest to munity: Boy Scouts, drama clubs, labor unions senior citizen groups, etc. In 2011 alone, the NYC issued over 122,000 permits for using the schools. But there is one group that is forbidden from using the facilities: churches....
Religious Activists Push Back Against ‘Blunt Instrument’ of Fossil Fuels Divestment
Your faithful correspondent last week exposed the fossil-fuel divestment endgame of religious shareholder activists. As You Sow President Danielle Fugere sees her group’s activities as awareness-raising exercises for climate change, but AYS’s alignment with environmentalist and divestment firebrand Naomi Klein suggests they’d settle for nothing less than nationalizing panies. This week, I’m happy to report another group frequently called to task in this space, the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, opposes the AYS divestment onslaught. Reporting in last week’s Wall...
Hostility Towards Religion Continues To Grow In America
Liberty Institute, a legal organization in Plano, Texas, has released the report, “Undeniable: The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America, 2014 Edition,” featuring more than 1,300 cases of religious hostility, persecution and/or Constitutional violations of rights in the United States. According to the report, Hostility to religion in America is still growing. Because religion is so vital to a free and well-ordered society, our goal is to expose and document this growing hostility to help Americans confront and reverse...
Death And Redemption In Ukraine
Bohdan Solchanyk was not a materialistic young man. He did not seek worldly pleasures, but rather took delight in his studies, his fiancee, his faith. What Bohdan wanted -what they both wanted – was live in the Ukraine with dignity and freedom. Bohdan’s dream died last week at a peaceful protest against the government, where he and 80 others were “brutally shot and killed by government snipers in the central square of the capital of Ukraine, as the world’s TV...
Landmark Human Trafficking Case Concludes With $14 Million Settlement
While sex trafficking gets a lot of attention in the media, labor trafficking is actually mon. It largely affects middle-aged men, most of whom are looking for ways to support themselves and their families. Often faced with overwhelming poverty, these men make ill-informed and risky choices, hoping that what they are being told by potential employers is true. In a landmark case, a Gulf pany, Signal International, has been ordered to pay $14 million in damages to men they had...
Florist Chooses Conscience Over Settlement
Last year Washington State’s Attorney General sued Arlene’s Flowers & Gifts on the basis of consumer protection. Florist Barronelle Stutzman had refused to sell flowers to a long time customer when the arrangements were to be used for a same-sex marriage ceremony. Although Stutzman did not have any qualms about serving serving gay customers, she “didn’t want to be involved in a same-sex marriage.” “I just put my hands on his and told [the customer who made the request] because...
Women and the Academy Awards
Patricia Arquette’s passion is fabulous, says Elise Hilton in this week’s Acton Commentary, but she’s wrong on economics: Ms. Arquette’s passion is fabulous, and I’m sure that’s what makes her a great actor. But she’s wrong on economics. The “women make 23 cents less than men” canard is far less accurate than Arquette thinks it is. Women are more likely to work part-time, to choose careers that pay less but offer more flexibility in scheduling (such as teaching) and often...
What Patricia Arquette Should Have Said About the Wage Gap and Women’s Rights
During last night’s Oscar ceremony, Best Supporting Actresswinner Patricia Arquette used her acceptance speech to rail against unfair pay for women: To every women who gave birth to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody else’s equal rights. It’s our time … to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America. The wage equality that Arquette is referring to is the gender wage gap—the difference...
Economic Freedom Isn’t Enough
We know that, for economies to thrive, people must be free to start their own businesses without taxing regulations, that free trade must be the de facto means of doing business, and that cronyism and corruption must be eradicated. But that’s not enough. At the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, blogger (and former Acton intern) Elise Amyx says we have to have human flourishing as well. Economic freedom is only ponent of human flourishing. We should think about it...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved