Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
John Hancock embodied freedom and generosity
John Hancock embodied freedom and generosity
Aug 29, 2026 1:08 PM

Forever known for his signature, the American Founding Father John Hancock (1737-93) was also staunch opponent of unnecessary or excessive taxation. “They have no right [The Crown] to put their hands in my pocket,” Hancock said. He strongly believed even after the American Revolution, that Congress, like Parliament, could use taxes as a form of tyranny.

As Governor of Massachusetts, Hancock sided with the people over and against over zealous tax appropriators and collectors. Hancock argued farmers and tradesmen would never be able to pay their taxes if their land and property were confiscated. He barred government officials from imprisoning farmers too poor to pay taxes. In addition to his views on taxes, Hancock supported cuts in government spending.

Hancock inherited a substantial amount of wealth from merchant trading, a business started by his uncle known as the “House of Hancock.” Hancock’s father, a minister, died when he was just a child. He was raised by his wealthy uncle and aunt. Their wealth gave him a first class education.

Hancock went on to increase the assets and e of his uncle’s business, when he took control of the enterprise. He was quite possibly the richest man in the American Colonies. Hancock enjoyed owning the finest home, attire, furniture, coaches, and wines. As a fault, he could even show ical attachment to material possessions from time to time. He once organized a military party to challenge the British during the revolutionary war, his part in the conflict was only to last a few weeks and was close to his home, still he galloped to battle with six carriages behind him carrying his finest warrior apparel and the finest French wines. Patriot Generals poked fun at his unnecessary show of pomp and pageantry. Still he fretted, when he realized he was missing a pair of imported leather boots.

While his wealth was immense, so was his generosity. Hundreds of colonists depended on his business for their economic livelihood. In addition, he helped his own ambitious employees start their own entrepreneurial endeavors. He gave lavishly to local churches, charities, the arts, assisted widows, and paid for the schooling of orphans. Hancock also spent his own wealth on public works and aesthetic improvements for the city of Boston.

His enormous popularity was in fact, to a large degree, due to his substantial giving. Hancock was also known for treating others with the characteristics of Christian principles. He treated those of modest means with the same respect as those who had access to wealth and power. Several authors have affectionately referred to him “As a man of the people.” A German officer who fought for the British was astounded at the way he befriended and talked to the very poorest citizens of Boston.

Hancock started out as a moderate in the dispute with the English. He preferred to petition the Crown and Parliament through his pen and numerous contacts. In fact, the majority of his wealth was created from trading and contracts with the English. His views gradually shifted towards independence however because of bination of issues. One was no doubt taxes and tariffs, but to a lesser degree Hancock may have been spurred by the desire to protect his home and possessions from anti-British mobs in Boston who found appeasement in looting the homes of loyalists and sympathizers of the English. He protected his property and home on one occasion by appeasing a mob with free alcohol. Boston had quickly turned into a hotbed of patriot radicalism.

Still, Hancock risked his wealth, health, and life for the American Revolution. His suffering from the gout was made worse due to the immense workload of his office. His young daughter died during this time, and later his only other child, a son, died on an accident on the ice. As President of the Second Continental Congress, the first signer of the Declaration of Independence, and President of the Congress of the Confederation, he worked feverishly daily and late into the nights to support the war effort, only pausing for a few hours of sleep and to honor the Sabbath. His position required him to be present for virtually all congressional meetings, hearings, and business.

He was selected for these prestigious positions because of his popularity among the vast majority of colonial leaders, who were often tied to regional loyalties. A large part of his duty was influencing states to support the revolution with ample financial and material assistance. It was a difficult task due to the weakness of the central government. Hancock ended up contributing much of his own fortune to the cause of liberty.

After the war Hancock was elected Governor of Massachusetts. He was easily reelected, and when he retired, again the people demanded his return to office. He was known for an mon fairness and protecting the rights of mon citizen from an oppressive government. He was lenient on the leaders of the Shays’ Rebellion. His decision to support the U.S. Constitution, pending the addition of a Bill of Rights, easily swayed a divided Massachusetts convention. He died in office as Governor in 1793. John Adams, often a political rival and opponent of Hancock, declared after his death:

I could melt into tears when I hear his name…If benevolence, charity, generosity were ever personified in North America, they were in John Hancock. What shall I say of his education? His literary acquisitions?…His military, civil, and political services? His sufferings and sacrifices? I can say with truth that I profoundly admired him and more profoundly loved him.

[To learn more about John Hancock read John Hancock: Merchant King and American Patriot by Harlow Giles Unger]

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
For the Good of Mankind, Side With the Consumer
Should we always take the side of the individual consumer? That’s the question Rod Dreher asks in a recent post on “Amazon and the Cost of Consumerism.” It’s a good question, one that people have been asking for centuries. The best answer that has been provided—as is usually the case when es to economic questions—was provided by the nineteenth-century French journalist Frédéric Bastiat. Bastiat argues, rather brilliantly, that, consumption is the great end and purpose of political economy; that good...
Was The Current Border Crisis A Foreseeable Event?
In a scathing report in The Washington Post, reporters David Nakamura, Jerry Markon and Manuel Roig-Franzia detail how the current border crisis involving a surge of children from Mexico and Central America was predicted by several human rights organizations and that the Obama administration failed to act, thus creating not only the increase in children illegally crossing the border, but also the desperate conditions the children have had to endure. In 2013, the University of Texas at El Paso issued...
Religious Left Takes Vow of Silence on Left-Wing ‘Dark Money’
When es to political and lobbying spending, it’s a mixed-up, muddled-up, shook-up world, to quote the Kinks’ Ray Davies. Leftist organizations such as the Center for Political Accountability, the Interfaith Center for Corporate Responsibility, and As You Sow seemingly check the closets and under the beds each night to ensure corporations aren’t exercising their First Amendment rights to freely engage in the political process. These shareholder activist groups work together and individually to stifle corporate speech by submitting proxy resolutions...
Religion & Liberty: An Interview with Uwe Siemon-Netto
Next year will mark the 40th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon and the end of America’s involvement in Vietnam. Uwe Siemon-Netto, a German, and former journalist for United Press International, covered much of the conflict in Vietnam. He has a new and excellent book titled, Triumph of the Absurd: A Reporter’s Love for the Abandoned People of Vietnam. Siemon-Netto is a Lutheran theologian and his extensive background in journalism and theology gives him tremendous credibility in discussing today’s media...
Audio: Elise Hilton on The Manufactured Border Crisis
Elise Hilton has been writing a good deal lately about our manufactured border crisis, and last week Al Kresta, host of Kresta in the Afternoon on the Ave Maria Radio Network, asked Elise to join him on his show to discuss the human tide currently engulfing the southern border of the United States. They discuss the response – or lack thereof – of the Obama Administration to the crisis, the underlying causes of the problem, and how the failures of...
Roadmap Out Of The Nihilistic Void
In a gutsy, thoughtful article attheAmerican Thinker , Danusha V. Goska describes her intellectual journey from a family of card-carrying Communists to discovering she wanted to spend time with people “building, cultivating, and establishing, something that they loved.” There’s a lot to mull over in Goska’s piece, but it was her discovery of a moral and religious framework that struck me. Rather than a “nihilistic void” that had been her life, Goska encountered people whose faith informed their actions in...
Skirting The Law: Five U.S. Territories Now Exempt From Obamacare
Last week was a busy one, news-wise, and this may have slipped by you. Suddenly, 4.5 million people in the 5 U.S. territories (American Somoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands) are now exempt from Obamacare. Just like that. What’s the story? Obamacare costs too darn much, and insurance providers were fleeing the U.S. territories, leaving many without insurance or at least affordable insurance. These territories have spent the last two years begging to get...
Explainer: The Obamacare Subsidies Ruling (Halbig v. Burwell)
What just happened with Obamacare? In a two-to-one decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dealt a serious blow to Obamacare by ruling the government may not provide subsidies to encourage people to buy health insurance on the new marketplaces run by the federal government. What did the court decide? Section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) makes tax credits available as a...
The Idle Rich
Over at his blog, Peter Boettke writes, “The idle rich are never really idle in a free market economy.” Now while we might want to distinguish between the rich and their riches, could it be that even in their consumption, conspicuous or otherwise, the rich are contributing to a rising tide that lifts all boats? Wesley Gant makes that related case over at Values & Capitalism: “Is It Possible to Waste Money?” Gant seems to conclude that it isn’t possible...
The Economics Of Sex
Economics, at first glance, doesn’t seem very…well…sexy. It’s all about numbers, right? How the stock market is doing, how much people are willing to spend on stuff they need or want, whether or not people have jobs. That’s economics, right? As the Rev. Robert Sirico is fond of saying, economics is fundamentally about human action. If this is true, then economics applies to sexual activity as well. In the following video (from the Austin Institute), today’s sexual landscape is examined...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved