Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
HBO’s ‘Chernobyl‘: A scathing rebuke of Soviet secrecy
HBO’s ‘Chernobyl‘: A scathing rebuke of Soviet secrecy
May 18, 2026 10:24 AM

In case you missed it, the final episode of the highly acclaimed five-part HBO miniseries “Chernobyl” aired last night. When the credits rolled, I let out a pent-up breath that I didn’t know that I was holding in and slumped back in my seat, finally able to relax. The show was over, but the weightiness of its message and atmosphere lingered on, sticking with me even as I laid down to sleep.

“Chernobyl” dramatizes the events leading up to and following the nuclear disaster at the Vladimir Lenin Nuclear Power Station just outside of Pripyat, Ukraine. It immediately takes a personal, character-driven focus on the events, each episode following the story of a particular person or group of people whose lives were irrevocably changed when the Unit 4 reactor at the plant exploded on April 26, 1986, releasing massive amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere during the worst nuclear disaster in history.

While “Chernobyl” took some liberties with the sequence and details of events and the people involved, it still managed to faithfully retell the overall story of the disaster and give a heart-wrenching look at the human impact. And it never stopped delivering blow after blow to the Soviet mismanagement, corruption, and secrecy that enabled the catastrophe.

The entire series focuses on the failings at each level of the Soviet state. From petent and undertrained nuclear technicians, to ambitious supervisors who ignored safety protocols, bureaucratic red tape halting action to limit the damage, and Soviet state secrecy trying to cover up the truth and save face on the world stage. The creators of “Chernobyl” lay waste to the Soviet machine while hailing as heroes the brave men and women who lived, toiled, and died striving to contain the disaster.

The show’s main character, a Russian nuclear physicist named Valery Legasov (brilliantly played by Jared Harris), binds the whole enterprise together, engaging with his counterpart Ulana Khomyuk (who represented the dozens of scientists who aided Legasov during the events in reality) in a sort of nuclear detective story as they try to piece together what caused the disaster while desperately trying to contain the damage.

Over just five episodes, we see Legasov develop as a character, his early horrified naiveté replaced by a world-weary stoicism as he faces down both the invisible killing power of Chernobyl’s radiation and the pressure of the immense Soviet bureaucratic machine seeking to cover up the truth. Even in the face of these obstacles and the human cost of what must be done to contain the damage, he still holds onto his earnest desire to help others and prevent another disaster from happening. Cigarette in hand, aided and supported by Khomyuk and his adversary-turned-friend Boris Shcherbina, he labors on tirelessly to the end, delivering one of the finest layman-level technical explanations of the Chernobyl disaster I’ve ever seen alongside a scathing condemnation of the Soviet state a la “The Gulag Archipelago” in his testimony during the post-disaster Soviet show trial. This segment alone makes watching the series worth it.

The production quality of the series was top-notch. Era-faithful wardrobe and set design as well as a life-size mockup of the destroyed reactor building were painstakingly made to immerse the viewer in the world. This alongside the droning, pulsating music and excellent sound design wove together a thick, foreboding atmosphere that settles on the viewer like a cloud of radioactive smog.

There’s something in the series for everybody: from the munist, to the history buff, to the nuclear physicist, to the drama junkie. If you haven’t yet seen “Chernobyl”, do yourself a favor and give it a look. This is some of the best that television has to offer.

Featured image courtesy IMDb and HBO. Still from promo trailer.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
‘Hokey Religions and Ancient Weapons’
This es from Han Solo, which pretty well sums up his critique of Jedi knights in the Star Wars saga, “Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side.” I also wonder whether it might be apt in describing the sometimes contemptuous relationship between scientific progress and religion (Christianity in particular), as the guiding pragmatic ethos of naturalism wars against orthodox Christian belief. Forbes has posted a slideshow giving reviews of the various technologies...
Freaks and chimeras
My more detailed response to last week’s NYT editorial defending chimera research is posted over at WorldMagBlog. ...
The moral imperative of our time?
In his “Bad Economics, Bad Public Policy and Bad Theology,” columnist Raymond Keating makes the case on OrthodoxyToday.org that the Religious Left offers “assorted biblical passages that speak of aiding the poor, the necessity for charity and justice, or other vague generalities, and then simply assert that these quotations support the particulars of their big government philosophy. Of course, this ranks as either ignorant or disingenuous from a theological standpoint.” Keating examines resurgent activism by liberal/leftist religious leaders on environmental...
The best kind of charity
A post by Leslie Sillars over at Signs of the Times takes ABC’s show, “Extreme Makeover: Home Edition,” to task. His difficulty, essentially, is this: is this charity in any reasonable sense of the word? It looks like the best kind of charity—unmerited favor for someone in need, out of the blue—yet, ABC makes buckets of money on the program, Sears and the other sponsors get loads of exposure, and Ty and the rest of them are portrayed as angels...
‘Differences between being an Evangelical and being a Republican’
An excellent reflection on the role of Christianity and its relation to political loyalties from Joe Carter at the evangelical outpost (no longer online). The key conclusion: “As a fellow traveler of the GOP, I find myself walking side by side with the party toward the same goals. But at other times our paths will diverge and I must follow where my conscience as a Christian conservative leads me. After all, to stand with Christ means that I can’t always...
Big story on small loans
Today’s Christian Science Monitor has a story on the increasing use of micro-loans by Christian aid and development groups. According to the story, “Religious organizations are increasingly adopting the Talmudic sentiment that the noblest form of charity is helping others to dispense with it.” Ron Sider, in the twentieth anniversary edition of his book, Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger, strongly endorses the use of micro-loans as a means of getting desperately needed capital to those who need it...
It’s that time of year
Time for the annual spate of “gap between rich and poor increases” stories in the MSM. There are a number of problems with the judgmental assumptions implicit in these kinds of stories. For example, there is a zero-sum view of wealth that pits individuals against each other. It’s essentially the “pie” view of money and wealth: if I take a piece, there’s that much less available for others. This is the distributivist economic model. This is a fundamentally flawed economic...
Good intentions aren’t enough
Rev. Robert Sirico spoke with Frank Beckmann today on Detroit-based WJR about faith and politics, emphasizing the proper role of religion in society as providing a solid moral foundation with which to approach political, social, economic decisions. Sirico also talks with the emergence of what Pope Benedict XVI refers to as the dictatorship of relativism – an idea which views the expression of religion as an impedance on liberty – and suggests an understanding of the integration between faith and...
E-Libraries
A story in the Sunday New York Times highlighted the move of the undergraduate library at the University of Texas at Austin to a predominantly electronic collection. mon reference materials like dictionaries will remain in hard copy, all other stacks of books “will be dispersed to other university collections to clear space for a 24-hour electronic mons, a fast-spreading phenomenon that is transforming research and study on campuses around the country.” This move should not be taken as indicative of...
Academic editorializing
The Telegraph reports that there is growing dissent among the ranks of some scientists, whose dissenting viewpoint is unable to find a place in many major academic journals. According to the story, Two of the world’s leading scientific journals e under fire from researchers for refusing to publish papers which challenge fashionable wisdom over global warming. … The controversy follows the publication by Science in December of a paper which claimed to have plete agreement among climate experts, not only...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved