Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Michigan Voters Reject $2 Billion Bipartisan Flim Flam
Michigan Voters Reject $2 Billion Bipartisan Flim Flam
Mar 28, 2026 1:45 PM

The Democrats are the party that says government will make you smarter, taller, richer, and remove the crabgrass on your lawn. The Republicans are the party that says government doesn’t work and then they get elected and prove it. — P.J. O’Rourke

Sometimes, a ray of light breaks through the dense gloom overhanging our political culture.

Gov. Rick SnyderMichigan voters, in a mass outbreak mon sense, on Tuesday resoundingly rejected a $2 billion tax increase proposal pitched as a fix for the state’s roads and, among many other things, a help for the working poor. That was one of the more outrageous claims, but the topper was Gov. Rick Snyder’s gun-to-the-head threat in March that if voters did not approve the tax increase, “there is no Plan B for the roads.” Insulting voters with such tactics undoubtedly played a role in the thrashing that Snyder and the Lansing political establishment received at the polls. As the Detroit News put it:

Proposal 1 suffered the worst defeat Tuesday of any Michigan constitutional amendment ballot measure since the current constitution was adopted more than a half-century ago, as 80.1 percent of voters rejected the sales tax increase and road funding plan.

The prior low mark of a constitutional ballot measure was set in 1980, when 78.8 percent of the electorate beat back Proposal A, which would have shifted taxes to ensure equal school funding among all districts in the state, according to state records. It was up against two property tax relief measures that attracted more votes even though they, too, were struck down.

This year’s thumping occurred even though the measure was backed by Gov. Rick Snyder as well as the Republican and Democratic legislative leaders from last year’s Michigan House and Senate. The Safe Roads Yes campaign ended up amassing about $9.5 million, 27 times as much money as the roughly $350,000 the three opposition campaigns bined. The result was a 4-1 defeat of the ballot proposal lawmakers cobbled together a week before Christmas.

The Wall Street Journal pointed out what Michigan voters already knew, which was that any measure crafted to raise funds for road building should be dedicated to just that.

Governor Rick Snyder and the GOP legislature pushed Proposal 1, which would have amended the Michigan constitution to allow raising the sales tax to 7% from 6%, rejiggering the way gas is taxed and raising vehicle registration fees. The package also included an expansion of the e tax credit, money munity colleges, public schools and local governments. Michiganders were promised about $1.3 billion in road spending if they’d foot the bill for more than $700 million in goodies.

[ … ]

Filling potholes really isn’t as hard as Michigan Republicans are making it seem: The state could cut a program that hands out money to wealthy filmmakers, nix $40 million in Amtrak subsidies and repeal a prevailing-wage law e up with the $2 billion Proposal 1 hoped to raise, according to the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.

Voters can elect Democrats if they want a tax increase. They elect Republicans to make hard spending choices and grow the economy.

The Mackinac Center’s legislative analyst Jack McHugh added this:

The colossal defeat of Prop 1 is even more intriguing since it had the backing of both the Republican and Democratic parties as well as the governor, who campaigned for it in the final weeks. With a few exceptions the mainstream news media also overwhelmingly favored the measure, with the state’s three statewide print and online news sources (Detroit Free Press, The Detroit News, MLive) all calling for a “yes” vote.

The defeat came despite the fact that a scattered opposition was massively outspent. According the most recent reports the mittee Safe Votes Yes raised $9.6 million to get the measure passed, ing from road builders but also from other special interests that appeared to have no direct stake in the e, such as large utilities (who have separate issues of their own pending before the current Legislature).

“The distance between voters on one side and the mainstream media and political class on the other is both startling and unprecedented,” said [McHugh]. “According to MIRS News the measure passed in just munities, two of which (Ann Arbor and East Lansing) are considered by many to be elitist and disconnected from the mass of Michigan voters (Kalamazoo was the munity).”

What now? Oh yeah, as the Oakland Press informs us: Lawmakers tackle non-existent Plan B for roads with Prop 1 defeat

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How Can We End Hunger in America?
What does it mean to be hungry in America? And how do we solve the issue of domestic hunger? To answer those questions, Congress created the bipartisan National Commissionon Hunger, a group tasked with providing “policy mendations to Congress and the USDA Secretary to more effectively use existing programs and funds of the Department of Agriculture bat domestic hunger and food insecurity.” mission recently released a report on their findings and mendations. According to the executive summary, “ This report...
Top 10 PowerBlog Posts for 2015
As we close out the year, we want to thank our PowerBlog readers for reading and contributing to our blog. If you’re a new reader we encourage you to catch up by checking out our top 10 most popular posts for 2015: 1. A Guide to Laudato Si: A Section-By-Section Summary of Pope Francis’ Encyclical on the Environment Joe Carter Pope Francis has released his eagerly anticipated encyclical on the environment, Laudato Si’. While the document deserves a close reading,...
Alexis de Tocqueville Vs. Bernie Sanders
Self-described democratic socialist, Sen. Bernie Sanders is doing relatively well in the race for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination. He recently polled at 34 percent (an increase from 30 percent in November) and, anecdotally, I passed several “Bernie” bumper-stickered cars on fairly empty roads this morning. Despite Sander’s and democratic socialism’s fashionableness these days, a Frenchman born in 1805 already warned against and explained the dangers of this kind of socialism. Writing for The Federalist, Acton’s Director of Research Samuel...
7 Figures: Millennials’ Views of American Institutions
A new Pew Research Center analysis of survey data shows that younger generations tend to have more-positive views than their elders on a number of institutions that play a significant role in American society. Here are 7 figures you should know from the report: 1. Millennials’ rating of churches and other religious organizations dropped 18 percentage points from 2010 to 2015. In 2010, nearly three-quarters (73 percent) said churches have a positive impact on the country; today, only 55 percent...
Discussion Question: What Makes Insider Trading Wrong?
For most of my life, much of what I’ve learned about the world came from watching movies. This was especially true in 1983, when I was in junior high. That was the year I learned about astronauts (The Right Stuff), thermonuclear war (War Games), and ewoks (Return of the Jedi). I also learned about financial crimes—specifically insider trading— from the Eddie Murphy/Dan edy, Trading Places. If you’ve forgotten the plot, here’s a brief summary by Gary Gensler, the former Chairperson...
How Tocqueville Schooled Bernie Sanders 200 Years Ago
Bernie Sanders appears to think all we need to be happy is more money,” says Samuel Gregg, Acton’s director of research, but Alexis de Tocqueville dismantled that idea two centuries ago. Tocqueville’s first reproach was that socialism—whatever its expression—has an inherently materialistic understanding of humans. “The first characteristic of all socialist ideologies is,” Tocqueville insisted, “an incessant, vigorous and extreme appeal to the material passions of man.” Tocqueville may have wrestled with religious questions for much of his life. Nevertheless,...
Hot Fries and the End of Work
“There can never be a world without work,” says James Bruce in this week’s Acton Commentary. “We are made to work. We flourish when we do, and we suffer when we don’t.” Now, if we think about work’s purpose or goal, we will realize that work can never end. Philosophically, rational agents have specific conditions for genuine flourishing, one of which is work. The sociological data certainly support the claims that we are made for work, and that we suffer...
Why Minimum Wages Increases Don’t Target Poverty
If you ask most people why they support raising the minimum wage they’ll says it’s because it helps the poor. But as David Neumark, a scholar at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco notes, numerous studies have shown that there is no statistically significant relationship between raising the minimum wage and reducing poverty. That finding may appear to be counterintuitive. After all, if poor people have low wages then increasing their wages should help reduce their poverty. To some...
Explaining Interest Rates to Bernie Sanders
The day after Christmas, presidential candidate Bernie Sanders asked on Twitter: “You have families out there paying 6, 8, 10 percent on student debt but you can refinance your homes at 3 percent. What sense is that?” My snarky tweet in response was, “Because you can foreclose on a house but you can’t repossess an MFA in creative writing.” A more thorough (and thoughtful) explanation is provided by Megan McArdle. She explains why loans secured (such a by a house)...
Video: Lawrence Reed Challenges Progressive Mythology
The final Acton Lecture Series event of 2015 took place on December 10th as the Acton Institute joined with our friends at the Mackinac Centerto e Lawrence Reed, the president of the Foundation for Economic Education. Reed is always a favorite ALS speaker, and once again he did not disappoint; his address was entitled “Excuse Me, Professor: Challenging the Myths of Progressivism”, and was based on his recently released book of the same title. Reed’s lecture is available to view...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved