Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Happy New Year: The minimum wage is practically irrelevant
Happy New Year: The minimum wage is practically irrelevant
May 14, 2026 8:48 AM

This morning, as Americans go to work for the first Monday of the New Year, a growing number will see their wages rise to $15 an hour or more – thanks, not to higher minimum wage laws, but to the bustling free market. Increasingly, economists agree that in the frenetic labor market of 2020, the minimum wage has e virtually irrelevant.

No one disputes that workers are earning higher salaries in 2020, and the lowest earners have received the biggest boost. James Pethokoukis of AEI writes:

Average hourly earnings for all employees have increased by 3.1 percent over the past year, with earnings for production and nonsupervisory employees up 3.7 percent. Not bad given low inflation and, unfortunately, low productivity growth.

But perhaps the most encouraging data point is how the lowest-paid workers continue to experience faster wage growth than workers overall, which wasn’t the case in the first years of the post-Great Recession recovery.

Pethokoukis notes that unemployment stands at a 50-year low of 3.5 percent, and employment rates for prime-age workers 25 to 54 have returned to pre-recession levels.

But some claim wages are rising due to “pressure” from the Fight for $15 movement, which has induced a handful of cities to increase their minimum wage. Is this true?

The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta weighed this assertion in the balance and found it wanting.

The pared the relative median wages of the states that increased their minimum wage between 2014 and 2019 to those that did not. (Interestingly, the states that did not alter their wage laws had a higher relative median wage.) Analysts found that both sets of states improved overall, regardless of legislation. This suggests that “the increased tightness of labor markets, or some other factor than hikes in state minimum wages, is playing a role in pushing up the pay for those in lower-wage jobs.”

The U.S. economy has exploded, thanks to a bout of tax-cutting and deregulation that rewards investment. The resultant national prosperity has required employers from Sinclair Broadcasting, to Target, to Amazon to increase their minimum to $15 an hour voluntarily.

This reveals a little-appreciated fact: For all the Sturm und Drang over raising the minimum wage, almost no one collects the minimum wage.

Mark J. Perry of AEI quotes aWall Street Journalarticle that, although the nation’s minimum wage has not budged from $7.25 an hour in a decade, today only “a tiny share of Americans, just 0.28% of the 156 million civilian workers earned the federal minimum last year [2018], according to the Labor Department. … Most of those employees were younger than 25 years old.”

This accords with federal statistics. The Bureau of Labor Statistics found that, in November, average hourly earnings for all employees on private non-farm payrolls rose to $28.29. In fact, the government states there is not a single industry in which the average hourly wage does not exceed $15 an hour. (Employees in the lowest-paid industry, leisure and hospitality, earn an average of $16.77 an hour. People in the information sector earn $42.29.)

The WSJ says, in this economy, the minimum wage teeters on the brink of ing “irrelevant.”

Many well-intentioned people believe raising the minimum wage is an imperative of the Christian faith. Democratic presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg has voiced this view.

Something can scarcely be a moral necessity, critical to the survival of millions, and irrelevant at the same time.

Once again, economic interventionists miss the point: They assume laws create economic realities. But wages are rising, because employers pete with one another for the most qualified workers. When corporations freely raise workers’ pay, it reflects real market conditions. Companies realize a pay hike is necessary to hire or retain the best talent, and they offer no more attractive a salary and benefits package than they can afford. They alone have this information; government neither has it nor seems to care.

When government artificially raises the minimum wage, it pressures the most vulnerable businesses and punishes economically weaker areas, leaving their workers – and citizens – jobless. The trauma of unemployment runs deeper than momentary salary reductions. “The absence of work damages the spirit, just as the absence of prayer damages practical activity,” said Pope Francis.

What matters to the poor is not higher minimum wage laws but higher wages. Economic freedom creates the prosperity that raises their pay. And less stultifying regulations will assure this productive bidding process continues to let all people use their God-given talents for the service of others.

Mozart. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Are tariffs the best tool to solve economic and social problems of globalization?
President Trump said in a press conference Tuesday that he may postpone the March 1st deadline for the extension of tariffs on Chinese goods as US trade representatives are in China working on a trade agreement. Trump promoted tariffs in his campaign and has argued that tariffs will help strengthen the US economy and bring back factory jobs to American workers. The first round of tariffs on started last year with a 25% tariff on over 800 different Chinese goods....
5 facts about Susan B. Anthony
Today is the 199th anniversary of the birth of Susan B. Anthony. In honor of her legacy, here are five facts you should know about the great American social reformer: 1. Anthony was born in Massachusetts in 1820 to a family of devout, radical Quakers. Her parents raised her and her siblings to have a passion for social reform, and stressed the importance of issues such as prison reform and the abolishment of slavery.Although she continued to describe herself as...
The Reverend Edmund A. Opitz, a precursor in the defense of religion and liberty
Today marks 13 years since the passing of the Reverend Edmund A. Opitz, pastor, author, and great supporter of the Acton Institute’s mission. On February 1, 1999, Rev. Opitz sent a letter to Leonard P. Liggio (1933-2014) and to me. We were both founding trustees of Acton, which at the time was not yet ten years old. Many friends in the freedom movement, including Father Robert Sirico, Acton’s co-founder, started attending programs conducted by Ed Opitz at the Foundation for...
Religion drives charitable giving in America
“In study after study,” says Karl Zinsmeister, “religious practice is the behavioral variable with the strongest and most consistent association with generous giving.” In his article for Philanthropy, Zinsmeister examines a range of data to show how America’s religiosity is connected to our charitable giving. Here are a few highlights from her report: • Among Americans who attend services weekly and pray daily, 45 percent had done volunteer work during the previous week. Among all other Americans, only 27 percent...
New Elinor Ostrom Women in Economics video
Over at Marginal Revolution University they have kicked off a new series of videos on Women in Economics: Women in Economics highlights the groundbreaking and inspiring work of female economists — not only to recognize the important work they’ve done but to also share their inspirational journeys. The first video features NobelLaureate Elinor Ostrom previously profiled by Sarah Stanley in Religion and Liberty: Elinor Ostrom was a professor at Indiana University and the senior research director of the Vincent and...
Valentine’s Day: Rosy economics?
Alright, I’ll confess: I am often accused of being a miser on St. Valentine’s Day. This is because I usually buy three roses for my Italian wife. Never a dozen like everyone else. While devoted to the Trinity, accepting the number 3 as a true sign of God’s perfect unity and love, and while I get a pass from my religious-minded and economically sensitive spouse, my wee rose acquisition is not just a test of love but it is also...
‘Social justice’ as a postmodern religion
Has “social justice” e a new religion in what many believe to be an irreligious age? Andrew Sullivan recently reflected on the decline of Christianity and the rise of “personal spiritualties” and “political religions,” noting the weaknesses of our modern orthodoxies. “We’re mistaken if we believe that the collapse of Christianity in America has led to a decline in religion,”Sullivan wrote. “It has merely led to religious impulses being expressed by political cults.” On the right, we see the over-elevation...
Who are ‘our poor’ in the immigration debate?
At First Things last week,in his essay “Our Poor,” economist Andrew M. Yuengert reflected upon his 2004 Acton monograph Inhabiting the Land, questioning whether his economic analysis (that immigration is a net gain for both immigrants and natives) needs more nuance in the light of our current political climate: In Inhabiting the Land I concluded that we could only argue against immigration if we were willing to “weigh the wage decrease for native unskilled workers more heavily than the significant...
Which is a real dystopia, the U.S. or Venezuela?
As Americans contemplate a “Green New Deal” and British schoolchildren skip school by the thousand to demand (more) government action on climate change, a little-noticed op-ed gives us a glimpse into a genuine dystopia. The author warns that this nightmare scenario will not unfold “The Day After Tomorrow” but has already taken place, for years, in the squalid homes and empty stores of socialist Venezuela. In the West, the stereotype of a Christian crackpot warning “The End is Near” on...
Sometimes enlightened love just ain’t enough
“What is love?” This question perhaps was most famously posed by the mononymous 1990s philosopher-poet, Haddaway. Among the ponderers of this question, Enlightenment philosophers such as Hume, Rousseau, Smith, and Kant are not as easily remembered, lacking as they did Haddaway’s infectious hook. That Adam Smith might be considered a philosopher of love is surprising given that he was a lifelong bachelor who seems not to have had a romantic bone in his body. And Kant derided romantic love as...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved