Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
French protesters demand: ‘Death to taxes’
French protesters demand: ‘Death to taxes’
Aug 29, 2026 4:12 AM

As satiated Americans gathered around their Thanksgiving tables to count their blessings, incensed protesters gathered in roadways and intersections across France to count the cost of Emmanuel Macron’s punishing gas taxes. A leaderless rebellion propelled hundreds of thousands of people into the streets – on foot, of course – and made France perhaps the least likely site in the world to see citizens demand, “Death to taxes.”

That was one of the phrases emblazoned on placards held aloft by the “gilets jaunes” movement (named for the yellow vests French drivers must wear in the event of a breakdown).

The protests, expected to last one day, have endured a week. On November 17, 244,000 protesters erected 2,000 roadblocks nationwide. Estimates of protesters from the following Saturday range from 81,000 to 106,000 – including 8,000 protesters on the Champ-Elysees alone.

When a few miscreants turned the protests violent, police responded with tear gas. Meanwhile, politicians from every opposition party hurried to claim ownership ofthe grassroots movement that voices an authentic national consensus: The government’s excessive taxes on gasoline and diesel are hurting families.

A problem of its own making

Like its neighbors, the French government once used taxes and incentives to “nudge” the French to ditch gasoline for diesel. Diesel, scientists said, emits less carbon dioxide than gasoline. The incentives worked, and by 2013, two-thirds of all new cars on French roadways had diesel engines.

But then the governments of Europe learned that, while diesel emits less CO2, it releases far higher levels of other particulates. Now the government is correcting a problem of its own making by taxing both diesel and gasoline. Last year, President Macron announced the government plans to end the sale of gasoline and diesel vehicles by 2040.

Meanwhile, he ratcheted up the economic pain. Gasoline costs as much as $7.06 a gallon (€1.64 a liter) in Paris. Diesel prices are being taxed into near parity. The government assesses that taxes account for 60 percent of the overall cost of fuel.

Carbon taxes continue to pile up with no end in sight. The New York Times reports, “the tax burden had grown by about €25 billion every year between 2002 and 2017.” Taxes increased this year, and the government plans to hike fuel taxes again early next year (by an additional 6.5 cents a liter for diesel and 2.9 cents a liter for gasoline).

Authorities hope the move will force the French to reduce their carbon footprint and switch from diesel, yesterday’s preferred purchase, to electric and hybrid cars. Instead, the people have gone public with their tales of pain and outrage:

A father of seven who makes 1,500 a month said he’s “sick of being taxed on everything”;A contractor who has to drive large distances for his business said, “It seems like to us that the government is only working to maintain its own privileges … Why should we have to finance their projects?”A 21-year-old woman said, “They take everything from us. They steal everything from us”; and860,000 people signed a petition on Change.org to reduce the gasoline tax.

Even far-Left radical Jean-Luc Melenchon has said, “When tax is no longer agreed to, it’s the start of revolutions in France.”

No one can doubt the potency of this populist revolt, least of all Macron, whose approval ratings have dipped into the 20s. How has his government responded?

Let them eat electric cars

Macron this week said the protests created “a moral crisis” of “ambient demagogy.” At times, he’s conflated the undeniably grassroots movement with a small fraction of extremists who joined in the protests. He vacillated between affirming the protesters’ pain and denouncing them as “thugs” who “want to destroy and create disorder.”

But on the substance of plaint, he refuses to budge. “We must not change course, because the policy direction is right and necessary,” Macron said.

He instead promised to dispatch his environmental minister to meet with the protesters. And he pledged enhanced tax incentives to purchase new electric cars.

“We can’t buy food at the end of the month but we’re going to buy an electric car?” asked an understandably piqued 45-year-old woman.

Macron’s moral morass

This is, indeed, a moral crisis. The power of the government has been harnessed to “nudge” an unwilling populace toward goals set by the political leadership. The tax burden imposed by the government has been so severe that an increasing number of families cannot care for their other legitimate needs. To add insult to injury, the French free-market think tank Fondation iFRAP reports that France already has one of the lowest levels of C02 emissions of any industrialized nation – and much of the carbon tax goes to the government’s general fund, not to alternative energy initiatives.

Moreover, the nation’s political leadership refuses to listen to the voice of the governed who are pleading for relief.

Oppressive taxes inhibit human flourishing. And unpopular elitists disregarding the pleas of their suffering people in order to fatten government coffers could drive a wedge in French society that explodes in perilous ways.

The biblical story of Rehoboam shows how excessively harsh taxation can divide a people. French history provides its own example of a monarch who cruelly ignored the plight of starving people. That story, too, ended badly.

A free market allows people to pursue their own ends, according to their own values. The French people’s already-light carbon footprint attests to the value they place on the environment. But humane economics values those people, their families, above all.

Pépellin. This photo has been cropped. CC BY-SA 4.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
5 Things Craigslist Teaches Us about the Beauty of Trade
I’ve been a Craigslist fan for years, using it for everything from snagging free goods to securing new jobs to buying baby strollers to selling baby strollers—you name it. Yet even as I’ve e somewhat of a Craigslist veteran, swapping this for that and that for this, each experience brings with it a new set of surprises and takeaways, particularly when es to the way I view trade and exchange. Alas, in today’s giant global economy, it can be all...
Protectionism: The Worst Thing for The World
UPS CEO D. Scott Davis was asked in a recent BusinessWeek interview, “You talk a lot about trade, global trade. What is pany’s role?” Here’s what Davis said(emphasis added): We always consider ourselves an enabler of merce. The worst thing for this country and UPS, and for the world, is protectionism. The natural reaction in a recession is people look inward and say, “Let’s put up barriers.” That stifles economic growth for everybody. I’m on the president’s Export Council, and...
Pope Francis and the Catholic Way of Dialogue
In Crisis Magazine, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg discusses how Pope Francis and the Catholic Church engage other religions and philosophies: “Dialogue, dialogue, dialogue.” That, according to Pope Francis, is the response he gives when leaders ask him for advice about how to resolve their societies’ internal differences. It is, he recently told a gathering of prominent Brazilians, the only way for societies to avoid the dead-ends of what Francis called “selfish indifference” and “violent protest.” Throughout the twentieth century,...
Why Thieves Hate Free Markets
Many people believe that market economies create a dog-eat-dog environment full of human conflict and struggle. But as Prof. Aeon Skoble explains, petition in markets encourages people to cooperate with one another for mutual benefit. (Via: Institute for Faith, Work, and Economics) ...
Battle in Seattle: Citizens United
As a child of the 1970s, your writer was witness to an amazing transformation in a large swath of the munity. In what seemed like a wink of an eye, clergy, religious and nuns grouped together with yippies, hippies, and other left-of-center tribes to advance progressive causes. Never you mind that much of these initiatives have little overlap with Judeo-Christian principles, just believe in your heart that Jesus would oppose genetically modified organisms and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United...
Seeking the Peace by Educating Children
One of the unintended consequences of the church growth movement was the narrowing of an understanding of how Christianity contributes to mon good by reducing what Christians contribute to the local church. While the church remains vital for the moral formation of society, there are other aspects of human flourishing that require the development of other institutions as Andy Crouch recently explained at Christianity Today. This reduction has been adopted in some platforms that currently promote church planting. This church...
Commentary: Divorce, Denial and the Death of God
Which came first, the collapse of the family or of traditional Christianity? “It’s a chicken-or-the-egg riddle, whether the disintegration of the family came first or the collapse of traditional Christian faith did,” write Elise Hilton, in this week’s Acton Commentary. “Too closely intertwined to make a call, Mary Eberstadt does pin a date on the collapse of this double helix: 1960. Why 1960? Why did God stop mattering at that point? Why did the family falter?” The full text of...
Economic Challenges Provide Church with Opportunity
Recent news reports on unemployment, underemployment, and the high level of dissatisfaction among those with full-time work are an opportunity for the church, says Michael Jahr. People are looking for meaning, fulfillment, opportunity – and the church has answers that no one else can provide. At a 2013 Oikonomia Network seminary faulty retreat, Pastor Dan Scott, author of “The Emerging American Church,” said, “American workers are having an increasingly difficult peting with their Polish, English, Spanish, Russian, Indian, Korean, and...
Conscience Rights for All
What do vegans, Catholics, and Starbucks have mon? According to attorney Mark Rienzi they all share the right to “decisions of conscience.” Starbucks has ethical standards for the coffee beans it buys. Vegan stores refuse to sell animal products because they believe doing so is immoral. Some businesses refuse to invest in sweatshops or panies or polluters,” Rienzi said in an Aug. 11 opinion essay for USA Today. “You can agree or disagree with the decisions of these businesses, but...
Bono: ‘Entrepreneurial Capitalism’ Is Necessary
As we noted yesterday, rock star Bono is now preaching the good of capitalism in alleviating poverty. James Pethokoukis at AEI illustrates exactly what happened in China when the power of entrepreneurial capitalism was unleashed. Bono spoke on the topic of capitalism and poverty at the 2012 Global Social Enterprise Event at Georgetown University: ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved