Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the Meals on Wheels controversy
Explainer: What you should know about the Meals on Wheels controversy
May 11, 2025 7:27 PM

Embed from Getty Images

What’s the story?

Last week, numerous media outlets falselyreported that the Trump administration proposed 2018 budget would eliminate charities like Meals on Wheels. The reports also claimedthat White House budget director Mick Mulvaney had said during a press conference that Meals on Wheels “doesn’t work.” (Representative headlines included Time’s “Trump’s Budget Would Kill a Program That Feeds 2.4 Million Senior Citizens” and Slate’s article: “Trump’s budget director says Meals on Wheels doesn’t work.”

What is “Meals on Wheels”?

Meals on Wheels is a name that refers to two different entities: (1) The approximately 5,000 independently-run munity programs called Meals on Wheels whose function is to provide nutritious meals to homebound seniors as well as safety checks and human connection, and (2) Meals on Wheels America, a national membership organization that does not provide direct services (i.e., meals).

Did the White House budget director say Meals on Wheels “doesn’t work”?

No. Mulvaney said that Community Development Block Grants (CDBGs), a program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), were identified as “just not showing any results” and that the $3 billion should be spent on other budget items.

Some states use CDBG money for Meals on Wheels. However, HUD doesn’t know how much of that money ultimately goes to that program. As USA Today notes, “It’s certainly a small fraction: Social services are capped by law at 15% of the block grants, and the most recent HUD figures show all senior services receive about $33 million.”

Even the liberal activist magazine Mother Jonescontends that Mulvaney’s words were taken out of context:

Mulvaney, obviously, wasn’t saying that Meals on Wheels doesn’t work. He was saying that CDBGs don’t work. Meals on Wheels might be great, munity grants aren’t, and he wants to eliminate them. But by smushing together three quotes delivered at three different points, it sounds like Mulvaney was gleefully killing off food for the elderly. . . . Someone managed to plant this idea with reporters, and more power to them. Good job! But reporters ought to be smart enough not to fall for it.

Is it true that Meals on Wheels only receives 3 percent of its funding from the federal government?

Yes and no. Meals on Wheels America (MOWA), the national membership organization, says it receives only 3 percent of its $7.9 million dollar budget from the federal government (approximately $239,347). parison, MOWA paid its top six employees a pensation of $1,065,344, including $304,758 to the nonprofit’s CEO.

MOWA says that “in the aggregate” local Meals on Wheels programs receive 35 percent of their funding directly from the federal government.

Will direct federal funding for local Meals on Wheels programs be cut?

Unclear, though unlikely.

The direct funding for Meals on Wheels es from the Nutrition Service Programs, administered by the Administration on Aging within the Administration for Community Living of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the Older Americans Act. In 2015, the program gave U.S. states, territories, and tribal groups a total of $224,673,820 for home meals.

President Trump’s budget proposal proposes to cut the Department of Health and Human Services by 16 percent. It is unknown whether any part of this reduction will include the Nutrition Service Programs, which helps to fund Meals on Wheels. Additionally, Congress could direct the funding for this program not be reduced or eliminated.

Some local organizations also gain additional funding Community Services Block Grant (CSBG), Social Services Block Grant (SSBG), Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS), and Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP). There is currently no evidence that any of these programs are being cut or that their budget reductions would affect Meals on Wheels programs.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
ResearchLinks – 07.27.12
Call for Papers: “The Spirituality of the Heidelberg Catechism” June 21-22th 2013, an international conference will take place in Apeldoorn on The Spirituality of the Heidelberg Catechism. The Heidelberg Catechism has a characteristic spirituality, which will be explored from historical and theological perspectives, as part of memoration of the 450th anniversary of this Catechism. Call for Papers: “Scientiae 2013: Disciplines of Knowing in the Early Modern World” University of Warwick (UK), 18th-20th April 2013. The premise of this conference is...
Rearranging the Deck Chairs on the Good Ship Liberalism
Over on the Library of Law and Liberty’s website, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg reviews political philosopher John Tomasi’s new book Free Market Fairness: Rather than attempting a synthesis peting schools of liberal thought, Tomasi outlines what he is very careful to specify as a “hybrid” (87) political theory that draws upon classical liberalism and libertarianism on the one hand, and what he calls high or left liberalism on the other. Tomasi does not seek to somehow ground classical liberal...
A Jump on a Dark Knight
Last night, I went to see the newest “Batman” movie with my fellow Acton interns. I thought it was a great movie, and I mend seeing it and reading Jordan Ballor’s review of it. I also want to echo some of the themes that Jordan discussed in his piece. After the movie was done, it turned out that the people who had parked behind me were in need of a jump for their car. I didn’t know these people, but...
What gave capitalism a bad name?
In his new book, Defending the Free Market: the Moral Case for a Free Economy, the Rev. Robert Sirico points out that capitalism has been given a bad name that it truly doesn’t deserve: Rightly understood, capitalism is the ponent of the natural order of liberty. Capitalism offers wide ownership of property, fair and equal rules for all, strict adherence to the rules of ownership, opportunities for charity, and the wise use of resources. Everywhere it has really been tried,...
Calming the Waters
In today’s “On the Square” over at First Things, Leroy Huizenga reflects upon “the technopoly” of our daily lives, where so much of our time is captivated by staring at puter screen, clicking links, reading posts, checking updates, and so on. Huizenga writes, I worry about ing a functional Gnostic, plugged into this new matrix, this new pixelated irreality. My reality easily es the screens, and the interactivity of hyperlinks means I can go where I will and create my...
Self-Appointed Nannys of the Nanny State
Economists have always been moralists, but since the mid-20th century many have also e wannabe technocrats—unelected experts who make public policy decisions based on specialized information rather than public opinion. A prime example is the new “libertarian paternalists” (a group that is definitely paternalistic but not very libertarian) who believe that government should attempt to influence the economic choices of affected parties in a way that will make choosers better off. In a review of Robert and Edward Skidelsky’s new...
Obama Erects Barriers to Business Growth
John Kennedy, President and CEO of Michigan-based Autocam, responded in an editorial to President Obama’s recent remarks regarding business owners and their success. Obama stated, “If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.” Kennedy responded: As a business founder, I particularly object to the claim, “If you’ve got a business – you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.” I benefited from my dad, who helped instill the entrepreneurial spirit, when I...
Samuel Gregg: The Economic Crisis and Europe’s Rule of Law Problem
Close attention to particular decisions by European institutions and governments, says Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg, suggests that many have significantly infringed the rule of law: Among the many non-economic factors shaping Europe’s current crisis, there is one which, despite its seriousness, has not yet received extensive attention: an emerging rule of law problem throughout the EU. Many will be taken aback by this claim. Isn’t Europe the continent where the very idea of the rule of law was first...
When Politics Trump Economics
That seems to be the story, based on what Veronique de Rugy has written at National Review Online. Calling for tax increases in an economic downturn doesn’t make any sense, even under Keynesian theories. So why do so many Keynesians seem to be supporting the idea of allowing tax increases for those earning more than $250,000 a year? Reason Magazine expanded on this question on their blog. They argue that this trend reveals more about neo-Keynesians like Paul Krugman than...
Are We Winning the War on (Spiritual) Poverty?
In America, too many of our citizens suffer from material poverty. But an even greater number suffer from spiritual poverty. Leon Kass asks, “How fares the struggle against our spiritual impoverishment? Are we Americans, despite our continuing freedom and prosperity, really losing the quest for meaningful lives?” It would be easy to argue that life in America is spiritually more impoverished than ever. As evidence, one might cite the rising respectability of public atheism and the falling off of religious...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved