Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about federal deficits
Explainer: What you should know about federal deficits
Nov 4, 2025 8:32 PM

What just happened?

The White House Office of Management and Budget recently released a forecast that the federal deficit would exceed $1 trillion this year. As Fox News points out, this would be the first time since the four years following the Great Recession that the deficit reached that level.

What is the federal deficit?

The term federal deficit refers to the federal government’s fiscal year budget deficit. Such a deficit occurs when total outgoing expenditures (such as for buying military aircraft or paying government salaries) exceeds the revenues collected in the form of taxes and fees. Deficits are measured over the course of the fiscal year, which runs from October 1 through September 30. Net interest payments, which measure inflows and outflows on interest from the federal debt, are included in deficit and surplus es.

What is a federal surplus?

If the government collects more in taxes than it spends, then it has incurred a surplus. In the past fifty years, the government has only recorded budgetsurpluses in five years: 1969, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.

What is the difference between the federal debt and the national deficit?

The federal deficit is the difference between what the federal government brings in each year in revenues (i.e., taxes and fees) and what it spends during that same fiscal year. The national debt is the accumulation of all federal government borrowing activity from private citizens, institutions, and domestic and foreign governments. Deficits have historically been the largest contributor to the federal debt.

What is a structural deficit?

In theory, deficits should shrink or disappear when the economy is growing since the government does not have as many expenses (e.g., unemployment payments) and increase only during economic slowdowns or recessions. Structural deficits, though, are budget conditions that produce deficits in all economic conditions because the government is structured in a way to continuously outspend its revenues.

How do current deficits affect future deficits?

Deficits increase the debt, which increase the interest payments on the debt, which can increase deficits, etc.—a vicious cycle of spiraling debt.

What was the peak for federal deficits?

To make parisons between deficits we need to look at them as a percentage of GDP, which allows us to see the size of the deficit in relation to the entire U.S. economy. Based on this we find that the federal deficits peaked during World War I (17% of GDP in 1919) and World War II (24% in 1945).

Over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that annual deficits will average 4.4 percent of GDP. Over the past fifty years including the Great Recession and its immediate aftermath, deficits have averaged only 2.9 percent of GDP.

What was President Trump’s position on deficits during his 2016 campaign?

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump promised not only to eliminate deficits but that he would eliminate the nation’s debt in eight years. Instead, his budgets would add $9.1 trillion during his tenure (assuming he is reelected). Based on the estimate of his own administration, his deficits would increase the U.S. debt to $29 trillion.

Why do deficits matter?

Deficits matter because they increase the total debt. According to the CBO, the budget deficits over the next 30 years are projected to drive federal debt held by the public to unprecedented levels—from 78 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2019 to 144 percent by 2049.This matters because the national debt is almost always an unjust form of an intergenerational wealth transfer.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Commentary: Federal Student Loans as a Problem of Subsidiarity
“When loans are guaranteed by the state and detached from market forces and personal responsibility,” says Dylan Pahman in this week’s Acton Commentary, “those institutions being paid with that loan money experience inflated demand as everyone and anyone now can go and wants to go college. As a result, tuition prices have been inflated. The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publications here. Federal Student Loans: A Problem of...
What You Need to Know About Wilhelm Röpke
Wilhelm Röpke is one of the most important 20th century economists that almost no Americans know anything about. To really learn about the man whose influence was considered largely responsible for enabling Germany’s post-World War II economic “miracle,” you should read Samuel Gregg’s Wilhelm Ropke’s Political Economy. But if you don’t have the time (or $109.25) to spend, you can read Ralph Ancil’s introductory article at Front Porch Republic: Throughout his professional life Röpke was concerned about a socially and...
The Federal Government Attacks Louisiana School Choice
Last week, as the country was remember MLK’s dream of children being judged on the content of their character rather than the color of their skin, Attorney General Eric Holder was suing the state of Louisiana because he’s more worried, as the Wall Street Journal says, about plexion of the schools’ student body than their manifest failure to educate. Late last week, Justice asked a federal court to stop 34 school districts in the Pelican State from handing out private-school...
Religious Shareholder Activists: Soros Gets a Free Pass
Reading the 2013 results of proxy shareholder resolutions orchestrated by various leftist organizations affiliated with “religiously” oriented investment groups, a colorfully descriptive phrase came to mind to describe both: Whatever its derivation, useful idiots is employed as “a pejorative term for people perceived as propagandists for a cause whose goals they are not fully aware of, and who are used cynically by the leaders of the cause.” For the purposes of this post, we’ll grant groups with purported religious and...
Callings and the childfree life
I share Fr. Robert Barron’s concern about many of the attitudes on display in this Time magazine cover story on “the childfree life.” As Barron writes, much of the problem stems from the basic American attitude toward a life of “having it all.” Thus, Barron observes, “Whereas in one phase of the feminist movement, ‘having it all’ meant that a woman should be able to both pursue a career and raise a family, now it apparently means a relationship and...
Peter Greer on the ‘Spiritual Danger’ of Service and Charity
Peter Greer has spent his life doing good, from serving refugees in the Congo to leading HOPE International, a Christian-based network of microfinance institutions operating in 16 countries around the world. Yet as Greer argues in his latest book, The Spiritual Danger of Doing Good, “service and charity have a dark side.” Pointing to a study by Fuller Seminary’s Dr. J. Robert Clinton, Greer notes that “only one out of three biblical leaders maintained a dynamic faith that enabled them...
The Camel’s Hump: Rudyard Kipling on Idleness and Hard Work
The other night, I sat down with my kids to read one of my favorite Rudyard Kipling poems, “The Camel’s Hump,”a remarkable 19th-century takedown of 21st-century couch-potato culture. With typical color and wit, Kipling takes aim at idleness, decrying “the hump we get from having too little to do” — “the hump that is black and blue.”Kipling proceeds to elevate labor, noting that hard work refreshes the soul and reinvigorates the spirit: “The cure for this ill is not to...
The End of Anthony Weiner’s Sad and Pathetic Lust for Political Power?
Anthony Weiner did not win the Democratic Party primary for New York City last night. Leading in the polls at one time, he ended up with 5 percent of the vote. His defiant and circus like campaign appropriately ended with more bizarre theatrics. In a scolding interview, Weiner was called out for his political power addiction recently by Lawrence O’Donnell of MSNBC. Though O’Donnell sees no need to call him out for his moral behavior and personally he doesn’t feel...
Australian PM Tony Abbott: Private Virtue vs. Public Duty
On Saturday, Tony Abbott, a member of the Liberal-National Coalition, was elected prime minister of Australia despite being considered “too religious, too conservative and too blunt” to win a national election. Turns out, he’s an admirer of the work of Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg (Australian born). In 2001, Abbott addressed the role of government in alleviating poverty and reducing unemployment in an issue of Policy Magazine, in a special feature titled, “Against the Prodigal State.” He begins: The story...
Quebec Ponders Banning Public Employees From Wearing Overt Religious Symbols
Parti Québécois and Bernard Drainville, minister of the newly proposed charter, announced yesterday that a new plan would ban overt religious symbols to be worn by “judges, police, prosecutors, public daycare workers, teachers, school employees, hospital workers and municipal personnel.” These symbols would include large crosses or crucifixes, turbans, hijab, and kippas. Smaller jewelry (such as Star of David earrings) would be allowed. This proposal has caused uproar, both in the Quebec government and in the public. Here are a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved