Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: How do French parliamentary elections work (and why was June 11 historic)?
Explainer: How do French parliamentary elections work (and why was June 11 historic)?
Sep 14, 2026 7:03 AM

On Sunday, France held the first round of its parliamentary elections. After the June 11, 2017, the nation is poised to usher in a new era of French political history.

How is French Parliament divided?

The French Parliament is divided into two houses: the National Assembly (Assemblée nationale) and the Senate (Sénat). The general public votes to elect members of the National Assembly, known as députés. The Senate is elected separately by grands électeurs, such as local elected officials.

The National Assembly has 577 seats: 536 constituencies within territorial France, 27 districts overseas, and 11 seats representing expatriate French voters. A party must win 289 seats to obtain a majority. Each constituency represents 125,000 people.

How do general elections to the French Parliament work?

All registered voters may vote for National Assembly in a two-round process. To be elected in the first round, a candidate must win 50 percent of the vote in any given constituency – and turnout must exceed 25 percent of all registered voters. If both criteria are met, there is no second round. Such es are rare in the multi-party environment of French politics, where some constituencies have as many as 20 candidates.

If no one reaches that threshold, the two candidates with the highest vote totals move on to the second round of elections. Additional candidates may appear on the second ballot if they won the votes of at least 12.5 percent of all registered voters in the constituency (not 12.5 percent of those who voted in that election). More than two candidates frequently advance to the second round of elections.

Why are there so many candidates?

France has a multi-party parliamentary democracy, rather than a winner-take-all system like the United States, allowing parties with minor support to win national representation. Thus, the French political spectrum currently includes everything from the occasional free market devotee to members of the National Front and the French Communist Party.

Parties also have a financial incentive to contest races. The party receives €40,000 from the government for every party member elected to Parliament, as well as at least €1 for each voter if candidates garner one percent of the vote in 50 constituencies or more.

What were the results of the June 11, 2017, election?

President Emmanuel Macron’s La République En Marche (Republic on the Move) Party, formed just over one year ago, won 32 percent of the vote. It is forecast to win a lopsided majority of between 390 and 450 of the National Assembly’s 577 seats.

What about the rest of the parties?

The nation’s center-Right party, Les Républicains, won 22 percent of the vote.

Two parties essentially tied for third place: The far-Left coalition of Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s France Unbowed (La France Insoumise) Party and the French Communist Party, on the one hand, and Marine Le Pen’s National Front on the other. Both garnered 13 percent of votes. The National Front is expected to win between three and 10 seats, including Marine Le Pen representing Pas-de-Calais. But her party won 50 percent of the vote in 40 constituencies in the French presidential election. FN also fell well short the 15 MPs necessary to form a parliamentary group in the National Assembly, giving it a broader platform.

The Socialist Party (Parti Socialiste) of outgoing President François Hollande has been devastated. It won 9.5 percent of the vote, going from 289 members to an estimated maximum of 30 and its presidential candidate, Leader Benoît Hamon, lost his own parliamentary race. The party’s remnants aredivided on whether to cooperate with Macron, who had served in Hollande’s government, or to align with Mélenchon’s coalition.

Why is the result historic?

The June 11 elections shattered the status quo that had held sway for decades. Control of the National Assembly has alternated between the center-Right party, now known as Les Républicains, and the Socialist Party. On June 11, both bined fielded fewer votes than President Emmanuel Macron’s newly formed La République En Marche Party. Many of its members, like Macron, lack elective political experience.

The election is also noteworthy for its low voter turnout. Only 48.7 percent of the nation’s 47 million potential voters cast a ballot in the first round of the 2017 National Assembly election, according to the French Interior Ministry. That is a record low since the establishment of the Fifth Republic in 1958. Political rivals say the low turnout undermines Macron’s legitimacy, and Le Pen has said the low voter participation rate calls the electoral rules themselves into question.

The number of multi-party runoff elections has also plummeted. In 2012, at least three candidates made it to the second round of elections in 34 districts. This year, there will be only one such race.

What do the results mean for the France’s future?

Macron could begin his presidency with the largest parliamentary majority since Charles De Gaulle in 1968. That makes it easier to enact his proposal to reform the stagnant French labor market by making it easier for employers to hire or fire employees. The process currently takes a year, and employers must prove in a judicial setting that they fired an employee with good cause.

Macron has also voiced support for tax and pension reforms. He proposed slashing the corporate tax and limiting the tax on total assets (a wealth tax known as the ISF).But he would expand the welfare state by extending some of its benefits to the self-employed.

Macron is a Europhile dedicated to a more closely integrated Europe that handsgreater control of its affairs to the European Union.

“France is back,” said Prime Minister Edouard Philippe on Sunday.

When is the second round of elections?

In 2017, the second round of elections will be held on June 18.

Schaull. This photo has been cropped.CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Speaking of ‘Priestly’ Science
Speaking of the “priestly” voice of science, Given all the atheist militancy raising a ruckus lately, I suppose it isn’t too surprising that I am stumbling upon more regular and more baldly dismissive declarations these days about the ineradicable patibility of science and religion among Science’s self-appointed Elite Champions online. I’ve been a perfectly convinced and rather cheerfully nonjudgmental atheist for well over twenty years at this point, but I must say that I think it is arrant nonsense to...
PowerBlog Cracks EO’s Top 10
A big tip o’ the hat to Joe Carter over at evangelical outpost for including the Acton PowerBlog in The EO 100, which he describes as “the top 100 blogs that I have found to be the most convicting, enlightening, frustrating, illuminating, maddening, stimulating, right-on and/or wrongheaded by Christians expressing a Christian worldview.” Also check out the 30 Most Influential Religion Blogs at Faith Central by Times (UK) reporter Joanna Sugden. Alas, the PowerBlog did not make the cut for...
OK, Let’s Review
How do you “end poverty” in the developing world? Well, certainly not by promoting a “poverty agenda” that has proven to be a failure again and again. The two items below both appeared yesterday. The first is from a review of “The Elephant and the Dragon,” a book by Robyn Meredith, a Hong Kong-based correspondent for Forbes magazine. The second is from mentary by the chairman of Microsoft India in the Wall Street Journal (reg. req’d). As Ms. Meredith prehensive,...
An Even Greater Society?
John Edwards formally kicked off his poverty tour in New Orleans’s Lower Ninth Ward this week and of course blamed the president for the government’s mishandling of the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Edwards also played up symbolism by visiting some of the samel cities Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy visited during their famed poverty tours. Edwards may not significantly differ from other Democratic front runners for the White House, although some say he is the only candidate with a...
John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, Part 2
Readings in Social Ethics: John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, part 2 of 3. There are six sermons in this text, based on the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus. This post deals with the second pair. References are to page numbers. Sermon 3: A summary and introduction to the series of sermons: “The parable of Lazarus was of extraordinary benefit to us, both rich and poor, teaching the latter to bear their poverty with equanimity, and not allowing...
New books update
Bringing to your attention two recent publications by Journal of Markets & Morality contributors: The first is Less Than Two Dollars a Day: A Christian View of World Poverty aand the Free Market, by Kent Van Til, published by Eerdmans. The second is Economics in Christian Perspective: Theory, Policy, and Life Choices, by Victor Claar and Robin Klay, published by InterVarsity. Based on a quick perusal, I guess that the latter entry is a little more sanguine about the achievements...
John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, Part 3
Readings in Social Ethics: John Chrysostom, On Wealth and Poverty, part 3 of 3. There are six sermons in this text, based on the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus. This post deals with the third and final pair. The first four sermons dealt directly with Chrysostom’s exegesis of the parable of Lazarus and the rich man. These latter two sermons were given on different occasions. References are to page numbers. Sermon 6: The es after an earthquake has...
‘A Threat to Tyranny Everywhere’
Arnold Kling had the opportunity to screen The Call of the Entrepreneur and published his reactions to it on Tech Central Station. In this rave review Mr. Kling, in the first paragraph, calls The Call both the “most subversive film” he has ever seen, and “a threat to tyranny everywhere.” He points out that while the film uses the so-called “G-word,” it avoids the scare-tactics that “An Inconvenient Truth,” also a religious film in his view, makes use of and...
Everything Old is New Again
Here’s an interesting report from the Media Research Center’s Business & Media Institute on the cyclical nature of media coverage on the issue of climate change. We all know about the global cooling craze of the 1970’s, but who knew that the issue goes back more than a century? It was five years before the turn of the century and major media were warning of disastrous climate change. Page six of The New York Times was headlined with the serious...
Starting Young
Acton continues its award winning ad campaign by looking at how the entrepreneurial calling begins at an early age. A child who sets up a lemonade stand outside of his house is an entrepreneur, assuming a certain amount of risk and responsibility and providing a product that will increase the happiness of passers by. Adults often praise the hard work of children, especially children who find ways to earn something through their hard work, but often this attitude changes as...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved