MADNESS.—It is somewhat remarkable that the OT ideas about madness should differ so much from those of the Gospels. In the OT madness is due to the influence of a spirit from God (1 Samuel 16:14; 1 Samuel 18:10), in the Gospels to a demon; in the OT it is conceived of as being closely connected with the ‘spirit of prophecy’ (which likewise came from God); this is clear from such passages as 1 Samuel 10:6; 1 Samuel 10:10-13; 1 Samuel 19:23-24, Hosea 9:7, 2 Kings 9:11, Jeremiah 29:26; there is no sign of this in the Gospels.* [Note: This is still the case in the East.] in the Gospels the reverse of this seems to be the case, if one regards the demoniac described in Luke 8:26-39 as a madman [see Demon].
There are very few references to madness in the Gospels; in Luke 6:11 the word σεληνιάζεσθαι ‘to be lunatic,’ or ‘moonstruck,’*μαἰνεσθαι, John 10:20) which seems to correspond with what would be understood by madness nowadays, viz. to be bereft of reason; in the passage in question it is certainly used in this sense; at the same time it must be remembered that [Note: See Trench, Synonyms of the NT11, pp. 21, 22, cf. Acts 16:16-18ἀλήθεια and παραφρονῶνταραφρονιαἐξέστη). Commentators are for the most part agreed that in this passage μαίνομαι is applied to St. Paul in a less offensive way ( consistently changes into, ‘Thou art mad,’ to correspond with ‘I am not mad (
|
|||||||
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |