Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Beyond mere affluence: Embracing Isaiah’s posterity gospel
Beyond mere affluence: Embracing Isaiah’s posterity gospel
Aug 28, 2026 3:08 PM

“This is where the church needs to be: going to every part of the world of mere affluence and turning it into a vineyard.” –Andy Crouch

In a recent essayinThe Atlantic, William Deresiewiczexpressed concern that the rise of “creative entrepreneurship” would mean “the end of art as we know it,” fearing that capitalism’s expansion of creative empowerment would mean “the removal of the last vestiges of protection and mediation” for higher ideals of beauty and truth.The risks are real. But as I’ve noted previously, our newfound freedoms — creative, economic, and otherwise — should inspire far more optimism than despair (and not only for the arts).

As economist Deirdre McCloskey points out, we have great reason to believe that the Great Enrichment will lead to other enrichments and higher purposes — “not the loss of one’s soul.”If such hopes are to be realized, however, we will need far more than the mere materialism and hyper-consumerism of our modern age.

In a lecture for the Oikonomia Network, Andy Crouch unpacks that key challenge, noting that as society has moved from a “high-friction, low-margin” world to one that is increasingly “low-friction, high-margin,” we face increasing temptations to opt for the artificial over the authentic.

“All the low-friction, high-margin things in my life are constantly tempting me to just press play and distract me away from the very patterns of family life, munity life, of institutions that could actually sustain something worth passing on,” Crouch explains. “I’m in constant danger of losing the things I actually want to hand on because of the abundance of options.”

On the surface, many of the metrics look good, but how do we know whether the foundation is sturdy and the fabric is strong? We’ve seen real strides in economic progress and rapid decreases in global poverty, for example, but what else should be paying attention to? This is where the church bears cultural witness.

“It can fool the eye, from a certain perspective,” Crouch explains, “…It’s the task of the church to pay attention in such a way that we might know ponents of the affluence we experience in our world are genuine, and ponents are actually merely illusion and incredibly evanescent.”

Pointing to the “Song of the Vineyard” in Isaiah 5, Crouch reminds us of a moment in Israel’s history when God saw social and spiritual fragility amid seeming economic abundance. “The nobility and the people exult in this moment of national prosperity based on technical wisdom and intelligence,” Crouch explains. “…Somehow in the midst of this environment of great prosperity, God sees something profoundly, tragically, disturbingly missing…There’s a fragility to this system that is not apparent from one point of view.”

Instead of tending to the vineyard — pursuing true abundance and flourishing — Israel squandered the grapes it was given. “What more was there to do for my vineyard,that I have not done in it?” asks the Lord. “When I looked for it to yield grapes, why did it yield wild grapes?”The song ends with a prophecy that all of Israel’s abundance will be reduced to barrenness, as surely it was.

But this needn’t be the end for our present circumstances.The lesson of Isaiah’s song is that our abundance has a purpose. We were not meant to live lives of “mere affluence.” God gives us grapes for a reason, and it’s up to us to then cultivate the vineyard. “While the Bible does not have a prosperity gospel in the way we use that phrase now,” Crouch explains, “…the Bible does have a posterity gospel…namely God’s intention to bless…those who love and fear and trust him, and his desire for that to be embedded in cultural systems that pass on flourishing generation after generation.”

So what will we do with our gifts of economic freedom and material abundance? What will we do with our endless options and opportunities?As Crouch explains, it’s more than possible to pursue “high-friction, low-margin” goods in a “low-friction, high-margin” world:

Prune your life, and all of the abundance of the world is yours for free, thrown in. But build your life around the low-friction, high-margin that’s offered you every day by our modern economy, and you will end up not even able to hold on to that chalk as it washes away in the rain…

So what is our calling in this modern world, as the church? It seems to me it’s to go into every part of the modern economy and find ways to prune it, to restore appropriate limits, and restore a kind of high-friction life that is economically sustainable, but is also embedded in what makes for deep flourishing.

It all depends on the orientation of our hearts and hands — how and whether we engage and occupy our economic systems and institutions in ways that edify and enrich society beyond our immediate satisfaction.

We live in a world that is blessed and booming with economic opportunity and material prosperity. Truth, goodness, and beauty have plenty of room to flourish. Instead of seeing grapes for the taking, let’s start seeing vineyards for the pruning.

Image: moniquayle (CC0)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Since Christ Died for Us
Yesterday my son asked me why today is called “Ash Wednesday.” In that question I could hear the echoes of another question, “Since Christ has died for us, why do we still have to die?” The latter question is found in the Heidelberg Catechism, and the brief but poignant answer has stuck with me since I first encountered it. First, the catechism clarifies that our death does not have redemptive power: “Our death does not pay the debt of our...
Religious Freedom and the HHS Mandate
Matthew Schmitz over onFirst Thoughtsposted a great article by Peter Berger sharing Peter’s thoughts on the recent HHS controversy. Peter gets at what is really the heart issue here. Though there is fierce debate ensuing about contraception, religious freedom is at the heart of the matter. Peter Berger, the eminent sociologist of religion at Boston University and longtime friend of First Things, offers his readers at the American Interest some background on the HHS controversy, the cobelligerence of Catholics and...
Biased in Favor of the Entrepreneur State
Yesterday I argued that since bias is inherent in institutions and neutrality between individual and social spheres is illusory we should harness and direct the bias of institutions towards a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles. One of the ways we can do that in the economic realm, I believe, is to encourage a bias toward entrepreneurship and away from corporatism. As Derek Thompson, a senior editor at The Atlantic, says, “It would...
Happiness is Subjective
One of the conclusions from last mentary was that the government shouldn’t be in the business of promoting a particular vision of the good life in America. That’s not to say that the government doesn’t have some role in promoting mon good or making some normative judgments about the good life. But it shouldn’t get anywhere near the level of specificity of promising a family, home, college education, and retirement for all. In part this is because while moral good...
Commentary: Human Excellence and the Moral Life
After 50-plus years of social unraveling, many reformers still see the “therapeutic model” as a cure for what ails American society. Or would a return to the classical virtues, as a means of healing first the person and then the culture, be the way of renewal? Rev. Gregory Jensen offers some thoughts in this week’s Acton Commentary (published Feb. 22), spurred by the reading of Charles Murray’s new book, Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960–2010. The full text...
Libertarians, Religious Conservatives, and the Myth of Social Neutrality
When es to our view of individual liberty, one of the most unexplored areas of distinction between libertarians and religious conservatives* is how we view neutrality and bias. Because the differences are uncharted, I have no way of describing the variance without resorting to a grossly simplistic caricature—so with a grossly simplistic caricature we shall proceed: Libertarians believe that neutrality between the various spheres of society—and especially betweenthe government and the individual—are both possible and desirable, and so the need...
What does it mean to be On Call In Culture?
Most of us know what it feels like… this pull toward something. Whether it is art or science or writing or business—there is something inside you that says, “Yes, this is where I belong. This is what I was meant to do!” As Christians this realization e with a bit of disappointment mixed with the excitement of finding our place. We somehow wish that our calling were something of a more spiritual nature…something that mattered more. But here’s a question:...
Samuel Gregg: Inequality Anyone?
Over at National Review Online, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg takes a look at a recent Charles Blow op-ed in the New York Times in which the writer hyperventilates about statements made by Rick Santorum on the subject of e inequality. Economically speaking, e inequality reflects the workings of several factors, many of which are essential if we want a dynamic, growing economy. Even your average neo-Keynesian economist will acknowledge that, without incentives (such as the prospect of a higher...
Gleaner Tech #2: The Global Village Construction Set
[Note: This is the second in an occasional series ongleaner technology.] The Global Village Construction Setis a collection of 40 machines needed to “create a small civilization with forts…like a life-size Lego set.” ...
Government and Gambling
Over at Mere Comments I note the recent invective against gambling leveled by Al Mohler and Russell Moore. I contend that as opposed to casinos, lotteries are in fact the most troubling example of state-sponsored gambling. And I also worry a bit about the use of legal means to prohibit gambling, as it isn’t so clear to me that gambling is always and in every case a moral evil. Thus, I write, that cultural rather than primarily political attempts to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved