Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Strong families are good for the economy – and vice versa
Strong families are good for the economy – and vice versa
Oct 28, 2025 5:37 AM

Families benefit when the economy of their state or nation is robust and free, and economies also benefit when its participants embody civic and moral values.

Read More…

Families and free market economies: On the surface, they seem unrelated. We associate family with game nights, holiday traditions, and cute baby photos, while the economy is associated with the stock market, cold-hearted businessmen, and bloated corporations.

What these stereotypes fail to recognize is that the health of the family, as a social institution, and the health of the economy are inherently intertwined. Families benefit when the economy of their state or nation is robust and free, and economies also benefit when its participants embody civic and moral values.

Three indices related to economic freedom and pro-family policies and culture demonstrate the positive relationship between families and free economies on a global scale. Nine nations rank consistently and highly ranked for their support of the traditional family: Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Germany, Estonia, Belgium, France, and the Netherlands, based on Acton Institute analysis of the Independent Global Index on Family (IGIF) 2016 Report, data from UNICEF and the Heritage Foundation’s 2021 Index of Economic Freedom.

One of the ways that countries can support family is through robust parental leave policies. In the United States, parents are given 12 weeks of unpaid leave by the Family and Medical Leave Act. However, Sweden gives parents a total of 480 days of paid leave which can be divided between the two parents. Women in the Netherlands receive 16 weeks of paid leave, and both parents are entitled to 26 weeks of unpaid leave.

Another type of pro-family policy is child or family allowances. Belgium offers birth grants of 1,000 euros for each child and a monthly allowance that continues until the child turns 18. Estonia has similar allowance policies, first established in the Child Benefit Act of 1992, and Iceland also introduced universal benefits for all children under the age of 7.

Additionally, childcare can be a considerable cost to families. Thus, many countries find ways to reduce the financial burden. In Denmark, “childcare is seen as a means of empowering children and supporting the development of their identities, while transmitting cultural values and encouraging their integration into society.” All children between six months and five years old are given access to subsidized childcare facilities, and over 90% of children between one and five years old are enrolled in day care. In Germany, public childcare is provided by non-profit organizations, many of which are associated with Protestant and Catholic churches. More than 90% of children ages three to five attend some form of childcare. Norway even allows parents to claim childcare and kindergarten costs as tax deductions. Last but not least, France, which has the second highest birth rate in Europe, has a calibrated e tax system that allows “families with more children [to] pay less.”

Compared with other nations, these nine, pro-family nations have some of the best and freest economies on the globe. Eight out of nine of these countries are ranked within the top 40 on Heritage’s Economic Freedom Index. When examined by their GDP, five (Germany, France, Netherlands, Sweden, and Belgium) were ranked within the top 25 economies in the world.

These data show a significant correlation between pro-family policies and greater economic freedom. On one hand, pro-family policies, such as paid maternity/paternity leave, may be the result of a stable and developed economy which can afford to offer its employees such benefits. However, data also show that providing paid leave to employees will motivate them to remain with pany and continue working in the long run, thus benefiting the organization and the overall economy.

On a universal level, it is evident that cultural beliefs will affect how individuals view and interact with the economy. World Finance reports that one cultural factor that impacts economic development is the “population’s willingness to engage in markets, whether through investment or employment. To assess this willingness to participate in markets, economists will sometimes look at the prevalence of social trust in a munity. Many studies have associated increased social trust with higher rates of trade, innovation and development in a country’s financial sector.”

Promoting the family helps foster a culture of connectedness, social integration, and trust, which can lead to a greater engagement in the marketplace. We cannot sacrifice the moral and civic role of the traditional family without simultaneously impairing the overall economy. But we also cannot undermine the economy for the sake of the family, because doing so will reduce the family’s ability to engage with and fulfill their role within society.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Buying a House Makes People Less Entrepreneurial
Suzy Khimm points out an interesting study from the UK’s Spatial Economics Research Centre: Our fixed-effects estimates show that purchasing a house reduces the likelihood of starting a business by 20-25%. … This result is driven by homeowners with mortgages and persists for several years after entering homeownership. … We argue that this finding can be rationalized by the fact that homeowners typically have to overinvest in housing (Brueckner, 1997; Flavin and Yamashita, 2002) and therefore cannot adequately diversify their...
DCI John Luther: Secular Authority
John Luther is pierced for Jenny's transgressions.An essay of mine on the wonderful and difficult BBC series “Luther” is up over at the Comment magazine website, “Get Your Hands Dirty: The Vocational Theology of Luther.” In this piece I reflect on DCI John Luther’s “overriding need to protect other people from injustice and harm, and even sometimes the consequences of their own sin and guilt,” and how that fits in with the Christian (and particularly Lutheran) doctrine of vocation. Indeed,...
Being a Christian CEO Means Never Having to Fire Someone
Does being a Christian in business mean you’ll never have to fire someone? Of course not. But that’s one of the many subtexts that is detectable in the recent attention being given to this story: “CEO of Christian Publishing Firm Fires 25 Employees after Anonymous Email.” Now I don’t know any more details than what is contained in the Romenesko report, and it may well be that CEO Ryan Tate acted in an imprudent and incorrect fashion following his receipt...
Samuel Gregg: Why Austerity Isn’t Enough
Writing on The American Spectator website, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg looks at the strange notion of European fiscal “austerity” even as more old continent economies veer toward the abyss. Is America far behind? Needless to say, Greece is Europe’s poster child for reform-failure. Throughout 2011, the Greek parliament passed reforms that diminished regulations that applied to many professions in the economy’s service sector. But as two Wall Street Journal journalists demonstrated one year later, “despite the change in the...
Only a Sunday Believer?
“I do my religion on Sundays.” That was House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s answer to a press conference question on the Catholic Church’s stance on contraception, according to The Washington Examiner. Pelosi has consistently backed the Obama administration’s call to force employers to offer abortion, sterilization and birth control as part of employee health care, despite many organizations’ ethical, moral and religious objections (Acton’s PowerBlog offers more here on this topic.) Pelosi’s answer is telling: Her faith should not affect...
Politics and Pulpits Don’t Mix
Over at Commentary Magazine, Jonathan S. Tobin remarks on the double standards liberals have about allowing politicians to promote political positions from the pulpits of churches and synagogues: [A]llowing a religious event to e the venue for partisan politics is always asking for trouble. No one is saying, or ought to say, that synagogue buildings can’t be used for debates or forums in which politics is discussed. But there is a big difference between a Sunday morning bagel breakfast to...
30 Years Ago Today: Reagan’s Westminster Address
The Washington Post’s editorial page reminds us that today is the 30th anniversary of Ronald Reagan’s address at Westminster Hall, London. The speech, famous for its “ash heap of history line,” was Reagan’s challenge to the Soviet Union’s very legitimacy and pointed to its hollow core. Reagan’s great strength was not just America’s military posture against the Soviets, but that he truly made the Cold War a battle of moral ideas. It was a decisive pivot away from America’s policy...
How Junk Bonds Killed the Three Martini Lunch
A recent editorial in the New York Times claims that during the 1980s leveraged buyouts “contributed significantly to the growth of the e gap, moving wealth from the middle class to the top end.” First Things editor R.R. Reno explains why the real story is plicated, more interesting, and explains much more than e inequality: The upper middle class world responded to the leveraged buyout revolution by upping mitments to education and economically oriented self-discipline. The old white-collar social contract...
Review: Can One Kill ‘For Greater Glory’?
Immediately after watching For Greater Glory, I found myself struggling to appreciate the myriad good intentions, talents and the $40 million that went into making it. Unlike the Cristeros who fought against the Mexican government, however, my efforts ultimately were unsuccessful. The film opened on a relatively limited 757 screens this past weekend, grossing $1.8 million and earning the No. 10 position of all films currently in theatrical release. Additionally, the film reportedly has been doing boffo at the Mexican...
The Dangers of Democratic Tyranny
In the context mentary on protests like those in Quebec and the Occupy movement more broadly, it’s worth reflecting on the dangers of democratic tyranny. The “people” can be tyrannical just as an individual sovereign or an oligarchy might. That’s why Aristotle considered democracy a defective form of government, because it too easily enshrines the will of the majority into an insuperable law. As Lord Acton put it, “It is bad to be oppressed by a minority, but it is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved