Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
As You Sow’s Multi-Faith Scientism
As You Sow’s Multi-Faith Scientism
Oct 18, 2026 3:28 AM

This year is shaping up as an annus horribilus for those opposed to public and private policy climate-change “solutions” that would reverse decades of advancements in wealth creation and the obliteration of poverty. This year’s capper is the ing Sustainable Innovation Forum in Paris, France, which will be held December 7-8 under the auspices of the at the 21st Conference of Parties (COP21).

As with any jet-airliner pilgrimage of this sort, we can anticipate all sorts of mischievous responses to the perceptions (1) climate change is imminent; (2) human activity is a significant contributor; (3) climate change is inherently catastrophic with no benefits whatsoever for any segment of humanity; and (4) human efforts will be enough to stop it. All of this with no sense of irony as to the carbon footprint thousands of global-warming conference attendees in the City of Light. Among the policy solutions crafted in Paris, rest assured, will be a plethora of new ways to pick the pockets of taxpayers, raid and deplete business coffers and increase government power. Those deep pockets are found almost exclusively in the industrialized West.

Naturally, the faith-based shareholder activist group As You Sow is among the cadre insisting it maintains a monopoly on climate science. AYS this week issued a release that opportunistically pulls quotes the Islamic Declaration on Climate Change, the Rabbinic Letter on the Climate Crisis and, of course, Pope Francis’ Laudato Siencyclical.

Then there’s this:

Faith-consistent and values-based investors are united in their belief that the current course of climate change, arguably the most urgent challenge facing our planet, can be significantly altered through decisive action on the part of the world’s corporations. As active shareholders we have used our voices to panies on environmental and social issues for over four decades, and we have seen the private sector use its enormous power to help solve some of the world’s most intractable problems. When properly channeled, this power can redirect markets towards greater justice and sustainability, and improve the lives of millions.

Fair enough as these things go – shareholders invest as a means to recognize returns on discretionary e. If pany’s evolving practices are determined offensive to the religious beliefs or secular values of any group of investors than the shareholders are well within their respective rights to submit resolutions seeking to remedy the offense or, more plete divestment.

But when self-admitted activists throw around abstract words such as “justice” and “sustainability,” watch out. It’s pretty obvious these shareholders haven’t familiarized themselves with Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations and The Theory of Moral Sentiments much less Pope Leo XII’s Rerum Novarum or Pope Pius XI’s Quadragesimo Anno encyclicals.

Instead of seeing the businesses in which they invest as potentially providing returns for themselves and fellow shareholders, creating jobs and contributing to the economic footprints of munities in which they operate, AYS and its likeminded activists panies as chess pieces to be used to promote progressive policies while hiding behind the masks of “justice” and “sustainability.”

How does AYS activism promote justice and sustainability exactly? Oh, yeah, I forgot…climate change:

The current climate data are irrefutable: without a significant course correction, climate change is destined to wreak irreversible damage to our planet’s ecosystem – mon home – and promise the quality of life of all its inhabitants. The adverse effects of climate change on health, food and water security, human rights, manufacturing and supply chains, and financial markets are already being felt, especially by munities, and, if left unaddressed, will only e more difficult and expensive to resolve.

This, to borrow a term coined by the British and used most recently by conservative writer Jonah Goldberg, is so much codswallop, or in the term minted by Russell Kirk, scientism as opposed to actual science. I’ve watched 1950s science-fiction movies with bug-eyed monsters, jet packs and theremin-laden soundtracks with more scientific veracity than pletely unsupported claims listed in the AYS screed above.

Rather than travel down the rabbit hole of refuting AYS’s claims, however, let’s look at the initiatives supported by AYS activists:

We call panies to:

Issue statements that are specific, clear, and constructive in support of a global agreement to limit warming to below 2 degrees C in advance of COP21, if they have not done so already.

Adopt science-based and time-bound quantitative greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction goals.

Engage with policy makers to support constructive public policy that will mitigate climate change risks and support a transition to a low-carbon economy, through both direct lobbying and third party organizations.

Commit to zero deforestation and adopt corporate water stewardship policies that respect the human right to water.

In other words, let’s bend the profitability panies and fellow shareholders to the will of a small group of investors that have placed their faith in scientism above the religious calling to nurture the poor and respect the property of others. More’s the pity.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Russian Warns on Demonic Roots of Socialism
In Rome to address a conference sponsored by the Dignitatis Humanae Institute (Institute for Human Dignity) on June 29, Russian pro-life campaigner Alexey Komov expressed amazement for the support that socialism gets in some quarters in the West even though it has “never worked in world history.” In an interview with the Zenit news service, Komov pointed to how this ideology had caused such great pain and suffering “all in the name of social reform, progress and improvement.” His criticism...
Don’t Eat Your Dog: The Surprising Moral Case for Free Enterprise
At the most recent Acton University, American Enterprise Institute president Arthur Brooks gave a brilliant and paradigm-shifting speech on why advocates of free enterprise need to explain why it is the most moral, most fair, and most helpful system for alleviating poverty. You can download it here. (It’ll be the best 49 cents you spend this week.) I was thrilled to discover today that AEI has created an animated video that covers much the same material as in his lecture....
Balancing the “Big Three”
This week we feature an interview with Diane Paddison, Chief Strategy Officer for Cassidy Turley in Dallas, Texas. She is the founder of non-profit 4WORD and author of the book Work, Love, Pray; Practical Wisdom for Young Professional Christian Women. For resources and to get connected into munity, follow her on Twitter @4wordwomen and Facebook. Diane Paddison is something of an expert. Sure she can negotiate multi-million dollar deals for fortune panies, but that is not what I am talking...
‘If there are people for whom to be Christian words alone would not suffice’
Comparing artists is about as helpful paring beer or theologians; it often es down to a matter of taste. However, just as with theologians, there are new insights to be gained from artists, even if they don’t turn out to be our favorite (I suppose the same holds with beer, as well.) Robert Royal, in an article for the Catholic Education Resource Center, poses the question of whether or not French poet Paul Claudel might be the best modern Catholic...
‘Religion Takes us into the Marketplace’
On The Foundry, Sarah Torre writes about the many faith based challenges that remain to the Obamacare law. There are many organizations that are religious in nature, but are not themselves churches. ply with the new health laws, they will pelled to provide conscience violating services. Towards the end of the post, Torres quotes the president of Geneva College, Dr. Ken Smith: The issue that we have with the entire law is that the Obama Administration has tried to define...
What life was like in 1776
During the Revolutionary Era, Americans had the highest per capita e in the civilized world and paid the lowest taxes, says Thomas Fleming, and they were determined to keep it that way. By 1776, the 13 American colonies had been in existence for over 150 years—more than enough time for the talented and ambitious to acquire money and land. At the top of the South’s earners were large planters such as George Washington. In the North their es were more...
Should the Church Evade the Issue of Tax Avoidance?
The issue of tax avoidance is plex, notes Philip Booth. Not all avoidance is illegal or immoral—some is even encouraged by the government. So how, Booth asks, do Catholics determine what is acceptable? Evasion involves illegally not paying tax that is due. This includes not declaring £10 received for babysitting and multi-million pound schemes by professional criminals. Evasion is wrong and it is also wrong to aid and abet somebody else in evasion, for example by paying a tradesperson cash...
America the Acquisitive?
Last week, in ...
Getting Religion Back into Our Economic Lives
National Review Online’s Kathryn Jean Lopez talks to Rev. Sirico about his new book, Defending the Free Market: The Moral Case for a Free Economy, the link between economic liberty and public morality, and the differences between socialism and capitalism: LOPEZ: How can you get more greed with socialism than capitalism? FR. SIRICO: To the extent that socialism holds back creativity and thus productivity, it increases poverty. When people e desperate, even good people can e self-centered. Few of us...
The Declaration of Independence and the Necessity of Religion
Last week’s Wall Street Journal features a column from Michael Meyerson detailing the religious perspective of the Declaration of Independence. With questions of religious liberty occupying a sizable space in the public square, the article is especially timely. According to Meyerson, the Declaration’s brilliance lies in the “theologically bilingual” language of the Framers. Phrases like “endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights” employ what he calls a nondenominational inclusivism, a show of rhetoric that neither endorses nor rejects any...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved