Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
A tale of two hypothetical presidents
A tale of two hypothetical presidents
Aug 31, 2025 11:29 PM

Imagine a president who regularly steps on his own shoelaces and seems to waste power. This president inspires an especially venomous reaction from the press. They actually have contempt for him. He repeatedly harms his own agenda by violating established norms with little regard for the negative impact of doing so. The institution of the presidency relies significantly on a reserve of social and cultural capital built up over the two plus centuries of its existence. My hypothetical president shows little concern for the consequences of depleting that capital. The result is likely to be, at a minimum, that he will have difficulty pushing his agenda forward.

Despite this situation, such a presidency can be a boon to the nation. Readers may need to stop and wipe the coffee off of their screens. Let me repeat: such a presidency can be a boon.

Let us now imagine an alternate scenario. Conjure up the image of a leader who is urbane and an intellectual. This person understands how to manipulate the levers of power to achieve the results he/she may desire. Further, this person has an ambitious dream of shaping policy to bring about a more just and verdant world and believes that an enlightened will is all that is necessary to bring it about. One might recall a significant candidate of the past who famously claimed that “political will is a renewable resource,” thus implying that we need only to want something to happen badly enough in order to bring it about.

This alternative leader, cultured and intellectual in nature, presents a substantial threat to the well-being of American enterprise. While the first president will likely continue to make headlines with tweets and push little actual policy, the alternative president would inspire admiration by many for good temperament and theoretical sophistication and would successfully make big changes. The problem with this alternative president is that he/she would likely privilege moral satisfaction over the actual flourishing of the American people and the economy upon which they depend.

Consider an issue such as the corporate tax. Our alternative president would likely view an increase in the corporate tax (which is already petitive) as a successful blow for social justice which would produce greater redistribution of wealth. Certainly, there would be academics to say so. In addition, our alternative chief would believe that many regulations dictating conditions to functioning businesses would all produce greater justice at little cost. The social planners would likely provide promises that it is so. While elites have largely abandoned the idea of government owning and operating most types of enterprises, they have found it much simpler to dictate conditions with little accountability on the state’s end.

Counter to many expectations, when our uncouth es into office, the stock market roars and even sophisticated Wall Streeters cautiously admit that he may be good for business. Is it his extremely fine economic mind? Is it his ability to set people at ease with his perfect manners and smooth rhetoric? No. These things are missing. But he has one quality they find highly reassuring.

He does not seem to agree with the highly refined geniuses who look upon businesses as a giant lemon which can be squeezed this way and that so as to bring about a quasi-paradise. This galoot does not believe that wages can simply be dictated and the payroll departments can be told to radically re-organize the way they’ve done business for years. He has been in business and knows that the regulatory hit could be even more damaging than high taxes. He is a schlub, but a practical one in many ways. Let’s say he has a street-level intuition about the limits of bureaucracy.

This first president, the one who doesn’t cut a fine figure in suits and resembles eccentric characters from the world of fiction, isn’t going to get much done. That’s okay. Some of his ideas are probably not great and are better left on a campaign website. For some, that is a bad thing. But it also happens that many think he won’t achieve political goals…and THAT is a good thing.

President number one is not very good at making the engine of government hum, but we may discover that such a quality is a feature and not a bug. When es to growing the state, Americans may find that they prefer an amateur to a pro.

Photo: Public Domain, tpsdave

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Stephanie Slade on markets, planning, and Catholic social teaching
Stephanie Slade writes in next month’s edition of Reason Magazine about, ‘Regulation and ‘the Right Ordering of Economic Life”according to Catholic social teaching: The Church’s surprising lesson for partisans of big government is that the best tools for correctly ordering economic life are found in the choices of individual market actors. Because those choices are based not only on their preferences but also on their convictions, people’s moral sensibilities—the extent to which they believe they have ethical obligations to each...
Spare a thought for China’s Muslim Uyghurs
The days in which many Westerners celebrated what many thought was mainland China’s inevitable march towards freedom as a consequence of its limited opening to global trade are now well and truly over. The present battle over Hong Kong, one of the world’s most economically-free regions, is plainly a proxy for a wider fight about China’s future—a future in which Beijing has made clear does not include much room for political freedom and rule of law. Then there is the...
Wealth inequality is a First World problem
As the West has e progressively more interventionist, concern with e inequality” has been eclipsed by “wealth inequality.” However, that focus betrays a certain blindness to a vital economic reality. Measures of equality and inequality tell us nothing about what really matters: a society’s prosperity or poverty. Communist societies were far from equal in practice. However, modern concerns about inequality focus on the fact that the free market does not reward all labor evenly. Yet the West’s efficiency creates the...
Nibbling at Dylan Pahman’s Chick-fil-A argument
As though guided by an invisible hand Dylan Pahman and I – independently and without coordination – each posted an essay about Chick-fil-A’s philanthropic giving within minutes of one another, each with slightly different emphases. Readers may see this as a conflict; however, probing the space between these analyses helps make sense of customer backlash, illustrates why “woke capitalism” of any variety is a miasma, and underlines that charitable decisions are best made by private individuals. Dylan quotes Milton Friedman’s...
Fact check: 5 facts about the fifth Democratic debate of 2019
The Democratic Party narrowed the number of presidential hopefuls to 10 at the fifth debate, held Wednesday in Atlanta. Several of their statements deserve greater scrutiny. 1. Elizabeth Warren: Freeloading billionaires? The 99 percent in America are on track to pay about 7.2 percent of their total wealth in taxes. The top one-tenth of one percent that I want to say, “Pay two cents more,” they’ll pay 3.2 percent in America. I’m tired of freeloading billionaires. I think it’s time...
The unfortunate lesson from Chick-fil-A’s surrender
Why do I care about Chick-fil-A’s decision to drop Salvation Army and Fellowship of Christian Athletes as they seek to properly “align their values” and make sure people understand “who they are”? prehend why Chick-fil-A wants to escape the censure of progressive elites. pany is a petitor. In terms of profit per square foot, they are the reigning champion in American fast food. When you have that strength and speed, you want to use it. pany has consistently been known...
There is no moral difference between eating Chick-fil-A and a McChicken
I am grateful to Fr. Ben Johnson for his thoughtful response to my recent post, “The social responsibility of Chick-fil-A is to make delicious sandwiches.”He adds some extra nuance, but I still stand my ground. Fr. Ben begins with an objection I’ve heard several times now: Friedman rightly notes that a CEO who funds a charity with the profits of a publicly held corporation spends the firm’s money, not his own. However, Chick-fil-A is a privately owned business, founded by...
The rise of ‘woke’ culture: Lessons on the power of institutions
We continue to see the ill effects of “cancel culture” and safetyism, whether through student-led riots and intimidation efforts at colleges and universities, the garden-variety intolerances of “woke capitalism,” or the self-destructive interventionism of “bulldozer parenting.” As far as how it’s e to be, we have explanations aplenty, from declines in religious life to the fraying of the social fabric to rises in political fragmentation and polarization. In an essay at Heterodox Academy, Musa Al-Gharbi points to yet another: a...
2019 Calihan Lecture Video: Religion, Society, and the Market
Last month, Prof. Giuseppe Franco received the 2019 Novak Award at the University of San Diego where he delivered the 19th Annual Calihan Lecture on “Religion, Society, and the Market: The Legacy of Wilhelm Röpke.” Watch the video now: TheNovak Awardrecognizes scholars early in their academic career who demonstrate outstanding intellectual merit in advancing the understanding of theology’s connection to human dignity, the importance of the rule of law, limited government, religious liberty, and freedom in economic life. Each Award...
Hong Kong demands freedom in landslide election
The citizens of Hong Kong expanded their democratic revolution to the ballot box on Sunday, as pro-democracy parties won control of virtually every local government from pro-Beijing functionaries. Yesterday’s district council elections – the largest in history, with an estimated 71 percent of all registered voters (or 2.94 million of 4.13 million) participating – proved voters’ overwhelming support for the traditional rights enjoyed by the former British protectorate. The South China Morning Post described the landslide election as a “tsunami...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved