Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
4 Reasons to Support School Choice from Pope Francis’s ‘Amoris Laetitia’
4 Reasons to Support School Choice from Pope Francis’s ‘Amoris Laetitia’
May 12, 2025 5:35 PM

Pope Francis’s recently released apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitiahas received considerable attention because of the issue of divorce munion. But the 60,000+ word document has much more to say about family life than the dissolution of marriage. For example, it provides pelling reasons for all Christians (not just Catholics) to support school choice.

The term “school choice” refers to programs that give parents the power and opportunity to choose the schools their children attend, whether public, private, parochial, or homeschool. While there are numerous passages relevant to school choice in Amoris Laetitia, here are four essential quotes:

“Economic constraints prohibit a family’s access to education, cultural activities and involvement in the life of society. In many ways, the present-day economic situation is keeping people from participating in society.” (p. 34)

A key sphere of society in which social justice is in desperate need of restoration is education. The poor deserve the same freedom to obtain a quality education that is too often reserved for those wealthy enough to rescue their children from failing schools. For this reason school choice should be considered a matter of social justice.

AsArchbishop Charles J. Chaput says, lack of a quality education is mon thread among persons in severe poverty.“Catholic social teaching is built on mitment to the poor,” says Chaput. “Few things are more important to people in poverty than ensuring their children’s education as a path to a better life.”

While there are some excellent public schools in America, many students are trapped in schools with inadequate facilities, substandard curriculum, and petent teachers. Most parents, however, cannot afford to pay for education twice—once in taxes and again in private school tuition. School choice programs empower parents by letting them use public funds set aside for education on programs that will best serve their children.

“. . . I feel it important to reiterate that the overall education of children is a “most serious duty” and at the same time a ‘primary right’ of parents.” (p. 66)

Education is a primary right of parents. But because government mandates education for children and provides resources for fulfilling that mandate, parents have a corresponding civil right. As Nelson Kloosterman argues, “parents have a civil right to support only that educational system they wish for religious reasons to use.” Says Kloosterman:

We must be clear that parental educational choice is more than a preference and a desire; it is first a human right, and therefore it must be protected in the context of judicially mandated activity. As a right inherent in the parent-child relationship, parental educational choice entails the right of parents to teach their children or have them taught in ways that are effective and that are consistent with their religious beliefs. (This latter was affirmed in the 1923 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Meyer v. State of Nebraska.) Since the government mandates education and provides resources for fulfilling that mandate, parents should by law be permitted to honour that mandate and use those resources in ways that are effective and consistent with their religious beliefs.

“Schools do not replace parents, plement them. This is a basic principle: ‘all other participants in the process of education are only able to carry out their responsibilities in the name of the parents, with their consent and, to a certain degree, with their authorization’.” (p. 66) —

The reasons many parents support school choice is simple: the public schools have failed in their responsibilities. “Most parents desire solid education for their children in a safe and supportive environment,” says Kevin E. Schmiesing. “Too many public schools do not provide such an environment.” School choice helps parents better fulfill their basic responsibilities. As Shmiesing adds:

The benefits of school choice are many, which should not be surprising. When parents are encouraged to take responsibility for their children’s education, both parents and students begin to view education in a different light. Shifting parents and children from a position of dependency on government to a position of empowerment promotes a vision of persons as participants in society, rather than observers or dependents.

“The State offers educational programmes in a subsidiary way, supporting the parents in their indeclinable role; parents themselves enjoy the right to choose freely the kind of education – accessible and of good quality – which they wish to give their children in accordance with their convictions.” (p. 66) —

While the Pope doesn’t directly use the term “school choice,” this quote shows that he endorses the general concept. Whether Catholic, Orthodox, evangelical, mainline, this is one area where all Christians should be able to agree with the pontiff.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Support for Obamacare Dwindling
Obamacare, the popular name for the Affordable Health Care Act, continues to find opposition from both individuals and states. The act is scheduled to take effect on October 1, 2013 for most of the country, but a USA Today/Pew Research poll finds that 53 percent of Americans polled oppose Obamacare. The numbers are even lower when one accounts for political parties. Overall, just 13% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents approve of the law while 85% disapprove. Fewer than half of...
Why Has the Economic Recovery Bypassed Young People?
In his latest column, Tyler Cowen points out that whatever economic recovery we’ve experienced has “largely bypassed young people,” arguing that such a development is bound to have an impact for years e: For Americans aged 16 to 24 who aren’t enrolled in school, the employmentpicture is grim. Only36 percent are working full time, down 10 percentage points from 2007. Longer term, the overall labor-force participation rate for that age group has dropped 20 percentage points for men and 14...
Pope Francis’ Cardinal-shaming Mini-popemobile
A couple of months ago I teased Pope Francis engaging in a “war on the Vatican’s luxury cars” while driving one of the greatest luxury cars of all time — the Popemobile. Although he probably won’t be able to give up his 160 mph, armor-plated, bullet-proof sedia gestatoria anytime soon, he’s make a bold, symbolic point with the latest addition to his fleet: a 1984 Renault 4. Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Ciro Benedettini, says Francis accepted the 1984 Renault 4,...
Sex-Selective Abortions Linked To Abuse Of Females
The U.S. House Foreign Affairs mittee held a hearing last week on India’s missing girls. In today’s Washington Times, Chris Smith, Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives from New Jersey and chair of the hearing, discusses the connection between sex-selective abortions and India’s massive problem with physical and sexual abuse of females. The roots of the present problem lie not only with cultural factors, such as the demand for dowries paid by the bride’s family, but also misbegotten...
Poland Attempts To Reduce National Debt By Dipping Into Pension Funds
Poland’s prime minister, Donald Tusk, announced Wednesday that the government would attempt to cut government debt by taking money from its citizens’ private pension funds. Poland currently has a two-fold pension system: mandatory contributions are made to the state pension fund and then to private funds. It is the state funds, known as ZUS, that the Polish government plans to “transfer” money from. According to Reuters: …Prime Minister Donald Tusk said private funds within the state-guaranteed system would have their...
Was the Sequester ‘Expansionary Austerity’?
Remember the “fiscal cliff”? It wasn’t a cliff. Over at Neighborhood Effects, James Broughel asks the question, “Has the Sequester Hurt the Economy?” So have the sequester cuts hurt the economy? One possible es from a new paper by Scott Sumner of Bentley University. Sumner argues that cuts to government spending don’t have serious deleterious macroeconomic effects when the Federal Reserve is targeting inflation. This is because the Fed ensures that prices stay stable under an inflation targeting regime, which...
Friday Night Videos 9.13.13
Giving (Via: Neatorama) What Surfing Can Teach You about Ownership (Via: Values & Capitalism) John Piper on the Prosperity Gospel (Via: Justin Taylor) ...
HBCU Funding: A Tale of Executive Orders
One of the things I never learned in my U.S. government courses in high school was just how quickly government agencies and programs grow without undergoing Congressional vetting. For example, I recently discovered that there exists a federally-funded White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU). When did that happen? How did that happen? In fact, a few days ago, the White House announced changes in the leadership of this initiative. President Obama names two dynamic new leaders...
Piper: ‘Work Is a Glorious Thing’
At Desiring God, John Piper explains how both the act and product of work are blessings, and that the God-designed essence of work is creativity — “not aimless, random doing, but creative, productive doing.” In addition to avoiding the hump of idleness, this means being ever diligent, discerning, obedient, and energetic in the work of our hands: When the book of Proverbs tells us to go to the ant and learn how to work hard and work smart (Proverbs 6:6–11),...
Quebec’s Religious Symbol Ban and the Myth of Religious Neutrality
Last week the ruling party of the province of Quebec, Parti Québécois, unveiled a new charter which would prohibit public employees from wearing overt religious garb. The document states: We propose to prohibit the wearing of overt and conspicuous religious symbols by state personnel in carrying out their duties. This restriction would reflect the state’s neutrality. Included in their examples of “conspicuous signs would not be allowed to state personnel” is the dastar, the turban worn by Sikh men. The...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved