Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Laudato: ¿Si or no?
Laudato: ¿Si or no?
Jul 4, 2025 3:09 AM

Since the publication of the encyclical Laudato Si by Francis, a long-unheard rumble has been growing across the world public opinion. He is an expert in making himself heard, so we might as well rest it as it is, because Francis would be pleased. Our readers, however, are used to our fixing troubles, so we will once again meet the subjective claim of the market.

The Laudato Si embraces three aspects: a theological aspect, an economic aspect, and a scientific aspect.

The primary aspect, also the specific realm of the teachings of the Church, is the theological one. Here lies a matter that has remained partly unseen or, better, unheard in the midst of the voices stirring, either in anger or in praise, about the Laudato.

As we all known, in the Genesis, God vests man with the power to ruleover the land. But this dominus may be understood in two senses: rule as a symbol of the dignity of human nature, created in God’s image and likeness, over non-human things, or rule as the master rules over his slave.

Now, what Francis teaches is that man’s bond with nature must be in the former sense. He thus frames the ecological issue within a Judeo-Christian perspective, where there is no pantheism between God and nature, where the earth is not a “mother” who replaces the creating Father. No; man is not the offspring of nature, but rather, of God, and given his natural dignity, man is ontologically superior to nature. But both (man on the one side, and the land and the rest of the living creatures on the other) are brethren in creation, and as such, their relation must not be Cain’s, but Abel’s; a harmony, though, that was lost in the original sin.

That being said, Francis reminds us of something that in philosophical terms may be expressed as follows: the relation between man and nature must e down to an instrumental rationality, where what matters is only the relation existing among ends, means, results and efficiency. Not that there is anything bad in this, on the contrary, it is often necessary to plan and evaluate, yet in the brotherly relation where the self relates to the other, the other is not a mere instrument.

Now, nature is not strictly a You, but under a Christian perspective, neither is it a mere thing enduring a slavery relation to an arbitrary master: man. Through saints such as Saint Francis and Fray Martin of Porres and their endearing relation with all created nature, God has presented us a symbol that does not restrict itself –as has been intended so many times- to a sweet tale story for children. They exhibit a sensibility towards all living creatures that must be embraced by every Christian: a brotherly relation implying neither submission of nature by man nor arbitrary ruling of nature, or one reduced to a rationalistic planning –daughter of the Enlightenment. Such brotherly relation is one of harmony, were nature may indeed serve man’s need, but not man’s arbitrariness, destruction or cruelty. Such sensibility towards nature as a sister in harmony is not new in terms of Christian sensibility, even though Francis is now reminding us of it, and its social implications do not lie in any given system; rather, they rest on changing habits as to consumption and-or protection of nature surrounding us.

This is simply what is most important about the encyclical.

Next, there are the economic and scientific issues. How much market or state are necessary to protect the environment, or the hypotheses and diverse empirical testing concerning global warning, pletely debatable issues on which any Catholic may speak their own mind, not because they are arbitrary issues, but because the social and natural sciences involved in them have a contingency margin that does not implicate the teaching of the Church, or Catholicism as such. From this perspective, Instituto Acton, exercising the legitimate liberty enjoyed by every believer around these matters, has always insisted on free market having much to offer in caring for the environment, above all through the internalization of negative externalities and the privatization of state public assets, all of it through a sharper definition of property rights. Interesting that authors advocating for a free society, such as Hayek and Feyerabend, would strongly criticize, at the core of their work, that same instrumental rationality that the School of Frankfurt has always steadily criticized. The constructivist rationalism, criticized by Hayek, and the union between state and science, criticized by Feyerabend, have led to a rationalistic planning that has strongly influenced what Mises calls interventionism and is now termed “crony capitalism”, a collusion between the state and private players, the latter being protected by the former, delaying the advent of new market alternatives involving clean energies, such as solar energy.

Therefore, ¿Laudato YES or NO? Because in the Christian perspective of ecology, obviously YES. In debatable matters, yes, no, nor, whatever (resorting to a thorough examination and prudence) may be argued. But always upholding a significant fundamental coincidence, beyond all the noises and fuss sought by our lively Pope.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
A Dangerous Moment with Promise
In this mentary, Acton president and co-founder Rev. Robert A. Sirico reflects on Christmas, but also on the things weighing heavily on many hearts. Despite this being a joyful time, we are caught in perilous moment in history due to the meeting of various things: intellectual, financial, militarily, and theologically. President Ronald Reagan gave a similar address in 1981: Rev. Sirico says: How to get to the heart of the matter? That, as Shakespeare might say, is the rub. Yet,...
Undercover Boss Celebrates Female Dehumanization
To end the 2014 on an incredibly dehumanizing note, CBS aired an episode of Undercover Boss that stirred up protests from all walks of life. Undercover Boss is usually a wonderful program that allows CEOs to see what is happening on the ground in panies and reward hard workers accordingly. However, this particular episode profiled Doug Guller, the CEO of Bikinis Sports Bar & Grill, who fired a bartender after she decided not to dehumanize herself by wearing a T-shirt...
The Blue-Cold Child
From Flannery O’Connor’s The Violent Bear It Away: God told the world he was going to send it a king and the world waited. The world thought, a golden fleece will do for His bed. Silver and gold and peacock tails, a thousand suns in a peacock’s tail will do for his crib. His mother will ride on a four-horned white beast and use the sunset for a cape. She’ll trail it behind her over the ground and let the...
The Year in Acton Commentary 2014
Every Wednesday we publish the Acton Commentary, a weekly article that covers topics related to Acton’s mission. As es to a close I thought it would be worth highlighting the mentaries that have been produced by Acton Institute staffers over the past year. Rev. Robert A. Sirico A Dangerous Moment with Promise The Holy War on Corporate Politicking Pope Francis, without the politics The Holy War on Corporate Politicking Pope Francis, without the politics Samuel Gregg Poverty, the Rule of...
10 Things Political Scientists Know That We Don’t
“If economics is the dismal science,” says Hans Noel, an associate professor at Georgetown University, “then political science is the dismissed science.” Most Americans—from pundits to voters—don’t think that political science has much to say about political life. But there are some things, notes Noel, that “political scientists know that it seems many practitioners, pundits, journalists, and otherwise informed citizens do not.” Here are excerpts from Noel’s list of ten things political scientists know that you don’t: #1. It’s The...
Radio Free Acton: Remembering Holodomor with Luba Markewycz
In this edition of Radio Free Acton, Paul Edwards speaks with Luba Markewycz of the Ukrainian Institute of Modern Art in Chicago, Illinois about the Holodomor – the Great Famine of the 1930s inflicted on Ukraine by Josef Stalin’s Soviet Government that killed millions of Ukrainians through starvation. They discuss the Holodomor itself, and the process undertaken by Markewycz to create an exhibition of art by young Ukrainians memorate the event. You can listen to the podcast using the audio...
Pope Francis, World Day Of Peace And Human Trafficking
January 1, for Catholics, is celebrated as the World Day of Peace. For January 1, 2015, Pope Francis’ message is a reflection on the horror of human trafficking. Entitled No Longer Slaves But Brothers And Sisters, the pope’s message calls trafficking an “abominable phenomenon” which cheapens human life and denies basic human rights to those enslaved. Taking his theme from St. Paul’s letter to Philemon, Pope Francis reflects on human dignity and true fraternity among all peoples. Pope Francis prayerfully...
Nothing New ‘Underneath that Burning Sun’
Friedrich Hayek once called intellectuals “professional secondhand dealers in ideas.” And the Preacher proclaimed, “There is nothing new under the sun.” So perhaps it shouldn’t be surprising when ideas, memes, and other cultural phenomena pop up again and again. There is, however, a notable correspondence between an Acton Commentary that I wrote earlier this month, “The Worst Christmas Song Ever,” and a piece that appeared weeks earlier at The Federalist. In “‘Do They Know It’s Christmas’ Is The Worst Christmas...
Why Do Black Lives Matter?
“Black lives matter.’ ‘All lives matter. These slogans may forever summarize the deep tensions in American life in 2014,’ says Anthony Bradley in this week’s Acton Commentary. “We can loudly protest that “Black lives matter” but it will mean nothing in the long run if we cannot explain why black lives matter.” Black lives matter because black people are persons. One of the greatest tragedies in American history was the myth that America could flourish without blacks flourishing as persons....
Poverty Imagery and the ‘Christmas Song’
In last week’s mentary, “The Worst Christmas Song Ever,” Jordan Ballor touched on the well-intentioned yet harmful message shared by “Do They Know It’s Christmas?” the 1984 song produced by the music group, Band Aid, in response to the famine that struck Ethiopia. Ballor describes the context and some of the song’s lyrics: The song describes Africa largely as a barren wasteland, ‘Where the only water flowing is the bitter sting of tears.’ It continues in this vein. Africa, the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved