Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
High Court, high stakes: Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg
High Court, high stakes: Replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Jun 30, 2025 10:35 PM

It is extremely mon for me to read anything published by Glamour. In 2018, however, a first-person profile by Clara Spera caught my attention. Spera, a Harvard-trained attorney, shared with readers a personal portrait of her grandmother, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Over the course of the last several months as Justice Ginsburg’s health began to fade more rapidly, and then again last week when news of her death was announced, I remembered this article and the humane sincerity with which it was written. Justice Ginsburg, it seems, spent her life in service of others – to her family as a mother and grandmother, to her students as a law professor, to her principles as a public interest attorney, and to her nation as a long-tenured judge and justice.

Unfortunately, Justice Ginsburg’s death e when her passing is not just a cause for private grief among her family and friends but also a political event. How much worse is the death of a matriarch when so many, both friend and foe, understand her passing only in instrumental terms. For some, she was part of dam holding back a decisive rightward shift on the Supreme Court; for others, her death presents an opportunity to see that shift materialize. It is no surprise, then, that the political war has already started. Democrats and Republicans are citing one another’s 2016 remarks in the wake of the death of Justice Scalia, and a mainstream media personality is calling for riots and destruction among his 300,000 Twitter followers if “they even try to replace” Ginsburg on the High Court.

The fact that a single judge is so strategically important to advancing one political agenda or another would pletely foreign to the Framers. In Federalist No. 78, titled “The Judiciary Department,” Alexander Hamilton famously describes the courts as the “least dangerous branch.” The courts established by the Constitution, he argued, are weak. They have “no influence over either the sword or the purse.” Courts today, and over the course of Justice Ginsburg’s entire career, have been anything but weak. And the furor that erupts around the death or retirement of justices is only further proof of this.

One of the most important and controversial decisions in American constitutional law was the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison, in which the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice John Marshall established the doctrine of judicial review. This decision established a precedent that has shaped the operation of the courts up to the present day. According to Marbury, courts possess the constitutional authority to review the legislative acts of Congress. For the first few years after the case, the doctrine gathered dust. But by 2008, Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority in Boumediene v. Bush equated an absence of judicial review with an absence of legal constraint. The Supreme Court had e the most dominant, towering branch of government, asserting control over the acts of the legislative and executive branches.

But it has not just been the legacy of Marbury that expanded the power and influence of the judiciary to proportions simply unimagined by our Constitution. The Supreme Court has traditionally been bound in its ability to consider only legal questions rather than political ones; however, that distinction has e blurred, especially in cases in the last several decades. For all of its moral faults, Dred Scott v. Sanford has more than a few jurisprudential ones, too. Chief Justice Roger Taney attempted to place slavery beyond political debate by making legally unfounded assertions rather than legal arguments – ultimately plunging the nation into Civil War. Even though the decision has been roundly condemned for its holding, the legacy of the type of legal reasoning and jurisprudential concepts employed by the Court in Dred Scott in order to reach a certain political e have lived on.

After World War II, the Supreme Court entered into a frenetic period of reshaping American society through cases centering on individual rights. It was this era that gave rise judicial opinions relating to abortion, prayer in schools, birth control, the rights of those arrested and accused of crimes, the death penalty, search warrants, and many other things. It is not the case, however, that some of the issues were not ripe for judicial consideration. It is that the courts side-stepped constitutional restraints on the power of the judiciary in order to do so. Constitutionally, a federal court can only consider a “case or controversy” rather than a theoretical legal question. This requires an actual litigant whose relevant rights are at issue and grants them “standing.” The Warren and Burger Courts proved to be particularly adept at discovering standing in unexplored and dusty jurisprudential corners. Further, the Supreme Court has no constitutional power to legislate, but many of the era’s decisions plex enforcement schemes and judicially created remedies which bear striking resemblance to legislation in form, substance, and application.

ing weeks are going to be brutal. The stakes are high, but they shouldn’t be. The Supreme Court was never designed to be as influential as it is, but it has e dangerous by detaching itself over the course of generations from its constitutional moorings. This contentious and fractured moment is the fruit of that drift.

Photo / Jacquelyn Martin.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Where criminal justice reform meets the redemptive power of work
According to a recent study by the Rand Corporation, “more than 2 million adults are incarcerated in U.S. prisons,” with roughly 700,000 leaving federal and state prisons each year. Of those released, “40 percent will be reincarcerated.” It’s a staggering statistic—one that ought to stir us toward greater reflection on how we might better support, empower, and equip prisoners in connecting with social and economic life. How might we reform our criminal justice system to better help and support these...
Explainer: Judge Kavanaugh and why you should care about ‘Chevron deference’
Judge Brett Kavanaugh made a second appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee today for his Supreme Court confirmation hearing. During questioning,Kavanaugh was asked about a controversial, but little-known, legal doctrine called “Chevrondeference.” Here’s what you should know about Kavanaugh’s position andwhy you should care about Chevron deference. What is the Chevron the Senate is referring to? The pany? Yes, though indirectly. Chevron, the corporation, was the plaintiff in the landmark Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense...
Radio Free Acton: ‘Work in the age of robots’; Has classical music been forgotten?
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, John Couretas, Executive Producer of Radio Free Acton, interviews Mark Mills, Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, on his new book “Work in the Age of Robots,” about what our jobs and the future of AI might look like. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks to Jay Nordlinger, Senior Editor of National Review, about Classical music: are people still listening to it nowadays and why is it important? Check out...
Acton Institute statement on Richard M. DeVos Sr. (1926-2018)
Richard (Rich) M. DeVos exemplified the value of hard work, free enterprise and expansive philanthropy in building munities. The Acton Institute mourns the passing of DeVos, 92, who for decades was known for leadership in business, his dedication to the promotion of liberty, and his courage in maintaining and defending the free and virtuous society. “Rich DeVos never shrank from the conviction that the roots of liberty and the morally-charged life are to be found in the eternal truths of...
Searching for Walker Percy in St. Francisville
Walker Percy wrote novels that explored the “dislocation of man in the modern age” and that were “delivered with a poetic Southern sensibility and informed by the author’s deep Catholic faith.” To celebrate the novelist’s life and work, the people of St. Francisville, Louisiana host an annual Walker Percy Weekend. Caroline Roberts, a writer and producer of the Radio Free Acton podcast, attended this year’s event and wrote about the experience for the latest edition of Acton Longform, our new...
Against job-shaming: ‘Cosby’ actor reminds us of the dignity of work
After a decades-long career in film, theater, and education, actor Geoffrey Owens decided to take a part-time job as a cashier at Trader Joe’s. When customers and news outlets began posting photos of the actor bagging groceries, the ments included a mix of mockery and what Owens describes as “job-shaming.”Fortunately, according to Owens, “the shame part didn’t last very long.” “It hurt…I was really devastated,” Owens explained on Good Morning America, “but the period of devastation was so short.” Owens...
Walmart’s T-shirt homage to mass murder
It is extremely concerning and offensive to find Walmart and other retailers promoting what they call “cool shirts“ — bright red tees emblazoned with the Soviet hammer and sickle, says Mari-Ann Kelam in this week’s Acton Commentary. “Making light of the mitted under and in the name munism shows ignorance and callousness.” As an Estonian-American living in Europe, I am embarrassed and pained. It is impossible to explain such flippancy to people here, many of whom suffered munism. People are...
How we participate in God’s own work
“This is what I have observed to be good,” the Preacher says, “that it is appropriate for a person to eat, to drink and to find satisfaction in their toilsome labor under the sun during the few days of life God has given them—for this is their lot” (Ecclesiastes 5:18[NIV]). “Toilsome labor” is work that is incessant, extremely hard, or exhausting. That doesn’t sound all that appealing, does it? So why does the Preacher say such labor isgood? Because, he...
The Great Recession and the failure of financial intermediaries.
Note: This is post #92 in a weekly video series on basic economics. What caused the Great Recession of 2008? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Tyler Cowen discusses a couple of key reasons, including homeowners’ leverage, securitization, and the role of excess confidence and incentives. He then considers what could have been done to prevent the worst financial crisis of our young century. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them...
How Switzerland honors the Protestant work ethic and Catholic subsidiarity
In the U.S., Labor Day weekend celebrates the work ethic that made this nation the most prosperous in human history, and federalism is enshrined in our constitution. But Switzerland – so often overlooked by the West – may have much to teach us about how to honor and embrace the profound influence of the Protestant work ethic and Catholic subsidiarity. At Acton’s Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website, political scientist Mark R. Royce discusses how aspects of Switzerland’s little-discussed political system...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved