Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
French protesters demand: ‘Death to taxes’
French protesters demand: ‘Death to taxes’
Oct 28, 2025 10:50 AM

As satiated Americans gathered around their Thanksgiving tables to count their blessings, incensed protesters gathered in roadways and intersections across France to count the cost of Emmanuel Macron’s punishing gas taxes. A leaderless rebellion propelled hundreds of thousands of people into the streets – on foot, of course – and made France perhaps the least likely site in the world to see citizens demand, “Death to taxes.”

That was one of the phrases emblazoned on placards held aloft by the “gilets jaunes” movement (named for the yellow vests French drivers must wear in the event of a breakdown).

The protests, expected to last one day, have endured a week. On November 17, 244,000 protesters erected 2,000 roadblocks nationwide. Estimates of protesters from the following Saturday range from 81,000 to 106,000 – including 8,000 protesters on the Champ-Elysees alone.

When a few miscreants turned the protests violent, police responded with tear gas. Meanwhile, politicians from every opposition party hurried to claim ownership ofthe grassroots movement that voices an authentic national consensus: The government’s excessive taxes on gasoline and diesel are hurting families.

A problem of its own making

Like its neighbors, the French government once used taxes and incentives to “nudge” the French to ditch gasoline for diesel. Diesel, scientists said, emits less carbon dioxide than gasoline. The incentives worked, and by 2013, two-thirds of all new cars on French roadways had diesel engines.

But then the governments of Europe learned that, while diesel emits less CO2, it releases far higher levels of other particulates. Now the government is correcting a problem of its own making by taxing both diesel and gasoline. Last year, President Macron announced the government plans to end the sale of gasoline and diesel vehicles by 2040.

Meanwhile, he ratcheted up the economic pain. Gasoline costs as much as $7.06 a gallon (€1.64 a liter) in Paris. Diesel prices are being taxed into near parity. The government assesses that taxes account for 60 percent of the overall cost of fuel.

Carbon taxes continue to pile up with no end in sight. The New York Times reports, “the tax burden had grown by about €25 billion every year between 2002 and 2017.” Taxes increased this year, and the government plans to hike fuel taxes again early next year (by an additional 6.5 cents a liter for diesel and 2.9 cents a liter for gasoline).

Authorities hope the move will force the French to reduce their carbon footprint and switch from diesel, yesterday’s preferred purchase, to electric and hybrid cars. Instead, the people have gone public with their tales of pain and outrage:

A father of seven who makes 1,500 a month said he’s “sick of being taxed on everything”;A contractor who has to drive large distances for his business said, “It seems like to us that the government is only working to maintain its own privileges … Why should we have to finance their projects?”A 21-year-old woman said, “They take everything from us. They steal everything from us”; and860,000 people signed a petition on Change.org to reduce the gasoline tax.

Even far-Left radical Jean-Luc Melenchon has said, “When tax is no longer agreed to, it’s the start of revolutions in France.”

No one can doubt the potency of this populist revolt, least of all Macron, whose approval ratings have dipped into the 20s. How has his government responded?

Let them eat electric cars

Macron this week said the protests created “a moral crisis” of “ambient demagogy.” At times, he’s conflated the undeniably grassroots movement with a small fraction of extremists who joined in the protests. He vacillated between affirming the protesters’ pain and denouncing them as “thugs” who “want to destroy and create disorder.”

But on the substance of plaint, he refuses to budge. “We must not change course, because the policy direction is right and necessary,” Macron said.

He instead promised to dispatch his environmental minister to meet with the protesters. And he pledged enhanced tax incentives to purchase new electric cars.

“We can’t buy food at the end of the month but we’re going to buy an electric car?” asked an understandably piqued 45-year-old woman.

Macron’s moral morass

This is, indeed, a moral crisis. The power of the government has been harnessed to “nudge” an unwilling populace toward goals set by the political leadership. The tax burden imposed by the government has been so severe that an increasing number of families cannot care for their other legitimate needs. To add insult to injury, the French free-market think tank Fondation iFRAP reports that France already has one of the lowest levels of C02 emissions of any industrialized nation – and much of the carbon tax goes to the government’s general fund, not to alternative energy initiatives.

Moreover, the nation’s political leadership refuses to listen to the voice of the governed who are pleading for relief.

Oppressive taxes inhibit human flourishing. And unpopular elitists disregarding the pleas of their suffering people in order to fatten government coffers could drive a wedge in French society that explodes in perilous ways.

The biblical story of Rehoboam shows how excessively harsh taxation can divide a people. French history provides its own example of a monarch who cruelly ignored the plight of starving people. That story, too, ended badly.

A free market allows people to pursue their own ends, according to their own values. The French people’s already-light carbon footprint attests to the value they place on the environment. But humane economics values those people, their families, above all.

Pépellin. This photo has been cropped. CC BY-SA 4.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Modern Papacy
It can be tempting to judge the papacy, the world’s longest continuously functioning institution, by its various historical stages that often have little relevance to the modern office. While the Chair of Peter remains the central teaching medium of the Roman Catholic Church, it is safe to say that the challenges faced by Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI are not the challenges faced by Pope Adrian I (772 – 795) or even Pope Leo XIII (1878 – 1903)....
5 Things You Should Know About Washington’s Birthday
Today in the United States is the federal holiday known as Washington’s Birthday (not “Presidents Day—see item #1). In honor of George Washington’s birthday, here are 5 things you should know about the day set aside for our America’s founding father. 1. Although some state and local governments and private businesses refer to today as President’s Day, the legal public holiday is designated as “Washington’s Birthday” in section 6103(a) of title 5 of the United States Code. The observance of...
Putting the Resignation of Benedict XVI in Perspective: Kresta in the Afternoon
This week, Istituto Acton Director Kishore Jayabalan joined Al Kresta of Ave Maria Radio to discuss the historic resignation of Pope Benedict XVI. The special broadcast featured Fr. Joseph Fessio, S.J., founder of Ignatius Press, who did his doctoral dissertation under then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. Click on the audio link below to listen. [audio: ...
Would Hayek Have Supported Obamacare?
“You can be for markets without being against redistribution,” says Erik Angner, a philosophy professor at George Mason University. Angner argues that the Nobel-winning economist Friedrich Hayek offers an alternative to contemporary liberals and leftists on the one hand and conservatives and libertarians on the other. As Amanda Winkler notes, In a controversialPolitco op-ed published in 2012, Angner wrote that while Britain’s National Health System and the price-rigging elements of Obamacare violate Hayekian principles, creating an individual mandate and giving...
Conscious Capitalism and the Higher Purpose of Business
In 1978, John Mackey was 25-year-old college dropout who believed that democratic socialism was a more “just” economic system than democratic capitalism. But his views soon changed after he and his girlfriend borrowed $45,000 from family and friends to open a small vegetarian grocery store in Austin, Texas. Although he was only earning $200 a month from his struggling business, his friends on the left viewed him as a “capitalistic exploiter” who was overcharging his customers and exploiting his workers....
George Washington’s Example on Religious Liberty
For George Washington’s birthday, Julia Shaw reminds us that the indispensable man of the American Founding was also an important champion of religious liberty: All Presidents can learn from Washington’s leadership in foreign policy, in upholding the rule of law, and—especially now—in the importance of religion and religious liberty. While the Obama Administration claims to be modating” Americans’ religious freedom concerns regarding the Health and Human Services (HHS) Obamacare mandate, it is actually trampling religious freedom. President Washington set a...
America’s Looming Demographic Disaster
“Our world is overpopulated.” If you repeat something often enough, it es “truth”. In 1968, Paul Ehrlich wrote The Population Bomb, warning that we’d all soon be fighting over food, space, and power as the earth sagged under the weight of all those darned people. He was wrong, of course, and not just wrong: spectacularly wrong. It didn’t keep him from being a celebrity or from his ridiculous notion from being believed. But he was still wrong. In What to...
Sharpening the Weapon of Love: From Moralism to Morality
Today at Ethika Politika, I explore the prospects for a renewed embrace of the Christian spiritual and ascetic tradition for ecumenical cooperation and mon good in my article “With Love as Our Byword.” As Roman Catholics anticipate the selection of a new pope, as an Orthodox Christian I hope that the great progress that has been made in ecumenical relations under Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI will continue with the next Roman Pontiff. In addition, I note...
Looking Back: Acton Experts on Benedict XVI’s Election
On April 19, 2005, JosephRatzinger was elected to e the next Pope after John Paul II.Several Acton Institute analysts wrote articles looking ahead to what kind of papacy the world could expect from Benedict XVI. Take a look and let us know how we did. (We’ve added links where they are still available). Alejandro Chafuen, a member of the Acton Institute’s board of directors, wrote a piece on April 20, 2005, titled, “Benedict XVI: A defender of personal freedom” for...
Video: Rev. Robert A. Sirico at the 2005 Papal Conclave
Digging into the Acton video vault, we’ve reposted on YouTube some of the analysis that Rev. Robert A. Sirico, co-founder and president of the Acton Institute, handled as the on-air expert for BBC News in 2005 and, when not on call from the BBC, Fox News, EWTN and others. The fourth video here is from last week’s appearance on Fox, discussing the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI. Check this resource page for updates on Acton’s ongoing coverage of Pope Benedict’s...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved