Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Baltimore Mom: Abusive Or Responsible?
Baltimore Mom: Abusive Or Responsible?
May 9, 2025 12:29 PM

There was some water cooler talk here in the office the other day as the video of the Baltimore mom went viral. That’s the mother who recognized her son as one of the rioters, and slapped him about the head with some degree of ferocity, then put him in the car and took him home.

The mother has since been identified as Toya Graham, who happened upon her son, brick in hand, when she realized school had let out early due to the riots. Graham had forbidden her son the night before from going to the area where the riots were taking place, and he promised he would not. When she realized he was not at home, she went looking for him.

Some of the coffee klatsch questions raised:

Was the mom being abusive?If mom was abusive, and the son was raised in an abusive atmosphere, did that lead him to being a willing participant in a violent protest?If that were your kid, what would you have done?

Social media is split: Mom was abusive, and in a different setting would likely be brought up on charges. Others hail her as “mom of the year.” From USA Today:

“Hypocrisy of the law, she should be arrested for assault, battery and child abuse,” said one tweet by a user identified as @cotrial.

Others questioned why anyone would condone or celebrate her actions.

“Tired of hearing about this Baltimore ‘Mom of the Year,’ ” said a tweet under the handle @DaAnGrYASiAN. “If she raised her son better, she wouldn’t have needed to do that.”

Was the mother justified in her reaction? Should she have first attempted to reason with her son, telling him to put the brick down, join her at the local coffee shop and they could discuss his feelings regarding the situation?

Corporal punishment of children is, of course, a subject on debate. What was once considered “normal” is now considered abusive (and much of what once passed as “discipline” certainly should be considered abusive.) Does a swift slap to a diapered bottom constitute abuse, however? More to the point here, if your child were in a dangerous situation (say, a riot) would you, as a parent, not do anything in your power to remove that kid from said situation?

I’m sure a lot of office break rooms were buzzing this week about the same thing. I can only speak for myself: I would have done the same thing as the mom in Baltimore. Graham and her son spoke to CNN’s Anderson Cooper:

I said, ‘You weren’t brought up like this,’ ” Graham said.

He’s not a perfect child, but he’s also not a thug, she said.

The 16-year-old boy said he understood that his mother was there looking out for him.

“She didn’t want me to get in trouble (with the) law. She didn’t want me to be like another Freddie Gray,” he said, referring to the 25-year-old man who died of a severe spinal injury after being arrested by Baltimore police.

According to the best science available, teens’ brains are not fully developed, and don’t typically pletely until they are in their mid-twenties. (We need to take into account individual differences, cultures and many other factors, but this statement holds true in most cases.) While teens can be very smart, they also tend to act much more emotionally and impulsively than adults. Their brains are often under hormonal “assault,” and the teen brain simply does not process the link between personal behavior and likely es very well.

If my toddler wandered out into the path of a car, would I yank him back to safety? Of course. If I walked in on a boy sexually assaulting my daughter would I pull him off in a manner that could be interpreted as violent? You bet. If my teen were in the middle of a riot, brick in hand, would I get him out of there, forcefully if necessary? Yup.

I do not justify abuse towards a child (and it was clear from the video that, at least in this instance, the boy was not hurt), but sometimes parenting is by “any means necessary,” and in this case, I side with the mom.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
What Christians (Should) Mean When We Talk About Conscience
A new Pew Research surveyfinds that the majority of American Catholics (73 percent)say they rely “a great deal” on their own conscience when facing difficult moral problems. Conscience was turned to more often than the three other sources — Catholic Church’s teachings (21 percent), the Bible (15 percent) or the pope (11 percent) bined. While it never really went away, conscience is making eback among Christians. Over the past few years, the term conscience has been increasingly referenced in debates...
Radio Free Acton: Magatte Wade on African Entrepreneurship
This week on Radio Free Acton, Magatte Wade joins us to discuss the challenges and rewards of being an entrepreneur in Africa. Too often, people in the West tend to think of Africa as a place to send aid rather than a place to engage in trade. Magatte is working to change that attitude while building her pany, Tiossan, as well asthe local economy in her native Senegal. Wadewill be joining us as a plenary speaker at Acton University in...
The Correlation Between GDP and Human Flourishing
Recently we considered a simple tool and metric for measuring economic well-being: real GDP per capita. Yet such metrics feel can seem materialistic. What about the things that money can’t buy, we wonder, like health and happiness? As economist Alex Tabarrok explains, while real GDP is an imperfect measure, it tends to be correlated with many of the non-monetary improvements that contribute to human flourishing. ...
The ‘Tragedy’ of the (Boston) Common
Boston Common Asset Management bills itself as “a leader in global sustainability initiatives.” Why would an investment portfolio pany label itself with the appellation “Common” when it carries such negative baggage? As it turns out, BCAM embraces mon” as something positive. From the BCAM website: Beginning in 1634, the Boston Common served as mon pasture for cattle grazing. As a public good, the Common was a space owned by no one but essential to all. We chose the name Boston...
Religious shareholders attack ExxonMobil’s reputation, worry about oil giant’s ‘reputational risk’
The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, shareholder activists of the corporate God-fly variety, are gearing up for the May 25 ExxonMobil Corporation annual general meeting. The ICCR agenda isn’t about maximizing shareholder value, but seems far more intent on reducing it. For the record, your writer possesses no financial stake in ExxonMobil, but if he did it’s certain he’d be upset mightily at ICCR’s efforts to hobble the industry giant and send stock prices plummeting even further. The religious-left activists...
Audio: Samuel Gregg on Rerum Novarum’s Relevance for Today
Acton Institute Director of Research Samuel Gregg is in Rome this week for Acton’s conference on the 125th anniversary of Pope Leo XIII’s ground-breaking encyclical Rerum Novarum.The conference – titled Freedom with Justice: Rerum Novarum and the New Things of Our Time – takes place on April 20th from 2-7:30 pm at the Roma-Trevi-Conference Center in Rome, Italy. Sam sat down for an in-depth interview with Vatican Radio about the encyclical and the conference, noting that “there are many things...
Time and Eternity: The Abiding Profit
“The temporal achievements of science, technology, inventions and the like also have a divine significance,” writesAbraham Kuyper in this week’s Acton Commentary, an excerpt fromCommon Grace: God’s Gifts for a Fallen World. With the destruction of this present form of the world, will the fruit mon grace be destroyed forever, or will that rich and multiform development for mon grace has equipped and will yet equip our human race also bear fruit for the kingdom of glory as that will...
Distributism Is the Future (That Few People Want)
Over the years, many of us here at Acton have been engaged in long-running(and mostly congenial) feud with distributists. Family squabbles can often be the most heated, and that is true of this rivalry between the Christianchampions of distributism and the Christian champions of free markets here at the Acton Institute. We fight among ourselves because we have an awful lot mon. For example, we share the afocus on encouraging subsidiarity, self-sufficiency, and entrepreneurship. We also share arespect for rule...
Video: Freedom and the Poverty Industry
Kris Mauren, executive director of the Acton Institute, kicks off the second season of the Free Market Series, a television program for American and Canadian audiences produced by The World Show in partnership with the Montreal Economic Institute and broadcast on PBS affiliates. In Episode 1, Mauren takes apart the “fatally flawed poverty industry” and talks about Acton’s Poverty Inc. documentary. Interview notes: Many people imagine that free markets are synonymous with self-interest and greed, but for Kris Mauren, freedom...
Why It Was Always Going to Be Tubman on Our Money
Last Summer I predicted that Harriet Tubman would be replacing Alexander Hamilton on the $10 bill. I was almost right. She’ll be replacing Andrew Jackson. The U.S. Treasury announced last year that the $10 bill is the next paper currency scheduled for a major redesign — a process that takes years because of the anti-counterfeiting technology involved — and will feature a “notable woman.” The new ten will be unveiled in 2020, the 100th anniversary of the passage of the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved