Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Religious shareholders attack ExxonMobil’s reputation, worry about oil giant’s ‘reputational risk’
Religious shareholders attack ExxonMobil’s reputation, worry about oil giant’s ‘reputational risk’
Aug 30, 2025 6:45 AM

The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, shareholder activists of the corporate God-fly variety, are gearing up for the May 25 ExxonMobil Corporation annual general meeting. The ICCR agenda isn’t about maximizing shareholder value, but seems far more intent on reducing it.

For the record, your writer possesses no financial stake in ExxonMobil, but if he did it’s certain he’d be upset mightily at ICCR’s efforts to hobble the industry giant and send stock prices plummeting even further. The religious-left activists of ICCR have submitted seven proxy resolutions aimed at ExxonMobil this season. Aiming to protect the interests of all its investors, pany challenged the resolutions, but was overruled by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. According to the ICCR website:

Included in this group of resolutions are calls for greater disclosure of lobbying activities that may be tied to the types of climate change denial campaigns currently under investigation, as well as a call for board expertise on environmental issues and a resolution asking that pany acknowledge the “moral imperative of limiting global warming to 2 celsius”, the threshold participants at the COP21 climate talks agreed could not be exceeded if we are to safeguard our planet’s future. Another resolution asks that pany assess the risks of their carbon assets within the context of this carbon-constrained future.

And this, from one of ICCR’s actual resolutions:

As a large GHG [greenhouse gas] emitter with carbon intensive products, ExxonMobil should robustly support the framework to address climate change resulting from the 21st Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in December 2015. Constructive engagement on climate policy is especially important given Exxon’s historical role in financing climate denial and misinformation campaigns on climate change. Failing to address this could present reputational risk for ExxonMobil. In contrast to ExxonMobil, ten oil industry peers including Total, Shell, BP, and Saudi Aramco, and business leaders in other industries, support an international agreement to limit warming to 2°C.

Ahhh, “climate denial,” to which your writer sarcastically offers the interrogative: “Could there be anything more morally reprehensible than questioning the veracity of scientifically inconclusive claims of imminent catastrophic climate-change?” But such is the dogmatic nature of these corporate God-flies that the question is rendered rhetorical. Never mind the facts that support the use of fossil fuels as essential to reducing world poverty because facts usually get in the way of a good photo-opportunity.

The Washington Post, in an op-ed this week aimed at a specific U.S. presidential candidate who voices much the same claptrap as ICCR, refutes many of the generalized claims weighed against fossil fuels:

When burned, natural gas produces about half the carbon dioxide emissions of coal. The recent fracking boom contributed to a reduction in national carbon dioxide emissions over the past several years, as utilities switched from cheap coal to now-cheaper gas. It is true that some concerns remain. Methane leaks from natural gas wells and pipelines. Many worry about drinking water near fracking operations. But the government can require drillers to address these issues without shutting the industry. It is also true that natural gas is a waystation; though it is cleaner than coal, natural gas still produces carbon dioxide emissions. Yet gas’s price and emissions profile is still attractive enough that the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, the most aggressive global warming policy the country has ever had, relies on gas displacing coal to meet medium-term emissions goals….

Nuclear accounts for about a fifth of the country’s electricity, and it is practically emissions-free. Shutting down that much clean electricity generation would put the country into a deep emissions hole…. Yet every dollar spent to replace one carbon-free source with another is a dollar that could have been spent replacing dangerous and dirty coal plants. Under [the candidate’s] vision, either the country would fail to maximize emissions cuts, or it would waste huge amounts of money unnecessarily replacing nuclear plants. Unsurprisingly, the Clean Power Plan relies on nuclear, too, assuming that the country will get about the same amount of electricity from nuclear in 2030.

Now, mind you, your writer doesn’t endorse all of the WaPo’s arguments. First of all, he’s not convinced cheap and plentiful coal should be pletely from our nation’s energy portfolio as opposed to exercising cleaner ways of burning it for energy. And, while “many worry about drinking water near fracking operations” might sound like pelling argument to “some” readers, it’s remarkably vague in identifying specific people, their numbers and the legitimacy of their concerns.

All told, however, it’s a far-more reasoned – and moral – response to the efforts ICCR is waging against ExxonMobil, panies and their respective shareholders.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bees, Pollination, and the Coase Theorem
Note: This is post #39 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Alex Tabarrok shows how bees and pollination demonstrate the Coase Theorem in action: when transaction costs are low and property rights are clearly defined, private arrangements ensure that the market works even when there are externalities. Under these conditions, the market properly manages externalities. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at...
Neamtu: Choose the ‘Soros infantry’ or Tocqueville’s vision
George Soros is synonymous with a well-funded, highly partisan brand of “philanthropy,” which begs the question: Why are U.S. taxpayers underwriting it? During the Obamaadministration, USAID granted Soros’ Foundation Open Society-Macedonia (FOSM) and its counterparts$4.8 million,earmarking an additional$9.5 millionthrough2021. Macedonia’s center-Right president, Gjorge Ivanov,has charged Soros’organizations with rallying to destabilize his government and askedwhyAmerican foreign aid is attemptingto foist unpopular, EU-centric policies on his nation. One Macedonian official called these groups “the Soros infantry.” In a fascinatingnew essayfor Religion &...
Supreme Court ruling protects children—and religious liberty
This morning the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision in favor of a church daycare in one of the year’s most significant religious liberty cases. The case, Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer, involved a religious preschool that was rejected from a state program that provides reimbursement grants to purchase rubberized surface material (i.e., tire scraps) for children’s playgrounds. The preschool was ultimately denied the grant for its playground solely because the playground belongs to a religious organization....
Can a nation maintain its culture and accept EU funds? Mideast refugees and economic coercion
“Does a nation have the right to preserve its cultural values, even if it means defying an EU policy? And can it do so while accepting EU money?” asks Marcin Rzegocki. Specifically, European politicians are threatening to withhold EU funds from three nations that refuse to accept mostly Muslim refugees from the Middle East and Africa out of security concerns. After European politicians invited refugees to resettle in Europe, they promptly determined the exact quota ofrefugees that each EUmember nation...
We now have proof higher minimum wages hurt the poor
In 2014 the city of Seattle announced it would be raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour. The minimum wage would increase from the state’s $9.47 minimum to as high as $11 on April 1, 2015. The second phase-in period started on January 1, 2016, when the minimum wage reached $13 for large employers. Under the law, by 2021 all businesses must raise the minimum wage for theirworkers to $15. At the time I noted that while this policy...
Southern Baptist leader reacts to Tim Farron’s resignation at Acton University 2017
One of the ethical leaders of America’s largest Protestant denomination has weighed in on the case of a British politician whose Christian faith cost him his job – and how modern evangelicals should respond to acts of religious bigotry in the West. Dr. Russell Moore, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) – the public policy arm of the 15-million-member Southern Baptist Convention – highlighted the importance of religious liberty during his evening plenary speech at Acton University...
Rev. Robert Sirico lecturing live from Acton University
Tune in live tonight, Friday, June 23, at 7:00 PM Eastern to watch Rev. Robert Sirico’s keynote speech at Acton University. Visit Acton’s page for the live video. ...
When progressive business owners oppose the $15 minimum wage
Progressives are known for making blanket denunciations of “corporate greed” with little distinction or discernment, rushing to support a range of regulations, price controls, and market manipulations to mitigate the supposed vices of free and open exchange. Yet amid such sweeping disdain, we also see an emerging fondness for particular kinds of businesses, namely, those that market themselves as pursuing more “moral” or munitarian” ends. Epitomized by terms like “localist consumerism, “artisanal quality,” and “social entrepreneurship,” these businesses are somehow...
Why Seattle’s minimum wage law is now destroying wages
“The city of Seattle has the highest minimum wage in the United States,” notes Dylan Pahman in this week’s Acton Commentary. “While economists and policy-makers continue to debate the issue, a recent working paper from researchers at the University of Washington (UW) raises serious questions about the effectiveness of minimum wage hikes.” In short, the study concludes that the “increase to $13 reduced hours worked in low-wage jobs by around 9 percent, while hourly wages in such jobs increased by...
How Genesis ties Christianity to economics and business
Many Christians have a distant, even negative, view of economics and business. Pastors discuss the need for moral activity within the business world, but often ignore whether business in itself is morally justifiable. Some even assume that business activity is a sort of necessary evil; that economics is an academic discipline with little connection to their faith, and often church leaders support economic proposals without understanding plexity of the issues involved. This harms the witness of the Church. In his...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved