Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
American higher education: Where free speech goes to die
American higher education: Where free speech goes to die
Aug 16, 2026 2:29 PM

You’ve heard of that mythical place where elephants go to die? Apparently, these giants “know” they are going to die, and they head off to a place known only to them.

Free speech in the United States goes off to die as well, but there is no myth surrounding this. Free speech dies in our colleges and universities. Just ask American Enterprise Institute’s Christina Sommers. Sommers is a former philosophy professor and AEI scholar who recently spoke at Oberlin College. Her speech was excellent, but it apparently frightened the pants off a bunch of students (oh, I probably can’t say that. It likely makes someone feel violated.) They paraded outside the room where Sommers spoke, holding signs invoking “trigger warnings” and announcing a “safe room” where those who found Sommers’ talk too much to handle. Her topic? “What’s Right (And Wrong) With Feminism.” She was harassed and harangued both in-person and online for daring to speak such words.

Kirsten Powers, a Fox News contributor, notes that free speech is anything but on our college campuses. She writes at The Daily Beast that even the mere whiff of something that might possibly offend someone somewhere is stamped out before it even leaves a person’s mouth – the very opposite of free speech. Even edian Chris Rock has noticed.

Chris Rock told journalist Frank Rich that he had stopped playing college campuses because of how easily the audiences were offended. Rock said he realized some time around 2006 that “This is not as much fun as it used to be” and noted George Carlin had felt the same way before he died. Rock attributed it to “Kids raised on a culture of ‘We’re not going to keep score in the game because we don’t want anybody to lose.’ Or just ignoring race to a fault. You can’t say ‘the black kid over there.’ No, it’s ‘the guy with the red shoes.’ You can’t even be offensive on your way to being inoffensive.” Sadly, Rock admitted that the climate of hypersensitivity had forced him and edians into self-censorship.

What ends up happening is that people on college and university campuses either don’t say exactly what they mean for fear of reprisal, or they end up doing this weird dance of “I meant to say” and “I didn’t mean to offend” and “Oh, just forget about it. I’ll shut up now.”

In December 2014, the president of Smith College, Kathleen McCartney, sent an email to the student body in the wake of the outcry over two different grand juries failing to indict police officers who killed African-American men. The subject heading read “All Lives Matter” and the email opened with, “As members of the munity we are struggling, and we are hurting.” She wrote, “We raise our voices in protest.” She outlined campus actions that would be taken to “heal those in pain” and to “teach, learn and share what we know” and to “work for equity and justice.”

Shortly thereafter, McCartney sent another email. This one was to apologize for the first. What had she done? She explained she had been informed by students “the phrase/hashtag ‘all lives matter’ has been used by some to draw attention away from the focus on institutional violence against black people.” She quoted two students, one of whom said, “The black students at this school deserve to have their specific struggles and pain recognized, not dissolved into the larger student body.” The Daily Hampshire Gazette reported that a Smith plained that by writing “All Lives Matter,” “It felt like [McCartney] was invalidating the experience of black lives.” Another Smith sophomore told the Gazette, “A lot of my news feed was negative remarks about her as a person.” In her apology email McCartney closed by affirming mitment to “working as a white ally.”

McCartney clearly was trying to support the students and was sympathetic to their concerns and issues. Despite the best of intentions, she caused grievous offense.

As my dad would say, you can’t win for losing.

This is not something to jest about, however. It’s very serious. Colleges, of all places, should be where all ideas get thrown into the mix, hashed out, discussed, debated. Instead, a few people tightly control what passes as dialogue, and everyone else sits with their mouths clamped shut. What was once the essence of the college experience has e a punishable offense. That’s not hyperbole:

At Colorado College, a private liberal arts college, administrators invented a “violence” policy that was used to punish non-violent speech. The consequences of violating a speech code are serious: it can often lead to public shaming, censoring, firings, suspensions, or expulsions, often with no due process.

If someone doesn’t like what you have to say, you can lose your job and reputation, and be opened up to almost unbearable harassment in the social media sphere.

A good college education broadens one’s mind. You hear and discuss things you had not before considered, and learn to debate. In this on-going quest for truth, one learns that while everyone gets to speak their mind, not everyone is right. Once colleges and universities shut down free-flowing discussions of everything from affirmative action to zoology, free speech is dead. Even worse, those students – in a few short years – will take those views of microagression, trigger warnings and safe spaces out into the world with them.

Be careful what you say around them.

Read “How Liberals Ruined College” at The Daily Beast.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Work, Globalization, and Civilization
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Lutheran World Federation Misses the Mark on Work and Wealth,” I reflect on the recently concluded general assembly of the Lutheran World Federation, held in Stuttgart. The theme of the meeting was “Give us today our daily bread,” but as I note, the assembly’s discussion of hunger, poverty, and economics lacked the proper integration of the value, dignity, and importance of work. As I contend, work is the regular means God has provided for the...
Salary and Significance
During a recent conversation, a Chinese friend of mented on the lack of political involvement that she has observed in her peers, especially parison to American college students. She attributes this lack of involvement to the fact that the Chinese do not believe that political action can change the policies or even the identities of their leaders. As a result, non-politicians in China do not get involved in politics, and politicians there focus on achieving their own goals rather than...
Krista Tippett: Effective Compassion through Faith
Krista TippettKrista Tippett is the host of the radio program Speaking of Faith, broadcast weekly on NPR since 2003. In her conversations with people of all faiths and occupations, Christian and Hindu, novelist and physicist, Tippett aims to better understand the way that belief and spirituality affect our society, worldview, and personal well-being. In the two books she has published in the last few years, certain themes stand out that define her own view of religion and its place in...
DeKoster on Work and Food
I mentioned Lester DeKoster’s little classic, Work: The Meaning of Your Life—A Christian Perspective, in the context of the Lutheran World Federation’s General Assembly and the theme, “Give us today our daily bread.” In this book, DeKoster makes a pointed connection between work and food: “I was hungry and you gave me something to eat.” The Lord is saying that where humans are hungry, there he too chooses to hunger. He waits in the hungry man or woman or child,...
An Open Letter from Alexis de Tocqueville to President Barack Obama and the American People
I think that the oppression threatening democracies will not be like anything there has been in the world before…. I see an innumerable crowd of men, all alike and equal, turned in upon themselves in a restless search for those petty, vulgar pleasures with which they fill their souls…. Above these men stands an immense and protective power which alone is responsible for looking after their enjoyments and watching over their destiny. It is absolute, meticulous, ordered, provident, and kindly...
Italy, competition and the problem of guilds
Last Saturday’s New York Times contains an entertaining, edifying but ultimately sad tale on what ails the Italian economy. Entitled “Is Italy Too Italian?“, the Global Business article seeks to explain why Italy often tops “the informal list of Nations That Worry Europe” economically. Part of the problem may be the reluctance to use modern industrial techniques that can reduce costs of production – can you afford to pay $4,000 for a suit??? – or the large public debt run...
The Birth of Freedom Curriculum: YouTube Trailer and Pre-Order
Here is the new trailer for the 7-part Birth of Freedom DVD Curriculum, created by Acton Media and released next month by Zondervan. You can pre-order the curriculum at the Acton Book Shoppe. ...
A ‘Reality Economics’ View of Entrepreneurship
This week I’m attending Mises University, one of the largest and most rigorous summer courses in the Austrian School of economics (or “reality economics,” as my friend Michael McKay likes to call it). Among the various lectures, there was one in particular that struck me as particularly relevant to the work of the Acton Institute. Peter Klein, professor of economics at the University of Missouri, delivered a presentation on entrepreneurship, a large part ofthe focus of his academic work. Dr....
Free and (Mostly) Virtuous Links
Mark Tooley follows the Prophet Wallis as he descends from the heavens in a fiery chariot, with trumpets and shouts, and goes among our youth at Wisconsin’s Lifest in The Pearly Gatecrasher. Physicists close in on the “God particle” (how small they make Him) but worry about sensitivities surrounding the name. Says one of the particle chasers: “It embarrasses me. Although I am not a believer myself, it’s a misuse of terminology that might offend some people.” Reason.tv Editor in...
Democrat Outreach to Religious Left ‘Aggressive’ and ‘Not Diminishing’
Compared to the Republican Party, the Democrats’ embrace of politicized religion came late. And because Democrats have only in the last 5-6 years learned how to do the God talk (thanks in large part to the efforts of Jim “The Prophet” Wallis) they can be excused as greenhorns when they whine about not getting the Church folk more mobilized for blatantly partisan efforts. But it is really annoying when those in the pews don’t go the extra mile, isn’t it?...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved