Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
You Can’t Separate Stewardship from Economics
You Can’t Separate Stewardship from Economics
Aug 28, 2026 7:10 PM

As Christians continue toturn their attentionto the intersection of faith and work, it can be easy to dwell on such matters onlyinsofar as theyapplyto ourindividual lives. What is our purpose, ourvocation, and our value? How does God view our work, and how ought we to render it back tohim? What is the source ofour economic action?

These questions are important, butthe answers will inevitably point us to a more public (and for some, controversial) context filled with profound questions of its own. Stewardship is step one: calling, work, service, generosity, and so on. But what about the ripple effects of all that? How does the personal aspect connect with the public?

As Greg Forster explains in his talk at the recent Faith@Work Summit:“You can’t separate stewardship from economics.”

Whether we recognize it or not, our work hasprofound implications for the broader social and economic order beyond gross domestic product. Aswe glorify God through ourwork, we are also creating and cultivating social and spiritual capital with our neighbors, yielding service and fostering trust as we bless strangers and receive similarblessings in return. Lester DeKoster calls it the “fabric of civilization,” weaved together by the Holy Spirit to restore “the broken family of humankind.”

As Forster explains:

When people do their work with that stewardship mindset, it doesn’t just change the personal meaning of work for each individual; it changes the public meaning of work. You can’t separate stewardship from economics.

When people do their work as good stewards, it makes it possible for us to trust strangers, and that is not normal in human history. For virtually all of history, people worked together, they bought and sold, only with those of the same race, the same religion, the same cultural group. Outsiders could not be trusted. But when people do their work as good stewards, it es possible for us to love strangers by working together with them, by buying and selling with them. The modern entrepreneurial economy…is a product of that openness and trust.

…In the entrepreneurial economy, we love strangers with our work and we trust strangers in economic exchange. And that is why, with all of its faults, with all of its limitations, with all of the serious challenges that it can create for us, the entrepreneurial economy has unleashed the power of human work for love, justice, and reconciliation in unprecedented ways.

This means more than simply expanding our imaginations about the broader reach of our work (though we must!). It means that Christians have a unique responsibility to pay attention to the systems, institutions, and organisms that drive or inhibitsuch activity. It means that Christianshave particular reasons to fight not just for God-glorifying work, but for the entrepreneurial economy that enables and empowers it.

As Forster indicates,for the bulk of human history, the type of collaboration, exchange, and reconciliation we see today was outrightprohibited, leading not only to widespread material poverty, but significant social/spiritual division, isolation, and disconnect. Even now, as projects like PovertyCureseekto highlight,the world’s poorestsuffer not for lack of initiative, creativity, or love for neighbor, but because they have been cut off from circles of entrepreneurial exchange and collaboration.

On this, Forster offers asimple but healthy reminder: economics matters, for orienting our hearts, hands, and imaginations, yes, but also for the cultivation and preservation of the broader political/social/economic order.

As we continue torefine our thinking about the shape and arc of Christian stewardship, let’snot forget or neglect the role ofeconomics in unleashing it for “love, justice, and reconciliation” across society.

VisitMISSION:WORK for more recorded talksfrom the Faith@Work Summit.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
‘No Bible Sunday’
“Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers” (Galatians 6:10 NIV). According to The Christian Post, “On May 22, churches in several parts of the world are planning to hold ‘No Bible’ services where The Bible, even hymn books, over-head-projector slides, or anything else containing Scripture, will be locked away from view.” The purpose is to illustrate the state of Christians and others across the globe,...
Wal-Mart’s wages
Here’s a well-balanced story by Steve Greenhouse in today’s New York Times, “Can’t Wal-Mart, a Retail Behemoth, Pay More?” On this point, refer to an op-ed by Acton staff about the economics and ethics of the “living wage” (PDF). For a discussion of the fairness of wages and free agreements of employment in Catholic Social Teaching, see “Justice and Charity in Wages,” from Religion & Liberty. ...
Civic groups remain relevant
Noting the declining participation munity and civic groups, Jordan J. Ballor assesses a different root cause than has been put forth so far. “The greatest share of blame,” he writes, “Ought to be laid at the feet of the modernist view of individuality, which minimizes the importance munity and social structures.” Read the full text here. ...
Benedict XVI on markets and morality
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, in his former role as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, was more focused on the theological implications of political heresies such as liberation theology than he was on questions of economics. Yet Benedict has written eloquently on the subject of markets and morality, as this 1985 presentation at a Rome conference amply shows. In a paper titled Market Economy and Ethics, he affirms that “market rules function only...
Remaking the covenant
Some theologians have taken a troubling interpretation of the Noahic covenant to support a heterodox agenda. The World Alliance of Reformed Churches, in its attempts to call a status confessionis, called various study groups and forums to report on the “global crisis of life.” To this end, both the south-south member churches forum (held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, April 23-26 2003) and the south-north member churches forum (held in London Colney, UK, February 8-11 2004) affirm that: God has made...
Dreadful Doldrums in Deutschland
Watch Germany fall further into the abyss as it turns its back on both liberalism and Christianity. Once a staunchly pro-American, global economic powerhouse, the country is now the “sick man” of Europe more ways than one. These recent news items offer proof: Chancellor Gerhard Schrr lashes out at the “unrestrained neo-liberal system” for his country’s economic woes. Schrr has been actively courting Russia and China as allies; John Vinocur’s column in yesterday’s International Herald Tribune points to “Schrrism” as...
Over the edge with the religious left
Over the course of the past few months, many leaders on the left have been ramping up their rhetoric against the influence of the much-maligned “religious right” in American politics. The most recent high-profile example came from Democratic Senator Ken Salazar of Colorado, who described James Dobson and his Focus on the Family organization as “…the Antichrist of the world” in response to their strong advocacy against the filibustering of judicial nominees. Salazar later retracted his statement in the face...
Acton and Kuyper on politics
"In the French revolution a civil liberty for every Christian to agree with the unbelieving majority; in Calvinism, a liberty of conscience, which enables every man to serve God according to his own conviction and the dictates of his own heart." —Abraham Kuyper, "Calvinism and Politics," Stone Lectures on Calvinism, 1898. "What the French took from the Americans was their theory of revolution, not their theory of government—their cutting, not their sewing." —Lord Acton "The French Revolution ignores God. It...
Two philosophers
On this date, in 1813, Danish philosopher and Christian Søren Kierkegaard was born. Five years later, on this date in 1818, German philosopher and atheist Karl Marx was born. For a rough sketch of where these men fit in the history of philosophy, see this “Flow Chart of Modern Philosophy After Kant.” ...
Fear the LORD and shun evil
A respondent over at Mere Comments gets right to the heart of what the scientific and technological ethos is (i.e., Technopoly): “If we can do it, it’s right” and “If we can do it, we do it” which resolve to “it’s right if I do it.” Always an mittee is there to help sear the consciences of those involved. These are precisely the guiding principles of university ethics panels that permit creation of genetic chimeras, promote embryonic stem cell usage...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved