Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
White House: We Don’t Negotiate With (GOP) Terrorists
White House: We Don’t Negotiate With (GOP) Terrorists
Aug 28, 2025 6:56 AM

In what presumably was a misguided attempt to have Aaron Sorkin pen their newest round of armor-piercing media talking points, the White House sent adviser Dan Pfeiffer to the set of CNN’s The Lead with Jake Tapper armed to the teeth with explosive political metaphors meant to describe the GOP’s position on debt-ceiling negotiations.

TAPPER: You saw — and this is the final question. You saw today a new Bloomberg News poll indicating that the American people support by a 2-1 margin its right to require spending cuts when negotiating the debt ceiling.

I understand that Keystone and other provisions that the Republicans are talking about attaching to the debt ceiling are not related, but why not cut some spending?

PFEIFFER: The Republicans — we are for cutting spending. We’re for reforming our tax code. We’re for reforming our entitlements.

What we’re not for is negotiating with people with a bomb strapped to their chest. We’re not going to do that. So, if they want to have a discussion about how we reduce our deficits, how we help the middle class, how we give them a better bargain, lift the debt ceiling, take the full faith and credit of the United States off the table and let’s have a discussion.

I don’t think — that’s not a plicated thing. What they’re doing is unprecedented. Imagine a scenario years from now, different Congress — we agree to their demands now. A year from now, maybe they want to privatize Medicare. Maybe four years from now, there’s a Democratic Congress and a Republican president, and the e forward and say, if you don’t raise taxes to levels that you don’t want, then we’re going to cause the economy to blow up.

We cannot live in a world where one-half of one branch of government can extract their demands that have been rejected by voters and can’t pass under normal circumstances or they are going to blow up the economy.

(You can watch the full exchange right here.)

Geez! I guess if they want to buy themselves some leverage and room to negotiate with this tough-nosed administration, perhaps Republicans ought to tell the White House that they’ve used lethal chemical weapons to eliminate the entire population of certain cities?

Follow the “logic” here:

The Left is demanding that the debt ceiling limit be removed. They’re vaguely promising spending-cut fidelity in return. The only reason the debt ceiling is even an issue is because the federal government continues to over-spend at unprecedented, unsustainable levels. The primary reason the Left wants the debt ceiling removed is so that more spending can ensue (as has happened 100% of the time in the past).

And because not everyone believes in their pledge to cut – because some would like there to be guaranteed restraints applied to what Thomas Sowell would call the “unconstrained” vision of the Left – these doubters/haters are labeled fiscal terrorists and likened to soulless animals who use mentally handicapped children to blow up crowded Middle Eastern markets.

But I thought the Right was solely responsible for the coarsening of political discourse in the country? Isn’t that what the host of The Rachel Maddow Show each night on MSNBC incessantly claims?

Listen, we’re all big boys and girls here. What Pfeiffer said isn’t the crime of the century. Words don’t mean that much in politics anyway.

But actions do.

For a moment, forget who you voted for. Forget Right and Left. Forget my witty Aaron Sorkin jab that started off this post.

Instead, dwell on the undeniable fact that we are trillions of dollars in debt as a nation. Mull over the reality of a future America that, on its current trajectory, is fundamentally worse off than the one the Baby Boomers, Gen X-ers and we Millennials inherited. Think of the account we will have to give, who have been blessed by our Maker with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the freest nation in history, as we stood idly by as Rome burned (and people we elected to represent us poured gasoline on the fire).

Our problem is not this-or-that political maneuver by either party. It’s ungratefulness and ingratitude in the face of unimaginable blessing. It’s the laziness that leads us to turn a blind eye and deaf ear to the reckless decisions being made by our proxies in Washington. It’s the systematic failure of stewardship at nearly every turn in our society.

This “bomb strapped” ing from the mouth of an empty political suit is merely emblematic of the utter lack of seriousness most Americans have about the trouble we are in. Millions have closed their eyes and hoped this would all go away with the casting of one ballot here, or the support of cutting programs that don’t personally impact them over there.

The worst part? I’m chief among them.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Too Good To Pass Up
Sometimes e across a story that’s so powerful that it DEMANDS to be posted. This is one such story: “Usually, if a turd gets into the Senate, it’s because he or she was elected,” Emily Heil reports for Roll Call. “But on Wednesday, several large piles of actual, nonmetaphorical ‘No. 2’ found their way into the Capitol, and the source isn’t yet clear.” It was the first sentence that got me. ...
No Place Like Home
At last year’s Acton University, a few Austrian attendees made an interesting youtube video celebrating their rediscovery of the huge and obvious contributions Austria has made to free-market economics. But what about the countries that don’t have an entire school of economic thought named after them? My conversations with international participants at this year’s conference underscored two themes over and over again. First, that even the unlikeliest countries have some philosophical heritage undergirding capitalist thought. Second, that AU attracts the...
Father Sirico Closes Acton University 2007
Acton University 2007 came to a close this evening with another stirring address by Rev. Robert Sirico which capped a great week in Grand Rapids for all involved. It’s getting late and I can’t hope to top what Father Robert had to say this evening, so I’ll refer all of you to the audio link below. It’s always a relief when e to the end of what is without a doubt the busiest week of the year for Acton’s Grand...
Green Consulting, Dogbert-style
Today’s Dilbert is a good one: “green” consulting, Dogbert-style. ...
Acton University – Day 2 Audio Roundup
Today’s lectures from Acton University 2007 (updated as more audio es available): Protestantism and Natural Law: Dr. Stephen GrabillTheology and History of Globalization: Dr. Samuel GreggThe Catholic Social Encyclical Tradition: Kishore JayalabanKnowing Good Works: Guidelines for Effective Compassion: Dr. Fred DeJongThe Political Economy of Globalization: Michael MillerSubsidiarity and Effective Private Charity: Ismael HernandezEconomics and Human Action: Jeff TuckerCatholic Social Teaching: Basic Principles: Stephen Haessler ...
Lessig to Fight ‘Corruption’
Lawrence Lessig, a legal scholar and high-profile advocate of copyright reform, has decided to “shift my academic work, and soon, my activism, away from the issues that have consumed me for the last 10 years, towards a new set of issues.” His new task? “‘Corruption’ as I’ve defined it elsewhere will be the focus of my work. For at least the next 10 years, it is the problem I will try to help solve.” Just how does Lessig define “corruption”?...
Armstrong’s Acton U Post Index
Here is an index of posts from last week’s Acton University: “What is Man?” Why the Answer Profoundly Matters (June 13)Integrity, Virtue and Vision in the World of Business (June 14)More Sights and Sounds at Acton University (June 15)Protestantism and Natural Law Theory (June 15)Economic Myths and Emergent Christian Thought (June 16) ...
Faith and Business
That religion can be big business is not news to anyone. But this Zenit analysis by Fr. John Flynn is an especially good synopsis of the current state and size of the “Christianity market” in the United States. On a roughly related note, I’ve been meaning to mention the creation of a new blog on faith and business: the Business as Mission Network blog run by Justin Forman. It tracks news in the “business as mission” movement, which envisions businesses,...
Acton University – Day 3 Audio Roundup
Today’s lectures from Acton University 2007 (updated as more audio es available): Natural Law and Protestant Public Theology: Dr. Stephen GrabillEnemies of the Inner City: John NunesMoral Objections to the Free Market: John SchneiderPrivate Property: Moral and Economic Foundations: Michael MillerThe Bad News about the Prosperity Gospel: Rev. John Nunes Random AU Pic of the Day I just made Kara Eagle’s Supergirl socks famous. ...
Integrity, Virtue and Vision in the World of Business
Acton PowerBlogger John H. Armstrong is with us this week in Grand Rapids for Acton University. He is founder and director of ACT 3, a ministry aimed at “encouraging the church, through its leadership, to pursue doctrinal and ethical reformation and to foster spiritual awakening.” Here’s his post on Wednesday’s conference activities: The relationship between integrity, virtue and vision is not often developed in the business world. Yesterday the Acton University experience afforded me a unique opportunity to understand better...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved